Histomorphological and Histomorphometric Assessment of the Bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster Chickens Following Vaccination against Infectious Bursal Disease Virus

M
Monalisha Debbarma1,*
A
Arup Kalita1
P
Pranab Chandra Kalita1
P
Probal Jyoti Doley1
R
Rupan Sarkar1
S
Swarup Debroy2
1Department of Veter inary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Selesih, Aizawl-796 001, Mizoram, India.
2Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Background: This study explores the histomorphological and histomorphometric features of the Bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens, highlighting distinctions between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. 

Methods: The study included 57 numbers of chickens of various sexes and developmental stages. These were divided into two groups: 30 in control group (C) and 27 to the treatment group (T). From each group, six chicks (C1 and T1) were retained for blood sample collection and three chickens (C2 and T2) were sacrificed to collect the samples of the Bursa at 4-week intervals from 0-28th week.

Result: The Bursa of Fabricius contains three layers: The tunica serosa, tunica muscularis and tunica mucosa. Two epithelial types were identified, Follicle-Associated Epithelium (FAE) and Inter-follicular Epithelium (IFE), both consist of principal columnar cells, basal cells and goblet cells. Histological assessments revealed an age-related rise in collagen and reticular fibers within the tunica muscularis and lamina propria. DNA and RNA in all follicular cells and weak positivity of PAS staining in the tunica mucosa. Morphometric analysis indicated that the number, length and breadth of plicae, epithelial height and follicular cortex and medulla dimensions peaked at 12th weeks, with higher values consistently observed in the vaccinated group. Secondary follicle development began earlier in vaccinated birds (4th week) indicating a stronger immune response due to vaccination. These findings highlight the role of vaccination in enhancing bursal development  and immune function that can aid in improving poultry health and optimizing productivity.

The Rainbow Rooster is a low-maintenance, dual-purpose breed that matures between 4 to 6 monthsand lays approximately 160-180 eggs over 16 months (Singh et al., 2021). Poultry farming, which includes both layer and broiler production, contributes to food security while also serving as a profitable source of income (Toorand Goel, 2024). Backyard poultry farming, especially in rural and hilly areas of India, holds promise for addressing nutritional deficiencies, poverty reduction, women's empowerment and self-employment (Islam et al., 2020). In Mizoram, a significant gap exists between the demandand supply of meat and eggs, with a shortage of 1540.559 tonnes of meat and 1992 lakh eggs (Economic Survey of Mizoram, 2021-2022). Bridging this gap requires farmer training in scientific poultry practices, including vaccination, feed managementand housing (Singh et al., 2021). Immunity is vital for poultry health, with the thymusand Bursa of Fabricius being primary lymphoid organs (Glick et al., 1956). Bursa of Fabricius is closely linked to the cloaca and digestive system. It is generally recognized as the primary lymphoid organ in chickens and is a crucial organ for the immune system to respond to environmental antigens (Ifrah et al., 2016). It appears by Day 5 of embryonic development, is essential for B-cell maturation and begins involution around 20 weeks (Fellah et al., 2014). Bursa removal impairs B-cell function and antibody production (Glick et al., 1956). Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) is caused by the Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV), a double-stranded RNA virus belonging to the family Birnaviridae. The virus specifically targets bursal B cells, leading to extensive lymphocyte destruction and resulting in lymphopenia (Shinde et al., 2021). It primarily affects 3 to 6-week-old chicks, damaging B cellsand causing immunosuppression (Caston et al., 2008; Dey et al., 2019; Pandey et al., 2021). The disease can lead to 100% morbidityand up to 60% mortality, depending on the strain (Jackwood, 2019). Vaccination is critical in controlling diseaseand boosting poultry productivity (Marangonand Busani, 2007).
Collection and preparation of samples
 
Chickens from each group were sacrificed by the cervical dislocation method (Jaksch, 1981). The foodand water were withheld for two hours prior to their slaughter. After the chickens were slaughtered, the feathers were physically removedand the bursa of Fabricius was retrieved via ventral abdominal dissection. The samples were cleaned with normal saline and blotted using blotting paper. The organs were observed critically. After collecting gross data, the bursa was preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin and prepared for paraffin wax embedding. The samples were dehydrated in increasing alcohol concentrations for two hours. The tissue was then embedded in paraffin wax after clearing. Sections were cut to a thickness of 5-6 mm using a semi-motorized rotary microtome. Subsequently, the samples were treated with various stains to facilitate histological analysis (Bancroftand Cook, 1994).
 
Location of experiments
 
The present research work was conducted from April 2022- April 2023 in the Department of Anatomyand Histology, College of Veterinary Sciencesand Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, India.
 
Experimental design
 
This study involved 57 chickens representing different gendersand stages of development. The chickens were divided into two groups: 30 in the control group (C)and 27 in the treatment group (T). The treatment group received an oral dose of a commercially available live IBDV vaccine on days 14and 21. Each bird was given one drop containing at least 103 PFU of the intermediate strain of IBD virus per dose. Six chicks from each group (C1 and T1) were maintained for blood sample collection, while three birds from each group (C2and T2) were sacrificed at 4-week intervals from 0-28th weeks for collection of the Bursa. The experiment was ethically approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), vide Approval Reference Number CVSC/CAU/IAEC/21-22/P-4 dated 16.11.2022.
Histomorphology
 
The Bursa of Fabricius comprises of three distinct layers: the tunica serosa, tunica muscularisand tunica mucosa (Fig 1). The tunica serosa includes mesothelium, subserosal connective tissue, blood vesselsand nerve endings. The tunica muscularis contains major blood vessels, nerves and two layers of smooth muscle fibers. The innermost tunica mucosa features the lamina epithelialis and lamina propria, the latter forming bursal folds that enclose lymphoid follicles. These findings align with Ebru et al., (2015), Tamilselvan et al., (2017) and Dahariya et al., (2020), while Jain et al., (2010), Fangand Peng (2014) and Penchev (2020) reported four tunics, indicating possible breed differences. These follicles are organized into a cortexand medulla, separated by a clearly defined corticomedullary border visible by the 8th week in the control groupand by the 4th week in the treatment group similar to findings by Kempashi et al., (2017), Ayman et al., (2020) and Wu et al., (2021). The cortex contains lymphocytes, lymphoblasts, macrophagesand plasma cells, while the medulla comprises reticular cells, macrophagesand plasma cells (Fig 2). The cortex stains more intensely due to the higher density of small lymphocytes consistent with Sultana et al., (2011), Yadav et al., (2020) and He et al., (2015). Medullary plasma cells exhibit prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum and large Golgi regions as also noted by Yadav et al., (2020). Secondary follicle or germinal center formation began at 4th weeks in the treatment group and at 8th weeks in the control group. The bursal folds are lined with two epithelial types: Follicle-associated epithelium (FAE), made of simple columnar cellsand Inter-follicular epithelium (IFE), composed of pseudostratified columnar cells (Fig 2), supporting findings by Romano et al., (1996), Kanasiya et al., (2017) and Kadam et al., (2020), Wardand Middleton (1971) and Ebru et al., (2015) observed variations in cell types across species. Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) were unevenly distributed, with higher density in the treatment group, consistent with Ayman et al., (2020). The epithelium contained columnar, basaland goblet cells, as described by Onyeanusi et al., (1993) and Kadam et al., (2020), while Kanasiya et al., (2017) and Yadav et al., (2020) noted four cell types in Kadaknath chickens, suggesting breed-specific variation.

Fig 1: (a) 4th weeks old treatment group showing PF: Primary follicles, G: Germinal centers (H and E, ´40); (b) Cortex (C) And medulla (M) Of bursal follicles in 4th weeks old treatment group (H and E, x 100); (c) Tunica serosa (TS), Tunica mucosa (TMuc), Tunica muscularis (TMs) in 8th weeks old control group (H and E, x 100); (d) cortex (C) and medulla (M) of bursal follicles of 8th weeks old control group.



Fig 2: (a) Plasma cells in the medulla of bursal follicles in 8th weeks old treatment group (H and E x 1000); (b) Follicle associated epithelium (arrow), F: Follicle (H and E, x 1000); (c) Three cell types in the epithelium of bursa of Fabricius: Principal columnar cells (C); Basal cells (B); Goblet cells (G) (H and E, x 1000); (d) Inter-follicular epithelium (arrow), F: Follicle (H andE, x 1000).



In this study, collagen fibers (red) were identified in the connective tissue of the tunica muscularisand the lamina propria around the follicles (Fig 3) using the van Gieson’s staining (van Gieson, 1889). These findings align with Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath chickens, Dahariya et al., (2020) in Hansli and Vencoob broiler chickenand Udoumoh et al., (2022) in broilers. At day 0, these fibers were sparse but increased with age in both control and treatment groups. Although the distribution pattern remained similar across groups, collagen fiber presence became more prominent by the 24th week, showing greater abundance compared to the 0-day group. In contrary, Jain et al., (2010) noted higher fiber density in Vanaraja chicks compared to CARI Shyama growers, indicating possible breed-specific differences. Reticular fibers (black) were observed alongside collagen fibers using the Gomori’s staining method (Gomori, 1937) in the loose connective tissue of the tunica muscularis and around the follicles in the lamina propria (Fig 4). These finding were consistent with findings by Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath birds and Deka et al., (2020) in Pati ducks. Although less dense than collagen fibers, reticular fibers increased with age in both control and treatment groups. However, no variation in their distribution was noted within the same age group, indicating no influence from IBDV vaccination. Hart’s staining (Mallory, 1961) revealed elastic fibers (blue-black to black) in the bursa of Fabricius, primarily around blood vessels in the tunica mucosa (Fig 5) consistent with findings by Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath chickens, Dahariya et al., (2020) in Hansli and Vencoob broilers. No differences were observed between control and treatment groups of the same age, suggesting the IBDV vaccine had no effect on tissue fibers. PAS-Alcian Blue staining at pH 2.5 (Mowry and McManus, 1963) revealed weak magenta staining, indicating low mucopolysaccharide presence. Both the epitheliumand tunica mucosa showed weak PAS positivity across all age groups in both control and treatment birds (Fig 6). These findings were similar with Sugimura et al., (1975) and Kempashi et al., (2017). Methyl Green Pyronin staining revealed positive detection of DNA (green-blue)and RNA (red) in the follicular cells of all experimental birds (Fig 7). Both control and treatment groups showed consistent DNAand RNA positivity across all age groups. These findings align with Gulmezand Aslan, (1999) in native geese. Bielschowsky’s staining identified black-stained nerve fibers, including axis cylindersand dendrites, in the tunica muscularis of the bursa of Fabricius (Fig 8). These fibers were present in all experimental birds from both control and treatment groups, regardless of age, consistent with Deka et al., (2020) in Pati ducks.

Fig 3: Collagen fibers (arrow), in (a) 8th weeks control group (VanGieson, x 40), (b) 12th weeks control group (VanGieson, x 100), (c) 12th weeks treatment group (VanGieson, x 40) and (d) 24th weeks treatment group (VanGieson, x 100).



Fig 4: Reticular fibers (arrow) in (a) 8th weeks control group (Gomori’s, x 40), (b) 8th weeks treatment group (Gomori’s, x 100), (c) 12th weeks control group (Gomori’s, x 40), (d) 12th weeks treatment group (Gomori’s, x 100).



Fig 5: Elastic fibers (arrow) at (a) 0-day old, (b) 24th weeks control group and (c) 24th weeks treatment group. (Hart’s method, x 1000).



Fig 6: Mucopolysaccharides (arrow) at (a) 8th weeks control group, (b) 8th weeks treatment group, (c) 12th weeks control group and (d) 12th weeks treatment group. (PAS-Alcian blue, x 400).



Fig 7: DNA (yellow arrow) and RNA (red arrow) at (a) 4th weeks control group, (b) 4th weeks treatment group, (c) 20th weeks control group and (d) 20th weeks treatment group (Methyl green pyronin method, x 1000).



Fig 8: Nerve fibers (arrow) in bursa of Fabricius at (a) 8th weeks control group (b) 8th weeks treatment group, (c) 16th weeks control group, (d) 16th weeks treatment group (Bielchowsky’s method, x 1000).


 
Histomorphometry
 
The number of follicles per plica increased with age until the 12th week, then declined in both groups (Fig 9). The treatment group showed a significantly higher follicle count at 8th and 12th weeks, with the highest number observed at 12th weeks. Jain et al., (2010) observed a higher number of follicles in CARI Shyama chicksand Vanaraja growers. Similarly, Kanasiya et al., (2017) reported the highest follicle count at 8th weeks in Kadaknath chickens, while Hashimoto and Sugimura (1976) recorded a peak at 13th weeks in White Pekin ducks. In contrast, Ayman et al., (2020) documented continuous follicular growth in Sonali chickens. Notably, a significant increase in follicle count at the 8thand 12th weeks in the treatment group may be attributed to an elevated immune cell response. Plicae length (Fig 10) and breadth (Fig 11) increased significantly up to the 12th week, followed by a gradual decline. Peak lengthand breadth occurred at 12 to 16th weeks in the control group and 8 to 12th weeks in the treatment group. Ayman et al., (2020) reported continuous growth in Sonali chickens up to 56 days. A highly significant difference of plical length between the control and treatment groups was observed from 4th to 12th weeks possibly due to increased immune cells. The maximum height of the lining epithelium (Fig 12) in the control group, was observed between the 8th and 12th weeks, while in the treatment group, it peaked between the 4th and 12th weeks. A significant difference was noted at 4th weeks of age in the treatment group compared to the control. The thickness of the cortex (Fig 13) increased until the 12th week, then gradually declined in both groups, showing significant differences. A notable difference between the groups was observed in the treatment group at the 8th and 12th weeks likely due to bursal maturation and increased immune cells. The control group showed maximum medullary breadth (Fig 14) at 12th weeks, while the treatment group peaked between 8th to 12th weeks. The breadth increased until the 12th week, then gradually declined, with a significant difference between the two groups at the age of 16th and 20th weeks. Ayman et al., (2020) observed continuous growth of lining epithelium, cortex thickness and medullary growth in Sonali chickens from 0-56 days.

Fig 9: Number of follicles per plicae in bursa of Fabricius of Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age.



Fig 10: Plical length of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 11: Plical breadth of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 12: Height of epithelium of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 13: Cortical thickness of bursal follicles in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 14: Medullary breadth of bursal follicles in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).

From the study, we can conclude that, the involution of the bursa was prolonged in the treatment group. There was early development of secondary follicles in the bursa of Fabricius in the treatment group. A significant increase in lymphocyte infiltration was observed in the bursal follicles of the treatment group. The treatment group showed a higher antibody response compared to the non-vaccinated control group.
The present study was supported by the College of Veterinary Sciencesand Animal Husbandry, Mizoram, Central Agricultural University. The authors sincerely express their gratitude for providing the necessary facilities and support for this research.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal Care and Handling Techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ayman, U., Alam, M.R.  and Das, S.K. (2020). Age-related develop ment and histomorphological observations of bursa of Fabricius in sonali chicken. Journal of Advanced Bio technology and Experimental Therapeutics. 3(1): 20-28.

  2. Bancroft, J.D.  and Cook, H.C. (1994). Manual of histological techniques  and their diagnostic applications. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research

  3. Caston, J.R., Rodriguez, J.F.  and Carrascosa, J.L. (2008). Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV). In: Segmented double-str anded RNA viruses: Structure  and molecular biology, Caister Academic Press, USA. [Patton, J.T. (ed)]. ISBN. 978-1-904455- 21-9. Web. https://doi.org/10.21775/9781910190753.

  4. Dahariya, N., Sathapathy, S., Patra, R., Mishra, U.K. Sahu, S.K., Samal, L., Jena, B. and Joshi, S.K. (2020). Age wise histological studies on the major lymphoid organs in various chicken genotypes. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 10(5): 811-819. doi:10.5455/ijlr.20200917075002.

  5. Deka. A., Mahanta. J.D.  and Perumal. P. (2020). Anatomy of bursa of fabricius of pati duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) of Assam at different stages of development. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 11(1): 057-063.

  6. Dey, S., Pathak, D., Ramamurthy, N., Kumar, H., Maity, H.K. and Chellappa, M.M. (2019). Infectious bursal disease virus in chick ens: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports. 10: 85-97.

  7. Ebru, K.S., Hikmet, A., Nevin, K. and Buket, B. (2015). The structure of bursa of Fabricius in the long-legged buzzard (Buteo Rufinus): Histological and histochemical study. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 65(4): 510-517.

  8. Economic Survey of Mizoram (2021-2022). Planning and Programme Implementation Department, Research  and Development Branch, Govt. of Mizoram. pp. 60-63.

  9. Fang, J. and Peng, Xi. (2014). Developmental changes in cell prolif eration and apoptosis in the normal duck bursa of Fabri cius. Journal of Veterinary Science. 15(4): 465-474.

  10. Fellah, J.S., Jaffredo, T., Nagy, N.  and Dunon, D. (2014). Development of the avian immune system. Avian Pathology. pp. 45-63.

  11. Glick, B., Chang, T.S. and Jaap, R.G. (1956). The bursa of Fabricius and antibody production. Poultry Science. 35(1): 224-225.

  12. Gomori, G. (1937). Silver impregnation of reticulum in paraffin sections. American Journal of Physiology. 13: 993.

  13. Gulmez, N.  and Aslan, S. (1999). Histological  and histometrical investiga- tions on bursa of Fabricius  and thymus of native geese. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 23(2): 163-171.

  14. Hashimoto, Y.  and Sugimura, M. (1976). Histological  and quantitative studies on the postnatal growth of the thymus and the bursa of Fabricius of white pekin ducks. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research. 24: 65-76.

  15. He, M., Liang, X., Wang, K., Pu, H., Hu, Y., Ye, G., Li, X.  and Liu, L. (2015). Age-related development  and histomorphological observation of bursa of Fabricius in yellow quails. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 95: 487-491.

  16. Ifrah, M.E., Perelman, B., Finger, A.  and Uni, Z. (2016). The role of the bursa of Fabricius in the immune response to vaccinal antigens  and the development of immune tolerance in chicks (Gallus domesticus) vaccinated at a very young age. Poultry Science. 96(1): 51-57. 

  17. Islam, R., Sapcota, D., Saikia, A.K.  and Sheikh, I. U. (2020). Perfor mances of improved dual type backyard chicken in free range system: A review. Journal of Poultry Science  and Technology. 8(2): 32-40.

  18. Jackwood, D.J. (2019). Infectious Bursal Disease in Poultry. MSD Veterinary manual.

  19. Jain, P., Ingole, S.P.  and Dang, U. (2010). Gross  and histological studies on bursa of Fabricius of CARI Shyama and Vanaraj breeds of poultry. Haryana Veterinarian. 49: 51-55.

  20. Jaksch, W. (1981). Euthanasia of day-old male chicks in the poultry industry. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems. 2(4): 203-213.

  21. Kadam, S.D., Waghaye, J.Y. and Thakur, P.N. (2020). Age related histomorphological study of bursa of fabricius in Japa nese quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica). Journal of En tomology and Zoology. 8(2): 369-374.

  22. Kanasiya, S., Karmore, S.K., Barhaiya, R.K., Gupta, S.K. and Jatav, G.P. (2017). Gross anatomical studies on primary lymphoid organs (Thymus and bursa of Fabricius) of Kadaknath Birds. The Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology. 13(2): 73-76.

  23. Kempashi, J., Kannan, T.A., Raja, A.  and Ramesh, G. (2017). Age related changes in the histoarchitecture of bursa of fabricius in nandanam chicken. International Journal of Livestock Research. 7(5): 250-255.

  24. Mallory, F.B. (1961). Pathological Technique, Hafner Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.

  25. Marangon, S. and Busani, L. (2007). The use of vaccination in poultry production. Revue Scientifique et Technique. 26(1):  265-274. 

  26. Mowry, R.W. and McManus, J.F.A. (1963). Staining methods: Histologic and Histochemical, New York, Hoeber Medical Division, Harper and Row, Publishers, p.80.

  27. Onyeanusi, B.I., Ezeokoli, C.D., Onyeanusi, J.C.  and Ema, A.N. (1993). The anatomy of the cloacal bursa (bursa of Fabricius) in the helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 22: 212-221.

  28. Pandey, M.K., Agrawal, D.K., Mishra, G.K., Gupta, V. and Raghuvanshi, P.D.S. (2021). Comparative haemato-biochemical and histopathological studies in birds inoculated with vaccine and field strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(3): 315-323. doi: 10.188 05/ijar.B-3962.

  29. Penchev, G. (2020). Gross morphometrical study on bursa of Fab ricius in developing bronze turkey (Meleagris galopavo). Trakia Journal of Sciences. 18(1): 1-4.

  30. Romano, N., Baldassini, M.R., Abelli, L., Aita, M. and Mastrolia, L. (1996). Ultrastructural study on the plical epithelium of the bursa of Fabricius in chick embryos: Influence of partial decerebration  and hypophyseal allografts. Journal of Anatomy. pp. 29-41.

  31. Shinde, R.S., Chauhan, H.C., Patel, S.S., Sharma, K.K., Patel, A.C., Shrimali, M.D., Mohapatra, S.K. and Ch andel, B.S. (2021). Molecular and cultures based diagnosis of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in vaccinated and non vac cinated poultry flocks. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4433.

  32. Singh, A.K., Debbarma, A., Baishya, A., Sarkar, D., Mohanta, K.P.  and Anil. (2021). Insights of improved backyard poultry farming in India with special Reference to Hilly Regions: A review. International Journal of Livestock Research. 11(3): 1-16.

  33. Sugimura, M., Hashimoto, Y. and Yamada, J. (1975). Morphology of bursa of Fabricius in bursectomized and thymectomized ducks. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research. 23: 17-24.

  34. Sultana, N., Khan, M.Z.I., Wares, M.A. and Masum, M.A. (2011). Histomorphological study of the major lymphoid tissues in indigenous ducklings of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 9(1): 53-58.

  35. Tamilselvan, S., Balasundaram, K.  and Jayachitra, S. (2017). Histology of bursa of Fabricius in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Indian Veterinary Journal. 4(07): 77-78.

  36. Toor, J.S. and Goel, R. (2024). Poultry farming in India with special Reference to Punjab: An overview. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(6): 1000-1004. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5540.

  37. Udoumoh, A.F., Nwaogu, I.C., Igwebuike, U.M. and Obidike, I.R. (2022). Pre-hatch and post-hatch development of the bursa of Fabricius in broiler chicken: A morphological study. Veterinary Research Forum. 13(3): 301-308.

  38. Van Gieson, I. (1889). Laboratory notes of technical methods for the nervous system. New York Medical Journal. pp. 50-57.

  39. Ward, J.G.  and Middleton, A.L.A. (1971). Weight  and histological studies of growth and regression in the bursa of Fabricius in the mallard, (Anas platyrhynchos). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 49: 11-14.

  40. Wu, B., Yu, Z., Deng, J., Yuan, S.  and Peng, X. (2021). Histomorp- hological structure of the Bursa cloacalis (bursa of Fab ricius) in young Leiothrixlutea: A comparative study using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. International Journal of Morphology. 39(6): 1646-1654.

  41. Yadav, M.K., Karmore, S.K., Gupta, S.K., Suman, A., Shrivastava, N., Kapadnis, P.J., Dharve, A.S. and Panwar, V.S. (2020). Histological and ultrastructural studies on Bursa of Fab ricius of Kadaknath breed of poultry. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 32(2): 55-58.

Histomorphological and Histomorphometric Assessment of the Bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster Chickens Following Vaccination against Infectious Bursal Disease Virus

M
Monalisha Debbarma1,*
A
Arup Kalita1
P
Pranab Chandra Kalita1
P
Probal Jyoti Doley1
R
Rupan Sarkar1
S
Swarup Debroy2
1Department of Veter inary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Selesih, Aizawl-796 001, Mizoram, India.
2Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Background: This study explores the histomorphological and histomorphometric features of the Bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens, highlighting distinctions between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. 

Methods: The study included 57 numbers of chickens of various sexes and developmental stages. These were divided into two groups: 30 in control group (C) and 27 to the treatment group (T). From each group, six chicks (C1 and T1) were retained for blood sample collection and three chickens (C2 and T2) were sacrificed to collect the samples of the Bursa at 4-week intervals from 0-28th week.

Result: The Bursa of Fabricius contains three layers: The tunica serosa, tunica muscularis and tunica mucosa. Two epithelial types were identified, Follicle-Associated Epithelium (FAE) and Inter-follicular Epithelium (IFE), both consist of principal columnar cells, basal cells and goblet cells. Histological assessments revealed an age-related rise in collagen and reticular fibers within the tunica muscularis and lamina propria. DNA and RNA in all follicular cells and weak positivity of PAS staining in the tunica mucosa. Morphometric analysis indicated that the number, length and breadth of plicae, epithelial height and follicular cortex and medulla dimensions peaked at 12th weeks, with higher values consistently observed in the vaccinated group. Secondary follicle development began earlier in vaccinated birds (4th week) indicating a stronger immune response due to vaccination. These findings highlight the role of vaccination in enhancing bursal development  and immune function that can aid in improving poultry health and optimizing productivity.

The Rainbow Rooster is a low-maintenance, dual-purpose breed that matures between 4 to 6 monthsand lays approximately 160-180 eggs over 16 months (Singh et al., 2021). Poultry farming, which includes both layer and broiler production, contributes to food security while also serving as a profitable source of income (Toorand Goel, 2024). Backyard poultry farming, especially in rural and hilly areas of India, holds promise for addressing nutritional deficiencies, poverty reduction, women's empowerment and self-employment (Islam et al., 2020). In Mizoram, a significant gap exists between the demandand supply of meat and eggs, with a shortage of 1540.559 tonnes of meat and 1992 lakh eggs (Economic Survey of Mizoram, 2021-2022). Bridging this gap requires farmer training in scientific poultry practices, including vaccination, feed managementand housing (Singh et al., 2021). Immunity is vital for poultry health, with the thymusand Bursa of Fabricius being primary lymphoid organs (Glick et al., 1956). Bursa of Fabricius is closely linked to the cloaca and digestive system. It is generally recognized as the primary lymphoid organ in chickens and is a crucial organ for the immune system to respond to environmental antigens (Ifrah et al., 2016). It appears by Day 5 of embryonic development, is essential for B-cell maturation and begins involution around 20 weeks (Fellah et al., 2014). Bursa removal impairs B-cell function and antibody production (Glick et al., 1956). Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) is caused by the Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV), a double-stranded RNA virus belonging to the family Birnaviridae. The virus specifically targets bursal B cells, leading to extensive lymphocyte destruction and resulting in lymphopenia (Shinde et al., 2021). It primarily affects 3 to 6-week-old chicks, damaging B cellsand causing immunosuppression (Caston et al., 2008; Dey et al., 2019; Pandey et al., 2021). The disease can lead to 100% morbidityand up to 60% mortality, depending on the strain (Jackwood, 2019). Vaccination is critical in controlling diseaseand boosting poultry productivity (Marangonand Busani, 2007).
Collection and preparation of samples
 
Chickens from each group were sacrificed by the cervical dislocation method (Jaksch, 1981). The foodand water were withheld for two hours prior to their slaughter. After the chickens were slaughtered, the feathers were physically removedand the bursa of Fabricius was retrieved via ventral abdominal dissection. The samples were cleaned with normal saline and blotted using blotting paper. The organs were observed critically. After collecting gross data, the bursa was preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin and prepared for paraffin wax embedding. The samples were dehydrated in increasing alcohol concentrations for two hours. The tissue was then embedded in paraffin wax after clearing. Sections were cut to a thickness of 5-6 mm using a semi-motorized rotary microtome. Subsequently, the samples were treated with various stains to facilitate histological analysis (Bancroftand Cook, 1994).
 
Location of experiments
 
The present research work was conducted from April 2022- April 2023 in the Department of Anatomyand Histology, College of Veterinary Sciencesand Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, India.
 
Experimental design
 
This study involved 57 chickens representing different gendersand stages of development. The chickens were divided into two groups: 30 in the control group (C)and 27 in the treatment group (T). The treatment group received an oral dose of a commercially available live IBDV vaccine on days 14and 21. Each bird was given one drop containing at least 103 PFU of the intermediate strain of IBD virus per dose. Six chicks from each group (C1 and T1) were maintained for blood sample collection, while three birds from each group (C2and T2) were sacrificed at 4-week intervals from 0-28th weeks for collection of the Bursa. The experiment was ethically approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), vide Approval Reference Number CVSC/CAU/IAEC/21-22/P-4 dated 16.11.2022.
Histomorphology
 
The Bursa of Fabricius comprises of three distinct layers: the tunica serosa, tunica muscularisand tunica mucosa (Fig 1). The tunica serosa includes mesothelium, subserosal connective tissue, blood vesselsand nerve endings. The tunica muscularis contains major blood vessels, nerves and two layers of smooth muscle fibers. The innermost tunica mucosa features the lamina epithelialis and lamina propria, the latter forming bursal folds that enclose lymphoid follicles. These findings align with Ebru et al., (2015), Tamilselvan et al., (2017) and Dahariya et al., (2020), while Jain et al., (2010), Fangand Peng (2014) and Penchev (2020) reported four tunics, indicating possible breed differences. These follicles are organized into a cortexand medulla, separated by a clearly defined corticomedullary border visible by the 8th week in the control groupand by the 4th week in the treatment group similar to findings by Kempashi et al., (2017), Ayman et al., (2020) and Wu et al., (2021). The cortex contains lymphocytes, lymphoblasts, macrophagesand plasma cells, while the medulla comprises reticular cells, macrophagesand plasma cells (Fig 2). The cortex stains more intensely due to the higher density of small lymphocytes consistent with Sultana et al., (2011), Yadav et al., (2020) and He et al., (2015). Medullary plasma cells exhibit prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum and large Golgi regions as also noted by Yadav et al., (2020). Secondary follicle or germinal center formation began at 4th weeks in the treatment group and at 8th weeks in the control group. The bursal folds are lined with two epithelial types: Follicle-associated epithelium (FAE), made of simple columnar cellsand Inter-follicular epithelium (IFE), composed of pseudostratified columnar cells (Fig 2), supporting findings by Romano et al., (1996), Kanasiya et al., (2017) and Kadam et al., (2020), Wardand Middleton (1971) and Ebru et al., (2015) observed variations in cell types across species. Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) were unevenly distributed, with higher density in the treatment group, consistent with Ayman et al., (2020). The epithelium contained columnar, basaland goblet cells, as described by Onyeanusi et al., (1993) and Kadam et al., (2020), while Kanasiya et al., (2017) and Yadav et al., (2020) noted four cell types in Kadaknath chickens, suggesting breed-specific variation.

Fig 1: (a) 4th weeks old treatment group showing PF: Primary follicles, G: Germinal centers (H and E, ´40); (b) Cortex (C) And medulla (M) Of bursal follicles in 4th weeks old treatment group (H and E, x 100); (c) Tunica serosa (TS), Tunica mucosa (TMuc), Tunica muscularis (TMs) in 8th weeks old control group (H and E, x 100); (d) cortex (C) and medulla (M) of bursal follicles of 8th weeks old control group.



Fig 2: (a) Plasma cells in the medulla of bursal follicles in 8th weeks old treatment group (H and E x 1000); (b) Follicle associated epithelium (arrow), F: Follicle (H and E, x 1000); (c) Three cell types in the epithelium of bursa of Fabricius: Principal columnar cells (C); Basal cells (B); Goblet cells (G) (H and E, x 1000); (d) Inter-follicular epithelium (arrow), F: Follicle (H andE, x 1000).



In this study, collagen fibers (red) were identified in the connective tissue of the tunica muscularisand the lamina propria around the follicles (Fig 3) using the van Gieson’s staining (van Gieson, 1889). These findings align with Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath chickens, Dahariya et al., (2020) in Hansli and Vencoob broiler chickenand Udoumoh et al., (2022) in broilers. At day 0, these fibers were sparse but increased with age in both control and treatment groups. Although the distribution pattern remained similar across groups, collagen fiber presence became more prominent by the 24th week, showing greater abundance compared to the 0-day group. In contrary, Jain et al., (2010) noted higher fiber density in Vanaraja chicks compared to CARI Shyama growers, indicating possible breed-specific differences. Reticular fibers (black) were observed alongside collagen fibers using the Gomori’s staining method (Gomori, 1937) in the loose connective tissue of the tunica muscularis and around the follicles in the lamina propria (Fig 4). These finding were consistent with findings by Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath birds and Deka et al., (2020) in Pati ducks. Although less dense than collagen fibers, reticular fibers increased with age in both control and treatment groups. However, no variation in their distribution was noted within the same age group, indicating no influence from IBDV vaccination. Hart’s staining (Mallory, 1961) revealed elastic fibers (blue-black to black) in the bursa of Fabricius, primarily around blood vessels in the tunica mucosa (Fig 5) consistent with findings by Kanasiya et al., (2017) in Kadaknath chickens, Dahariya et al., (2020) in Hansli and Vencoob broilers. No differences were observed between control and treatment groups of the same age, suggesting the IBDV vaccine had no effect on tissue fibers. PAS-Alcian Blue staining at pH 2.5 (Mowry and McManus, 1963) revealed weak magenta staining, indicating low mucopolysaccharide presence. Both the epitheliumand tunica mucosa showed weak PAS positivity across all age groups in both control and treatment birds (Fig 6). These findings were similar with Sugimura et al., (1975) and Kempashi et al., (2017). Methyl Green Pyronin staining revealed positive detection of DNA (green-blue)and RNA (red) in the follicular cells of all experimental birds (Fig 7). Both control and treatment groups showed consistent DNAand RNA positivity across all age groups. These findings align with Gulmezand Aslan, (1999) in native geese. Bielschowsky’s staining identified black-stained nerve fibers, including axis cylindersand dendrites, in the tunica muscularis of the bursa of Fabricius (Fig 8). These fibers were present in all experimental birds from both control and treatment groups, regardless of age, consistent with Deka et al., (2020) in Pati ducks.

Fig 3: Collagen fibers (arrow), in (a) 8th weeks control group (VanGieson, x 40), (b) 12th weeks control group (VanGieson, x 100), (c) 12th weeks treatment group (VanGieson, x 40) and (d) 24th weeks treatment group (VanGieson, x 100).



Fig 4: Reticular fibers (arrow) in (a) 8th weeks control group (Gomori’s, x 40), (b) 8th weeks treatment group (Gomori’s, x 100), (c) 12th weeks control group (Gomori’s, x 40), (d) 12th weeks treatment group (Gomori’s, x 100).



Fig 5: Elastic fibers (arrow) at (a) 0-day old, (b) 24th weeks control group and (c) 24th weeks treatment group. (Hart’s method, x 1000).



Fig 6: Mucopolysaccharides (arrow) at (a) 8th weeks control group, (b) 8th weeks treatment group, (c) 12th weeks control group and (d) 12th weeks treatment group. (PAS-Alcian blue, x 400).



Fig 7: DNA (yellow arrow) and RNA (red arrow) at (a) 4th weeks control group, (b) 4th weeks treatment group, (c) 20th weeks control group and (d) 20th weeks treatment group (Methyl green pyronin method, x 1000).



Fig 8: Nerve fibers (arrow) in bursa of Fabricius at (a) 8th weeks control group (b) 8th weeks treatment group, (c) 16th weeks control group, (d) 16th weeks treatment group (Bielchowsky’s method, x 1000).


 
Histomorphometry
 
The number of follicles per plica increased with age until the 12th week, then declined in both groups (Fig 9). The treatment group showed a significantly higher follicle count at 8th and 12th weeks, with the highest number observed at 12th weeks. Jain et al., (2010) observed a higher number of follicles in CARI Shyama chicksand Vanaraja growers. Similarly, Kanasiya et al., (2017) reported the highest follicle count at 8th weeks in Kadaknath chickens, while Hashimoto and Sugimura (1976) recorded a peak at 13th weeks in White Pekin ducks. In contrast, Ayman et al., (2020) documented continuous follicular growth in Sonali chickens. Notably, a significant increase in follicle count at the 8thand 12th weeks in the treatment group may be attributed to an elevated immune cell response. Plicae length (Fig 10) and breadth (Fig 11) increased significantly up to the 12th week, followed by a gradual decline. Peak lengthand breadth occurred at 12 to 16th weeks in the control group and 8 to 12th weeks in the treatment group. Ayman et al., (2020) reported continuous growth in Sonali chickens up to 56 days. A highly significant difference of plical length between the control and treatment groups was observed from 4th to 12th weeks possibly due to increased immune cells. The maximum height of the lining epithelium (Fig 12) in the control group, was observed between the 8th and 12th weeks, while in the treatment group, it peaked between the 4th and 12th weeks. A significant difference was noted at 4th weeks of age in the treatment group compared to the control. The thickness of the cortex (Fig 13) increased until the 12th week, then gradually declined in both groups, showing significant differences. A notable difference between the groups was observed in the treatment group at the 8th and 12th weeks likely due to bursal maturation and increased immune cells. The control group showed maximum medullary breadth (Fig 14) at 12th weeks, while the treatment group peaked between 8th to 12th weeks. The breadth increased until the 12th week, then gradually declined, with a significant difference between the two groups at the age of 16th and 20th weeks. Ayman et al., (2020) observed continuous growth of lining epithelium, cortex thickness and medullary growth in Sonali chickens from 0-56 days.

Fig 9: Number of follicles per plicae in bursa of Fabricius of Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age.



Fig 10: Plical length of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 11: Plical breadth of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 12: Height of epithelium of bursa of Fabricius in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 13: Cortical thickness of bursal follicles in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).



Fig 14: Medullary breadth of bursal follicles in Rainbow Rooster chickens from 0-day to 20th weeks of age (µm).

From the study, we can conclude that, the involution of the bursa was prolonged in the treatment group. There was early development of secondary follicles in the bursa of Fabricius in the treatment group. A significant increase in lymphocyte infiltration was observed in the bursal follicles of the treatment group. The treatment group showed a higher antibody response compared to the non-vaccinated control group.
The present study was supported by the College of Veterinary Sciencesand Animal Husbandry, Mizoram, Central Agricultural University. The authors sincerely express their gratitude for providing the necessary facilities and support for this research.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal Care and Handling Techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ayman, U., Alam, M.R.  and Das, S.K. (2020). Age-related develop ment and histomorphological observations of bursa of Fabricius in sonali chicken. Journal of Advanced Bio technology and Experimental Therapeutics. 3(1): 20-28.

  2. Bancroft, J.D.  and Cook, H.C. (1994). Manual of histological techniques  and their diagnostic applications. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research

  3. Caston, J.R., Rodriguez, J.F.  and Carrascosa, J.L. (2008). Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV). In: Segmented double-str anded RNA viruses: Structure  and molecular biology, Caister Academic Press, USA. [Patton, J.T. (ed)]. ISBN. 978-1-904455- 21-9. Web. https://doi.org/10.21775/9781910190753.

  4. Dahariya, N., Sathapathy, S., Patra, R., Mishra, U.K. Sahu, S.K., Samal, L., Jena, B. and Joshi, S.K. (2020). Age wise histological studies on the major lymphoid organs in various chicken genotypes. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 10(5): 811-819. doi:10.5455/ijlr.20200917075002.

  5. Deka. A., Mahanta. J.D.  and Perumal. P. (2020). Anatomy of bursa of fabricius of pati duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) of Assam at different stages of development. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 11(1): 057-063.

  6. Dey, S., Pathak, D., Ramamurthy, N., Kumar, H., Maity, H.K. and Chellappa, M.M. (2019). Infectious bursal disease virus in chick ens: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports. 10: 85-97.

  7. Ebru, K.S., Hikmet, A., Nevin, K. and Buket, B. (2015). The structure of bursa of Fabricius in the long-legged buzzard (Buteo Rufinus): Histological and histochemical study. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 65(4): 510-517.

  8. Economic Survey of Mizoram (2021-2022). Planning and Programme Implementation Department, Research  and Development Branch, Govt. of Mizoram. pp. 60-63.

  9. Fang, J. and Peng, Xi. (2014). Developmental changes in cell prolif eration and apoptosis in the normal duck bursa of Fabri cius. Journal of Veterinary Science. 15(4): 465-474.

  10. Fellah, J.S., Jaffredo, T., Nagy, N.  and Dunon, D. (2014). Development of the avian immune system. Avian Pathology. pp. 45-63.

  11. Glick, B., Chang, T.S. and Jaap, R.G. (1956). The bursa of Fabricius and antibody production. Poultry Science. 35(1): 224-225.

  12. Gomori, G. (1937). Silver impregnation of reticulum in paraffin sections. American Journal of Physiology. 13: 993.

  13. Gulmez, N.  and Aslan, S. (1999). Histological  and histometrical investiga- tions on bursa of Fabricius  and thymus of native geese. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 23(2): 163-171.

  14. Hashimoto, Y.  and Sugimura, M. (1976). Histological  and quantitative studies on the postnatal growth of the thymus and the bursa of Fabricius of white pekin ducks. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research. 24: 65-76.

  15. He, M., Liang, X., Wang, K., Pu, H., Hu, Y., Ye, G., Li, X.  and Liu, L. (2015). Age-related development  and histomorphological observation of bursa of Fabricius in yellow quails. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 95: 487-491.

  16. Ifrah, M.E., Perelman, B., Finger, A.  and Uni, Z. (2016). The role of the bursa of Fabricius in the immune response to vaccinal antigens  and the development of immune tolerance in chicks (Gallus domesticus) vaccinated at a very young age. Poultry Science. 96(1): 51-57. 

  17. Islam, R., Sapcota, D., Saikia, A.K.  and Sheikh, I. U. (2020). Perfor mances of improved dual type backyard chicken in free range system: A review. Journal of Poultry Science  and Technology. 8(2): 32-40.

  18. Jackwood, D.J. (2019). Infectious Bursal Disease in Poultry. MSD Veterinary manual.

  19. Jain, P., Ingole, S.P.  and Dang, U. (2010). Gross  and histological studies on bursa of Fabricius of CARI Shyama and Vanaraj breeds of poultry. Haryana Veterinarian. 49: 51-55.

  20. Jaksch, W. (1981). Euthanasia of day-old male chicks in the poultry industry. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems. 2(4): 203-213.

  21. Kadam, S.D., Waghaye, J.Y. and Thakur, P.N. (2020). Age related histomorphological study of bursa of fabricius in Japa nese quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica). Journal of En tomology and Zoology. 8(2): 369-374.

  22. Kanasiya, S., Karmore, S.K., Barhaiya, R.K., Gupta, S.K. and Jatav, G.P. (2017). Gross anatomical studies on primary lymphoid organs (Thymus and bursa of Fabricius) of Kadaknath Birds. The Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology. 13(2): 73-76.

  23. Kempashi, J., Kannan, T.A., Raja, A.  and Ramesh, G. (2017). Age related changes in the histoarchitecture of bursa of fabricius in nandanam chicken. International Journal of Livestock Research. 7(5): 250-255.

  24. Mallory, F.B. (1961). Pathological Technique, Hafner Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.

  25. Marangon, S. and Busani, L. (2007). The use of vaccination in poultry production. Revue Scientifique et Technique. 26(1):  265-274. 

  26. Mowry, R.W. and McManus, J.F.A. (1963). Staining methods: Histologic and Histochemical, New York, Hoeber Medical Division, Harper and Row, Publishers, p.80.

  27. Onyeanusi, B.I., Ezeokoli, C.D., Onyeanusi, J.C.  and Ema, A.N. (1993). The anatomy of the cloacal bursa (bursa of Fabricius) in the helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 22: 212-221.

  28. Pandey, M.K., Agrawal, D.K., Mishra, G.K., Gupta, V. and Raghuvanshi, P.D.S. (2021). Comparative haemato-biochemical and histopathological studies in birds inoculated with vaccine and field strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(3): 315-323. doi: 10.188 05/ijar.B-3962.

  29. Penchev, G. (2020). Gross morphometrical study on bursa of Fab ricius in developing bronze turkey (Meleagris galopavo). Trakia Journal of Sciences. 18(1): 1-4.

  30. Romano, N., Baldassini, M.R., Abelli, L., Aita, M. and Mastrolia, L. (1996). Ultrastructural study on the plical epithelium of the bursa of Fabricius in chick embryos: Influence of partial decerebration  and hypophyseal allografts. Journal of Anatomy. pp. 29-41.

  31. Shinde, R.S., Chauhan, H.C., Patel, S.S., Sharma, K.K., Patel, A.C., Shrimali, M.D., Mohapatra, S.K. and Ch andel, B.S. (2021). Molecular and cultures based diagnosis of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in vaccinated and non vac cinated poultry flocks. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4433.

  32. Singh, A.K., Debbarma, A., Baishya, A., Sarkar, D., Mohanta, K.P.  and Anil. (2021). Insights of improved backyard poultry farming in India with special Reference to Hilly Regions: A review. International Journal of Livestock Research. 11(3): 1-16.

  33. Sugimura, M., Hashimoto, Y. and Yamada, J. (1975). Morphology of bursa of Fabricius in bursectomized and thymectomized ducks. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research. 23: 17-24.

  34. Sultana, N., Khan, M.Z.I., Wares, M.A. and Masum, M.A. (2011). Histomorphological study of the major lymphoid tissues in indigenous ducklings of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 9(1): 53-58.

  35. Tamilselvan, S., Balasundaram, K.  and Jayachitra, S. (2017). Histology of bursa of Fabricius in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Indian Veterinary Journal. 4(07): 77-78.

  36. Toor, J.S. and Goel, R. (2024). Poultry farming in India with special Reference to Punjab: An overview. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(6): 1000-1004. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5540.

  37. Udoumoh, A.F., Nwaogu, I.C., Igwebuike, U.M. and Obidike, I.R. (2022). Pre-hatch and post-hatch development of the bursa of Fabricius in broiler chicken: A morphological study. Veterinary Research Forum. 13(3): 301-308.

  38. Van Gieson, I. (1889). Laboratory notes of technical methods for the nervous system. New York Medical Journal. pp. 50-57.

  39. Ward, J.G.  and Middleton, A.L.A. (1971). Weight  and histological studies of growth and regression in the bursa of Fabricius in the mallard, (Anas platyrhynchos). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 49: 11-14.

  40. Wu, B., Yu, Z., Deng, J., Yuan, S.  and Peng, X. (2021). Histomorp- hological structure of the Bursa cloacalis (bursa of Fab ricius) in young Leiothrixlutea: A comparative study using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. International Journal of Morphology. 39(6): 1646-1654.

  41. Yadav, M.K., Karmore, S.K., Gupta, S.K., Suman, A., Shrivastava, N., Kapadnis, P.J., Dharve, A.S. and Panwar, V.S. (2020). Histological and ultrastructural studies on Bursa of Fab ricius of Kadaknath breed of poultry. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 32(2): 55-58.
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)