Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 37 issue 4 (december 2003) : 303 - 306

STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL VARV\TIONS IN,FRENCHBEAN '(PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) AS INFLUENCED BY INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN LEVELS UNDER NORTH GUJARAT CONDmONS

M
M.P. Prajapati
L
L.R.Patel
B
B.M. Patel
B
B.S. Patel
1Department of Agronomy. C.P. College 'Of Agriculture GUjarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushinagar· 385 506. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Prajapati M.P., L.R.Patel, Patel B.M., Patel B.S. (2025). STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL VARV\TIONS IN,FRENCHBEAN '(PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) AS INFLUENCED BY INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN LEVELS UNDER NORTH GUJARAT CONDmONS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 303 - 306. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Reid studies carried out during 1998–99 and 1999–2000 revealed that the LAI of frenchbean increased upto 60 DAS and thereafter, it decreased under all the weed control treatments and different levels of nitrogen. Maximum values of fresh as well as dry weight per plant, LAI, NAR, CGR, RGR, harvest Index and seed yield were recorded under weed free condition, followed by application of pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg/ha+one HW at 45 DAS, Ukewise, physiological parameters viz., fresh as well as dry matter production per plant LAI, NAR, RGR, CGR and harvest index were significantly higher under the highest level of nitrogen Le. 120 kg N/ha. The lowest values of all the growth parameters were registered under the weedy check treatment receiving no nitrogen

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ali, M. and Kushwaha, R.B. (1987). Indian Frog., 5: 2o-23~
    2. Habbish, I.G. and Ishaq, MK (1974). Expt. Agril, 10: 45·50.
    3. Pandey, R.K etal (1979)./ndianJ. Agric. Sci., 48: 466-473.
    4. Ramachandra, R.A.etal (1998). Crop Res., 15: 21-25.
    5. Rana, N.S. and Singh,H. (1998)./ndianJ. Agron., 43: 367-370.
    6. SaXena, KK and Verma, V.S. (1994). HaryanaJ. Agron., 10: 211-214.
    7. Sreelatha, OK et al (1997). Ann. Agric. Res., 18: 111-114.
    8. Wallace, D.H. and Munger, H.M. (1965). Crop. Sci., 6: 503-507.
    9. Watson, D.L. (1952). Adv. Agron., 4: 101-145.
    10. Williams, R.E (1946). Ami. Bot., 10: 41-72.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 37 issue 4 (december 2003) : 303 - 306

      STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL VARV\TIONS IN,FRENCHBEAN '(PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) AS INFLUENCED BY INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN LEVELS UNDER NORTH GUJARAT CONDmONS

      M
      M.P. Prajapati
      L
      L.R.Patel
      B
      B.M. Patel
      B
      B.S. Patel
      1Department of Agronomy. C.P. College 'Of Agriculture GUjarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushinagar· 385 506. India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Prajapati M.P., L.R.Patel, Patel B.M., Patel B.S. (2025). STUDIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL VARV\TIONS IN,FRENCHBEAN '(PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) AS INFLUENCED BY INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN LEVELS UNDER NORTH GUJARAT CONDmONS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 303 - 306. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Reid studies carried out during 1998–99 and 1999–2000 revealed that the LAI of frenchbean increased upto 60 DAS and thereafter, it decreased under all the weed control treatments and different levels of nitrogen. Maximum values of fresh as well as dry weight per plant, LAI, NAR, CGR, RGR, harvest Index and seed yield were recorded under weed free condition, followed by application of pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg/ha+one HW at 45 DAS, Ukewise, physiological parameters viz., fresh as well as dry matter production per plant LAI, NAR, RGR, CGR and harvest index were significantly higher under the highest level of nitrogen Le. 120 kg N/ha. The lowest values of all the growth parameters were registered under the weedy check treatment receiving no nitrogen

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Ali, M. and Kushwaha, R.B. (1987). Indian Frog., 5: 2o-23~
        2. Habbish, I.G. and Ishaq, MK (1974). Expt. Agril, 10: 45·50.
        3. Pandey, R.K etal (1979)./ndianJ. Agric. Sci., 48: 466-473.
        4. Ramachandra, R.A.etal (1998). Crop Res., 15: 21-25.
        5. Rana, N.S. and Singh,H. (1998)./ndianJ. Agron., 43: 367-370.
        6. SaXena, KK and Verma, V.S. (1994). HaryanaJ. Agron., 10: 211-214.
        7. Sreelatha, OK et al (1997). Ann. Agric. Res., 18: 111-114.
        8. Wallace, D.H. and Munger, H.M. (1965). Crop. Sci., 6: 503-507.
        9. Watson, D.L. (1952). Adv. Agron., 4: 101-145.
        10. Williams, R.E (1946). Ami. Bot., 10: 41-72.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)