Chief Editor:

V. Geethalakshmi

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA

Frequency:Monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

THE ALTITUDE AFFECTS THE RUNNER PLANT PRODUCTION AND QUAUTY IN STRAWBERRY CULTIVARS

L. Pirlak, M. GilleryOz, I. Bolat*

Affiliations

¹AtatOrk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Erzurum, Turkey

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Pirlak L., GilleryOz M., Bolat* I. (2025). THE ALTITUDE AFFECTS THE RUNNER PLANT PRODUCTION AND QUAUTY IN STRAWBERRY CULTIVARS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 295 - 298. doi: .

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted at the elevations of 1200 and 1850 m on the strawberry cultlvars Pajaro, Douglas and Doritt (216), to determine the effect of elevation on runner plant production and quality. 1be production of runner plants at different elevations were similar. There was an important difference between the two elevations with respect tei rooted runner plant numbers. The runner plants from the lower elevation was better than those from higher. At the lower elevation, the runner plants had much more leaves and primary adventive roots and longer roots. There was no difference in the crown dlameter of runner plants. Elevation also affected the quality of runner plants. The percentage of No.1 runner plants produced at 1200 m was greater than that of plants produced at 1850 m. In conclusion, production of runner plant at 1200 m e1evation appears better than at 1850 m

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Anon~. (19991. The sUmmarY ofAgricuhuralStatistics, 1979-1998, State Institute of Statistics PrIme Ministry Republie of Turkey. Ankara:Publ. No:2275:36.
: ChiIders,N.F. eta/. (1995). ModernFrvJt.Science, OrcJwrJMKlSmalFrvitCulture, HortiCulturaiPublicatiCll1S,~, Florida, pp. 506-535.
Dowdy, S.and Wearden, S.(1983). StatJstlcsfor Research. J. Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Hancock, J.F. (1999). Strawberiies. CAB) Publishing, p.237. .
.-Kaska, N. eta/. (1984). Turkish. J. Agric. MKI Forestry., 12: 259-264.
Mason, ·D.T. and Dudney, J.P. (1982). Crop Res, tHort.Res.J, 22:85-92. • .
Paydas, S. and Kaska, N.(1993). Ada. Horl.,345: 81-92.
Soon GI, P. et al (1997). J. Korean Soc. Hort. Sci, 38: 608-613.
TUremls, N. and Kaska, N. (1995).TurkishJ. Agric. and Forestry, 19(6): 457-463.
TUremls, N. etal (1996). Bahce, 25(1-2): 3-10. •
Voth, V. and ~. Bringhurst, S: (1958). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort ·Sci., 72: 186-197

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.