Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Agricultural Research
Print ISSN: 0367-8245
Online ISSN: 0976-058X
NASS Rating
5.60
SJR
0.217
CiteScore
0.595

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issure 1 (march 2003) : 1 - 8

DUAL INOCULATION EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUMAND PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA (PSB) ON PEA (P/SUM SATIVUM L.)

M.K. Tyagi, C.P. Singh·, P. Bhattacharayya··, N.L. Sharma·"
1Regional BiofertiUzer· Development Centre, tvjl;'istry of Agriculture, Government of India, Jabalpur - 482 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Tyagi M.K., Singh· C.P., Bhattacharayya·· P., Sharma·" N.L. (2025). DUAL INOCULATION EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUMAND PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA (PSB) ON PEA (P/SUM SATIVUM L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(1): 1 - 8. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The combined influence of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) were studied on Peer (Pisum sativum L) with the application of two levels of nitrogen (0 and 10 kg ha−1), five P sources and levels i.e. control, two P sources {single super phosphate (SSP) and mussoorie rock phosphate (MRP)} with two levels of each (30 and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1) and five biofertilizer treatments including control, Rhizobium, PSB, Compositculture of Rhizobium + PSB and single culture of Rhizobium and PSB. The highest number of nodules, grain and dry matter yield was recorded with combined inoculation of composit and single culture of Rhizobium and PSB. Application of Rhizobium and PSB alone performed poor. No significant differences were observed among phosphatic fertilizer treatments viz., SSP30, SSP60 and MRP30. The interaction effect between phosphorus and biofertilizers was found significant

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Alagawadi, A.R. and Gaur, A.C. (1988). PI. Soil, 105: 241-246.
    2. Dubey, S.K. (1996).lndianJ. Agric. Sci., 66: 28-32.
    3. Dubey, S.K. (1996).lndianJ. Agric. Sci., 66: 246-249.
    4. Dubey, S.K. et al. (1997). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 44: 503-505.
    5. Gaur, A.C. (1985). Proc. National Symp. Soil Biology, Hisar P 125-138..
    6. 7
    7. 8 INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
    8. Pant, L.M. eta/. (1995). J.lndianSoc. Soi/Sci., 43: 691-692.
    9. Phookan, D.B. and Shadeque, A. (1994). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 64: 572-573.
    10. Sati, PC. eta/. (1991).lndianJ. AgricSci. 61: 51-53.
    11. Singh, c.P. eta/. (1980). Aanna/sDeMicrobioJ, 131 B: 289-296.
    12. Singh, c.P. eta/. (1982). Rev. Eco/. Bio/., 19~17-25.
    13. Singh, K.B. eta/. (1981). IndianJ. Agric. Res., 15: 152-156.
    14. Sritlastava, S.N.L. and Varma, S.C. (1985). Indian J. Agric. Res., 19: 131-137.
    15. Srivastava, TK and Ahlawat, I.P.S. (1995). Response of pea (Pisum sativum) to phosphorus molybdenum and
    16. biofertilizers. Indian J. Agron. 40: 630-635.
    17. Tiwari, VN. eta/. (1989). J.lndianSoc. Soil Sci., 37: 712·716.
    18. Tomar, R.K.S. eta/. (1996).lndianJ.Agron., 41: 412-415.
    19. Tomar, S.S. eta/. (1993). IndianJ. Agron., 38:131-133.
    20. Vaishya, UK et a/. (1996). J. Indiao Soc. Soil Sci., 44: 524-526
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)