Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 39 issue 4 (december 2005) : 281 - 285

DIALLEL ANALYSIS IN SUNFLOWER

N
N. Manivannan
P
P. Vidhyavathi
V
V. Muralidharan
1Department of Oilseeds, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Manivannan N., Vidhyavathi P., Muralidharan V. (2025). DIALLEL ANALYSIS IN SUNFLOWER. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(4): 281 - 285. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Five genotypes of sunflower namely 852 B, 336 B, TNHSF 239, TNAUSUF 207 and CO 4 were crossed in diallel fashion excluding reciprocals. The F1s and parents were evaluated for days to 50% flowering, plant height, head diameter and seed yield plant. Both additive and nonadditive gene action were important and preponderance of non-additive gene action was observed for all characters. The parents TNHSF 239 and CO 4 showed superior per se performance for all characters except days to 50 per cent flowering. The parent TNAUSUF 207 showed desirable gca for all characters and TNHSF 239 and CO 4 for all characters except plant height. Superior Per se performance and heterosis were recorded for TNHSF 239 x CO 4 and TNAUSUF 207 x CO 4. These hybrids could be considered desirable for commercial evaluation. Both the parents of the selected hybrids namely TNHSF 239 x TNAUSUF 207 and TNAUSUF 207 x CO 4 were good combiner for all characters and the combining ability of hybrids were also desirable for all characters. Selection should be postponed to later generation in these crosses due to the presence of additive type of epistasis. Hence these hybrids could be recommended for pedigree programme to evolve superior inbreds/variety.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bajaj, RK et al. (1997). Crop Imp., 24: SO-54.
    2. Cruz, QA Dela. (1986). Phillipines J. Crop Sci., 11: 171-174.
    3. Fatteh, U.G. et al. (1995). J. Oilseeds Res., 12(2): 184-190.
    4. Gangappa, E. et al. (1997). Helia, 20: 73-84.
    5. Giriffing, B. (l96S). Aust. J. BioI.Sci., 9: 463-93.
    6. Giriraj, K. et aJ. (1987). Indian J. Genetics, 47: 31S-317.
    7. Govindaraju, T.A. et al. (1992). J. Oilseeds Res.. 9: 314-319.Vol. 39, No.4, 2005 Gupta, R.K. and Singh, S.P. (1988). Genetica, 20: 161-173.
    8. Kaddol, G.P. et al. (1984). Indian J. Genetics, 44: 447-451.
    9. Lande, S.S. et al. (1997). J. Soils Crops, 7: 205-207.
    10. Manivannan, N. (1997). J. Oilseeds Res., 14(2): 165-167.
    11. Merinkovic, R. (1993). Indian J. Genetics, 53: 229-304.
    12. Ortegonn, MAS. and Escobedo Mendoza, A. (1993). Helia, 16: 45-54.
    13. Rao, V.R. et al. (1992). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 17: 149-150.
    14. Shekar, G.c. et al. (1998). Helia, 21: 7-14.
    15. Sheriff, N.M. and Appadurai, R. (1985). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 55: 315-318.
    16. Sudhakar, D. et al. (1984). J. Oilseeds Res., 1: 157-166.
    17. Singh, D.P. et aI. (1999). J. Oilseeds Res., 16: 38-42.
    18. 285
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 39 issue 4 (december 2005) : 281 - 285

      DIALLEL ANALYSIS IN SUNFLOWER

      N
      N. Manivannan
      P
      P. Vidhyavathi
      V
      V. Muralidharan
      1Department of Oilseeds, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003. India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Manivannan N., Vidhyavathi P., Muralidharan V. (2025). DIALLEL ANALYSIS IN SUNFLOWER. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(4): 281 - 285. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Five genotypes of sunflower namely 852 B, 336 B, TNHSF 239, TNAUSUF 207 and CO 4 were crossed in diallel fashion excluding reciprocals. The F1s and parents were evaluated for days to 50% flowering, plant height, head diameter and seed yield plant. Both additive and nonadditive gene action were important and preponderance of non-additive gene action was observed for all characters. The parents TNHSF 239 and CO 4 showed superior per se performance for all characters except days to 50 per cent flowering. The parent TNAUSUF 207 showed desirable gca for all characters and TNHSF 239 and CO 4 for all characters except plant height. Superior Per se performance and heterosis were recorded for TNHSF 239 x CO 4 and TNAUSUF 207 x CO 4. These hybrids could be considered desirable for commercial evaluation. Both the parents of the selected hybrids namely TNHSF 239 x TNAUSUF 207 and TNAUSUF 207 x CO 4 were good combiner for all characters and the combining ability of hybrids were also desirable for all characters. Selection should be postponed to later generation in these crosses due to the presence of additive type of epistasis. Hence these hybrids could be recommended for pedigree programme to evolve superior inbreds/variety.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Bajaj, RK et al. (1997). Crop Imp., 24: SO-54.
        2. Cruz, QA Dela. (1986). Phillipines J. Crop Sci., 11: 171-174.
        3. Fatteh, U.G. et al. (1995). J. Oilseeds Res., 12(2): 184-190.
        4. Gangappa, E. et al. (1997). Helia, 20: 73-84.
        5. Giriffing, B. (l96S). Aust. J. BioI.Sci., 9: 463-93.
        6. Giriraj, K. et aJ. (1987). Indian J. Genetics, 47: 31S-317.
        7. Govindaraju, T.A. et al. (1992). J. Oilseeds Res.. 9: 314-319.Vol. 39, No.4, 2005 Gupta, R.K. and Singh, S.P. (1988). Genetica, 20: 161-173.
        8. Kaddol, G.P. et al. (1984). Indian J. Genetics, 44: 447-451.
        9. Lande, S.S. et al. (1997). J. Soils Crops, 7: 205-207.
        10. Manivannan, N. (1997). J. Oilseeds Res., 14(2): 165-167.
        11. Merinkovic, R. (1993). Indian J. Genetics, 53: 229-304.
        12. Ortegonn, MAS. and Escobedo Mendoza, A. (1993). Helia, 16: 45-54.
        13. Rao, V.R. et al. (1992). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 17: 149-150.
        14. Shekar, G.c. et al. (1998). Helia, 21: 7-14.
        15. Sheriff, N.M. and Appadurai, R. (1985). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 55: 315-318.
        16. Sudhakar, D. et al. (1984). J. Oilseeds Res., 1: 157-166.
        17. Singh, D.P. et aI. (1999). J. Oilseeds Res., 16: 38-42.
        18. 285
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)