Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 39 issue 3 (september 2005) : 213 - 216

EFFECT OF SOIL FERTILITY AND INTEGRATED PLANT NUTRITION SYSTEM ON YIELD, RESPONSE AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY AGGREGATUM ONION

R
R. Santhi
R
R. Natesan
G
G. Selvakumari
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Santhi R., Natesan R., Selvakumari G. (2025). EFFECT OF SOIL FERTILITY AND INTEGRATED PLANT NUTRITION SYSTEM ON YIELD, RESPONSE AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY AGGREGATUM ONION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(3): 213 - 216. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Field experiments were conducted following the Inductive cum targeted yield concept, to study the effect of soil fertility and Integrated Plant Nutrition System (IPNS) on the yield of onion (var CO 4) in Typic Ustropept soils of Tamil Nadu. The treatments consisted of five levels of N, four levels of P 2O 5, three levels of K 2O, two levels of FYM and two levels of Azospirillum (Azo). Marked fertility built up due to fertiliser addition at graded levels was recorded. The bulb yields as well as uptake by onion increased with increase in dose of fertiliser N, P 2O 5 and K 2O and also with application of FYM and Azospirillum. Response to fertiliser nutrients was also recorded

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Biswas (2002). Fertil. News., 47(10): 21-24.
    2. Dixit, S.P. (1997). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 67: 222-223.
    3. Gupta, R.P. et al. (1999). NHRDF News Letter, XIX(2&3): 7-9.
    4. Hanway, J.J. and Heidal, H. (1952). Iowa State College Agric. Bull., 57: 1-13.
    5. Olsen, S.R. et al. (1954). USDA Circ., 939.
    6. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publications, Bombay.
    7. Ramamoorthy, B. et al. (1967). Indian Fmg., 17: 43-45.
    8. Subba Rao, A. and Sanjay Srivastava (2000). Fertil. News., 45(2): 25-38.
    9. Subba Rao, A. and Sanjay Srivastava (2001). Sixteenth Progress Report of All India Co-ordinated Project for Investigations on Soil Test Crop Response Correlation (1998-2001), IISS, Bhopal.
    10. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 39 issue 3 (september 2005) : 213 - 216

      EFFECT OF SOIL FERTILITY AND INTEGRATED PLANT NUTRITION SYSTEM ON YIELD, RESPONSE AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY AGGREGATUM ONION

      R
      R. Santhi
      R
      R. Natesan
      G
      G. Selvakumari
      1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Santhi R., Natesan R., Selvakumari G. (2025). EFFECT OF SOIL FERTILITY AND INTEGRATED PLANT NUTRITION SYSTEM ON YIELD, RESPONSE AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY AGGREGATUM ONION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(3): 213 - 216. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Field experiments were conducted following the Inductive cum targeted yield concept, to study the effect of soil fertility and Integrated Plant Nutrition System (IPNS) on the yield of onion (var CO 4) in Typic Ustropept soils of Tamil Nadu. The treatments consisted of five levels of N, four levels of P 2O 5, three levels of K 2O, two levels of FYM and two levels of Azospirillum (Azo). Marked fertility built up due to fertiliser addition at graded levels was recorded. The bulb yields as well as uptake by onion increased with increase in dose of fertiliser N, P 2O 5 and K 2O and also with application of FYM and Azospirillum. Response to fertiliser nutrients was also recorded

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Biswas (2002). Fertil. News., 47(10): 21-24.
        2. Dixit, S.P. (1997). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 67: 222-223.
        3. Gupta, R.P. et al. (1999). NHRDF News Letter, XIX(2&3): 7-9.
        4. Hanway, J.J. and Heidal, H. (1952). Iowa State College Agric. Bull., 57: 1-13.
        5. Olsen, S.R. et al. (1954). USDA Circ., 939.
        6. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publications, Bombay.
        7. Ramamoorthy, B. et al. (1967). Indian Fmg., 17: 43-45.
        8. Subba Rao, A. and Sanjay Srivastava (2000). Fertil. News., 45(2): 25-38.
        9. Subba Rao, A. and Sanjay Srivastava (2001). Sixteenth Progress Report of All India Co-ordinated Project for Investigations on Soil Test Crop Response Correlation (1998-2001), IISS, Bhopal.
        10. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)