volume 39 issue 2 (june 2005) : 154 - 156

HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SPIRAUNG WHITEFLY, ALEURODICUS DISPERSUS RUSSEL (HOMOPTERA : ALEYRODIDAE) IN GUAVA

M
M.A. Mannan
N
N. Islam
B
B.R. Banik
M
M.R. Ali
1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Jamalpur, Bangladesh
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mannan M.A., Islam N., Banik B.R., Ali M.R. (2025). HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SPIRAUNG WHITEFLY, ALEURODICUS DISPERSUS RUSSEL (HOMOPTERA : ALEYRODIDAE) IN GUAVA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 154 - 156. doi: .
The study was conducted to find out the relative susceptibility among five guava varieties viz., Kazipiara, Shorupkati, Polypiara, IPSA and one local variety and population distribution at different plant canopies of the guava plants. The introduced guava variety Kazipiara was found to be statistically more susceptible to whitefly infestation than the other varieties. The spatial distribution indicated that the nymphs and adults of whitefly were significantly higher in the upper canopy than in middle and lower canopy. The lowest population was found in the lower canopy of the guava plant.
    1. Alam, S. et a/. (1997). Bang/adesh J. £ot.. 7: 67-73.
    2. Arx. R.v. et a/. (1994). J. Econ. £ot., 77: 1130-1136.
    3. Byrnee. D.A. et a/. (1990). Whiteflies: Their binomics. pest status and managenment. InterJ:ept Ltd .. Andover. UK
    4. Gerling. D. (1985). Entomophi'lga. 30: 163-165.
    5. Kajita. H. and Alam, M.Z. (1996). App/. Zool.. 31: 159-162.
    6. Krishna. N.1. and Lingappa. S.1. (1992). Insect Sci. Appl. (ICIPE), 13(3): 377-379.
    7. Naranjo. S.E. and Flint, H.M. (1995). Envir. Ent., 24: 261-270.
    8. Rao, N.v. et a/. (1991). J. Insect Sci., 4: 32-36.
    9. Rashid, M.M. et a/. (1987). Bangladesher Pha/. Rashid Publishing House: BARI Campus, Joydevpur, pp. 124-199
    10. Scanlan. EM. (1995). Fruit Production Manual. Development of Agricultral Extension. Bangladesh Agric. Dev. Corp Dhaka. pp. 116-117.
    volume 39 issue 2 (june 2005) : 154 - 156

    HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SPIRAUNG WHITEFLY, ALEURODICUS DISPERSUS RUSSEL (HOMOPTERA : ALEYRODIDAE) IN GUAVA

    M
    M.A. Mannan
    N
    N. Islam
    B
    B.R. Banik
    M
    M.R. Ali
    1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Jamalpur, Bangladesh
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Mannan M.A., Islam N., Banik B.R., Ali M.R. (2025). HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SPIRAUNG WHITEFLY, ALEURODICUS DISPERSUS RUSSEL (HOMOPTERA : ALEYRODIDAE) IN GUAVA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 154 - 156. doi: .
    The study was conducted to find out the relative susceptibility among five guava varieties viz., Kazipiara, Shorupkati, Polypiara, IPSA and one local variety and population distribution at different plant canopies of the guava plants. The introduced guava variety Kazipiara was found to be statistically more susceptible to whitefly infestation than the other varieties. The spatial distribution indicated that the nymphs and adults of whitefly were significantly higher in the upper canopy than in middle and lower canopy. The lowest population was found in the lower canopy of the guava plant.
      1. Alam, S. et a/. (1997). Bang/adesh J. £ot.. 7: 67-73.
      2. Arx. R.v. et a/. (1994). J. Econ. £ot., 77: 1130-1136.
      3. Byrnee. D.A. et a/. (1990). Whiteflies: Their binomics. pest status and managenment. InterJ:ept Ltd .. Andover. UK
      4. Gerling. D. (1985). Entomophi'lga. 30: 163-165.
      5. Kajita. H. and Alam, M.Z. (1996). App/. Zool.. 31: 159-162.
      6. Krishna. N.1. and Lingappa. S.1. (1992). Insect Sci. Appl. (ICIPE), 13(3): 377-379.
      7. Naranjo. S.E. and Flint, H.M. (1995). Envir. Ent., 24: 261-270.
      8. Rao, N.v. et a/. (1991). J. Insect Sci., 4: 32-36.
      9. Rashid, M.M. et a/. (1987). Bangladesher Pha/. Rashid Publishing House: BARI Campus, Joydevpur, pp. 124-199
      10. Scanlan. EM. (1995). Fruit Production Manual. Development of Agricultral Extension. Bangladesh Agric. Dev. Corp Dhaka. pp. 116-117.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)