Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 39 issue 2 (june 2005) : 110 - 115

INFLUENCE OF INTEG~TEDWEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED COMPETITION FOR NUTRIENTS IN WHEAT

Deep Kumar, N.N. Angiras, Y. Singh-, 5.5. Rana

Affiliations

¹Department of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyala, Palampur - 176061, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Kumar Deep, Angiras N.N., Singh- Y., Rana 5.5. (2025). INFLUENCE OF INTEG~TEDWEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED COMPETITION FOR NUTRIENTS IN WHEAT. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 110 - 115. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 1995–96 and 1996–97 to study the effect of herbicides m conjunction with cultural practices (viz. stale seed bed, normal seed bed, normal seed bed plus triallate 1.00 kg/ha) on wheat. The major weeds were Phalaris minor, Lalium temulentum, Avena fatua andVicia saliva. Uncontrolled weed growth, depleted 83.4, 18.7 and 80.8 kg/ha of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively which was 47.1, 11.5 and 55.21 kg/ha higher than the total uptake of these nutrients by wheat crop. NPK depletion by P. Minor and L. temulentum was significantly lower in stale seed bed and normal seed bed + triallate 1.0 kg/ha. However, NPK depletion by A. fatua in normal seed bed + triallate was significantly lower as compared to stale seed bed. Integration of stale seed bed or normal seed bed + triallate with lsoproturon + surfactant and dichlofop-methyl + surfactant reduced weed dry weight and NPK depletion by weeds and increased grain yield and NPK uptake by wheat crop. Stale seed bed in conjunction with isoproturon + surfactant and dichlofop + surfactant effected increase in wheat grain yield by 113.8 and 1 17.4%, respectively over unweeded normal seed bed.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Adams, J.C. (1985). Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci., 38: 161-162.
Allcoat, RWP. (1985). Aspects Appl. Bio., 9: 237-244.
Bainade, S.S. and Patel, Z.G. (1991). Indian J. Agron., 36: 67-71.
Foy, c.L. and Smith, L.W (1969). Advances in Chemistry Series No. 86-pesticide formulation Research pp 56.
Gauvrit, C. and Dufour, J.l. (1990). Agronomie., 10: 841-846.
Hanson, D.G. and Rasmusson, D. (1983). Proc. North Central Weed Contr. Con£. W Fargo, USA, pp 80-81.
Kirkland, KJ. (1994). Weed Technol., 8: 607-611.
Li, L.T. (1966). J. Taiwan Agric. Res., 15(2): 1-5.
Malik, RK et a/. (1985). Annual Can£. ISWS. pp 41.
Mdanghlan, WT. (1982). Proc. 35th Newzea/and Weed and Pest Contr. Can£. Christchurch, NZ, 226-229.
McWhorter, C.G. (1985). Herbicide Physiology. CRC Press Inc. Boca, Raton, Florida, USA: pp. 142..
Miller, S.D. (1970). Dissertation Abstracts- International. 34(7}: 3049; 81pp.
Mustafee, T.P. (1989). PestoIogy, 13(3}: 5-11.
Ray, B. et a/. (1982). Annual can£. ISWS. New Delhi, pp 7.
Thakur, DR and Singh, KK (1989). Indian J. Weed Sci., 21(3&4): 56-58.
West, E.S. and Todd, WR. (1961). Text Book of Biochemistry 3medition. Macmillan Co. New York, pp. 264.
Yadav, PK etal. (1995). Indian J. Agric Sci., 65: 265-270

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

INFLUENCE OF INTEG~TEDWEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED COMPETITION FOR NUTRIENTS IN WHEAT

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board