Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 39 issue 2 (june 2005) : 95 - 102

EFFEct OF VARIOUS POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS ON EXTENSION OF SHELF UFE OF KESAR MANGO FRUITS

D
D.P. Waskar
R
R.S. Gaikwad
1Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri - 413 722, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Waskar D.P., Gaikwad R.S. (2025). EFFEct OF VARIOUS POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS ON EXTENSION OF SHELF UFE OF KESAR MANGO FRUITS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 95 - 102. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present investigation was undertaken to study the effect of various postharvest treatments on extension of shelf-life of Kesar mango fruits. For this purpose, the mango fruits were harvested at proper stage of maturity and subjected to various postharvest dip treatments such as calcium chlOride (2%), waxing (6%) and fungicides viz., Bavistin (0.1%) and Captan (0.2%) either alone or in combination. The mango fruits were then packed in corrugated fibre board box and stored in three storage environments viz., at room temperature (28.12 to 36.18°C temperature and 46.18 to 71.25% RH), in cool chamber (21.47 to 27.10°C temperature and 91 to 95% RH) and cool store (10°C temperature and 90 to 95% RH). It was found that the shelf life of mango fruits couId be extended upto 65 days when treated with a combination of CaCl 2 (2%) + wax (6%) + Bavistin (0.1%) and stored in cool store, upto 35 days when stored in cool chamber and upto 24 days when stored at room temperature. On the contrary, the shelf life of untreated fruit was found to be hardly 18 days at room temperature. It was also observed that this treatment recorded lower physiological loss in weight and high organoleptic score when stored in cool store and cool chamber as compared to room temperature storage. The untreated (control) fruits were found to be infected with Colletotrichum gloeosporioldes, Diploidia natalensis and Rhizopus sp.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amerine, M.A. et al. (1965). Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press. New York and London.
    2. Anonymous (1985). Zero Energy Cool Chamber. IARI, Research Bulletin No. 43: 24.
    3. Anonymous (1989). Use of fungicides to control postharvest diseases of mango due to anthracnose and stem end rot.
    4. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India. Annual R.eport, PHT.
    5. Anonymous, (1990). Annual Report. All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops, !ARI,'New Delhi, India.
    6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd Ed., 1984. International
    7. Rice Research Institute Book. Willey Interscience Pub., New York. : 306-308.
    8. Joshi, G.D. (1983). Ph.D. Thesis, \ARI, New Delhi, India.
    9. Joshi, G.D. and Roy, S.K. (1985). Prog. Hort., 17: 56-63.
    10. Patil, SA (1990). M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Konkan KrishiVidyapeeth, Dapoli,lndia.
    11. Ramana, K.V.R. et al. (1984). Indian Fd. Packer, 38: 58-66.
    12. Rameshwar, A. (1988). Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables in India. (Venkataratnam, L. et al. eds.) Agriculture Horticultural Society, Hyderabad, India. : 32-47.
    13. Roy, SK.(1982). In: Fruits of India, Tropical and Sub-tropical. (Bose, T.K. ed.) Naya Prokash, Calcutta, India.
    14. Salunkhe, DK and Desai, B.B. (1984). Postharvest Biotechnology of Fruits. Vol. I. Boca Raton, FL : CRC. : 168.
    15. Shanta Krishnamurthy (1993). In: Summer Institute (ICAR) on Advances in Fruit Production held at IIHR, Bangalore during Aug. 25 Sept. 13, 1993. : 496-509.
    16. Waskar. D.P. and Masalkar, S.D. (1997). Acta. Hort., 45(2): 687-695.
    17. Waskar, D.P. etal. (1997). Acta. Hort., 45: 662-668.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 39 issue 2 (june 2005) : 95 - 102

      EFFEct OF VARIOUS POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS ON EXTENSION OF SHELF UFE OF KESAR MANGO FRUITS

      D
      D.P. Waskar
      R
      R.S. Gaikwad
      1Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri - 413 722, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Waskar D.P., Gaikwad R.S. (2025). EFFEct OF VARIOUS POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS ON EXTENSION OF SHELF UFE OF KESAR MANGO FRUITS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 95 - 102. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The present investigation was undertaken to study the effect of various postharvest treatments on extension of shelf-life of Kesar mango fruits. For this purpose, the mango fruits were harvested at proper stage of maturity and subjected to various postharvest dip treatments such as calcium chlOride (2%), waxing (6%) and fungicides viz., Bavistin (0.1%) and Captan (0.2%) either alone or in combination. The mango fruits were then packed in corrugated fibre board box and stored in three storage environments viz., at room temperature (28.12 to 36.18°C temperature and 46.18 to 71.25% RH), in cool chamber (21.47 to 27.10°C temperature and 91 to 95% RH) and cool store (10°C temperature and 90 to 95% RH). It was found that the shelf life of mango fruits couId be extended upto 65 days when treated with a combination of CaCl 2 (2%) + wax (6%) + Bavistin (0.1%) and stored in cool store, upto 35 days when stored in cool chamber and upto 24 days when stored at room temperature. On the contrary, the shelf life of untreated fruit was found to be hardly 18 days at room temperature. It was also observed that this treatment recorded lower physiological loss in weight and high organoleptic score when stored in cool store and cool chamber as compared to room temperature storage. The untreated (control) fruits were found to be infected with Colletotrichum gloeosporioldes, Diploidia natalensis and Rhizopus sp.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Amerine, M.A. et al. (1965). Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press. New York and London.
        2. Anonymous (1985). Zero Energy Cool Chamber. IARI, Research Bulletin No. 43: 24.
        3. Anonymous (1989). Use of fungicides to control postharvest diseases of mango due to anthracnose and stem end rot.
        4. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India. Annual R.eport, PHT.
        5. Anonymous, (1990). Annual Report. All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops, !ARI,'New Delhi, India.
        6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd Ed., 1984. International
        7. Rice Research Institute Book. Willey Interscience Pub., New York. : 306-308.
        8. Joshi, G.D. (1983). Ph.D. Thesis, \ARI, New Delhi, India.
        9. Joshi, G.D. and Roy, S.K. (1985). Prog. Hort., 17: 56-63.
        10. Patil, SA (1990). M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Konkan KrishiVidyapeeth, Dapoli,lndia.
        11. Ramana, K.V.R. et al. (1984). Indian Fd. Packer, 38: 58-66.
        12. Rameshwar, A. (1988). Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables in India. (Venkataratnam, L. et al. eds.) Agriculture Horticultural Society, Hyderabad, India. : 32-47.
        13. Roy, SK.(1982). In: Fruits of India, Tropical and Sub-tropical. (Bose, T.K. ed.) Naya Prokash, Calcutta, India.
        14. Salunkhe, DK and Desai, B.B. (1984). Postharvest Biotechnology of Fruits. Vol. I. Boca Raton, FL : CRC. : 168.
        15. Shanta Krishnamurthy (1993). In: Summer Institute (ICAR) on Advances in Fruit Production held at IIHR, Bangalore during Aug. 25 Sept. 13, 1993. : 496-509.
        16. Waskar. D.P. and Masalkar, S.D. (1997). Acta. Hort., 45(2): 687-695.
        17. Waskar, D.P. etal. (1997). Acta. Hort., 45: 662-668.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)