Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 41 issue 3 (september 2007) : 164 - 170

LIFE SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA FOR FORMULATION OF PEST MODEL

M
M. Das
N
N. Chaudhuri
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya Pundibari, Cooch Behar - 736 165, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Das M., Chaudhuri N. (2025). LIFE SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA FOR FORMULATION OF PEST MODEL. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(3): 164 - 170. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In Terai region of West Bengal the Diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) appeared on cabbage during February and the infestation continued up to May in an overlapping manner, within and over the generations. During February-March the prevailing climatic conditions did favour not only the multiplication of Plutella population but also activated its parasitoids. Higher level of potential fecundity (76.5), net reproductive rate (14.145) and innate capacity for increase in number (0.101) of adult of February-March generation and faster development (life cycle of 32 days) irrespective of shorter doubling time (6.887 days) and higher weekly multiplication rate (2.027), more number of hypothetical F2 (200.08) females and higher survival value (0.46) during February-March resulted in higher level of infestation in March-April. The key mortality factor for different generations were recorded as physical character of leaves for 1st and 2nd instar larvae, diseases and some unknown causes for 3rd and 4th instar larvae, parasitoid for pupae/larvae-pupae and low hatchibility for eggs. All of these had a direct bearing upon variation in climatic conditions as well as with crop phenology in all the generations. After April, adverse climatic conditions and late stage of crop growth reduced the infestation level under field conditions.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Andrawartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. (1954). In: The Distriburion and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    2. Atwal, A.S. and Bains, S.S. (1974). In: Applied Animal Ecology, Kalyani Publishers. Ludhiana, pp. 111-118.
    3. Bhalla, O.P. and Dubey, J.K. (1986). In: Diamond back moth management. (Talekar, N.S. and Griggs, T.D. eds.)
    4. Proceedings of First International Workshop held during March 11-I5, 1985, AVRDC, Taiwan, pp. 55-61.
    5. Birch, L.C. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol., 17: 15-26.
    6. Capinera, J.L. (2001). Handbook of Vegetable Pests. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 729.
    7. Deevey, E.S. Jr (1947). Q. Rev. Biol., 22: 283-314.
    8. Harcourt, D.G. (I954). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, pp. 107.
    9. Harcourt, D.G. (1969). The development and use of life tables in the study of natural insect populations. A review
    10. of-Entomology, 14: 175-196.
    11. He, Y.R. et al. (2000). J. South China Agric. Univ., 21(1): 34-37.
    12. Hemchandra,O. and Singh, T.K. (2003). Ann Plant Protection Sci., 11(2): 269-273.
    13. Howe, R.W. (1953). Ann. Applied Biol., 40: 134-155.
    14. Justin, C.G.L. et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J., 87(4-6): 206-210.
    15. Kandoria, J.L. et al. (1994). J. Insect Sci., 7: 76-80.
    16. Kfir, R. and Thomas, J. (2001). ARC - PPRI Bulletin of Plant Protection News No. 59.
    17. Khaire, V.A. (1987). Current Research Reporter, Mahatama Phule Agricultural University, 3(1): 27-31.
    18. Liu, Shu-Sheng et al. (2000). Environ. Ent., 31(2): 221-231.
    19. Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007 169
    20. Mau, F.L. and Kessing, J.L.M. (1992). In: Crop Knowledge Master. Department of Entomology, Honolulu, Hawaii.
    21. Morris, R.F. and Miller, C.A. (1954). Canadian J. Zoology, 32: 283-301.
    22. Reddy, C.N. and Singh, T.V.K. (1998). Indian J. Ent., 60(4): 321-325.
    23. Southwood, T.R.E. (1978). In: Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Population. The English Language Book Society and Chapman and Hall, London.
    24. Tabashnik. B.F. et al. (1990). J. Econ. Ento., 83(5): 1671-1676.
    25. Talekar, N.S. and Shelton, A.M. (1993). Ann. Rev. Entomology, 38: 275-301.
    26. Verkerk, R.H.J. and Wright, D.J. (1996). Bull. Entomol. Res., 86: 205-216.
    27. Wang, X.G. et al. (1999). Biocontrol, 44: 391-402
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 41 issue 3 (september 2007) : 164 - 170

      LIFE SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA FOR FORMULATION OF PEST MODEL

      M
      M. Das
      N
      N. Chaudhuri
      1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya Pundibari, Cooch Behar - 736 165, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Das M., Chaudhuri N. (2025). LIFE SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA FOR FORMULATION OF PEST MODEL. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(3): 164 - 170. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      In Terai region of West Bengal the Diamond back moth (Plutella xylostella) appeared on cabbage during February and the infestation continued up to May in an overlapping manner, within and over the generations. During February-March the prevailing climatic conditions did favour not only the multiplication of Plutella population but also activated its parasitoids. Higher level of potential fecundity (76.5), net reproductive rate (14.145) and innate capacity for increase in number (0.101) of adult of February-March generation and faster development (life cycle of 32 days) irrespective of shorter doubling time (6.887 days) and higher weekly multiplication rate (2.027), more number of hypothetical F2 (200.08) females and higher survival value (0.46) during February-March resulted in higher level of infestation in March-April. The key mortality factor for different generations were recorded as physical character of leaves for 1st and 2nd instar larvae, diseases and some unknown causes for 3rd and 4th instar larvae, parasitoid for pupae/larvae-pupae and low hatchibility for eggs. All of these had a direct bearing upon variation in climatic conditions as well as with crop phenology in all the generations. After April, adverse climatic conditions and late stage of crop growth reduced the infestation level under field conditions.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Andrawartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. (1954). In: The Distriburion and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
        2. Atwal, A.S. and Bains, S.S. (1974). In: Applied Animal Ecology, Kalyani Publishers. Ludhiana, pp. 111-118.
        3. Bhalla, O.P. and Dubey, J.K. (1986). In: Diamond back moth management. (Talekar, N.S. and Griggs, T.D. eds.)
        4. Proceedings of First International Workshop held during March 11-I5, 1985, AVRDC, Taiwan, pp. 55-61.
        5. Birch, L.C. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol., 17: 15-26.
        6. Capinera, J.L. (2001). Handbook of Vegetable Pests. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 729.
        7. Deevey, E.S. Jr (1947). Q. Rev. Biol., 22: 283-314.
        8. Harcourt, D.G. (I954). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, pp. 107.
        9. Harcourt, D.G. (1969). The development and use of life tables in the study of natural insect populations. A review
        10. of-Entomology, 14: 175-196.
        11. He, Y.R. et al. (2000). J. South China Agric. Univ., 21(1): 34-37.
        12. Hemchandra,O. and Singh, T.K. (2003). Ann Plant Protection Sci., 11(2): 269-273.
        13. Howe, R.W. (1953). Ann. Applied Biol., 40: 134-155.
        14. Justin, C.G.L. et al. (2000). Madras Agric. J., 87(4-6): 206-210.
        15. Kandoria, J.L. et al. (1994). J. Insect Sci., 7: 76-80.
        16. Kfir, R. and Thomas, J. (2001). ARC - PPRI Bulletin of Plant Protection News No. 59.
        17. Khaire, V.A. (1987). Current Research Reporter, Mahatama Phule Agricultural University, 3(1): 27-31.
        18. Liu, Shu-Sheng et al. (2000). Environ. Ent., 31(2): 221-231.
        19. Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007 169
        20. Mau, F.L. and Kessing, J.L.M. (1992). In: Crop Knowledge Master. Department of Entomology, Honolulu, Hawaii.
        21. Morris, R.F. and Miller, C.A. (1954). Canadian J. Zoology, 32: 283-301.
        22. Reddy, C.N. and Singh, T.V.K. (1998). Indian J. Ent., 60(4): 321-325.
        23. Southwood, T.R.E. (1978). In: Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Population. The English Language Book Society and Chapman and Hall, London.
        24. Tabashnik. B.F. et al. (1990). J. Econ. Ento., 83(5): 1671-1676.
        25. Talekar, N.S. and Shelton, A.M. (1993). Ann. Rev. Entomology, 38: 275-301.
        26. Verkerk, R.H.J. and Wright, D.J. (1996). Bull. Entomol. Res., 86: 205-216.
        27. Wang, X.G. et al. (1999). Biocontrol, 44: 391-402
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)