Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 42 issue 4 (december 2008) : 283-287

BIOMANAGEMENT OF LANTANA (LANTANA CAMARA L.) AND CONGRESS GRASS (PARTHENIUM HYSTEROPHORUS L.) THROUGH VERMICOMPOSTING AND ITS RESPONSE ON SOIL FERTILITY

V
Vivek Sharma
J
J.K. Pandher*
K
Kamla Kanwar
1Department of Soil Science, CSKHPKV, Palampur (Himachal), India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sharma Vivek, Pandher* J.K., Kanwar Kamla (2025). BIOMANAGEMENT OF LANTANA (LANTANA CAMARA L.) AND CONGRESS GRASS (PARTHENIUM HYSTEROPHORUS L.) THROUGH VERMICOMPOSTING AND ITS RESPONSE ON SOIL FERTILITY. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(4): 283-287. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The investigation was made for the biomanagement of lantana (Lantana camara L.) and congress
grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) through vermicomposting using earthworm species Eudrilus
eugeniae. The mixture of cowdung and raw material of both the weeds was used in the ratio of 1:1.
The vermicompost was ready for use within two months. The nutrient composition of vermicompost
prepared from lantana and congress grass was higher than that of its substrates as well as FYM.
Further, the effects of vermicompost prepared from different sources were evaluated on soil fertility
and yield of wheat (PbW 343). For this, a field experiment was carried out using three different
sources of organic manures viz. lantana vermicompost, congress grass vermicompost and FYM and
three levels of recommended NPK fertilizers i.e. 33, 67 and 100 % along with control. The higher
grain and straw yield of wheat, maximum concentrations of available nutrients in soil were observed
at 67% recommended NPK along with the different sources of vermicompost. Among organic
manures, lantana vermicompost was found to be superior to congress grass and FYM in terms of
nutrient composition as well as in increasing the yield of wheat. Among different treatments, 67 %
recommended NPK along with 10 tha-1 lantana vermicompost was found to be the best treatment for
increasing wheat yield and maintaining soil fertility.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. A.OA.C. (1960). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association Analytical, Chemist, Benjamin Frankin Station, Washington, DC (U.S.A).
    2. Dinesh, R. and Dubey R.P. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 47:421-425.
    3. Gill, M.P.S. (1995). National Seminar on Development in Soil Science Abstract. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 146-147.
    4. Gomez, G.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition) John.
    5. Willey and Sons, New York USA. p 680.
    6. Gujral, G.S. and Vasudeven, P. (1983). J. Scientific Industrial Res. 42:281-286.
    7. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Publications, New Delhi.
    8. Jeyabal, A. and Kuppuswamy, G. (2001) European J. Agron. 15:153-170.
    9. Kalembasa, D. (1995). Agrocenosis Zeszyty Problemobe Pastepow Nauk Rolniczych 437:29-252.
    10. Kohli, R.K. and Rani, D. (1994). Bulletin (Sci.). Punjab University 44:105-149.
    11. Maheshrappa, H.P. et al. (1999). Annal Agric. Res. 20:318-323.
    12. Mishra, M.M. and Bangar, K.C. (1986). Biol. Agric. Hort. 3:337.
    13. Mrinal, S, et al. (1998). J. Indian Potato Assoc. 25:141-142.
    14. Nethra, N.N. et al. (1999). Crop Research, Hisar 17:209-215.
    15. Olsen, S.R. et al. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soil by Extraction with NaHCO3 USDA and Circ. 939:19-33.
    16. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis, (Asian Edition), Hans Publishers, Bombay. Pp. 223-237.
    17. Rahul, D.S. and Shukla, U.C. (1979). Indian J. Agric. Chem. 12:11.
    18. Ranwa, R.S. and Singh, K.P. (1999). Indian J. Agron. 44:554-559.
    19. Singh, J. and Rai, S.N. (1998). Indian Fmg. 48(4):15-20.
    20. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). Curr. Sci. 25:259-260.
    21. Vasanthi, D. and Kumarswamy, K. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 47:268-272.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 42 issue 4 (december 2008) : 283-287

      BIOMANAGEMENT OF LANTANA (LANTANA CAMARA L.) AND CONGRESS GRASS (PARTHENIUM HYSTEROPHORUS L.) THROUGH VERMICOMPOSTING AND ITS RESPONSE ON SOIL FERTILITY

      V
      Vivek Sharma
      J
      J.K. Pandher*
      K
      Kamla Kanwar
      1Department of Soil Science, CSKHPKV, Palampur (Himachal), India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Sharma Vivek, Pandher* J.K., Kanwar Kamla (2025). BIOMANAGEMENT OF LANTANA (LANTANA CAMARA L.) AND CONGRESS GRASS (PARTHENIUM HYSTEROPHORUS L.) THROUGH VERMICOMPOSTING AND ITS RESPONSE ON SOIL FERTILITY. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(4): 283-287. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The investigation was made for the biomanagement of lantana (Lantana camara L.) and congress
      grass (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) through vermicomposting using earthworm species Eudrilus
      eugeniae. The mixture of cowdung and raw material of both the weeds was used in the ratio of 1:1.
      The vermicompost was ready for use within two months. The nutrient composition of vermicompost
      prepared from lantana and congress grass was higher than that of its substrates as well as FYM.
      Further, the effects of vermicompost prepared from different sources were evaluated on soil fertility
      and yield of wheat (PbW 343). For this, a field experiment was carried out using three different
      sources of organic manures viz. lantana vermicompost, congress grass vermicompost and FYM and
      three levels of recommended NPK fertilizers i.e. 33, 67 and 100 % along with control. The higher
      grain and straw yield of wheat, maximum concentrations of available nutrients in soil were observed
      at 67% recommended NPK along with the different sources of vermicompost. Among organic
      manures, lantana vermicompost was found to be superior to congress grass and FYM in terms of
      nutrient composition as well as in increasing the yield of wheat. Among different treatments, 67 %
      recommended NPK along with 10 tha-1 lantana vermicompost was found to be the best treatment for
      increasing wheat yield and maintaining soil fertility.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. A.OA.C. (1960). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association Analytical, Chemist, Benjamin Frankin Station, Washington, DC (U.S.A).
        2. Dinesh, R. and Dubey R.P. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 47:421-425.
        3. Gill, M.P.S. (1995). National Seminar on Development in Soil Science Abstract. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 146-147.
        4. Gomez, G.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition) John.
        5. Willey and Sons, New York USA. p 680.
        6. Gujral, G.S. and Vasudeven, P. (1983). J. Scientific Industrial Res. 42:281-286.
        7. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Publications, New Delhi.
        8. Jeyabal, A. and Kuppuswamy, G. (2001) European J. Agron. 15:153-170.
        9. Kalembasa, D. (1995). Agrocenosis Zeszyty Problemobe Pastepow Nauk Rolniczych 437:29-252.
        10. Kohli, R.K. and Rani, D. (1994). Bulletin (Sci.). Punjab University 44:105-149.
        11. Maheshrappa, H.P. et al. (1999). Annal Agric. Res. 20:318-323.
        12. Mishra, M.M. and Bangar, K.C. (1986). Biol. Agric. Hort. 3:337.
        13. Mrinal, S, et al. (1998). J. Indian Potato Assoc. 25:141-142.
        14. Nethra, N.N. et al. (1999). Crop Research, Hisar 17:209-215.
        15. Olsen, S.R. et al. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soil by Extraction with NaHCO3 USDA and Circ. 939:19-33.
        16. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis, (Asian Edition), Hans Publishers, Bombay. Pp. 223-237.
        17. Rahul, D.S. and Shukla, U.C. (1979). Indian J. Agric. Chem. 12:11.
        18. Ranwa, R.S. and Singh, K.P. (1999). Indian J. Agron. 44:554-559.
        19. Singh, J. and Rai, S.N. (1998). Indian Fmg. 48(4):15-20.
        20. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). Curr. Sci. 25:259-260.
        21. Vasanthi, D. and Kumarswamy, K. (1999). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 47:268-272.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)