volume 42 issue 2 (june 2008) : 86 - 91

BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF ASH GROUD BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS

S
Salikutty Joseph
B
Bavrah Balan
1College of Horticulture, KAU, Vellanikkara, Thrissur - 680 656, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Joseph Salikutty, Balan Bavrah (2025). BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF ASH GROUD BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(2): 86 - 91. doi: .
The biological efficiency indices LER, LEC, ATER, aggressivity and RCC were worked out for
the system in both planting systems. LER and ATER for all the treatments were above one and this
indicated that intercropping in ash gourd is biologically efficient. The LEC value was highest for ash
gourd + amaranthus (T4) and ash gourd + bush cowpea (T3) combination. Negative aggressivity
values for treatments containing three crop combinations indicated that the intercrops could be more
aggressive, but there is no yield reduction in the base crop, ash gourd.
    1. Adetiloye, P.O et al. (1983). Ecol. Modelling, 19: 27-39.
    2. Balasubramanian R. et al. (1994). Madras Agric. J. 81: 342-344.
    3. Dubey D. N. et al. (1995) . Indian J. Agric. Sci., 65: 469-473.
    4. Hiebsch C. K. and Mc Collum R. I. (1987). Agron J., 79: 15-22.
    5. Ikeorgu J. E. G. et al.(1989). Trop. Agric., 66: 110-117.
    6. Lai Z. M. (1985). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 11: 163-172.
    7. McGilchrist C. A. (1965). Biometrics, 21: 975-985.
    8. Mead R. and Willey R. W. (1980). Exp. Agric., 16: 217-228.
    9. Olasantan F.O. (1985) Beitrage Zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinatmedizin, 23: 397-404.
    10. Prasad K. and Srivastava R. C. (1991). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 61: 243-246.
    11. Ramachander P. R., et al.(1989). S. Indian Hort. 37: 230-234.
    12. Shah M. H. et al.( 1991). Indian J. Agron., 36: 23-28.
    13. Sharma R. K. et al. ( 1992 ). Indian J. Agron., 37: 420-423.
    14. Sheelavantar M. N. (1990).In: Intercropping Principles and Practices. (Hosmani, M. M. et al.) University of Agricultural Science, Dharwad. pp 13.
    15. Singh R. N. and Gupta P. C. (1993). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 63: 1-3.
    16. Sur S. C. and Das P. K. (1992). Indian Fmg., 9-11.
    17. Willey R. W. (1979). Field Crop Abst. 73-85.
    18. Yadav R. L. and Prasad S. R. (1990). Indian J. Agron., 35: 451-455.
    volume 42 issue 2 (june 2008) : 86 - 91

    BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF ASH GROUD BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS

    S
    Salikutty Joseph
    B
    Bavrah Balan
    1College of Horticulture, KAU, Vellanikkara, Thrissur - 680 656, India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Joseph Salikutty, Balan Bavrah (2025). BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF ASH GROUD BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(2): 86 - 91. doi: .
    The biological efficiency indices LER, LEC, ATER, aggressivity and RCC were worked out for
    the system in both planting systems. LER and ATER for all the treatments were above one and this
    indicated that intercropping in ash gourd is biologically efficient. The LEC value was highest for ash
    gourd + amaranthus (T4) and ash gourd + bush cowpea (T3) combination. Negative aggressivity
    values for treatments containing three crop combinations indicated that the intercrops could be more
    aggressive, but there is no yield reduction in the base crop, ash gourd.
      1. Adetiloye, P.O et al. (1983). Ecol. Modelling, 19: 27-39.
      2. Balasubramanian R. et al. (1994). Madras Agric. J. 81: 342-344.
      3. Dubey D. N. et al. (1995) . Indian J. Agric. Sci., 65: 469-473.
      4. Hiebsch C. K. and Mc Collum R. I. (1987). Agron J., 79: 15-22.
      5. Ikeorgu J. E. G. et al.(1989). Trop. Agric., 66: 110-117.
      6. Lai Z. M. (1985). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 11: 163-172.
      7. McGilchrist C. A. (1965). Biometrics, 21: 975-985.
      8. Mead R. and Willey R. W. (1980). Exp. Agric., 16: 217-228.
      9. Olasantan F.O. (1985) Beitrage Zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinatmedizin, 23: 397-404.
      10. Prasad K. and Srivastava R. C. (1991). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 61: 243-246.
      11. Ramachander P. R., et al.(1989). S. Indian Hort. 37: 230-234.
      12. Shah M. H. et al.( 1991). Indian J. Agron., 36: 23-28.
      13. Sharma R. K. et al. ( 1992 ). Indian J. Agron., 37: 420-423.
      14. Sheelavantar M. N. (1990).In: Intercropping Principles and Practices. (Hosmani, M. M. et al.) University of Agricultural Science, Dharwad. pp 13.
      15. Singh R. N. and Gupta P. C. (1993). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 63: 1-3.
      16. Sur S. C. and Das P. K. (1992). Indian Fmg., 9-11.
      17. Willey R. W. (1979). Field Crop Abst. 73-85.
      18. Yadav R. L. and Prasad S. R. (1990). Indian J. Agron., 35: 451-455.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)