Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 43 issue 4 (december 2009) : 279 - 283


V.J. Bhatiya, M.A. Vaddoria, D.R. Mehta, B.A. Monpara
1Department of Agricultural Botany, College of Agriculture Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh- 362 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhatiya V.J., Vaddoria M.A., Mehta D.R., Monpara B.A. (2024). GENETICS OF SLOW- RUSTING RESISTANCE TO LEAF RUST IN BREAD WHEAT. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(4): 279 - 283. doi: .
Genetic architecture of slow-rusting resistance to leaf rust was studied using
generation mean analysis involving six basic generations (P1,P2, F1, F2, BC1 and
BC2) of two bread wheat crosses viz., J 24 x HD 2189 and J 24 x HS 347. The
individual and joint scaling tests revealed the presence of digenic epistasis for
inheritance of slow-leaf rusting in both the crosses. The best fitting model revealed
the significance of only additive (d) gene effect in cross J 24 x HD 2189 where
simple selection could be effective for exploiting slow rusting phenomenon. In case
of cross J 24 x HS 347, all the gene effects except (m) were significant indicating
importance of additive and non-additive gene effects. Therefore, improvement
through reciprocal recurrent selection, biparental mating or diallel selective mating
could be employed for improvement of this trait. However, number of gene pairs
controlling slow-leaf rusting was quite variable in both the crosses.
  1. Anonymous (2005). CMIE, Andheri (East), Mumbai.
  2. Bjarko, M.E. and Line, R.F. (1988). Phytopathology, 78: 457-461.
  3. Caldwall, R.M. (1969). In Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. 3rd ed. (Finalay, K.W. and Shepherd, K.W,ed.) 263-272.
  4. Cavalli, L.L. (1952). Quantitative inheritance. H.M.S.O., London. 135-144.
  5. Das, al. (1992). Crop Sci., 32: 1452-1456.
  6. Fisher,R.A. and Yates, F.(1938). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research.
  7. Jacobs, Th. and Broers, L.H.M. (1989). Euphytica, 44: 197-206.
  8. Jensen, A. B. (1970). Crop. Sci., 42: 629-635.
  9. Jinks, J.L. and Jones, R.M. (1958). Genetics, 43: 223-234.
  10. Joshi, A.B. and Dhawan, N.L. (1966). Indian J. Genet., 26(A):101-113.
  11. Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics. Mathuen and Company Ltd., London.
  12. Ohm, H.W. and Shaner, G.E. (1976). Phytopathology, 66: 1356-1360.
  13. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme,V.P. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
  14. Peterson, R.F. et al. (1948). Can. J. Res. Sect. C., 26: 496-500.
  15. Tandon, G. et al. (1989). Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res., 19: 1-5
  16. Wright, S. (1968). Evaluation and Genetics of Populations. 1.: 5 -9
  17. Zhang, R.J. et al. (2001). Phytopathology, 91: 680-686.

Editorial Board

View all (0)