Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 194-199

EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS APPLICATION OF BRASSINOLIDE AND SALICYLIC ACID ON CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK)

U
U. Maity
A
A.K. Bera
1Department of Plant Physiology Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Mohanpur – 741 252, West Bengal, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Maity U., Bera A.K. (2025). EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS APPLICATION OF BRASSINOLIDE AND SALICYLIC ACID ON CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(3): 194-199. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Brassinolide, a steroidal compound of plant origin and salicylic acid, a phenolic
compound have been found to increase yield in green gram. But, the physiological
and biochemical basis of yield improvement are yet to be ascertained. A field
experiment was conducted to understand the influence of brassinolide (0.10, 0.25
and 0.50 ppm) and salicylic acid (500, 1000 and 1500 ppm) on certain physiological
and biochemical aspects of green gram plant leading to higher yield in this crop.
Altogether,8 treatments were given as foliar spray including two types of control –
namely water spray and no spray. Foliar application of these plant growth regulators,
once at pre-flowering and second time at flowering stage of the crop significantly
increased chlorophyll-a, b and total chlorophyll content, Hill activity in the leaves of
green gram plant. Reducing, non-reducing sugar, starch and soluble protein content
in the leaves were also increased over control and water spray due to these treatments.
Brassinolide at 0.25 ppm and salicylic acid at 1000 ppm were found to be most
effective indicating optimum doses respectively and brassinolide seems to be superior
than salicylic acid to influence these physiological and biochemical yield parameters

REFERENCES

  1. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Plant Physiol., 24 : 1 – 15.
  2. Clouse, S.D. (1998). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 49 : 427 – 451.
  3. Jain, A. and Srivastava, H.S. (1981). Physiol. Plantarum, 51 : 331 – 342.
  4. Kananbala, S. and Singh, T.N. (2003). Crop Res., 26(2) : 355 – 360.
  5. Lowry, O.H. et al. (1951). J. Biol. Chem., 193 : 265 – 275.
  6. Maity, U. (2007). Ph.D. Thesis, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.
  7. Mathur, S. et al. (1988). J. Indian Bot. Soc., 67 : 212.
  8. Mukherjee, D. and Rao, K.U.M. (1993). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 36(1) : 13 – 16.
  9. Naidu, R.A.M. et al. (1984). Physiol. Plant Path., 25 : 181 – 190.
  10. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1989). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
  11. Paricha, P.C. et al. (1977). Sci. & Cult., 43 : 230 -231.
  12. Petzold, U. et al. (1992). Acta Bot. Neerl., 41(4) : 469 – 479.
  13. Prakash, M. et al. (2003) Indian J. Plant Physiol., 8(3) : 313 – 315.
  14. Roth-Bejerano, N. and Lips, H. (1970). New Phytol., 69 : 165 – 169.
  15. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (1991). Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
  16. Salem, S.M. (1989). Bull. Faculty Agric., Univ. Cairo, 40(1) : 213 – 223.
  17. Schneider, E.A. and Whitman, F. (1974). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 25 : 487 – 513.
  18. Sharma, K. and Kaur, S. (2003). Indian Agriculturist, 47 : (1/2) : 79 – 84.
  19. Soleman, N.J. (1988). Intern. Biol. (Sci. Engg.)., 49 : 265 – 268.
  20. Srivastava, H.S. (1980). Phytochemistry, 13 : 725 – 733.
  21. Tetley, R.M. and Thiman, K.V. (1974). Plant Physiol., 54 : 294 – 303.
  22. Vardhini, B.V. and Rao, R.S.S. (1998). Phytochemistry, 48 (6) : 927 – 930.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 194-199

    EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS APPLICATION OF BRASSINOLIDE AND SALICYLIC ACID ON CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK)

    U
    U. Maity
    A
    A.K. Bera
    1Department of Plant Physiology Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Mohanpur – 741 252, West Bengal, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Maity U., Bera A.K. (2025). EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS APPLICATION OF BRASSINOLIDE AND SALICYLIC ACID ON CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(3): 194-199. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Brassinolide, a steroidal compound of plant origin and salicylic acid, a phenolic
    compound have been found to increase yield in green gram. But, the physiological
    and biochemical basis of yield improvement are yet to be ascertained. A field
    experiment was conducted to understand the influence of brassinolide (0.10, 0.25
    and 0.50 ppm) and salicylic acid (500, 1000 and 1500 ppm) on certain physiological
    and biochemical aspects of green gram plant leading to higher yield in this crop.
    Altogether,8 treatments were given as foliar spray including two types of control –
    namely water spray and no spray. Foliar application of these plant growth regulators,
    once at pre-flowering and second time at flowering stage of the crop significantly
    increased chlorophyll-a, b and total chlorophyll content, Hill activity in the leaves of
    green gram plant. Reducing, non-reducing sugar, starch and soluble protein content
    in the leaves were also increased over control and water spray due to these treatments.
    Brassinolide at 0.25 ppm and salicylic acid at 1000 ppm were found to be most
    effective indicating optimum doses respectively and brassinolide seems to be superior
    than salicylic acid to influence these physiological and biochemical yield parameters

    REFERENCES

    1. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Plant Physiol., 24 : 1 – 15.
    2. Clouse, S.D. (1998). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 49 : 427 – 451.
    3. Jain, A. and Srivastava, H.S. (1981). Physiol. Plantarum, 51 : 331 – 342.
    4. Kananbala, S. and Singh, T.N. (2003). Crop Res., 26(2) : 355 – 360.
    5. Lowry, O.H. et al. (1951). J. Biol. Chem., 193 : 265 – 275.
    6. Maity, U. (2007). Ph.D. Thesis, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.
    7. Mathur, S. et al. (1988). J. Indian Bot. Soc., 67 : 212.
    8. Mukherjee, D. and Rao, K.U.M. (1993). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 36(1) : 13 – 16.
    9. Naidu, R.A.M. et al. (1984). Physiol. Plant Path., 25 : 181 – 190.
    10. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1989). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
    11. Paricha, P.C. et al. (1977). Sci. & Cult., 43 : 230 -231.
    12. Petzold, U. et al. (1992). Acta Bot. Neerl., 41(4) : 469 – 479.
    13. Prakash, M. et al. (2003) Indian J. Plant Physiol., 8(3) : 313 – 315.
    14. Roth-Bejerano, N. and Lips, H. (1970). New Phytol., 69 : 165 – 169.
    15. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (1991). Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
    16. Salem, S.M. (1989). Bull. Faculty Agric., Univ. Cairo, 40(1) : 213 – 223.
    17. Schneider, E.A. and Whitman, F. (1974). Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 25 : 487 – 513.
    18. Sharma, K. and Kaur, S. (2003). Indian Agriculturist, 47 : (1/2) : 79 – 84.
    19. Soleman, N.J. (1988). Intern. Biol. (Sci. Engg.)., 49 : 265 – 268.
    20. Srivastava, H.S. (1980). Phytochemistry, 13 : 725 – 733.
    21. Tetley, R.M. and Thiman, K.V. (1974). Plant Physiol., 54 : 294 – 303.
    22. Vardhini, B.V. and Rao, R.S.S. (1998). Phytochemistry, 48 (6) : 927 – 930.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)