Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 187-193

MORPHOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES UNDER TRIBE PHASEOLAE OF INDIAN FABACEAE.

B
Baisakhi Bandyopadhyay
S
S.C.Santra
1Department of Environmental Science, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, 741235,Nadia, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bandyopadhyay Baisakhi, S.C.Santra (2025). MORPHOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES UNDER TRIBE PHASEOLAE OF INDIAN FABACEAE.. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(3): 187-193. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The Phaseolae contain in one tribe both the largest number of genera and the
most economic importance of any tribe of the family of Fabaceae. Still, this tribe has
largely been ignored from the time of Bentham’s treatment in Genera Plantarum
(1865).The present study aims at securing data on seed surface study by SEM (scanning
electron microscopy), biochemical (protein characteristics) and cytological (both
chromosomal and in situ DNA methods of different hybrid varieties of some species
of the tribe Phaseolae, with a view to working out the similarity and variability and
interrelationships of different taxa. The present work is an attempt to combine
morphological, biochemical and cytological analyses for an understanding of the
inter-relationships at inter-and intrageneric, specific and varietal levels. Such an
understanding can help in analyzing the taxonomic implications and in formulating
projects for future improvement of these seeds.

REFERENCES

  1. Banerjee, N. and Sharma, A.K. (1985).. Proc. Indian natn. Sci. Acad. 51(4) : 505-510.
  2. Bentham, G. (1865)., “Genera Plantarum”. In Bentham and J.D. Hooker” Genera Plantarum”. Vol. 1.Reeve, London..
  3. Boulter (1981) In Advances in Legume Systematics”(Polhill,R.M and Raven, P.H.eds): 501-512.
  4. Candolle A.P.de (1825-1827). Memoires sur la famille des legumineuses.A.Berlin.Paris.
  5. Goldblatt, P. (1981)”Advances in Legume Systematics”. (Polhill,R.M and Raven,P.M,eds):427.
  6. Jones, W.E., et al (1998). Ann. Bt. 82 (2): 189-194.
  7. Lackey, J.A. (1977). Bot . J. Linn. Soc. 74 : 163-178..
  8. Lewis, W.H. (1974). Lloyds 37: 460-464.
  9. Linnaeus, C.(1753). “Species Plantarum”, vol 1,Salvius, Stockholm.
  10. Lowry, O..H., et al. (1951).J.Biol.Chem.193:265-275.
  11. Mukherjee, S. and Sharma, A.K. (1986). In: Perspectives in Cytology and Genetics. (Manna, G. K. and Sinha, U. eds.) Kalyani University Press, 5:735-740.
  12. Mukhopadhyay, S. and Sharma, A.K. (1987). Cytologia, 52: 821-831.
  13. Mukherjee, S. and Sharma. A.K.(1990) Proc. Indian Acad. Sc. ( Plant Sci ) 100 (1) 1-6.
  14. Naranjo, C. A., et al. (1998). Ann. Bot. 82: 757-764.
  15. Vol. 43, No. 3, 2009 193 Narayan, R.K.J. (1982) Evolution 36: 877-891.
  16. Narayan, R.K.J. (1985) In Kew chromosome conference-2. Brandham [P.E.and Bennet M..D. (eds)].George Allen and Unwin (Lond.). 243-250.
  17. Narayan, R.K.J. (1987) Pl.Syst.Evol.157:161-180.
  18. Narayan, R.K.J. (1988) Evol. Trends in Plants 2:121-130.
  19. Palomino, G., Sousa, M.S. (2000). Ann. Bot. 85 (1): 69-76.
  20. Polhill, R.M. and Raven, P.H.(1981).In “ Advances in Legume Systematics,” (eds Polhill R.M. and Raven P. H.) Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.
  21. Sanjappa, M. (1992). Legumes of India. Bishen Singh Mahendra. Dehradun
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 3 (september 2009) : 187-193

    MORPHOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES UNDER TRIBE PHASEOLAE OF INDIAN FABACEAE.

    B
    Baisakhi Bandyopadhyay
    S
    S.C.Santra
    1Department of Environmental Science, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, 741235,Nadia, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Bandyopadhyay Baisakhi, S.C.Santra (2025). MORPHOLOGICAL, BIOCHEMICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES UNDER TRIBE PHASEOLAE OF INDIAN FABACEAE.. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(3): 187-193. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The Phaseolae contain in one tribe both the largest number of genera and the
    most economic importance of any tribe of the family of Fabaceae. Still, this tribe has
    largely been ignored from the time of Bentham’s treatment in Genera Plantarum
    (1865).The present study aims at securing data on seed surface study by SEM (scanning
    electron microscopy), biochemical (protein characteristics) and cytological (both
    chromosomal and in situ DNA methods of different hybrid varieties of some species
    of the tribe Phaseolae, with a view to working out the similarity and variability and
    interrelationships of different taxa. The present work is an attempt to combine
    morphological, biochemical and cytological analyses for an understanding of the
    inter-relationships at inter-and intrageneric, specific and varietal levels. Such an
    understanding can help in analyzing the taxonomic implications and in formulating
    projects for future improvement of these seeds.

    REFERENCES

    1. Banerjee, N. and Sharma, A.K. (1985).. Proc. Indian natn. Sci. Acad. 51(4) : 505-510.
    2. Bentham, G. (1865)., “Genera Plantarum”. In Bentham and J.D. Hooker” Genera Plantarum”. Vol. 1.Reeve, London..
    3. Boulter (1981) In Advances in Legume Systematics”(Polhill,R.M and Raven, P.H.eds): 501-512.
    4. Candolle A.P.de (1825-1827). Memoires sur la famille des legumineuses.A.Berlin.Paris.
    5. Goldblatt, P. (1981)”Advances in Legume Systematics”. (Polhill,R.M and Raven,P.M,eds):427.
    6. Jones, W.E., et al (1998). Ann. Bt. 82 (2): 189-194.
    7. Lackey, J.A. (1977). Bot . J. Linn. Soc. 74 : 163-178..
    8. Lewis, W.H. (1974). Lloyds 37: 460-464.
    9. Linnaeus, C.(1753). “Species Plantarum”, vol 1,Salvius, Stockholm.
    10. Lowry, O..H., et al. (1951).J.Biol.Chem.193:265-275.
    11. Mukherjee, S. and Sharma, A.K. (1986). In: Perspectives in Cytology and Genetics. (Manna, G. K. and Sinha, U. eds.) Kalyani University Press, 5:735-740.
    12. Mukhopadhyay, S. and Sharma, A.K. (1987). Cytologia, 52: 821-831.
    13. Mukherjee, S. and Sharma. A.K.(1990) Proc. Indian Acad. Sc. ( Plant Sci ) 100 (1) 1-6.
    14. Naranjo, C. A., et al. (1998). Ann. Bot. 82: 757-764.
    15. Vol. 43, No. 3, 2009 193 Narayan, R.K.J. (1982) Evolution 36: 877-891.
    16. Narayan, R.K.J. (1985) In Kew chromosome conference-2. Brandham [P.E.and Bennet M..D. (eds)].George Allen and Unwin (Lond.). 243-250.
    17. Narayan, R.K.J. (1987) Pl.Syst.Evol.157:161-180.
    18. Narayan, R.K.J. (1988) Evol. Trends in Plants 2:121-130.
    19. Palomino, G., Sousa, M.S. (2000). Ann. Bot. 85 (1): 69-76.
    20. Polhill, R.M. and Raven, P.H.(1981).In “ Advances in Legume Systematics,” (eds Polhill R.M. and Raven P. H.) Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.
    21. Sanjappa, M. (1992). Legumes of India. Bishen Singh Mahendra. Dehradun
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)