Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 79-87

ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF WEED SPECIES EXTRACTSON GERMINATION, GROWTH AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS IN DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF WHEAT (TRITICUMAESTIVUML.)

B
Bhawana Joshi
S
Sarika
N
N. Pandey*
P
P.B. Rao
1Department of Biological Sciences, College of Basic Sciences &Humanities, G.B. Pant Univ. of Agric &Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Joshi Bhawana, Sarika, Pandey* N., Rao P.B. (2025). ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF WEED SPECIES EXTRACTSON GERMINATION, GROWTH AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS IN DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF WHEAT (TRITICUMAESTIVUML.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 79-87. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The effect of weed extracts of Ageratum conyzoides L., Chenopodium album L,
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., and Parthenium hysterophorus L. were examined on the
seed germination, seedling growth, chlorophyll, proline and total protein content in
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties (PBW-154, PBW-343, PBW-373, PBW-443, PBW502,
RR-21, UP-262, UP-ll09, UP-2382 and UP-2425). Weed extracts decreased
germination (%) at the end of experiment (after 8 days) in all wheat varieties except
in PBW-502, RR-21, UP-262, UP-ll09 and UP-2382. The seedling growth (both length
and dry weight) was reduced, along with chl-a and chl-b content, and proline (a
stress amino acid ) content increased in all the varieties compared to control. Among
the four weed extracts, the inhibitory effect on different varieties of wheat on these
parameters followed the order: P. hysterophorus > A. conyzoides > C. album and >
C. dactylon. However, the total protein content was either increased or decreased in
all the varieties compared to control. Among the varieties, RR-21, UP-2382 and UP2425
were resistant; PBW-343, PBW-373, PBW-502 and UP-ll09 were susceptible
with different weed extracts.

REFERENCES

  1. *Bradford, M. (1976). Anals. Biochem. 72:48-254.
  2. Amon, D.I. (1949). Plant Physiol. 24:1-15.
  3. Bates, L.S., et al. (1973). Plant and Soil. 39:205-207.
  4. Djanaguiraman, M., et al. (2005). Intern. J. Agric. Biol. 7(1):35-38.
  5. Gattas, HAM., et al. (1999). Genetics and Molecular BioI. 22:95-99.
  6. Grodszinsky, AM. (1989). Biol. Plant. 31:448-457.
  7. Hiscox, J.D. and Israelsham, G.F. (1979). Can. J. Bot. 57:1332-1334.
  8. Inderjit and Dakshini, K. M. M. (1992). Amer. J. Bot. 79(9):977-981.
  9. Khawas, SA and Shehata, M'.M. (2005). Biotech. 4(1):23-34.
  10. Oudhia, P. (2000). Crop Res., Hisar. 20(3):563-566.
  11. Patil,V.A, et al. (1992). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 17:503-504.
  12. Prasad, D., etal. (1999). AllelopathyJ. 6(2):31-39.
  13. Qasem, J.R. (1995). Weed Res. Oxford. 3S(1):41-49.
  14. Qian, M.X., etal. (2005). Xibei-Zhiwz-Xuebao. 25(5):1025-1028.
  15. Vol. 43, No.2, 2009
  16. Rao, P.B. and Singh, S.P. (1985). Ann. Bot. 56:783-794.
  17. Rao, VS. (1992). Principles of Weed Science, Oxford & ISH Publication House, New Delhi. 504 p.
  18. Rice, E.L. (1984). Allelopathy. Second Edition, Academic Press, London. 422 p.
  19. Saxena, S., etal. (2003). AllelopathyJ. 11:201-216.
  20. Singh, H.P., et al. (2003). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 189(5):341-346.
  21. Singh, S.P. and Sangeeta. (1991). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 167(3):201-206.
  22. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1969). Statistical Methods. 6lh ed. Oxford and ISH, New Delhi.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 79-87

    ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF WEED SPECIES EXTRACTSON GERMINATION, GROWTH AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS IN DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF WHEAT (TRITICUMAESTIVUML.)

    B
    Bhawana Joshi
    S
    Sarika
    N
    N. Pandey*
    P
    P.B. Rao
    1Department of Biological Sciences, College of Basic Sciences &Humanities, G.B. Pant Univ. of Agric &Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Joshi Bhawana, Sarika, Pandey* N., Rao P.B. (2025). ALLELOPATHIC EFFECT OF WEED SPECIES EXTRACTSON GERMINATION, GROWTH AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS IN DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF WHEAT (TRITICUMAESTIVUML.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 79-87. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The effect of weed extracts of Ageratum conyzoides L., Chenopodium album L,
    Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., and Parthenium hysterophorus L. were examined on the
    seed germination, seedling growth, chlorophyll, proline and total protein content in
    wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties (PBW-154, PBW-343, PBW-373, PBW-443, PBW502,
    RR-21, UP-262, UP-ll09, UP-2382 and UP-2425). Weed extracts decreased
    germination (%) at the end of experiment (after 8 days) in all wheat varieties except
    in PBW-502, RR-21, UP-262, UP-ll09 and UP-2382. The seedling growth (both length
    and dry weight) was reduced, along with chl-a and chl-b content, and proline (a
    stress amino acid ) content increased in all the varieties compared to control. Among
    the four weed extracts, the inhibitory effect on different varieties of wheat on these
    parameters followed the order: P. hysterophorus > A. conyzoides > C. album and >
    C. dactylon. However, the total protein content was either increased or decreased in
    all the varieties compared to control. Among the varieties, RR-21, UP-2382 and UP2425
    were resistant; PBW-343, PBW-373, PBW-502 and UP-ll09 were susceptible
    with different weed extracts.

    REFERENCES

    1. *Bradford, M. (1976). Anals. Biochem. 72:48-254.
    2. Amon, D.I. (1949). Plant Physiol. 24:1-15.
    3. Bates, L.S., et al. (1973). Plant and Soil. 39:205-207.
    4. Djanaguiraman, M., et al. (2005). Intern. J. Agric. Biol. 7(1):35-38.
    5. Gattas, HAM., et al. (1999). Genetics and Molecular BioI. 22:95-99.
    6. Grodszinsky, AM. (1989). Biol. Plant. 31:448-457.
    7. Hiscox, J.D. and Israelsham, G.F. (1979). Can. J. Bot. 57:1332-1334.
    8. Inderjit and Dakshini, K. M. M. (1992). Amer. J. Bot. 79(9):977-981.
    9. Khawas, SA and Shehata, M'.M. (2005). Biotech. 4(1):23-34.
    10. Oudhia, P. (2000). Crop Res., Hisar. 20(3):563-566.
    11. Patil,V.A, et al. (1992). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 17:503-504.
    12. Prasad, D., etal. (1999). AllelopathyJ. 6(2):31-39.
    13. Qasem, J.R. (1995). Weed Res. Oxford. 3S(1):41-49.
    14. Qian, M.X., etal. (2005). Xibei-Zhiwz-Xuebao. 25(5):1025-1028.
    15. Vol. 43, No.2, 2009
    16. Rao, P.B. and Singh, S.P. (1985). Ann. Bot. 56:783-794.
    17. Rao, VS. (1992). Principles of Weed Science, Oxford & ISH Publication House, New Delhi. 504 p.
    18. Rice, E.L. (1984). Allelopathy. Second Edition, Academic Press, London. 422 p.
    19. Saxena, S., etal. (2003). AllelopathyJ. 11:201-216.
    20. Singh, H.P., et al. (2003). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 189(5):341-346.
    21. Singh, S.P. and Sangeeta. (1991). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 167(3):201-206.
    22. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1969). Statistical Methods. 6lh ed. Oxford and ISH, New Delhi.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)