Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 44 issue 4 (december 2010) : 274 - 280

EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF BORON ON GROWTH, QUALITY AND FRUIT YIELD OF PKM 1 TOMATO

S
S. Sathya
S
S. Mani
P
P.P. Mahendran
K
K. Arulmozhiselvan
1Department of Soil and Environment Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai- 625 104, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sathya S., Mani S., Mahendran P.P., Arulmozhiselvan K. (2025). EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF BORON ON GROWTH, QUALITY AND FRUIT YIELD OF PKM 1 TOMATO. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(4): 274 - 280. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The field experiment was conducted during 2006 at Agricultural College and Research Institute,
Madurai to investigate the effect of application of boron on growth, quality and fruit yield of PKM 1
tomato. The biometric characters such as plant height and number branches were significantly
influenced by soil and foliar application of boron. It was observed that among the various levels of
soil application of boron, borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recorded increase in height and number of branches
whereas among the various levels of foliar application of boron, 0.25 per cent borax spray produced
taller plants with more no. of branches. The quality parameters of PKM 1 tomato fruit such as lycopene,
ascorbic acid, crude protein and total soluble sugars were significantly increased due to the soil
application of borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recording a value of 3.99 mg 100g-1, 23.0 mg 100g-1, 10.13 per cent
and 9.20° brix respectively. The crude fibre and titratable acidity were found to be highest in control
that received the recommended dose of NPK alone, whereas the lowest value was recorded in soil
application of borax @ 20 kg ha-1. The results also revealed that the highest fruit yield of 33 tonnes
per hectare was recorded in treatment that received borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recording 33.6 per cent
increase over control and was found to be significantly superior to rest of the treatments. The quadratic
response curve fitted to the yield data of PKM 1 tomato (y = 23503.57 + 1093.79x – 29.79x2) and was
found to be highly significant with an r value of 0.928**. The physical and economic optimum of
borax for maximum yield of tomato was found to be 18.36 kg ha-1 and 18.29 kg ha-1 respectively at
a price level of Rs.10 per kg of tomato and Rs.40 per kg of borax.

REFERENCES

  1. A.O.A.C. (1962). Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Methods of Analysis. Washington D.C. (USA).
  2. Arora et al. (1983). Haryana J. Horti. Sci., 12: 217-219.
  3. Bose, U. S. and Tripathi, S. K. (1996). Crop Res., 12 (1): 61-64.
  4. Chopra, S. L. and Kanwar, J. S. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry, Kalyani Pubishers, New Delhi.
  5. Elabeen, A. Z. and Methlly, A. M. (1982). Agri.Res. Rev., 60(3): 143-146.
  6. Esteban et al. (1985). Plant and Soil, 88(10): 149-151.
  7. Fazalur Rahman Mallick, M and Muthukrishnan, C .R. (1979). South Indian Hort., 27: 121-124.
  8. Gupta P.K. et al. (2003). Ann. Agric. Res. New Series. 24(1): 100-103.
  9. Gupta, V. C. (1993). CRC Press, Boca Ratoz FL, USA.
  10. Hooda R.S. et al. (1984). Haryana J.Hort. Sci., 12: 46-47.
  11. Kannan. P. (2004). M.Sc. Thesis.Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
  12. Khumbhar, V. S. and Deshmukh, S. S. (1993). South Indian Hort., 41: 144-147.
  13. Lal, K. N and Rao, M. S. (1954). Micro Elements Nutrition of Plants. Bull.. Bhupress,Varanasi,India, pp.165-175
  14. Lalit Bhatt et al. (2004). Prog. Hort., 36(2): 331-334.
  15. Maharana J. et al. (1990). Environment and Ecology, 8(1): 1327-1337.
  16. Paithankar et al. (2004). J. Soils and Crops, 14 (1): 46-49.
  17. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
  18. Pilbeam. D. J. and Kirkby, E. A. (1985). J. Pl. Nutr., 6(7): 563-582.
  19. Prabha. K. (1995). M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
  20. Rao, N. and Vidyasagar, S. (1981). Andhra Agric. J., 28: 150-155.
  21. Rawat, P. S. and Mathpal, K. N. (1984). Sci. and Cul., 50(8): 243-244.
  22. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (1992). Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Willey Eastern Ltd., and
  23. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Ciombatore.
  24. Swarrop Krishan et al. (1998). Journal of the Andaman Science Association. 14(1): 50-52.
  25. Uziak, A. and Nurznski. (1964). Hort. Abstr., 37: 185.
  26. Verma A.N. et al. (1973). Mysore J. Agric.Sci.,7(1):130-132.
  27. Verma S.K. et al. (1995). Veg. Sci., 22(1): 5-8.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 44 issue 4 (december 2010) : 274 - 280

    EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF BORON ON GROWTH, QUALITY AND FRUIT YIELD OF PKM 1 TOMATO

    S
    S. Sathya
    S
    S. Mani
    P
    P.P. Mahendran
    K
    K. Arulmozhiselvan
    1Department of Soil and Environment Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai- 625 104, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Sathya S., Mani S., Mahendran P.P., Arulmozhiselvan K. (2025). EFFECT OF APPLICATION OF BORON ON GROWTH, QUALITY AND FRUIT YIELD OF PKM 1 TOMATO. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(4): 274 - 280. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The field experiment was conducted during 2006 at Agricultural College and Research Institute,
    Madurai to investigate the effect of application of boron on growth, quality and fruit yield of PKM 1
    tomato. The biometric characters such as plant height and number branches were significantly
    influenced by soil and foliar application of boron. It was observed that among the various levels of
    soil application of boron, borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recorded increase in height and number of branches
    whereas among the various levels of foliar application of boron, 0.25 per cent borax spray produced
    taller plants with more no. of branches. The quality parameters of PKM 1 tomato fruit such as lycopene,
    ascorbic acid, crude protein and total soluble sugars were significantly increased due to the soil
    application of borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recording a value of 3.99 mg 100g-1, 23.0 mg 100g-1, 10.13 per cent
    and 9.20° brix respectively. The crude fibre and titratable acidity were found to be highest in control
    that received the recommended dose of NPK alone, whereas the lowest value was recorded in soil
    application of borax @ 20 kg ha-1. The results also revealed that the highest fruit yield of 33 tonnes
    per hectare was recorded in treatment that received borax @ 20 kg ha-1 recording 33.6 per cent
    increase over control and was found to be significantly superior to rest of the treatments. The quadratic
    response curve fitted to the yield data of PKM 1 tomato (y = 23503.57 + 1093.79x – 29.79x2) and was
    found to be highly significant with an r value of 0.928**. The physical and economic optimum of
    borax for maximum yield of tomato was found to be 18.36 kg ha-1 and 18.29 kg ha-1 respectively at
    a price level of Rs.10 per kg of tomato and Rs.40 per kg of borax.

    REFERENCES

    1. A.O.A.C. (1962). Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Methods of Analysis. Washington D.C. (USA).
    2. Arora et al. (1983). Haryana J. Horti. Sci., 12: 217-219.
    3. Bose, U. S. and Tripathi, S. K. (1996). Crop Res., 12 (1): 61-64.
    4. Chopra, S. L. and Kanwar, J. S. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry, Kalyani Pubishers, New Delhi.
    5. Elabeen, A. Z. and Methlly, A. M. (1982). Agri.Res. Rev., 60(3): 143-146.
    6. Esteban et al. (1985). Plant and Soil, 88(10): 149-151.
    7. Fazalur Rahman Mallick, M and Muthukrishnan, C .R. (1979). South Indian Hort., 27: 121-124.
    8. Gupta P.K. et al. (2003). Ann. Agric. Res. New Series. 24(1): 100-103.
    9. Gupta, V. C. (1993). CRC Press, Boca Ratoz FL, USA.
    10. Hooda R.S. et al. (1984). Haryana J.Hort. Sci., 12: 46-47.
    11. Kannan. P. (2004). M.Sc. Thesis.Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    12. Khumbhar, V. S. and Deshmukh, S. S. (1993). South Indian Hort., 41: 144-147.
    13. Lal, K. N and Rao, M. S. (1954). Micro Elements Nutrition of Plants. Bull.. Bhupress,Varanasi,India, pp.165-175
    14. Lalit Bhatt et al. (2004). Prog. Hort., 36(2): 331-334.
    15. Maharana J. et al. (1990). Environment and Ecology, 8(1): 1327-1337.
    16. Paithankar et al. (2004). J. Soils and Crops, 14 (1): 46-49.
    17. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
    18. Pilbeam. D. J. and Kirkby, E. A. (1985). J. Pl. Nutr., 6(7): 563-582.
    19. Prabha. K. (1995). M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
    20. Rao, N. and Vidyasagar, S. (1981). Andhra Agric. J., 28: 150-155.
    21. Rawat, P. S. and Mathpal, K. N. (1984). Sci. and Cul., 50(8): 243-244.
    22. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (1992). Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Willey Eastern Ltd., and
    23. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Ciombatore.
    24. Swarrop Krishan et al. (1998). Journal of the Andaman Science Association. 14(1): 50-52.
    25. Uziak, A. and Nurznski. (1964). Hort. Abstr., 37: 185.
    26. Verma A.N. et al. (1973). Mysore J. Agric.Sci.,7(1):130-132.
    27. Verma S.K. et al. (1995). Veg. Sci., 22(1): 5-8.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)