Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 47 issue 6 (december 2013) : 549-552

STUDIES OF GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS OF FINGER MILLET [ELEUSINE CORACANA (L.) GAERTN]

C
C.V. Chandra Mohan Reddy*
P
PVRM Reddy
P
P. Munirathnam
J
Jayarame Gowda1
1All India Coordinated Small Millets Improvement Project, (ICAR) GKVK, Bangalore- 560 065, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Reddy* Mohan Chandra C.V., Reddy PVRM, Munirathnam P., Gowda1 Jayarame (2025). STUDIES OF GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS OF FINGER MILLET [ELEUSINE CORACANA (L.) GAERTN]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(6): 549-552. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Eighteen elite entries of finger millet were evaluated in a field study to assess the magnitude of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield contributing traits. The analysis of variance revealed that there were significant differences among the entries for all the traits studied. A wide range of variation was recorded for days to 50% flowering, plant height, ear head length, chlorophyll content, grain yield and straw yield. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was greater than genotypic coefficient of variation for all the characters studied which shows the influence of the environmental effect on the characters. High values for phenotypic coefficient and genotypic coefficient was recorded for number of fingers per ear head. High heritability and high genetic advance was recorded for ear head yield, ear head length and number of fingers per ear head indicating that these characters were controlled by additive gene effects. Selection based on these characters would be effective for future finger millet crop improvement program. Moderate heritability coupled with moderate genetic advance was observed for grain yield and straw yield. Threshing percentage showed low heritability as well as low genetic advance.

REFERENCES

  1. Abraham M J, Gupta A S and Sarma B K. (1989). Genetic variability and character association of yield and its components in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) in acidic soils of Meghalaya. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 59: 579-581.
  2. Burton G W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grass. Proceedings of 6th International Grass land Congress 1: 277–283.
  3. Chetan S and Malleshi N G. (2007). Finger mille polyphenols: Characterization and their nutraceuticalpotential. American J. Food Technol. 2: 582–592.
  4. Daba C. (2000). Variability and Association among Yield and Related Traits in Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L) Gaertn]. M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University.
  5. Dhagate N K, Patidar G L, Shrivastava P S and Joshi R C. (1972). Correlation and genetic variability study in ragi [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn]. JNKVV Res. J. 6:121-124.
  6. Falconer D S. (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, London.
  7. Indiastat. (2010). Area, Production and Productivity of Ragi in India. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI Publication, N Delhi.
  8. Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. (1955). Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in Soybeans. Agron. J. 47: 314– 318.
  9. Joshi A K, Kumari M, Singh V P, Reddy C M, Kumar S, Rane J and Chand R. (2007). Stay Green Trait: Variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 153: 59-71.
  10. Lush J L. (1940). Intra-sire correlation and regression of offspring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proc. Ame. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33: 293-301.
  11. Naik B J, Shankare Gowda B T and Seetharam A. (1994). Pattern of variability in relation to domestication of finger millet in Africa and India, pp. In [K.E. Riley, S.C. Gupta, A. Seetharam and J.N. Mushonga (eds.)]. Advances in Small Millets. International Science, New York, 347-363p.
  12. Panse V G. (1957). Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetics 17: 318-328.
  13. Panse V G and Sukathme P V. (1967). Statistical Method for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi. pp. 381.
  14. Patnaik M C. (1968). Variation and correlation in finger millet. Indian J. Genet. 28: 225-229.
  15. Poehlman J M. (1987). Breeding Field Crops. 3rd ed. AVI Publishing Company, Inc. West Port, CT. Pp. 187-213.
  16. Prasada Rao K E, De Wet J M J, Gopal Reddy V and Mengesha M H. (1994). Diversity in the small millets collection at ICRISAT. In [K.E. Riley, S.C. Gupta, A. Seetharam and J.N. Mushonga (eds.)]. Advances in Small Millets. International Science, New York, 331-345p
  17. Reddy C V C M and Reddy Y R. (2011) Genetic parameters for yield and quality traits in desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). J. Cotton Res. and Develop. 25: 168-170.
  18. Robinson H F, Comstock R E and Harvey P H. (1949). Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in Corn (Zea mays). Agron. J. 41: 353 – 359.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 47 issue 6 (december 2013) : 549-552

    STUDIES OF GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS OF FINGER MILLET [ELEUSINE CORACANA (L.) GAERTN]

    C
    C.V. Chandra Mohan Reddy*
    P
    PVRM Reddy
    P
    P. Munirathnam
    J
    Jayarame Gowda1
    1All India Coordinated Small Millets Improvement Project, (ICAR) GKVK, Bangalore- 560 065, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Reddy* Mohan Chandra C.V., Reddy PVRM, Munirathnam P., Gowda1 Jayarame (2025). STUDIES OF GENETIC VARIABILITY IN YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS OF FINGER MILLET [ELEUSINE CORACANA (L.) GAERTN]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(6): 549-552. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Eighteen elite entries of finger millet were evaluated in a field study to assess the magnitude of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield contributing traits. The analysis of variance revealed that there were significant differences among the entries for all the traits studied. A wide range of variation was recorded for days to 50% flowering, plant height, ear head length, chlorophyll content, grain yield and straw yield. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was greater than genotypic coefficient of variation for all the characters studied which shows the influence of the environmental effect on the characters. High values for phenotypic coefficient and genotypic coefficient was recorded for number of fingers per ear head. High heritability and high genetic advance was recorded for ear head yield, ear head length and number of fingers per ear head indicating that these characters were controlled by additive gene effects. Selection based on these characters would be effective for future finger millet crop improvement program. Moderate heritability coupled with moderate genetic advance was observed for grain yield and straw yield. Threshing percentage showed low heritability as well as low genetic advance.

    REFERENCES

    1. Abraham M J, Gupta A S and Sarma B K. (1989). Genetic variability and character association of yield and its components in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) in acidic soils of Meghalaya. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 59: 579-581.
    2. Burton G W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grass. Proceedings of 6th International Grass land Congress 1: 277–283.
    3. Chetan S and Malleshi N G. (2007). Finger mille polyphenols: Characterization and their nutraceuticalpotential. American J. Food Technol. 2: 582–592.
    4. Daba C. (2000). Variability and Association among Yield and Related Traits in Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L) Gaertn]. M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University.
    5. Dhagate N K, Patidar G L, Shrivastava P S and Joshi R C. (1972). Correlation and genetic variability study in ragi [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn]. JNKVV Res. J. 6:121-124.
    6. Falconer D S. (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, London.
    7. Indiastat. (2010). Area, Production and Productivity of Ragi in India. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI Publication, N Delhi.
    8. Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. (1955). Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in Soybeans. Agron. J. 47: 314– 318.
    9. Joshi A K, Kumari M, Singh V P, Reddy C M, Kumar S, Rane J and Chand R. (2007). Stay Green Trait: Variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 153: 59-71.
    10. Lush J L. (1940). Intra-sire correlation and regression of offspring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proc. Ame. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33: 293-301.
    11. Naik B J, Shankare Gowda B T and Seetharam A. (1994). Pattern of variability in relation to domestication of finger millet in Africa and India, pp. In [K.E. Riley, S.C. Gupta, A. Seetharam and J.N. Mushonga (eds.)]. Advances in Small Millets. International Science, New York, 347-363p.
    12. Panse V G. (1957). Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetics 17: 318-328.
    13. Panse V G and Sukathme P V. (1967). Statistical Method for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi. pp. 381.
    14. Patnaik M C. (1968). Variation and correlation in finger millet. Indian J. Genet. 28: 225-229.
    15. Poehlman J M. (1987). Breeding Field Crops. 3rd ed. AVI Publishing Company, Inc. West Port, CT. Pp. 187-213.
    16. Prasada Rao K E, De Wet J M J, Gopal Reddy V and Mengesha M H. (1994). Diversity in the small millets collection at ICRISAT. In [K.E. Riley, S.C. Gupta, A. Seetharam and J.N. Mushonga (eds.)]. Advances in Small Millets. International Science, New York, 331-345p
    17. Reddy C V C M and Reddy Y R. (2011) Genetic parameters for yield and quality traits in desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). J. Cotton Res. and Develop. 25: 168-170.
    18. Robinson H F, Comstock R E and Harvey P H. (1949). Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in Corn (Zea mays). Agron. J. 41: 353 – 359.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)