Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 58 issue 3 (june 2024) : 517-524

Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilization for Barley Crop at Full and Deficit Irrigation in the Arid Region

Habibah Al-Menaie1,*, Ouhoud Al-Ragam1, Abdullah Al-Shatti1, Mai Ali Al-Hadidi1, Merlene Ann Babu1
1Desert Agriculture and Ecosystem Program, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait.
Cite article:- Al-Menaie Habibah, Al-Ragam Ouhoud, Al-Shatti Abdullah, Al-Hadidi Ali Mai, Babu Ann Merlene (2024). Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilization for Barley Crop at Full and Deficit Irrigation in the Arid Region . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(3): 517-524. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-823.

Background: Nitrogen and water are two major limiting factors that affects the growth and yield of barley. Optimization of nitrogen application is crucial in enhancing barley yield and nitrogen use efficiency while minimizing the negative effects of its intense application on human health and the environment. However, the crop yield response to nitrogen application rates differ under different irrigation conditions owing to the complementary relationship between nitrogen and water. Therefore, it is vital to study the impact of different nitrogen application rates on improving barley growth and yield under full as well as deficit irrigation to select the best field management option, thereby enhancing sustainable agriculture.

Methods: The present study investigated the impact of three nitrogen application rates [0 (control), 50 and 100 kgN/ha)] at two irrigation rates corresponding to 100% and 75% crop evapotranspiration (ETc) on the growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley. Stable isotopic technique was used to determine the nitrogen use efficiency.

Result: The nitrogen application rate enacted a significant impact on plant height, number of plants/m2, number of spikes/m2, biomass yield and nitrogen use efficiency; whereas irrigation rates significantly affected the plant height, number of plants/m2, spike length, number of spikes/m2, biomass yield, grain and straw yield. In addition, a significant interaction between irrigation and nitrogen was observed for all the studied parameters except plant height, spike length, straw yield and total nitrogen uptake. The deficit irrigation 75% ETc with 50 kgN/ha presented the highest nitrogen use efficiency (37.56%), but the total biomass yield was reduced by 37% in comparison to 100% ETc irrigation. Thus irrigation and fertilization combination of 100% ETc with 50 kgN/ha was identified as the best irrigation and fertilization practice producing highest biomass yield, grain yield and straw yield in barley with a nitrogen use efficiency of 20.48%.

Nitrogen fertilization holds paramount importance in agriculture and plays a vital role in crop production and ecosystem management (Rimmi et al., 2023). It is a critical component of amino acids, proteins, chlorophyll and nucleic acids and plays a significant role in supporting the overall growth, development and reproduction of plants (Chen et al., 2022). Maximizing crop yields through nitrogen fertilization can enhance the economic viability of farming operations. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization is a crucial component of sustainable farming, helping to improve food security while safeguarding the environment and natural resources (Abdelaal et al., 2019; Spiertz, 2010). It ensures that crops receive the right amount of nitrogen for their specific needs, leading to higher yields and improved agricultural productivity. The recent research reported the overuse of nitrogen in Kuwait creating around 100 kg excess nitrogen per hectare (Lassaletta et al., 2014). Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), which is mainly used for making bread and as animal feed and forage in Kuwait requires large amounts of nitrogen to achieve a higher yield (Hafez and Abou El Hassan, 2015). Globally, it ranks fourth in cereal production after maize, wheat and rice (FAO, 2013) and is included in the list of the priority crops in the Agriculture Master Plan of the State of Kuwait (KISR, 1996). Mostly nitrogen fertilizers are added in excessive amounts by the farmers to intensify barley production which results in environmental loss via nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emissions (Mahmoud et al., 2021). Previous research reported that around 60% of the fertilizer applied is either lost to the atmosphere, or groundwater or remained in the soil, while only 40% of the fertilizer applied is taken up by the crop (Anas et al., 2020). In addition, it leads to diminishing returns and economical inefficiency that necessitates a significant increase in the efficiency of nutrient use to increase crop productivity at a minimum cost. Thus, it is critical to optimize nitrogen fertilization to produce more crops per unit of nitrogen fertilizer applied and thereby reduce production costs.
Water scarcity is a major limiting factor in enhancing crop production in Kuwait. The unavailability of permanent surface water and underground freshwater resources, in addition to the deterioration of the quantity and quality of groundwater, exacerbates the water crisis in Kuwait. A steady increase was found in the withdrawal of agricultural water of Kuwait from 0.32 billion m3 per year in 1994 to 0.78 billion m3 per year in 2017, growing at an average annual rate of 34.53%. A similar increase was observed in the consumption of fertilizer in Kuwait through 1999-2018 period ending at 1,059.5 kg per hectare in 2018 (World Data Atlas, 2018). Previous reports have shown that improper agricultural management practices could lead to a loss of up to 70 to 80% of the added nitrogen in rain-fed conditions and 60 to 70% in irrigated fields (Ladha et al., 2005; Robertz, 2008). Nitrogen and water are complementary factors controlling crop growth and development (Palmroth et al., 2013). The plant response to increasing doses of one of these factors is best when the other factor is not limited. Therefore, an integrated approach for fertilizer and water management is vital in improving yield as well as nitrogen use efficiency (Kumar et al., 2020).
Kuwait is an arid country with less fertile soil lacking sufficient organic matter content required to support crop growth. Thus application of nitrogen fertilizer is required to promote vigorous plant growth and subsequent yield. Poor farming practices accompanied by improper water and fertilizer management practices drastically affects the plant productivity. It possesses a threat to the environment and sustainability of the agriculture production activity in Kuwait. Several previous studies have been focused on the single effects of nitrogen or irrigation application rates on the growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley (Adebayo et al., 2021; Al-Menaie et al., 2021; El-Nakhlawy et al., 2018). However, scanty information is available on the barley yield, nitrogen use efficiency under different combination of irrigation and nitrogen rates. An elaborate understanding of how different crops respond to nitrogen fertilizer could be crucial for planning, screening and executing of future field trials. Thus the study investigated the effect of three different nitrogen treatments (0, 50, 100 kgN/ha) under two irrigation regimes (100% and 75% ETc) on growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley under Kuwait arid conditions for two growing seasons (2020-2021 and 2021-2022).
Forage crops establishment
The study was conducted at KISR Station for Research and Innovation-KSRI (29.3156° N, 47.8403° E), Kuwait at Kabd. The barley variety Kuwait 3 was selected for the experiment taking into consideration its high growth and yield performance as well as better adaptability to Kuwait’s environmental conditions (Al-Menaie et al., 2019). The selected barley variety was subjected to three different nitrogen rates (i.e.100 kgN/ha, 50 kgN/ha and 0 kgN/ha) under two irrigation rates (100% ETc, 75% ETc). Split plot randomized complete block design was used to conduct the experiment from November 2020-March 2021 and November 2021-March 2022. The long term averages as well as monthly average for precipitation in Kuwait is presented in Fig 1 and 2. Two irrigation rates formed the main plots. The subplots were constituted by three different nitrogen treatments. The selected barley cultivar was planted via strip seeding method within a plot area of 21 m2 for each of the treatments which were triplicated. The results are presented as the average of two seasons.

Fig 1: Long term average precipitation in Kuwait (Source:

Fig 2: Monthly average precipitation in Kuwait (Source: Weather and accessed on 5 November 2023).

A sprinkler irrigation system with an automatic timer was used to irrigate the experimental plots. Irrigations rates were based on reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimated using daily measurements of maximum and minimum air temperature and relative humidity, average wind speed and total solar radiation. The Penman-Monteith method, as described in the commonly used FAO-56 reference (Allen et al., 1998), was used to estimate ET0 and actual evapotranspiration by the crop (ETc) using the crop coefficient (kc) for barley:
ET= kc × ET

Nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilizers were broadcasted in the plots. Phosphorous was applied in the form of triple superphosphate [(Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O)] containing 43-44% P2O5 @ 150 kg P2O5 ha-1 during land preparation stage. Potassium was added at the rate of 120 kg K2O ha-1 in the form of potassium sulfate (K2SO4) fertilizer (50% K2O) as two equal doses at tillering and heading stages. The nitrogen in the form of urea [(CO(NH2)2] containing 46% N was applied @ 0 kgN/ha (control), 50 kgN/ha and 100 kgN/ha in 10 split applications at 10 days interval starting after the emergence of the seedling to just before heading. Split application of nitrogen fertilizer is a common local practice as the soil texture is sandy. One-time application of nitrogen fertilizer might lead to significant loss of fertilizer through leaching during daily irrigation practice.
Determination of nitrogen use efficiency
Plant growth and yield parameters including plant height, number of plants/m2, spike length, number of spikes/m2, grain yield, harvest index, straw yield, biomass yield was determined. Stable nitrogen-15 isotope was used to determine the nitrogen use efficiency using previously established equations (Zapata, 1990). Micro-plots of 0.5 m × 0.5 m were used for nitrogen-15 calculation. At physiological maturity, whole plant samples were collected from each of the nitrogen-15 labeled plot to calculate the total nitrogen-15 uptake. For dry matter production, plant samples were collected from area treated with non-labelled urea. Wet digestion method was used to determine the total nitrogen using Kjeldahl apparatus. Subsamples obtained from the grain and shoot from the labeled microplots at harvest were analyzed for nitrogen-15 analysis calculation of atomic N excess at International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) laboratories, Seibersdorf. The proportion of enriched isotopic N15/N14 was estimated using mass spectrometer and the percentage of nitrogen in the plant tissues, the nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff), nitrogen derived from soil (Ndfs), total nitrogen absorbed N-uptake and the utilization rate of added nitrogen fertilizer N-recovery were determined for all treatments. The data obtained was used to calculate nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) using following equations (Zapata, 1990):

Statistical analysis
Multifactor analysis of variance was performed to determine any significant difference in the mean values of the dependent variable under different irrigation as well as nitrogen treatments using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Treatments displaying significant differences were subjected to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) for mean separation at a 95% confidence level.
Soil analysis
The soil at the experimental site was sandy in texture (98.6% sand, 1% silt and 0.4% clay) at soil depths of 0 to 30 cm. The subsurface (30 to 60 cm) contained 93.6% sand, 6% silt and 0.4% clay, whereas soil samples collected from 60 to 90 cm depth had 91.6% sand, 6% silt and 2.4% clay. The 90 to 120 cm soil depth contained 91.6% sand, 4% silt and 4.4% clay.  All three depths are classified as sandy textures (Soil Science Division Staff, 2017). The results of soil chemical analyses (120 cm depth) are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Soil physical and chemical analysis.

Growth and yield parameters
The yield and growth performance, as well as nitrogen use efficiency of the barley crop variety Kuwait 3 subjected to three different nitrogen applications under two different irrigation rates, are given as the following tables:
Plant height
The data showed that irrigation application rates had a significant effect on the plant height (p£0.001). Average plant height at 75% ETc was 11.80% higher than those plants irrigated at 100% ETc. Plant height also varied significantly between the nitrogen treatments (p£0.01) presenting taller plants with the nitrogen application rate of 50 kgN/ha (Table 2). However, no significant interaction was found between irrigation and nitrogen treatments.

Table 2:Effect of different irrigation levels and nitrogen rates on plant height (cm).

Number of plants/m2
The irrigation (p£0.001) and nitrogen treatments (p£0.01) significantly affected the number of plants/m2. In addition, an interaction was noted between irrigation and nitrogen treatments. Both irrigation treatments recorded the highest values with 50 kgN/ha (Table 3). However, a significant difference was not noted between the nitrogen treatments at 75% ETc.

Table 3:Effect of different irrigation levels and nitrogen treatments on the number of plants/m2.

Number of spikes/m2
The statistical analysis revealed a significant effect of irrigation (p£0.001) and nitrogen (p£0.001) treatments on the number of spikes/m2. The 100% ETc irrigation application rate increased the number of spikes/m2 by 24% when compared to the plants irrigated at 75% ETc (Table 4). Similarly, number of spikes/m2 decreased with the increasing nitrogen application rates. In addition, the significant interaction noted between irrigation and nitrogen (p£0.001) revealed the highest value at 100% ETc for each of the nitrogen treatments.

Table 4:Effect of different irrigation levels and nitrogen treatments on the number of spikes/m2.

Biomass yield
The irrigation (p£0.001) and nitrogen treatments (p£0.05) had a significant effect on the biomass yield (Fig 3). The biomass yield with 100% ETc was 31% higher in comparison to the yield produced at 75% ETc level. In addition, a significant interaction was also found between irrigation and nitrogen (p£0.05). The plants irrigated with 100 % ETc under 50 kgN/ha presented the highest yield.

Fig 3: Effect of different irrigation and nitrogen treatments on the biomass yield (t/ha).

Grain yield
The grain yield varied significantly between irrigation rates (p£0.05), displaying higher values with 100% ETc. In addition, a significant interactive effect was noted between irrigation and nitrogen which revealed the highest value at 100% ETc coupled with 50 kgN/ha (Fig 4). In contrast to 100% ETc, the nitrogen treatment 100 kgN/ha presented the highest grain yield 75% ETc with deficit irrigation.

Fig 4: Effect of different irrigation and nitrogen treatments on grain yield (t/ha).

Straw yield
The dry straw yield varied significantly between the two irrigation application rates (p£0.05) producing the highest yield at 100% ETc. It was increased by 28% in comparison to its value under 75% ETc (Fig 5). However, the nitrogen treatments did not impose any significant effect on straw yield and no significant interaction was noted between these independent factors.

Fig 5: Effect of different irrigation and nitrogen treatments on straw yield (t/ha).


Nitrogen use efficiency
The nitrogen treatments (p£0.05) imposed a significant effect on the nitrogen use efficiency, whereas it did not vary significantly between the irrigation treatments (p³0.05). The nitrogen use efficiency of plants at 50 kgN/ha was 72% higher than those at 100 kgN/ha (Table 5). However, a significant interaction was noted between irrigation and nitrogen (p£0.05) presenting the highest nitrogen use efficiency at 75% ETc level with 50 kgN/ha.

Table 5:Effect of different irrigation and nitrogen treatments on nitrogen use efficiency (%).

Over use of nitrogen fertilizers results in environmental pollution, eutrophication, greenhouse gas emissions, reduced biodiversity, soil biodegradation, increased production costs and also impose cytotoxic effects (Rimmi et al., 2023; Arora and Verma, 2023). The study evaluated the barley yield performance under 100 as well as 50 KgN/ha with full and deficit irrigation. A significant interaction was noted between nitrogen and irrigation application levels which reported the highest biomass and grain yield under reduced nitrogen application of 50 kgN/ha at 100% ETc. The yield response curve for nitrogen application displayed an increase till 50 kgN/ha followed by a decline at 100 kgN/ha. Considering irrigation treatments, significantly higher biomass, grain as well as straw yield was noted with 100% ETc irrigation level. Deficit irrigation reduced the number of plants/m2 as well as number of spikes/m2 as major carbon portion would be dedicated to root growth to access and acquire more water (Meier et al., 2018). Each of the nitrogen treatments recorded lower biomass, yield and straw yield values under deficit irrigation when compared to full irrigation. However, the study was not able to identify the nitrogen rate producing the maximum achievable yield under deficit irrigation as the biomass, grain and straw yield increased with the increasing nitrogen application rates.  As much of the photo assimilates could have been used in enhancing the root biomass rather than grain filling, a higher nitrogen application rate of 100 kgN/ha was required to produce higher biomass, grain and straw yield in crops at deficit irrigation (Boudiar et al., 2020).
Thus the study revealed the potential of reduced nitrogen application rate of 50 kgN/ha under full irrigation (100% ETc) in presenting improved barley yield when compared to 100 kgN/ha under Kuwait’s environmental conditions. This implies that lower nitrogen application rate of 50 kgN/ha, could produce higher yield in barley if water is not limiting. The enhanced cell division, leaf area, transpiration and photosynthesis under full irrigation could enhance crop yield (Zhang et al., 2015; Hafez and Abou El Hassan, 2015; Hoseinlou et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013). However, the farmers need to test the soil fertility status before application of nitrogen fertilizers. Nitrogen use efficiency along with crop yield is an important factor to be considered in Kuwait’s less fertile soil with little organic matter content to increase the economic profitability as well as environmental safety. With full irrigation, 20.48% nitrogen use efficiency was noted under 50 kgN/ha which did not vary significantly from that under 100 kgN/ha (21.54%). The absence of significant difference between the nitrogen use efficiency values under 50 and 100 kgN/ha nitrogen treatments under full irrigation could be due to the leaching of nitrate under increased water availability (Hafez and Kobata, 2012). Although nitrogen use efficiency was higher with 50 kgN/ha at deficit irrigation (75% ETc.) in the study, the total biomass yield was reduced by 37% when compared to its performance at 100% ETc. Deficit irrigation could enhance nitrogen translocation from soil to grain due to enhanced root biomass, which leads to higher sink nitrogen content (Xu et al., 2006; Sinclair et al., 2000). Higher nitrogen application rates decrease nitrogen use efficiency value in crops as the supply of nitrogen exceeds the actual plant requirement (Dhaka et al., 2020; Hafez and Abou El Hassan, 2015). The nitrogen harvest index, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen recovery efficiency and nitrogen utilization efficiency increase under decreasing nitrogen rates (Beatty et al., 2010; Arduini et al., 2006; Rutkowska et al., 2014). In contrast, several other studies have reported increased agronomic nitrogen use efficiency with the increasing supply of nitrogen (Timsina et al., 2001; Pirmoradian et al., 2004). Thus the selection of the best irrigation and fertilization pattern will depend on the water availability, cost of water, irrigation cost, soil fertility and input to yield price ratio in the region. Thus the study demonstrated the potential of reduced nitrogen application rate of 50 kgN/ha under 100% ETc full irrigation condition to improving barley production in arid regions like Kuwait.
Proper nutrient management is crucial for sustainable agriculture, ensuring that crops receive the nutrients they need while minimizing negative environmental and economic impacts. The study recommends selecting fertilization and irrigation combination of 100% ETc with 50 kgN/ha as the best field management option in improving barley yield with a nitrogen use efficiency of 20.48% under Kuwait’s arid conditions. The results thus provide a baseline for studies intended to improving resource use efficient barley production in Kuwait and other regions with similar soil and environments.
We thank the management of the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for their continued interest in the project, encouragement and provision of financial support for the project. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Shabbir A. Shahid for his support in soil physical and chemical analysis.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Abdelaal, H.K., Bugaev, P.D., Fomina, T.N. (2019). Nitrogen fertilization effect on grain yield and quality of spring triticale varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(5): 578-583. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-426.

  2. Adebayo, A.R., Kutu, F.R., Sebetha, E.T. (2021). Effect of different nitrogen fertilizer rates and plant density on growth of water efficient maize variety under different field conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(1): 81-86. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-574.

  3. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. (1998). Irrigation and Drainage Paper Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements - 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

  4. Al-Menaie, H.S., Al-Shatti, A., Al-Ragom, O., McCann, I., El-Hadidi, M.A., Babu, M.A. (2019). A comparative evaluation of growth and yield response of barley under fresh and brackish water irrigation: An inevitable step towards improving food security in arid region. European Journal of Scientific Research. 154: 345-360. 

  5. Al-Menaie, H.S., Al-Ragom, O., Al-Shatti, A., McCann, I., Naseeb, A., El-Hadidi, M.A., Babu, M.A. (2021). Impact of different irrigation and nitrogen treatments on barley yield, yield components and water use efficiency. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research. 15: 7-19. 

  6. Anas, M., Liao, F., Verma, K.K., Sarwar, M.A., Mahmood, A., Chen, Z.K., Li, Q., Zang, X., Liu, Y., Li, Y. (2020). Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: Agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Biological Research. 53(1): 1-20. doi: 10.1186/ s40659-020-00312-4.

  7. Arduini, I., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L., Mariotti, M. (2006). Grain yield and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. European Journal of Agronomy. 25: 309-318. 

  8. Arora, K. and Verma, S. (2023). Temporal monitoring and assessment of inorganic nitrogen content of soil due to nitrogen fertilizers and their related cytotoxic effects. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(4): 490-496. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5301.

  9. Beatty, P.H., Anbessa, Y., Juskiw, P., Carroll, R.T., Wang, J., Good, A.G. (2010). Nitrogen use efficiencies of spring barley grown under varying nitrogen conditions in the field and growth chamber. Annals of Botany. 105: 1171-1182. 

  10. Boudiar, R., Casas, A.M., Gioia, T., Fiorani, F., Nagel, K.A., Igartua, E. (2020). Effects of low water availability on root placement and shoot development in landraces and modern barley cultivars. Agronomy. 10: 134. 

  11. Chen, L.H., Cheng, Z.X., Xu, M., Yang, Z.J., Yang, L.T. (2022). Effects of nitrogen deficiency on the metabolism of organic acids and amino acids in Oryza sativa. Plants. 11: 2576.

  12. Dhaka, A.K., Satish, K., Bhagat, S., Karmal, S., Amit, K., Navish, K. (2020). Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels. Legume Research. 43(1): 105-110. doi:10.18805/LR-4062.

  13. El-Nakhlawy S.F., Ismail S.M., Basahi, J.M. (2018). Optimizing mungbean productivity and irrigation water use efficiency through the use of low water- consumption during plant growth stages. Legume Research. 41(1): 108-113. doi: 10.18805/lr.v40i04.9014.

  14. FAO, (2013). Statistical Yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations online database. Available at http:// Accessed on June 2013. 

  15. Hafez, E.M., Abou El Hassan, W.H. (2015). Nitrogen and water utilization efficiency of barley subjected to desiccated conditions in moderately salt-affected soil. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy. 37: 231-249. 

  16. Hafez, E.M., Kobata, T. (2012). The effect of different nitrogen sources from urea and ammonium sulfate on the spikelet number in Egyptian spring wheat cultivars on well-watered pot soils. Plant Production Science. 15: 332-338. 

  17. Hoseinlou, S.H., Ali, E., Mehdi, G., Elham, M. (2013). Nitrogen use efficiency under water deficit condition in spring barley. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4: 3681-3687.

  18. Kumar, R., Pareek, N.K., Rathore, V.S., Nangiya Vinay, Yadava, N.D., Yadav, R.S. (2020). Effect of water and nitrogen levels on yield attributes, water productivity and economics of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in hot arid region. Legume Research. 43(5): 702-705. doi: 10.18805/LR-4076.

  19. KISR, (Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research) (1996). Agricultural Master Plan of the State of Kuwait (1995-2015): Plan Overview. Kuwait, 1996.

  20. Ladha, J.K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, T.J., Six, J., van Kessel, C. (2005). Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: Retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy. 87: 85-156.

  21. Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J., Garnier, J. (2014). 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: The relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environment Research Letters. 9: 105011. 

  22. Liu, X., Fan, Y., Long, J., Wei, R., Kjelgren, R., Gong, C., Zhao, J. (2013). Effects of soil water and nitrogen availability on photosynthesis and water use efficiency of Robinia pseudo acacia seedlings. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 25: 585-595. 

  23. Mahmoud, K., Panday, D., Mergoum, A., Missaoui, A. (2021). Nitrogen losses and potential mitigation strategies for a sustainable agroecosystem. Sustainability. 13: 2400.

  24. Meier, I.C., Knutzen, F., Eder, L.M., Müller-Haubold, H., Goebel, M.O., Bachmann, J., Dietrich, H., Leuschner, C. (2018). The deep root system of Fagus sylvatica on sandy soil: Structure and variation across a precipitation gradient. Ecosystem. 21: 280-296.

  25. Palmroth, S., Katul, G.G., Maier, C.A., Ward, E., Manzoni, S., Vico, G. (2013). On the complementary relationship between marginal nitrogen and water-use efficiencies among Pinustaeda leaves grown under ambient and CO2-enriched environments. Annals of Botany. 111(3): 467-477. 

  26. Pirmoradian, N., Sepaskhah, A., Maftoun, M. (2004). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on nitrogen use efficiency and grain protein of rice. Agronomie. 24: 143-153. 

  27. Rimmi, S.N., Islam, M.S., Alam, M.S., Khan, M.A.R., Binte, B.I. (2023). Yield response of maize to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(5): 649-654. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-493.

  28. Roberts, T.L. (2008). Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture. 32: 177-182. 

  29. Rutkowska, A., Piku³a, D., Stêpieñ, W. (2014). Nitrogen use efficiency of maize and spring barley under potassium fertilization in long-term field experiment. Plant Soil Environment. 60: 550-554. 

  30. Sinclair, T.R., Pinter, P.J., Kimball, B.A., Adamsen, F.J., LaMorte, R.L., Wall, G.W., Hunsaker, J., Adam, N., Brook, T.J., Garcia, R.L., Thompson, T., Leavitt, S., Mattias, A. (2000). Leaf nitrogen concentration of wheat subjected to elevated [CO2] and either water or N deficits. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 79: 53-60. 

  31. Soil Survey Division Staff, (2017). Soil Survey Manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 

  32. Spiertz, J.H.J. (2010). Nitrogen, sustainable agriculture and food security: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 30: 43-55. 

  33. Timsina, J., Singh, U., Badaruddin, M., Meisner, C., Amin (2001). Cultivar, nitrogen and water effects on productivity and nitrogen-use efficiency and balance for rice-wheat sequences of Bangladesh. Field Crops Research. 72: 143-161. 

  34. World Data Atlas, (2018). Kuwait - Agriculture. atlas/Kuwait/Fertilizer Consumption (accessed on September 09, 2018).

  35. Xu, Z.Z., Zhen, W.Y., Dong, W. (2006). Nitrogen translocation in wheat plants under soil water deficit. Plant and Soil. 280: 291-303.

  36. Zapata, F. (1990). Isotopic Techniques in Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Studies. In: Use of Nuclear Techniques in Studies of Soil Plant Relationships. [G. Hardarson (Ed.)], Soil Science Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. (pp 61-129).

  37. Zhang, S., Gao, P., Tong, Y., Norse, D., Lu, Y., Powlson, D. (2015). Overcoming nitrogen fertilizer over-use through technical and advisory approaches: A case study from Shaanxi Province, Northwest China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 209: 89-99.

Editorial Board

View all (0)