Chief EditorT. Mohapatra
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.20
Full Research Article
Identification of Insect Pests of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Girar Jarso and Hidebu Abote Districts, North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Central Ethiopia
- Email email@example.com
First Online 30-04-2022|
Methods: The field survey was carried out during 2019-2020 crop growing season. Purposive sampling technique was used for selecting the districts based on the potential producers of maize and a random sampling technique was used to select the kebeles and the stakeholders.
Result: The major identified insect pests of maize in the two districts were grass hopper (Hieroglyphus nigrorepletus), maize leaf hopper (Cicadulin ambila), maize pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera, Etiella), maize stem borers (Chilopartellus Swinhoe), Hairy caterpillar (Amsacta albistriga Walker), Black cut worm (Agrotis ipsilon Hufnagal), Maize leaf Aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), Army worm (Mythimna separata Walker), Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), Pink stem borer (Sesamiain ferens Walker), Corn Earworm (Helicoverpa zea Boddias), Chafer beetle (Chiloloba acuta Wiedmann), Shoot bug (Peregrinus maidis Ashamed), White grub (Holotrichia consanguinea) and shoot fly (Atherigona soccata).
Due to changing global climatic patterns and due to change in host range of pests, many new pests previously not known on maize has been reported to feed on maize and a latitudinal shift in the distribution of insect pests has been observed (David and Ramamurthy, 2017). Stem borers belong to a group of moths whose larval stages are the most destructive, as they initiate their feeding on the plant, thereby inflicting physically and economically important damage on crops. Stem borers caused important lossesof maize ranging from 11% in the highlands to 21% was lost in the dry areas in Ethiopia (Odendo et al., 2003).
In the study area, the socio-economic conditions are very poor and maize production is highly limited due to lack of insect pests’ awareness, identification and prevalence of pestsand insufficient of agricultural extension expert in the characteristics and identification of insect pests. Thus, the current investigation was aimed to identify theinsect pests’ infestation level of maize, the types of species/orders and infestation status at different maize growth stages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The sample size was determined according to the formula:
n= Sample size; N= Number population; e is confidence level (95%) (Yemane, 1967). The survey was purposively selected to get ease access of resources to elicit the views of persons who have expertise and knowledge about specific domain (Tongco, 2007). The pest assessment was carried out at all crops growth stages. Ten crops were taken from each diagonalfrom 10 m2 area and assessed. Pest assessment was done along the two diagonals (in an “X” pattern) of the field from three points quadrants. The major data collected were the species/orders of insect pests and nature of pests’ damage to maize at different growth stages. Morphological identification of pest was done using hand lens and utilizing identification keys (Zim and Cottam, 2000). The pests status were determined based on the degree of damage caused to plant and were named in a scale of 1-3, where 1 = little or not important; 2 = cause little and occasional damage and 3 = common and causes serious damage (Adamu et al., 2000). The data were analyzed using SPSS (Version 20.00) and descriptive statistics was used to get the variation of the surveyed insect pests in percentage.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The survey indicated that the majority of respondents ranked (50.00%) as yield loss by insect pests, (37.00%) yield loss by lack of improved maize varieties, (33.00%) yield loss by diseases, (18.12%) yield loss by lack of inorganic fertilizer and (11.10%) yield losses by weed infestation in Girar Jarso District (Table 1). Likewise, maize production was affected as the respondents mentioned (48.00%) due to lack of improved maize seed variety, (47.00%) due to attacked by insects, (29.00%) loses due to diseases infestation, (28.20%) due to lack of inorganic fertilizer and (8.88%) by weeds in the surveyed kebeles of Hidebu Abote District (Fig 2). Early et al. (2016) reported that the spread of insect pests, plant diseases and invasive alien plant species to new regions, as the world’s climate changes, is a threat to farmers globally, especially in Africa where climate change effects are projected to be the most severe in the world and anticipated that the spread of diseases, insect pests and weeds were potentially cause the loss of more than 40% of the world’s food supply. As reported by (Bhandari et al., 2015), Survey report revealed that 42% respondents ranked for insects as a main problem followed by 32% for weed and 17% for disease.
Insect pest Infestation at different growth stages
The highest and lowest Average yield loss of maize due to insects stated by respondents (46.68%) and (30.95%) were infested at Shebele Fati and Sherer Genet kebele of GirarJarso Districts whereas the highest and the lowest average that respondents ranked (52.93%) and (20.50%) yield loss of maize were reduced by insect at Gidabo Jama and Dabala Bokolo kebeles of Hidebu Abote district at different growth stages.At district level, the total average yield loss of maize emphasized by respondents were (48.00%) by lack of improved variety and (8.88%) by weed infestation in Hidebu Abote District (Table 2) . The maximum and minimum infested maize by insects were (64.38%) and (63.34%) and 9.20% to 13.00% in Girar Jarso and Hidebu Abote Districts at late seedling and seedling growth stage (Fig 3). The samples of photos of infested maize and sorghum by insects at different crops growth stages at the two districts were taken during field observation (Fig 4).
Major identified insect pests of maize at Hidebu Abote district
The survey result indicated that lepidopterans, orthopterans, coleopterans, hemipterans and thysonepterans were identified in the district. From the fifteen identified insects, grass hopper (Hieroglyphus nigrorepletus), maize leaf hopper (Cicadulinambila), maize pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera, Etiella), maize stem borers (Chilopartellus Swinhoe), Hairy caterpillar (Amsacta albistriga Walker), black cut worm (Agrotisipsilon Hufnagal), Maize leaf Aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch), army worm (Mythimna separata Walker), fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), pink stem borer (Sesamia inferens Walker), Thrips (Megaluro thripsusitatus) and corn ear worm (Helicoverpa zea Boddias) were identified as a major pests causing serious losses of maize (Table 3).The research reported by (Fenta et al., 2019), More than 40 species of insects has been recorded on maize in the field.
Major identified insects at Girar Jarso district
Grass hopper (Hieroglyphus nigrorepletus), thrips (Megaluro thripsusitatus), maize stem borer (Chilopartellus Swinhoe), corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch) and pink stem borer (Sesamia inferens Walker) were the major insect pests infested maize at different growth stages. Whereas, maize leaf hoppers (Empoasca kraemeri), hairy caterpillar (Amsacta albistriga Walker), army worm (Mythimna separata Walker), chafer beetle (Chiloloba acuta Wiedmann) and corn ear worm (Helicoverpa zea Boddi) were the minor insectsinfested maize medium to lower at different growth stages. In other ways, pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera Etiella), black cut worm (Agrotis ipsilon Hufnagal), fall army worm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and shoot bug (Peregrinus maidis Ashamed) were the lowest available insects cause little or not important to loss of maize at kebeles of Girar Jarso district (Table 4). The total average number of insect pests emerged were (124) at late seedling stage, (94) at seedling stage and (78) at maturity stage. Homoptera, Lepidoptera, Thysnoptera, dipthera and Orthoptera were the major insect orders infested maize at seedling, late seedling and maturity stages.
Conflict of interest
- Adamu, R.A., Dike, M.C., Akpa, A.D. (2000). Preliminary Studies on Insect Pests of Green Gran [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilezek] in Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. In: Entomology in Nation Building: The Nigerian Experience, [Dike M.C., Okunade S.O., Okonkwo N.O., Abba A.A. (eds)]. ESN Occational Pub. 32: 135-147.
- Bhandari, G., Achhami, B.B., Karki, T.B., Bhandari, B. and Bhandari, G. (2015). Survey on maize post-harvest losses and its management practices in the western hills of Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development. 1(1): 98- 105. ISSN: 2467-9305 (Online)/2467-9291 (Print) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.34288.
- Central Statistical Agency (CSA, 2020). Agricultural Sample Survey of 2019/2020 (2012E.C). Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Statistical Bulletin 587; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Volume I pp: 9-11.
- David B.V, Ramamurthy V.V. (2017). Frontier Areas in Pest Management. Elements of Economic Entomology. Brillion Publishing, New Delhi, 288-298.
- Early, R., Bradley, B.A., Dukes, J.S., Lawler, J.J., Olden, J.D., Blumenthal, D.M., Gonzalez, P., Grosholz, E.D., Ibañez, I., Miller, L.P. (2016). Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nature Communications P. 7.
- Fenta, A. and Dereje, A. (2019). Status and control measures of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) infestations in maize fields in Ethiopia: A review paper (2019). Cogent Food and Agriculture. 5: 1641902.
- Inuwa, M.M. (2018). Economic Analysis and Resource Use Efficiency on Maize Production under Sasakawa Technologies in Bauchi, Nigeria.
- Midingoyi, S.G., Affognon, H.D., Macharia, I., Ong’amo, G., Abonyo, E., Ogola, G., De Groote, H. and LeRu, B. (2016). Assessing the long-term welfare effects of the biological control of cereal stem borer pests in East and Southern Africa: Evidence from Kenya, Mozambique and Zambia’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 230: 10-23.
- Odendo, M., Ouma, J., Wachira, S. and Wanyama, J. (2003). Economic Assessment of Maize Yield Loss Due to Stem Borer in Major Maize Agro-Ecological Zones of Kenya. In: African Crop Science Conference Proceedings. 6: 683-687.
- Tongco, M.D.C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 5: 147-158.
- Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd edition, Harper and Row, New York, USA.
- Zim, H.S, Cottam, C. (2000). A Golden Guide: Insect (3rd ed.). Golden Press: New York, USA; 4-142.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.