Banner

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Elucidating the Genetic Variability in M2 Generation of Foxtail Millet [Setaria italica (L.)] Genotype for Growth and Yield-related Traits Through Chemical Mutation

P. Rithika Jayaveer1, R. Sathya1,*
  • 0009-0003-7471-3513, 0000-0002-4691-7872
1Department of Crop Improvement, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) is a valuable cereal crop with potential for yield enhancement through induced mutagenesis. Creating genetic variability is a crucial step in crop improvement and chemical mutagens like ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) have proven effective in generating useful mutations. This study was designed to explore the extent of genetic variability induced in the M2 generation of foxtail millet using EMS, with a particular focus on key agronomic traits that influence yield and adaptability.

Methods: The experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with EMS treatments at concentrations ranging from 0.2% to 0.9%. The M‚  population was evaluated for agronomic traits including days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, number of productive tillers, flag leaf length and breadth, panicle length and 1000-grain weight. Data collected were analyzed for heritability and genetic advance to assess the effectiveness of each EMS treatment in inducing useful variability.

Results: Among the EMS treatments, T5 exhibited the most promising results, showing superior performance in plant height, number of tillers, flag leaf length, panicle length and 1000-grain weight. This treatment also demonstrated the highest heritability and genetic advance, indicating strong genetic control over these traits and the potential for effective selection. T6 was more influential in altering flowering traits. The results confirm that EMS is an effective mutagen for creating desirable variability, providing a valuable genetic base for breeding programs aimed at improving the yield and adaptability of foxtail millet.

Among the treatments, T5 consistently exhibited superior performance, showing the highest heritability and genetic gain for traits like plant height, tiller number, flag leaf length, panicle length and 1000-grain weight. This suggests that T5 is the most promising treatment for selection in mutation breeding, particularly for improving yield-related traits. On the other hand, T6 showed better results in modifying flowering traits, making it a suitable option for breeders focusing on early or late flowering varieties.
       
Setaria italica
, belonging to the subfamily Panicoideaceae, is an essential food crop recognized for its high nutritional value, being rich in protein, fiber, minerals and vitamins (Diao et al., 2014). This nutrient-dense cereal is often referred to as the “crop of the poor” due to its affordability and adaptability. With a short life cycle, it serves as a secondary food and fodder crop after wheat and barley, making it agronomically significant (Brink, 2006). Additionally, its health benefits contribute to its role as an energy-rich dietary component. Setaria italica, also known as foxtail millet, is widely regarded as a therapeutic food.
Given its valuable properties, large-scale cultivation using advanced methods such as mutation breeding is recommended to enhance its characteristics. This eco-friendly crop thrives in vulnerable ecosystems and serves multiple purposes, including being a high-energy feed for lovebirds, a quick-cooking cereal, a base for malt-based products and a key ingredient in dishes like puttu. It also holds therapeutic potential, featuring a low glycemic index (Jali et al., 2012) and aiding in the reduction of colon cancer risk (Shan et al., 2015).
       
Due to its short growth cycle (Doust et al., 2009) Setaria italica can achieve high productivity within a limited time frame. Research on its application as a bioenergy crop has highlighted the role of mutation breeding and genetic manipulation in its commercialization (Christopher et al., 2017). Furthermore, novel proteins linked to stress tolerance have been identified (Mistra et al., 2012). Mutations act as a source of genetic variability and mutation breeding is used to enhance the crop’s economic value, making it a valuable genetic marker in modern plant breeding techniques (Singh and Yadav, 1991).
       
Among various breeding approaches, induced mutation through chemical mutagens has been particularly effective in improving the crop’s economic traits. Chlorophyll and morphological mutations in the M2 generation have been utilized as efficient tools to analyze morphological variations, micro and macro mutants, with macro mutations observed in grain density and yield per unit area in finger millet (Ambavane et al., 2015). These findings contribute to the overall improvement of Setaria italica.
       
Different chlorophyll and morphological mutations have been recorded at EMS concentrations of 30 mM. Even minor phenotypic variations can lead to significant modifications in the plant. The viable and desirable macro mutations serve as genetic raw material for further breeding advancements (Sharma and Sharma, 1981). The present study has identified a broad spectrum of mutants in the M‚  generation of Setaria italica local cultivated variety (Gustafsson, 1940). Initial research in the M1 generation faced challenges due to chemical mutagen-induced stress, but the M2 generation exhibited recurrent mutant occurrences, demonstrating its potential for crop improvement (Anittha and Mullainathan, 2018).
       
Mutation breeding plays a vital role in enhancing genetic variability, particularly in self-pollinated crops like foxtail millet, where natural variation is limited. In order to improve crops, genetic variety is essential. According to Sebastian et al., (2025), hybridization is usually used in traditional plant breeding programs to develop this kind of diversity, which is then selected from the segregating generations. In these situations, mutation breeding is a useful substitute. It has been demonstrated that both chemical and radiation mutagens are effective in producing mutations and encouraging genetic recombination, which eventually leads to increased variability in features controlled by quantitative inheritance (Saikia et al., 2025).
       
Induced mutations through chemical mutagens such as EMS offer a rapid and targeted approach for generating novel phenotypes with improved agronomic traits. This strategy has been widely employed in cereals and small millets to create early-maturing, high-yielding, or stress-resilient varieties (Talebi and Talebi, 2012; Francis et al., 2022). Therefore, incorporating mutation breeding into crop improvement programs provides a promising avenue for addressing food and nutritional security under changing climatic conditions.
The field experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Department of Agronomy, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu district, Tamil Nadu, India during 2023-2024. Seeds of the local foxtail millet variety were procured from local farmers in and around Chengalpattu region to ensure representation of region-specific genotype.
 
Chemical mutagen treatment
 
The seeds were subjected to chemical mutagens, including Ethyl Methane Sulphonate (EMS) at concentrations of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9% for six hours.
 
Experimental design
 
Seeds harvested from the M1 generation were advanced to the M2  generation using a randomized block design (RBD). The field was enriched with organic manure and optimal agricultural practices were followed to ensure proper growth.
 
Growth strategies
 
M2 generation seeds, treated with varying concentrations of EMS, were germinated. By the 15th day, the morphological mutants were identified and isolated.
 
Observations recorded in M2 generation
 
The agronomic traits of Setaria italica (foxtail millet) were recorded at specific growth stages to evaluate the effects of mutagenic treatments. Observations were taken from five randomly selected plants per treatment to ensure accuracy and representativeness. The first parameter, 50% flowering, was recorded when half of the plants in each treatment showed visible panicle emergence and floral initiation. This stage is crucial for assessing the impact of mutations on reproductive timing and crop development.
       
Days to maturity was noted when approximately 80-90% of the panicles reached physiological maturity, indicated by grain hardening and drying of plant tissues. This trait helps determine the effect of mutations on the crop’s lifecycle duration. Plant height was measured from the base to the tip of the tallest panicle at full maturity, providing insights into how mutagenic treatments influenced vegetative growth.
       
The number of productive tillers was counted at the grain-filling stage, considering only the tillers that successfully produced panicles with grains. This parameter directly contributes to yield potential. The flag leaf length and width were measured at the booting stage before panicle emergence, as these traits play a significant role in photosynthetic efficiency and biomass accumulation.
       
Panicle length was measured at full maturity from the base to the tip, as longer panicles generally indicate a higher grain-bearing capacity. Lastly, 1000-grain weight was recorded after complete grain maturity and drying, serving as a key indicator of seed size, density and overall yield quality. All these observations were carefully documented to analyze the effects of induced mutations on growth and productivity.
 
Statistical analysis
 
To determine significant differences among treatments, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was used as a post hoc analysis at a significance level of p = 0.05. The data were presented as mean values from three replicates, with standard deviation serving as a measure of variability. A one-way ANOVA was performed to assess the impact of different treatments. Statistical analysis and graphical data representations were conducted using the R Studio 4.4.1 software.
50% flowering
 
The time taken for 50% of the plants to reach the flowering stage is a crucial trait in crop improvement. Among the treatments, T6 exhibited the highest heritability (88.10%) and genetic advance (0.52%), (Table 1) indicating that flowering time is largely governed by genetic factors rather than environmental influence. This suggests that mutation breeding with T6 can be effectively used to modify flowering time for early or late-flowering varieties.

Table 1: Effect of mutagens on 50% flowering in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


       
Similar delays in flowering due to EMS-induced mutagenesis were observed by Francis et al., (2022) in proso millet, who reported extended vegetative phases at higher EMS doses. Ghimire et al., (2018) also observed wide genotypic variation for flowering time in Setaria italica accessions, supporting the effectiveness of mutagenic treatments in altering reproductive phenology.
 
Days to maturity
 
Days to maturity is a key determinant of crop duration and adaptability. T5 exhibited the highest heritability (92.30%) and genetic advance (1.42%), signifying strong genetic control and selection potential (Table 2). This makes T5 a promising treatment for modifying the maturity period to suit diverse agro-climatic conditions. Similar maturity shifts were noted by Anittha and Mullainathan (2018) in EMS-treated foxtail millet, highlighting how chemical mutagens can extend or shorten the growth cycle depending on concentration and genotype interaction.

Table 2: Effect of mutagens on days to maturity in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


 
Plant height
 
Plant height influences lodging resistance and biomass accumulation. In this study, T5 recorded the maximum heritability (94.20%) and genetic advance (4.90%), indicating strong additive genetic effect (Table 3). These findings suggest that selection for height variability under mutagenic stress is effective. Ambavane et al., (2015) reported comparable increases in plant height in finger millet following gamma irradiation, while Bolbhat and Thikekar, (2020) noted similar morphological elongation due to EMS in barnyard millet.

Table 3: Effect of mutagens on plant height in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


 
Number of productive tillers
 
The number of productive tillers is directly associated with yield potential. T5 registered the highest heritability (96.30%) and genetic advance (14.60%), (Table 4) reflecting strong genetic influence and favourable selection response. Comparable increases in tillering ability were noted by Awte and Bolbhat, (2014) in EMS-treated horsegram and by Gupta and Yashvir, (1976) in foxtail millet, where mutagenesis induced viable tillering-related mutations.

Flag leaf length and width
 
Flag leaf traits influence photosynthetic efficiency and assimilate partitioning. T5 treated plants showed superior flag leaf length and width, with heritability values of 93.80% and 91.50%, respectively (Table 5 and Table 6). Genetic advances were also high, supporting their selection. These results align with findings by Anittha and Mullainathan, (2018) who reported expanded leaf morphology in EMS-induced M2 mutants of Setaria italica. Enhanced leaf area improves light interception and photosynthetic rate, which contributes to yield improvement.

Table 5: Effect of mutagens on flag leaf length in M2 generation of foxtail millet.



Table 6: Effect of mutagens on flag leaf width in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


 
Panicle length
 
Panicle length determines the grain-bearing capacity of the plant. T5 demonstrated the highest heritability (94.60%) and genetic advance (11.70%), indicating significant variability induced by EMS (Table 7). This matches results from Sellapillai et al., (2022) in finger millet, where EMS and gamma rays increased panicle size and grain number, showing the effectiveness of mutagenic treatments in panicle trait enhancement.

Table 7: Effect of mutagens on panicle length in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


 
1000-grain weight
 
Grain weight is a key component of yield. T5 recorded the highest 1000-grain weight, with a heritability of 95.30% and genetic advance of 3.65% (Table 8). The strong genetic control over this trait indicates its reliability in selection. Sun et al., (2019) observed similar improvements in seed weight in Setaria italica mutant libraries and Vaithiyalingan et al., (2024) reported enhanced seed weight in kodo millet mutants, underscoring the usefulness of EMS in enhancing seed attributes.

Table 8: Effect of mutagens on 1000 grain weight in M2 generation of foxtail millet.


               
The results of this study demonstrate that EMS-induced mutagenesis is an efficient approach for generating genetic diversity in foxtail millet. The observed high heritability and genetic advance in several key traits confirm the effectiveness of chemical mutagens in inducing stable and heritable changes. This supports the broader significance of mutation breeding as a strategic tool for improving underutilized crops like foxtail millet, particularly in marginal environments where resilience and yield stability are critical. By identifying superior mutants in the M‚  generation, this research lays the foundation for developing improved varieties suited for future breeding programs.
The present study highlights the significant impact of induced mutations on various agronomic traits in Setaria italica in M‚  generation. The results demonstrated notable variability in key characteristics such as flowering time, plant height, productive tillers, panicle length, flag leaf dimensions and grain weight, with different treatments influencing these traits to varying degrees. High heritability and genetic advance observed in several parameters indicate strong genetic control, making selection more effective for breeding programs.
       
Moving forward, the selection of promising mutants from the M‚  generation can lead to the development of superior Setaria italica varieties with enhanced yield potential, adaptability and nutritional value.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal care and handling techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ambavane, A.R., Sawardekar, S.V., Sawantdesai, S.A. and Gokhale, N.B. (2015). Studies on mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and its effect on quantitative traits in finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn]. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 8: 120-125.

  2. Anittha, I. and Mullainathan, L. (2018). Chlorophyll and morphological mutations induced by chemical mutagens EMS, DES in [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.] var. CO(Te)7 in M2 generation. International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences. 5(6): 61-65.

  3. Anittha, I. and Mullainathan, L. (2018). Mutagenic effect of EMS and DES on tenai (Setaria italica) in M1 generation. Journal of Phytology. 10: 6-8.

  4. Awte, P.A. and Bolbhat, S.N. (2014). Effect of EMS on seed germination, seedling height and plant survival of horsegram cv. Rayat-1. Journal of Environmental Science, Computer Science and Engineering and Technology. 1: 272-276.

  5. Bolbhat, S.N. and Thikekar, C.S. (2020). Studies on Effect of Induced Mutagenesis on Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] in M1 Generation.

  6. Brink, M. (2006). Plant Resources of Tropical Africa / Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale. PROTA.

  7. Christopher, B., Antony, P. and Christopher, M.L. (2017). The application of Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT IR) spectroscopy to identify variation in cell wall composition of Setaria italica ecotypes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 16(6): 1256-1267.

  8. Diao, X., Schnable, J., Bennetzen, J. and Li, J. (2014). Initiation of Setaria as a model plant. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering. 1(1): 16-20.

  9. Doust, A.N., Kellogg, E. A., Devos, K. M. and Bennetzen, J.L. (2009). Foxtail millet: A sequence-driven grass model system. Plant Physiology. 149(1): 137-141.

  10. Francis, N., Joseph, A., Raja, A. and Doss, A. (2022). Gamma irradiation to induce beneficial mutants in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.): An underutilized food crop. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 98(7): 1277-1288.

  11. Francis, N., Ravikesavan, R., Iyanar, K., Muthurajan, R., Thiyagarajan, C. and Alagarswamy, S. (2022). Dose optimization, mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of EMS in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Madras Agricultural Journal. 107: 47.

  12. Ghimire, K.H., Yadav, R.K., Gautam, R. and Paudel, A. (2018). Nepalese foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] genetic diversity revealed by morphological markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 65: 1147-1157.

  13. Gupta, P.K. and Yashvir. (1976). Induced mutations in foxtail millet (Setaria italica Beauv.) II. Viable mutations in ear characters induced by gamma rays, EMS and DES. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 48(3): 131-136.

  14. Gustafsson, A. (1940). The mutation system of the chlorophyll apparatus. Advances in Genetics. 36: 1-40.

  15. Jali, M.V., Kamatar, M.Y., Jali, S.M., Hiremath, M.B. and Naik, M.B. (2012). Efficacy of value added foxtail millet therapeutic food in the management of diabetes and dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. Recent Research in Science and Technology. 4: 3-4.

  16. Mistra, A.K., Puranik, S., Bahadur, R.P. and Prasad, M. (2012). The DNA binding activity of an AP2 protein is involved in transcriptional regulation of a stress-responsive gene, SiWD40, in foxtail millet. Genomics. 100: 252-263.

  17. Saikia, D., Sarma, A. and Bordoloi, D. (2025). Characterization of Mungbean Mutants [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in M4 and M5 Generations. Legume Research. 48(5): 756-761. doi: 10.18805/LR-4992.

  18. Sebastian, K., Bindu, B. and Arya, M.S. (2025). Recent advances and achievements in mutation breeding of fruit crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 46(2): 220-228. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2616.

  19. Sellapillai, L., Sugumar, S., Rajendran, L. and Ramesh, T. (2022). Gamma ray induced positive alterations in morphogenetic and yield attributing traits of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] in M2 generation. Plant Science Today. 9(4): 939-949.

  20. Shan, S., Shi, J., Li, Z., Gao, H., Shi, T. and Li, Z. (2015). Targeted anti-colon cancer activities of a millet bran-derived peroxidase were mediated by elevated ROS generation. Food and Function. 6: 2331-2338.

  21. Sharma, S.K. and Sharma, B. (1981). Induced chlorophyll mutation in Lentil. Indian Journal of Genetics. 41: 328-333.

  22. Singh, V.P. and Yadav, R.D.S. (1991). Induced mutations for quantitative and qualitative traits in green gram [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek] cv. T44. Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 45: 1-6.

  23. Sun, J., Chen, J., Pan, Y., Li, C., Xu, C. and Wang, X. (2019). Generation and characterization of a foxtail millet (Setaria italica) mutant library. Frontiers in Plant Science.

  24. Talebi, A.B., Talebi, A.M. and Shahrokhifar, B. (2012). Ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) induced mutagenesis in Malaysian rice (cv. MR219) for lethal dose determination. American Journal of Plant Science. 3(12). doi: 10.4236/ajps.2012. 312202.

  25. Vaithiyalingan, M., Nirmalakumari, A. and Manimozhi Selvi, V. (2024). Mutation effectiveness and efficiency in kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 15(2): 454-458.

Editorial Board

View all (0)