Banner

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Effect of Varying Lopping Schedules and Stump Heights on Growth, Fodder Yield and Quality of Dual-purpose Barley (Hordeum distichon L.) 

Sonia1, Barkha1,*, Kangujam Bokado1, Heisnam Sobhana Devi1
  • https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0715-0285
1Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 411, Punjab, India.

Background: The present study investigated the effect of lopping schedules and stump heights on the growth, fodder yield and quality of dual-purpose barley to optimise fodder production from existing cropping patterns in Punjab during winters.

Methods: An experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24 at the agriculture farm of Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab with 10 treatments viz., T1: No lopping, T2: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 1-inch stump height, T3: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T4: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 3 inches stump height, T5: Lopping @ 45 DAS + 1 inch stump height, T6: Lopping @ 45 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T7: Lopping @ 45 DAS + 3 inches stump height, T8: Lopping @6 0 DAS + 1-inch stump height, T9: Lopping @ 60 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T10: Lopping @ 60 DAS + 3 inches stump height, replicated four times in randomized block design. Growth parameters, fodder yield and quality parameters were recorded.

Result: Though, the higher green fodder yield (10.9 t/ha) was obtained under lopping at 60 DAS with a 1inch stump height, to maintain quality and further regeneration of crop, lopping done at 30 DAS with 3 inches stump height was found to be better with considerable green fodder yield (2.5 t/ha). Lopping in dual-purpose barley should be done at early vegetative stages to obtain a considerable amount of quality green fodder, as it provides sufficient time for the crop to regenerate further.

Barley, the fourth most important cereal crop globally, is cultivated for its grains and green fodder. It’s grown on over 50 million hectares of land globally, producing 150.9 million metric tonnes per hectare. India produced about 1.91 million metric tonnes of barley on an average of 27.3 quintals per hectare in 2023, over 617.5 thousand hectares, while Punjab produced around 21,100 tonnes over 5,500 hectares, resulting in a yield of 3.84 tonnes per hectare (DES, 2023; USDA, 2023).
       
In modern agriculture, dual-purpose barley has become popular as a versatile crop that offers both fodder and grains in adverse climatic conditions and possesses a good regeneration capacity. In the arid and semi-arid areas of India, small and marginal farmers use barley to address the scarcity of green fodder during the lean winter period without compromising grain production (Manju et al., 2019). Lopping before the jointing stage for fodder production and optimal stump height influences regeneration, root systems, nutrient allocation and photosynthesis, all of which affect the plant’s regeneration. Early lopping of barley resulted in higher-quality fodder than later lopping (Prasanna et al., 2024). Additionally, delaying sowing negatively affected both fodder quality and grain production (Singh et al., 2017).
       
Fodder quality is mainly assessed by its digestibility, with major quality parameters being crude protein (protein), which is generally required for tissue growth and milk production and crude fibre (fibre), which supports the effective digestion system and nutrient absorption. An adequate amount of ash content in fodder results in better bone health and metabolic processes. Lower amounts of ADF (indigestible fibre) in fodder allow the animals to extract more nutrients and energy, which results in boosting their productivity. Moderate levels of NDF (total fibre) maintain proper rumen function and prevent digestive disorders in animals (Van Soest et al., 1991). 
       
In most parts of Punjab, the dairy sector holds equal significance as crop production, but due to a significant imbalance between the availability and demand of feed, especially during winters, it is adversely affected (Dhillon and Ram, 2021). The availability of green fodder in the Punjab region is only 28.4kg/animal, falling short of the required 40.0 kg /animal (Dhillon et al., 2018).
       
As many farmers in Punjab already grow barley for their grain, quality green fodder supply for their livestock can also be managed from the same without any need to grow a separate fodder crop. Thus, to mitigate the fodder shortage during the lean period in winter from the existing cropping pattern, this investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of various lopping schedules and stump height on dual-purpose barley.
A field experiment was carried out at Lovely Professional University in Phagwara, Punjab, during the rabi seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24. The site is at an elevation of 254 m. The temperature ranged from 33.1°C to 7.1°C in 2022-23 and 33.8°C to 6.2°C in 2023-24, with rainfall totals of 116.6 mm and 142.2 mm. The soil was sandy loam and its chemical properties were assessed before the experiment shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Chemical properties of the soil (2022-23 and 2023-24).


 
Preliminary information
 
The experiment was organised in a randomised block design with ten treatments and four replications. The treatments include- T1: No lopping (Control), T2: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 1-inch stump height, T3: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T4: Lopping @ 30 DAS + 3 inches stump height, T5: Lopping @ 45 DAS + 1-inch stump height, T6: Lopping @45 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T7: Lopping @ 45 DAS + 3 inches stump height, T8: Lopping @ 60 DAS + 1 -inch stump height, T9: Lopping @ 60 DAS + 2 inches stump height, T10: Lopping @ 60 DAS + 3 inches stump height.
       
DWRUB-52 was sown at 100 kg ha-1 on November 19, 2022 and November 18, 2023, using a single-row hand drill at a 5 cm depth and 22.5 cm row spacing. A total of 75:30:20 NPK kg ha-1 was applied, with nitrogen in three splits. The crop was irrigated three times: once before sowing and twice during critical stages. Broadleaf weeds were controlled with 2,4-D herbicide and one manual weeding.
 
Biometric observations
 
Five plants per plot were measured for height at 30, 60, 90, 120 days and maturity. Whole plant samples from borders were collected for dry matter assessment, using (Radford’s, 1967) formulas for growth parameters.

The equations used for the computations are as follows:
 
 
Whereas,
W1 and W2 = weights of dry matter (g) at times t1 and t2.
S = area and InW1 and InW2 are their natural logs.
 
Green fodder yield and quality
 
Green fodder lopping was done manually in the net plot area, excluding T1-No cutting. The other treatments were lopped as specified and allowed to regenerate. Green fodder was measured per hectare and stump regrowth was monitored. Plant samples were collected, dried at 60°C, ground and analysed for quality using standard procedures in Table 2.

Table 2: Formula used for green fodder quality parameters.


 
Statistical analysis
 
Statistical analysis was performed using microsoft excel with ANOVA based on a randomised block design. Nine treatments were assessed for green fodder yield, regeneration days and quality, excluding treatment T1 due to no lopping. The least significant difference (LSD) and standard error of the mean (SEM) were calculated at the 5% significance level.
Growth parameters
 
Data presented in Table 3 showing the periodical plant height (cm) of dual-purpose barley revealed that till 30 DAS, there was no significant influence on plant height since no treatment was given till that time. At 60 DAS, T8 (51.6) showed a significantly higher plant height, which was statistically at par with T1(51.4 cm) and T9 (50.6). In later stages, i.e. 90, 120 days and at harvest, T1(86.1, 102.9 and 104.1) showed maximum plant height, followed by T4(82.8, 99.0 and 99.6). Treatment shows significant results later due to lopping time, stump height and an extra 15-30 days for vegetative growth in plants at 45 and 60 DAS. These results are supported by Lal and Saini, 2016; Dudi et al., 2019; Neelam et al., 2022.

Table 3: Effect of lopping schedules and stump height on plant height and dry matter accumulation of dual-purpose barley (pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


       
Throughout the entire experiment in both years, dry matter accumulation (g/mrl) was recorded as maximum in T1(193.2), followed by T4, except during 60 DAS due to lopping. The early growth stage shows non-significant data in dry matter accumulation (DMA). At 60 DAS, significantly, the highest DMA was recorded in T1(193.2), which is statistically at par with T8(192.2), T10 (188.9) and T9(184.3). At 90, the significantly highest DMA was recorded in T1(291.2), which is statistically at par with T4 (280.4). Significantly higher values are recorded at 120 and harvest is recorded in T1(296.4, 301.2).
       
Data in Table 4 shows the growth between 0-30 DAS was non-significant in both AGR and CGR. Between 30-60 DAS interval, highest AGR and CGR was recorded in T9 (2.05 g/plant/day, 8.20 g m-1 row length day-1) which is followed by T10(1.99 g/plant/day, 7.99 g m-1 row length day-1), T8 (1.95 g/plant/day, 7.83 g m-1 row length day-1) and T1(1.92 g/plant/day, 7.71 g m-1 row length day-1). Growth rate between 60-90 and 90-120 DAS shows significantly higher growth in both AGR and CGR in T1 (1.93 g/plant/day, 3.96 and 7.42 g m-1 row length day-1, 16.81 g m-1 row length day-1). Growth between 120- harvest shows a significantly higher growth rate in T4 (0.83 g/plant/day, 3.35 g m-1 row length day-1), which is followed by T1(0.82,3.29 g m-1 row length day-1).

Table 4: Effect of lopping schedules and stump height on the absolute growth rate and crop growth rate of dual-purpose barley (pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


       
Relative growth rate shows non-significant results between 0-30 and 60-90 DAS (Table 4). However, between 30-60 DAS, the significantly highest growth was recorded at T10 (0.016 g g-1 day-1), followed by Tand T(0.016 g g-1 day-1). In 90-120 DAS, T8 (0.0096 g g-1 day-1) shows the most comparable RGR, followed by T9 and T10 (0.0093 g g-1 day-1). From 120 DAS to harvest, T1, T3 and T4 (0.0013 g g-1 day-1) show higher results.
       
Taller stumps preserve nutrients, provide energy for the new shoots and absorb sunlight, while growth hormones such as auxins and cytokines boost cell division and elongation (Meena et al., 2017; Nand et al., 2019).
 
Green fodder yield
 
Data presented in Table 5 revealed that significantly higher green fodder yield (t ha-1) was recorded in T8 (10.9), followed by T9 (9.6), which stayed at par. Lopping at 60 DAS yields more fodder than at 45 and 30 DAS due to higher later vegetative biomass. Similar results are reported by (Dhillon et al., 2021). However, to get substantial fodder yield along with optimum grain yield in dual-purpose crops, it is important to decide on the right stage of harvesting (Singh et al., 2017). So, lopping done at 30 DAS with stump heights of 1-inch (2.9), 2-inch (2.7) and 3-inch (2.5) is better as cutting plants at an early stage gives them sufficient time for regeneration and further growth.

Table 5: Effect of lopping schedules and stump height on the relative growth rate, green fodder yield and regeneration of dual-purpose barley (pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


 
Days taken for regeneration
 
The regeneration after lopping in barley is illustrated in Fig 1. Among all treatments, T2(10 days) led to shorter regeneration times. Early lopping focuses energy on root and shoot growth, improving regeneration without affecting grain yield. However, cutting the crop at 60 DAS occurred under poor temperature conditions, delaying barley regeneration. The findings are further supported by Dhillon and Ram, 2021.

Fig 1: Impact of lopping time and stump height on regeneration of dual-purpose barley.


 
Quality parameters
 
For desirable fodder quality, it should have higher levels of crude protein (%) and crude fibre (%) along with lower levels of ash content (%), neutral detergent fibre (%) and acid detergent fibre (%). Pooled data in Table 6 revealed that the lopping done in T(15.23) contained remarkably richer crude protein, which was statistically at par with T3(15.10). It also resulted in significantly lower neutral detergent fibre (40.28) and acid detergent fibre (21.77), which is desirable for livestock. Significantly higher crude fibre content was recorded in T8 (25.17). Significantly lower ash content in fodder was recorded under T2 (7.9). Good quality green fodder can be obtained until the flowering stage and lopping after this stage will impact quality and regeneration capacity (Singh et al., 2017). Higher crude protein content results from enhanced photosynthetic activity, food allocation and metabolically active tissue, contributing to growth and energy generation (Balfany et al., 2023; Sarkar et al., 2020).

Table 6: Effect of lopping schedules and stump height on quality of green fodder barley (pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


       
As the plants mature, they accumulate more structural carbohydrates for structural integrity and cell development and the feed concentration rises due to higher nutritional absorption (Lee, 2018; Hundal et al., 2014; Meena et al., 2016). Higher neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre values are a result of structural carbohydrates like cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin accumulating in later stages; these components provide rigidity, nutrient redistribution and protection against environmental stress (Osho et al., 2013). Similar results were also reported by Ishrath et al., (2018).
 
Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that lopping barley at 60 DAS will give a higher green fodder yield. However, as it is a dual-purpose crop and grains are to be harvested, lopping should be done at 30 DAS at 3-inch stump height to obtain a considerable amount of good-quality green fodder. Fodder quality deteriorates with advancing age and lopping at an earlier growth stage also results in quicker regeneration for further development to achieve optimum grain production.
 
 
The researchers appreciate the support and lab facilities from the Department of Agronomy at Lovely Professional University.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. AOAC International (2000). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17: 1-2. 

  2. AOAC International. (2001). AOAC Official Method. Protein (crude) in animal feed, forage (plant tissue), grain and oilseeds. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 

  3. Balfany, C., Gutierrez, J., Moncada, M. and Komarnytsky, S. (2023). Current status and nutritional value of green leaf  protein. Nutrients. 15: 1327.

  4. Dhillon, B.S. and Ram, H. (2021). Thermal time requirement and fodder yield of dual-purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as influenced by sowing dates and cutting management in a semi-arid environment. Forage Research. 47: 197-203.

  5. Dhillon, B.S., Uppal, R.S. and Goyal, M. (2019). Forage quality and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as influenced by cutting management under staggered sowing in North- West India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 66: 1244-1258.

  6. Dhillon, B.S., Uppal, R.S. and Dhaliwal, S.S. (2018). Yield and nutrient uptake of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as influenced by time of sowing and cutting management. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7: 2063-2068. 

  7. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2023). Barley production report. https://data.desagri.gov.in/website/crops-apy- report-web.

  8. Dudi, S. (2019). Growth and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties as influenced by application of plant growth regulators. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7: 1278-1282.

  9. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). US Agricultural Research Service. pp. 379.

  10. Hundal, J.S., Kumar, Balwinder., Wadhwa, M., Bakshi, M.P.S. and Ram, H. (2014). Nutritional evaluation of dual-purpose barley as fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 84: 298-301. 

  11. Ishrath, P.K., Thomas, U.C. and G. Dhanya (2018). Effect of cutting intervals on yield and quality fodder production in hybrid napier. Forage Research. 44: 137-140.

  12. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Oxford IBH Publishing House, Bombay.38.

  13. Lal, M. and Saini, K.S. (2016). Impact of different planting techniques and cutting practices on yield performance, weeds, quality and economics of dual-purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 12: 385-389.

  14. Lee, M.A. (2018). A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments. Journal of Plant Research. 131(4): 641-654.

  15. Manju, Kaur, V., Sharma, K. and Kumar, V. (2019). Identification of promising sources for drought tolerance in cultivated and wild species germplasm of barley based on root architecture. Journal of Environmental Biology. 40: 309- 315.

  16. Meena, N.K., Choudhary, J. and Mali, H. (2016). Effect of dual-purpose varieties, cutting schedules and fertility levels on nutrient content, uptake, quality and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Forage Research. 42: 109-114.

  17. Meena, N.K., Gupta, V., Mali, H. and Choudhary, J. (2017). Performance of dual-purpose varieties, cutting schedules and fertility levels to growth and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 228-232.

  18. Nand, V., Yadav, R., Kumar, R., Doharey, R.K., Verma, S.K., Yadav, N. and Yadav, R.K. (2019). Effect of fertilizers and cutting schedule on growth and quality of dual-purpose barley crop (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8: 126-130.

  19. Neelam, Kumar, S., Satpal, Kumar, J., Devi, U. and Hooda, V.S. (2022). Agronomic evaluation of dual-purpose barley varieties under different cutting management system. Forage Research. 47: 449-455. 

  20. Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture. 939.

  21. Osho, S.O., Oso, A.O., Akpan, I.E., Ayanniyi, T.A., Fafiolu, A.O., Jegede, A.V. and Idowu, O.M.O. (2013). Effect of varying NDF, ADF and digestible energy levels on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, caecal fermentation, caecal and faecal microflora of growing rabbits. Global Journals. 13: 5-13.

  22. Prasanna, S.P., Choudhary, M., Bhattacharjee, S., Praveen, B.R. and Naik, V.S. (2024). Impact of agronomic practices on quality and productivity of fodder crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 1-9. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2672.

  23. Radford, P.J. (1967). Growth analysis formulae their use and abuse. Crop science. 7: 171-175.

  24. Sarkar, S., Mondal, M., Ghosh, P., Saha, M. and Chatterjee, S. (2020). Quantification of total protein content from some traditionally used edible plant leaves: A comparative study. Journal of Medicinal Plant Studies. 8: 166-170.

  25. Singh, M., Chauhan, A., Kumar, R., Joshi, D., Soni, P. G. and Meena, V.K. (2017). Dual purpose barley as affected by date of sowing, varieties and stage of harvesting-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 38: 159-164. 

  26. Thiex, N., Novotny, L. and Crawford, A. (2012). Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 221 942.05 revisited. Journal of AOAC International. 95(5): 1392-1397.

  27. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2023). Barley Production Data. International Production Assessment Division. https;//ipad.fas.usda.gov/ogamaps/cropproductionmaps.aspx

  28. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74: 3583-3597. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)