Banner

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Effect of Irrigation Levels and Silicon on Growth and Productivity of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Saumya Sharma1, Hitesh Kapoor2, Shivanshu Ladohia3, Shrikant Choudhary1, Mayur Darvhankar1,*
  • 0000-0002-6646-0072
1Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 411, Punjab, India.
2Department of Fruit Science, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 411, Punjab, India.
3Department of Agronomy, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Background: Irrigation management and silicon fertilization are critical challenges in optimizing crop performance, particularly under water stress conditions. Therefore, effective irrigation and silicon fertilization strategies are crucial for optimizing barley growth, particularly under varying environmental conditions. This study investigates the impact of varying irrigation levels and silicon application on the growth, phenology, yield attributes and quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Methods: The experiment was conducted under controlled field conditions at the Agriculture Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, during the Rabi season of 2023-2024. It utilized a split plot design (SPD), featuring three irrigation levels based on number of irrigations: I1 (no irrigation), I2 (two irrigations at tillering and grain development) and I3 (four irrigations at tillering, jointing, booting and grain development stages) and five silicon treatments: S1 (control), S2 (0.50% at tillering), S3 (0.50% at tillering and booting), S4 (1% at tillering) and S5 (1% at tillering and booting). Observations were recorded on plant population, leaf area, days to emergence, heading, flowering, physiological maturity, weight of grains spike-1, biological yield, SPAD chlorophyll index, proline content and relative water content.

Result: Results indicated that employing four irrigation treatments and 0.5% silicon spray applied at key growth stages significantly improved barley morphology, phenology, yield characteristics, biochemical attributes and plant-water relations indicating better water retention and stress tolerance. The synergistic effects of these treatments suggest that balanced irrigation coupled with silicon application can be an effective strategy for maximizing barley growth and quality in varying environmental conditions. This research offers valuable insights for agricultural practices aimed at optimizing cereal crop performance under variable water availability for effective crop management practices.

Globally, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is cultivated in both temperate and tropical climates due to its wide adaptability (Al-Hajaj et al., 2022). After rice, maize and wheat, barley ranks fourth in global cereal production. The top barley-producing countries include Canada, Russia, Australia, Ukraine and Germany (Bvenura and Kambizi, 2022). In India, it serves as a staple grain during winter, especially in the western plains and is widely used as feed for livestock and poultry, as well as for human consumption (Verma et al., 2022). Much of the barley grown in India also supports industrial applications, particularly in whiskey and beer production and as animal feed (Kumar et al., 2018). Due to its strong resilience to harsh environmental conditions and minimal input requirements, barley is often referred to as the “poor man’s crop” (Chhokar et al., 2022).
       
Drought stress is projected to reduce global agricultural productivity by up to 30% by 2025, posing a significant challenge to sustainable agriculture, especially in dry and semi-arid regions with limited water resources (Rajanna et al., 2023). Global warming and climate instability are aggravating water scarcity for crops in many countries (Khondoker et al., 2023). Among the various limiting factors in crop production, water availability is one of the most critical. In semi-arid regions, soil water deficit resulting from low precipitation and increased evapotranspiration is a major stressor for plants (Bello et al., 2024). Meteorological drought-characterized by a prolonged decline in rainfall-combined with elevated evapotranspiration leads to agricultural drought (Sun et al., 2023).
       
Water shortages induce plant stress that alters key physiological processes, such as stomatal closure and reduced growth, thereby lowering water consumption and ultimately reducing crop output (Wu et al., 2022). Effective water management in crops like barley involves understanding how water stress impacts growth and productivity, along with continuous monitoring of plant and soil water status (Trușcă et al., 2023). Crop water stress, mainly caused by insufficient soil moisture, directly affects irrigation strategies, especially when roots fail to access adequate water or when transpiration rates become excessively high (Kang et al., 2021). Classifying water stress as light, moderate, or severe is essential for planning irrigation efficiently and ensuring stable long-term yield (Seleiman et al., 2021).
       
Silicon (Si), the second most abundant element in earth crust (28.8%) after the oxygen (47%) (Jain, 2025), plays an important role in various plant physiological processes (Souri et al., 2021), particularly in alleviating stress caused by both abiotic and biotic factors like drought (Wade et al., 2022). Since its absorption and transport rely on the transpiration stream, shifts in water availability due to climate change may hinder silicon’s effectiveness in improving crop performance (Kuhla et al., 2021). Therefore, it is vital to understand how future changes in rainfall patterns may affect Si absorption to fully harness its potential benefits (Thakral et al., 2021). Silicon application enhances plants’ drought tolerance through several mechanisms: boosting antioxidant defense systems, increasing CO2 uptake during water stress (Bhardwaj and Kapoor, 2021), reducing transpiration by forming a cuticle-Si layer and reinforcing plant structure to prevent lodging (Wade et al., 2022; Malik et al., 2021). As climate change continues to threaten water availability, the use of Si to alleviate drought-induced yield losses in crops like barley is receiving increased attention (Irfan et al., 2023).
Experimental site and soil
 
The present study was conducted in Rabi season of 2023-2024 at Lovely Professional University, Phagwara (Punjab) at the experimental site of the Agricultural Research Field, Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture. Lovely Professional University is situated 8 km from Phagwara, at an elevation of 245 meters above mean sea level (AMSL). The region has a subtropical climate and is located at 31.2560oN latitude and 75.7051oE longitude. Soil samples were randomly collected from various locations in the experimental field using a soil auger, down to a depth of 15 cm, to evaluate the fertility status and physiological and chemical characteristics of the soil. According to the triangle technique of soil classification established by the International Society of Soil Science (ISSS), the soil in the experimental field may texturally be categorized as sandy loam.
 
Experimental design and treatment details
 
The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications. Within each of the 45 plots that made up each replication, the treatments were placed at random. As a result, 15 treatment combinations with irrigation levels in main plots and foliar silicon levels in sub-plots were compared. The variables under investigation comprised of three levels of irrigation : I1: Control (no irrigation), I2: Two irrigations (tillering + grain development stage) and I3: Four irrigations (tillering + jointing + boot + grain development stage). Additionally, five levels of foliar silicon application were examined : S1: 0% (control), S2: 0.50% (tillering stage), S3: 0.50% (tillering + booting stage), S4: 1% (tillering stage) and S5: 1% (tillering + booting stage). For foliar spray, powdered water-soluble kaolinite-based greensil silicon (95% silica compound) was utilized. The barley variety used was PL 891, known for its adaptability and suitability under Punjab agro-climatic conditions. The crop was sown with a row spacing of 22.5 cm. A recommended basal dose of fertilizers was applied at sowing time, consisting of 55 kg ha-1 of urea, 27 kg ha-1 of DAP and 75 kg ha-1 of murate of potash.
 
Statistical analysis
 
IBM SPSS version 26 was used to perform an ANOVA on barley growth data to assess the effects of treatment variables. The analysis tested various parameters at a 95% confidence level (p≤0.05) to determine significant variations in morphology, phenology, yield characteristics, biochemical attributes and plant-water relation.
Morpho-phenological parameters of barley
 
Leaf area was significantly influenced by irrigation and silicon application (p<0.05). Compared to I1 (control), I2 and I3 showed increases of 10.6% and 22.8%, respectively, due to improved moisture availability. Si3 recorded the highest leaf area, with a 20.7% rise over Si1 (p<0.05). A significant interaction effect was observed among irrigation and silicon levels (Table 1).

Table 1: Effect of irrigation levels and silicon on morphological and phenological parameters of barley.


       
The increased leaf expansion in watered plants was the result of rise in leaf area. The process of leaf expansion was facilitated by both turgor forces and increased turgor pressure in the cells as a result of increasing soil moisture (Wang et al., 2024). Previous experiments conducted with silicon have reported where in silicon treatment can maintain leaf area compared to the untreated plants grown under drought conditions (Ahsan et al., 2023). Crops have also shown to have greater value of leaf area index under silicon treatment when compared to the silicon free growing conditions (Eghlima et al., 2024).
       
Heading stage was significantly delayed with increasing irrigation (p<0.05). Compared to I1, treatments I2 and I3 extended the time to heading by 5.8% and 9.9%, respectively. Silicon treatments showed no significant effect on days to heading (Table 1).
       
Days to flowering were also significantly influenced by irrigation (p<0.05). Irrigation at I2 and I3 increased the duration to flowering by 8.3% and 12.2%, respectively, compared to I1. No significant variation was observed among silicon treatments for this parameter (Table 1).
       
Physiological maturity showed significant differences across irrigation treatments (p<0.05). Compared to I1, treatment I2 extended the crop duration by 4.3%, while I3 delayed it by 8.9%, pointing toward enhanced longevity under improved irrigation. Silicon levels, however, did not significantly influence this parameter (Table 1).
       
The most crucial factor in how different crops adjust to their growing conditions is phenological growth. It has been believed that the plant or a portion of the plant, has a developmental clock that is temperature-dependent and advances at a certain rate for each of the aforementioned phases (Nasir, 2022). The crop receiving constant access to moisture, which led to an increase in plant growth, might be the cause of the delay in the development of various phenological phases. Early development occurs when the plant is forced to finish its life cycle quickly due to water stress. Longer crop longevity and the longer reproductive phase of crop growth have also been recorded with increased irrigation levels (Kumar et al., 2018; Zabihullah, 2020). This may be also be explained by the fact that sufficient moisture availability improved both the vegetative and reproductive phases of the plant. Stress at any stage of crop growth reduced the plant’s life cycle by a few days since the plants sought to finish it as soon as possible in order to avoid or escape stressful situations (Kavita, 2021).
 
Yield attributing characteristics
 
Weight of grains per spike was significantly affected by irrigation and silicon application (p<0.05). Iand I3 increased grain weight by 26.4% and 50.4%, respectively, over I1 (1.25 g), with I3 recording the highest (1.88 g). Silicon treatment Si3  showed a 36.9% improvement over Si1, with a grain weight of 1.89 g. Si2 (1.75 g) and Si4 (1.66 g) also showed significant gains. The I × Si interaction was significant, with I3 × Si3 showing the highest grain weight (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of irrigation levels and silicon on yield attributes, biochemical parameters and relative water content (RWC) of barley.


       
By keeping grains at their ideal moisture levels, irrigation guarantees a sufficient supply of water for grain filling, thereby increasing grain weight. Better nutrient absorption and photosynthesis are facilitated by regular water supply, which promotes more robust grain growth. Plants are able to effectively acquire and retain more nutrients, which leads to the production of bigger and heavier grains (Tahir et al., 2024). By improving the structural integrity and stress resilience of plants, silicon makes grains heavier by providing them with greater support and nutrition distribution. Enhancing photosynthetic efficiency and nutrient absorption results in enhanced grain filling efficacy. Furthermore, silicon aids in reducing stress that could otherwise restrict grain growth and weight. When comparing the non-silicon supplemented plants to the silicon-treated plants, an increase in grain weight (g) was seen and the increase was statistically significant (Das et al., 2023).
       
Biological yield also responded significantly to treatments (p<0.05). I3 produced the highest yield (89.95 q ha-1), showing a 52.6% increase over I1 (58.91 q ha-1). Among silicon treatments, Si3 recorded the highest biological yield (87.86 q ha-1), which was 34.5% more than Si1 (65.34 q ha-1). The interaction effect between irrigation and silicon levels was statistically significant (Table 2).
       
Leaf abscission under drought conditions can lead to a decrease in the weight of plant shoots and a reduction in biological production. The improvement in moisture supply and its positive impact on biological yield plant-1 were the main causes of the biological yield improvement (Nasir, 2022; Ghanem et al., 2024). The outcomes matched the findings of Prem et al. (2024). The higher biological yield may be the result of enhanced nutritional availability in the soil, higher chlorophyll content and enhanced photosynthetic activity, all of which have a positive impact on the metabolism of carbohydrates and activate the carbon-fixing enzyme for greater photosynthesis. A sufficient amount of silicon boosts photosynthetic activity, enabling the plant to gather sufficient photosynthates and increase dry matter synthesis (Das et al., 2023).
 
Biochemical parameters
 
SPAD chlorophyll index improved significantly with irrigation and silicon application (p<0.05). Compared to I1, I2 and I3 increased SPAD values by 19.1% and 15.8%, respectively, indicating enhanced chlorophyll retention under better moisture availability. Among silicon treatments, Si‚  recorded a 19.3% increase in SPAD index over Si1, while Si3 (19.1%) and Si5 (13.1%) also showed significant improvements, confirming the beneficial role of silicon in chlorophyll preservation (Table 2).
       
The value recorded from a SPAD meter is used as an indicator of how relative chlorophyll concentration reacts to various stimuli, such as moisture and extremely high or low temperatures. By the absence of irrigation, elevated concentrations of peroxidase and chlorophillase enzymes and reactive oxygen species (increase in O2 and H2O2), which cause lipid peroxidation and a subsequent decrease in chlorophyll content (Choudhury et al., 2022). Drought stress causes chlorophyll degradation, leading to reduced chlorophyll concentrations and disrupting photosynthetic pigments, which impairs gas exchange and stunts plant growth and production (Khayatnezhad and Gholamin, 2021). Silicon application enhances plant structure and photo-synthesis by increasing chlorophyll levels, likely due to silicon accumulating in epidermal cells, which protects the photosynthetic apparatus from damage. (Bhardwaj and Kapoor, 2021). Similar findings of lower chlorophyll content when irrigation was stopped were also reported by Muhammad et al., (2022).
       
Proline content decreased with improved irrigation and silicon application (p<0.05). Compared to I1, proline content declined by 7.2% under I2 and by 3.9% under I3, reflecting reduced stress conditions. Among silicon treatments, Si2 lowered proline content by 6.5% compared to Si1, followed by Si3 (5.5%) and Si4 (3.2%), suggesting silicon’s effectiveness in mitigating drought-induced stress responses (Table 2).
       
Proline, a heterocyclic amino acid that accumulates in the cytoplasm, aids in osmotic adjustment during stress and acts as an osmolyte, electron sink, radical scavenger and macromolecule stabilizer. Fewer studies have examined high proline levels as indicators of damage rather than stress tolerance (Hosseinifard et al., 2022). Proline accumulates in plants under water stress, helping to stabilize proteins, cellular structures and maintain turgor. With sufficient irrigation, proline levels are lower due to reduced water stress and better overall plant health. (Ghosh et al., 2022). The proline levels in stressed plants that decrease when silicon is added might be a sign that stress-related damage is decreasing. It turned out that silicon application in rice  (Bhardwaj et al., 2023) and sunflower (Ahmed and Tameemi, 2025) decreased the content of proline under stress.
 
Plant-water relations
 
Relative water content (RWC) responded significantly to irrigation and foliar silicon application (p<0.05). Compared to I1, RWC increased by 19.2% under I2 and 14.5% under I3. Among silicon treatments, Si2 showed the highest RWC, recording a 19.4% increase over Si1. Si3 (59.17%) and Si4 (55.22%) were found to be statistically at par (p<0.05) (Table 2).
               
Relative water content has been demonstrated to be a valuable screening method for drought resistance in cereals and a trustworthy indicator of plant water status relative to their fully turgid condition. Water stress reduces the relative water content of crops by inducing water loss, increasing the buildup of harmful ions that damage cell membranes and hamper metabolic activities (Yadav et al., 2020). It is these effects that cause turgor loss in leaves. In contrast, irrigation maintains a strong turgor pressure and a relative leaf water content (Hemati et al., 2022). The ability of silicon to maintain the relative water contents under water stress is a significant property (Bukhari et al., 2021). The plant body’s relative water content and nutrient absorption were reduced by water stress; however, Si treatment performed an excellent role of maintaining the turgor presser, which encouraged greater plant growth and productivity (Qamar et al., 2020).
In conclusion, the growth, phenology, yield attributes and biochemical parameters of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) are considerably influenced by the synergistic impact of irrigation levels and silicon application. The combination of silicon supplementation and optimal irrigation increases stress resistance, boosts nutrient absorption and maximizes water use efficiency. In addition to encouraging strong plant growth, this integrated strategy raises the potential production and enhances the quality of barley grains. The results highlight the importance of silicon application and strategic irrigation management for sustainable barley cultivation, especially in areas with limited water resources and unstable weather patterns. Future studies should aim to optimize agronomic practices for improved crop performance by researching further into the underlying processes of these interactions.
The authors wish to sincerely acknowledge Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India for providing facility of using research area and lab facilities for research purpose.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Ahmed, F.W., AL-Tameemi, A.J.H. (2025). Effect of silicon and abscisic acid spray on growth, yield and quality of sunflower under different irrigation periods. Agricultural Science Digest. 45(2): 207-214. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-648.

  2. Ahsan, M., Valipour, M., Nawaz, F., Raheel, M., Abbas, H.T., Sajid, M., Zulfiqar, H. (2023). Evaluation of silicon supplementation for drought stress under water-deficit conditions: An application of sustainable agriculture. Agronomy. 13(2): 599.

  3. Al-Hajaj, N., Grando, S., Ababnah, M., Alomari, N., Albatianh, A., Nesir, J., Ceccarelli, S. (2022). Phenotypic evolution of the wild progenitor of cultivated barley [Hordeum vulgare (L.) subsp. Spontaneum] across bioclimatic regions in Jordan. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 69(4): 1485-1507.

  4. Bello, A. (2024). Dissertation: Irrigation Strategies and Precipitation Scenario Effects on Wild Blueberries. The University of Maine.

  5. Bhardwaj, S. and Kapoor, D. (2021). Fascinating regulatory mechanism of silicon for alleviating drought stress in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 166: 1044-1053.

  6. Bhardwaj, S., Sharma, D., Singh, S., Ramamurthy, P.C., Verma, T., Pujari, M., Prasad, R. (2023). Physiological and molecular insights into the role of silicon in improving plant performance under abiotic stresses. Plant and Soil. 486(1): 25-43.

  7. Bukhari, M.A., Ahmad, Z., Ashraf, M.Y., Afzal, M., Nawaz, F., Nafees, M., Manan, A. (2021). Silicon mitigates drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through improving photo- synthetic pigments, biochemical and yield characters. Silicon. 13: 4757-4772.

  8. Bvenura, C. and Kambizi, L. (2022). Future Grain Crops. In Future Foods. Academic Press. pp: 81-105.

  9. Chhokar, R.S., Kumar, N., Sharma, R.K., Gill, S.C., Kharub, A.S., Khippal, A.K., Tripathi, S. C. (2022). Improved agronomic practices for enhancing the resource use efficiency and productivity of wheat and barley. In New Horizons in Wheat and Barley Research: Crop Protection and Resource Management. pp: 393-426.

  10. Choudhury, S., Moulick, D., Ghosh, D., Soliman, M., Alkhedaide, A., Gaber, A., Hossain, A. (2022). Drought-induced oxidative stress in pearl millet (Cenchrus americanus L.) at seedling stage: Survival mechanisms through alteration of morphophysiological and antioxidants activity. Life. 12(8): 1171.

  11. Das, S., Kundu, S., Meena, K., Jha, R.K., Varma, A., Bahuguna, R.N., Tripathi, S. (2023). Seed biopriming with potential bioagents influences physiological processes and plant defense enzymes to ameliorate sheath blight induced yield loss in rice (Oryza sativa L.). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 39(5): 136.

  12. Eghlima, G., Chegini, K.G., Farzaneh, M., Aghamir, F. (2024). Effect of common horsetail extract on growth characteristics, essential oil yield and chemical compositions of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Scientific Reports. 14(1): 11082.

  13. Ghanem, H.E., Al-Farouk, M.O., Shehata, A.S. (2024). Growth, physiological performance and yield traits responses in bread wheat cultivars under drought, sprinkler irrigation and potassium levels conditions. Journal of Plant Production. 15(6): 311-327.

  14. Ghosh, U.K., Islam, M.N., Siddiqui, M.N., Cao, X., Khan, M.A.R. (2022). Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: Understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biology. 24(2): 227-239.

  15. Hemati, A., Moghiseh, E., Amirifar, A., Mofidi-Chelan, M., Asgari Lajayer, B. (2022). Physiological effects of drought stress in plants. In Plant Stress Mitigators: Action and Application.  pp:113-124. 

  16. Hosseinifard, M., Stefaniak, S., Ghorbani Javid, M., Soltani, E., Wojtyla, Ł., Garnczarska, M. (2022). Contribution of exogenous proline to abiotic stresses tolerance in plants: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23(9): 5186.

  17. Irfan, M., Maqsood, M.A., Rehman, H.U., Mahboob, W., Sarwar, N., Hafeez, O.B.A., Aziz, T. (2023). Silicon nutrition in plants under water-deficit conditions: Overview and prospects. Water. 15(4): 739.

  18. Jain, R. (2025). Role of silicon in sugarcane: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 46(2): 288-294. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2568.

  19. Kang, J., Hao, X., Zhou, H., Ding, R. (2021). An integrated strategy for improving water use efficiency by understanding physiological mechanisms of crops responding to water deficit: Present and prospect. Agricultural Water Management. 255: 107008.

  20. Kavita. (2021). Enhancing water use efficiency of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) through the use of smart agrochemicals (Doctoral dissertation, Agronomy, CCSHAU, Hisar).

  21. Khayatnezhad, M. and Gholamin, R. (2021). The effect of drought stress on the superoxide dismutase and chlorophyll content in durum wheat genotypes. Advancements in Life Sciences. 8(2): 119-123.

  22. Khondoker, M., Mandal, S., Gurav, R., Hwang, S. (2023). Freshwater shortage, salinity increase and global food production: A need for sustainable irrigation water desalination-A scoping  review. Earth. 4(2): 223-240.

  23. Kuhla, J., Pausch, J., Schaller, J. (2021). Effect on soil water availability, rather than silicon uptake by plants, explains the beneficial effect of silicon on rice during drought. Plant, Cell and Environment. 44(10): 3336-3346.

  24. Kumar, M., Pannu, R.K. Singh, B. 2018. Effect of irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on phenology and grain yield of late sown wheat. Wheat and Barley Research. 10(1): 15-19.

  25. Malik, M.A., Wani, A.H., Mir, S.H., Rehman, I.U., Tahir, I., Ahmad, P., Rashid, I. (2021). Elucidating the role of silicon in drought stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 165: 187-195.

  26. Muhammad, I., Yang, L., Ahmad, S., Farooq, S., Al-Ghamdi, A.A., Khan, A., Zhou, X.B. (2022). Nitrogen fertilizer modulates plant growth, chlorophyll pigments and enzymatic activities under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy. 12(4): 845.

  27. Nasir, A.Q. (2022). Effect of different establishment and moisture conservation practices on wheat under limited irrigated conditions (Doctoral dissertation, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Hisar).

  28. Prem, G., Kumar, N., Poddar, A., Mehta, A.R., Kumar, R. (2024). Residue and irrigation management for optimizing productivity and profitability of wheat in Ambala (Haryana). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(2024): 1079- 1086. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6324.

  29. Qamar, R., Anjum, I., Safdar, M.E., Javeed, H.M.R., Rehman, A., Ramzan, Y. (2020). Mitigating water stress on wheat through foliar application of silicon. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 8(1): 1-10. 

  30. Rajanna, G.A., Suman, A., Venkatesh, P. (2023). Mitigating drought stress effects in arid and semi-arid agro-ecosystems through bioirrigation strategies-A review. Sustainability. 15(4): 3542.

  31. Rea, R.S., Islam, M.R., Rahman, M.M., Nath, B., Mix, K. (2022). Growth, nutrient accumulation and drought tolerance in crop plants with silicon application: A review. Sustainability. 14(8): 4525.

  32. Seleiman, M.F., Al-Suhaibani, N., Ali, N., Akmal, M., Alotaibi, M., Refay, Y., Battaglia, M.L. (2021). Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants. 10(2): 259.

  33. Souri, Z., Khanna, K., Karimi, N., Ahmad, P. (2021). Silicon and plants: Current knowledge and future prospects. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 40: 906-925.

  34. Sun, P., Liu, R., Yao, R., Shen, H., Bian, Y. (2023). Responses of agricultural drought to meteorological drought under different climatic zones and vegetation types. Journal of Hydrology. 619: 129305.

  35. Tahir, M., Arshad, M.A., Akbar, B.A., Bibi, A., Ain, Q.U., Bilal, A., Pervaiz, R. (2024). Integrated nitrogen and irrigation management strategies for sustainable wheat production: Enhancing yield and environmental efficiency. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 13(4): 209-222.

  36. Thakral, V., Bhat, J.A., Kumar, N., Myaka, B., Sudhakaran, S., Patil, G., Deshmukh, R. (2021). Role of silicon under contrasting biotic and abiotic stress conditions provides benefits for climate smart cropping. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 189: 104545. 

  37. Trușcă, M., Gâdea, S., Vidican, R., Stoian, V., Vâtcã, A., Balint, C., Vâtcã, S. (2023). Exploring the research challenges and perspectives in ecophysiology of plants affected by salinity stress. Agriculture. 13(3): 734.

  38. Verma, R.P.S., Lal, C., Malik, R., Kharub, A.S., Kumar, L., Kumar, D. (2022). Barley Improvement: Current Status and Future Prospects in Changing Scenario. New Horizons in Wheat and Barley Research: Global Trends, Breeding and Quality Enhancement. pp: 93-134. 

  39. Wade, R.N., Donaldson, S.M., Karley, A.J., Johnson, S.N., Hartley, S.E. (2022). Uptake of silicon in barley under contrasting drought regimes. Plant and Soil. 477(1): 69-81.

  40. Wang, S., Peng, J., Dong, W., Wei, Z., Zafar, S.U., Jin, T., Liu, E. (2024). Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer regimes to increase the yield and nitrogen utilization of tibetan barley in Tibet. Agronomy. 14(8): 1775.

  41. Wu, J., Wang, J., Hui, W., Zhao, F., Wang, P., Su, C., Gong, W. (2022). Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: A review. Forests. 13(2): 324.

  42. Yadav, S., Modi, P., Dave, A., Vijapura, A., Patel, D., Patel, M. (2020). Effect of abiotic stress on crops. Sustainable Crop Production. 3(17): 5-16.

  43. Zabihullah (2020). Assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus requirement of timely sown bed planted wheat under varying irrigation levels. M.Sc. (Agronomy) Thesis. Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Editorial Board

View all (0)