Chief EditorT. Mohapatra
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.20
Full Research Article
Residual Effects of Red Gram [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] on Growth, Yield and Quality of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.)
- Email firstname.lastname@example.org
First Online 15-12-2021|
Methods: The field experiment to assess the effect of red gram residue incorporation on the growth and yield of fodder maize was carried out in the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala during June - August 2019. Fodder maize (African tall) was sown in the plots after incorporation of crop residues of red gram varieties (APK 1 and Vamban (Rg) 3) grown under different planting geometry (40 cm x 20 cm and 60 cm x 30 cm) and NPK doses (40:80:40, 30:60:30 and 20:40:20 kg NPK ha-1) and compared with the package of practices recommendation and in randomized block design (RBD) replicated thrice.
Result: Significantly higher quantities of red gram residues were realised and incorporated in the treatments involving a planting geometry of 40 cm x 20 cm and an NPK dose of 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1 in both varieties used, Vamban (Rg) 3 and APK 1 (T7 and T1). Nutrient contents in the residues and decomposition in T1 and T7 resulted in the maximum additions in soil, available N, P and K status and dehydrogenase activity. Evaluation of the residual effects of the legume on fodder maize revealed the significantly highest growth and yields in maize raised with chemical fertilizers as per package recommendation and, among the residue incorporated treatments, maximum plant height and fodder yields were recorded in the treatment in which residues of Vamban (Rg) 3 raised at 40 cm x 20 cm spacing and fertilised with 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1 were incorporated, on par with variety APK 1 raised under same management practice. The green fodder yield with residue incorporation was 80-90 per cent that under chemical fertilizer managed treatment. Among the quality parameters, crude protein (9.30%) was the highest with chemical fertilizer application while carbohydrate content (66.23%) was the lowest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
After the harvest of red gram, crop residues were incorporated in the respective plots. Quantity of residues generated in each treatment was recorded and the amount of nutrients added in the soil by crop residues computed based on the nutrient contents in the residues. The soil dehydrogenase activity was monitored at 20 days interval and the soil chemical properties in each treatment plot were assessed both before and after the experiment as per standard analytical procedures. With the onset of south west monsoon, seeds of fodder maize variety “African tall” (@ 60 kg ha-1) were sown in each plot at a spacing of 30 cm x 15 cm. Nutrients were applied in treatment T13 alone, basal dose of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 and NPK dose of 120:60:40 kg NPK ha-1 using urea, rajphos and muriate of potash as nutrient sources. The crop was harvested for fodder @ 60 DAS and observations on plant height and green fodder yields were recorded. Green fodder samples were dried to compute the dry fodder yields. Fodder quality in terms of protein and carbohydrate content were estimated as per standard procedures. The data were statistically analysed using the F-test (Gomez and Gomez, 1984) and critical differences were computed when treatment effects were found to be significant for comparison.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The quantity of residues generated with the different agronomic practices adopted in the two varieties of red gram and the nutrients (N, P and K) accretion possible based on the nutrient contents in the residues are presented in Table 1. The amount of residues produced were significantly the highest (4.83 t ha-1) in T7 (v2s1n1, Vamban (Rg) 3 + 40 cm x 20 cm + 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1), which was at par with that in treatment T1 (v1s1n1, APK 1 + 40 cm x 20 cm + 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1). Vamban (Rg) and APK 1 are short duration varieties (100 - 105, 95 - 105 days, respectively) with a yield potential ranging from 0.94 to 1.04 t ha-1. It is reasoned that the better growth and biomass production with the closer spacing and the highest nutrient dose that ensured an adequate supply of the major nutrients were responsible for the superior dry matter production and hence residues available for incorporation. The higher plant population (12 plants m-2) in the closer spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm ensured higher quantum of residues compared to the wider spacing (60 cm x 30 cm). Considering the nutrient contents in the residues, the nutrient accretions possible are estimated to range from 46.58 to 101.19 for N, 4.50 to 16.34 for P and 16.72 to 35.16 for K kg ha-1.
Effect residue incorporation on soil properties
Dehydrogenase activity in soil is considered as an indication of the soil microbial activity (Gu et al., 2009). Monitoring the dehydrogenase activity during decomposition revealed an increase, irrespective of the treatments (Table 2) and the values were maximum at 60 DAI. The treatment T1 (v1s1n1) resulted in significantly the highest dehydrogenase activity at all stages of estimation, the value being 30.13 µ TPF g-1 soil 24 hr-1 at 60 DAI, on par with the treatment T7 (v2s1n1), 30.12 µ TPF g-1 soil 24 hr-1.
The soil chemical properties at the start of the experiment are depicted in Table 3. Perusal of the data reveal that the treatment T1 recorded the significantly highest organic carbon and available N before sowing and T7 resulted the significantly highest P and K. The treatment T1 was at par with T7. The results indicate that residue incorporation has significant effect on soil chemical properties. The mineralisation of crop residues results in increased NPK availability in soil (Abiven and Recous, 2007).
Growth and yield of fodder maize
The variations in plant height and fodder yield are presented in Table 4. Plants were significantly superior in height (198.00 cm), in T13, (POP-100 per cent nutrient application), indicating the stimulative effect of the readily available nutrients from the chemical fertilizer sources. The shortest plants (156.33 cm) were observed in the absolute control plot in which nether residues nor manures were applied. Green fodder yields followed a similar trend as plant height. The highest green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was observed in POP recommendation (37. 25 and 12.07 t ha-1 respectively) and the lowest in absolute control plot (19.67 and 6.13 t ha-1 respectively). Among the residue incorporated treatments, T7 (Vamban (Rg) 3 + 40 cm x 20 cm + 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1) resulted in significantly tallest plants (183.78 cm), highest green (33.61 t ha-1) and dry (11.37 t ha-1) fodder yield on par with treatment T1 (APK 1 + 40 cm x 20 cm + 40:80:40 kg NPK ha-1). The yields were 70.86 and 85.48 per cent higher than the absolute control.
Fodder maize in the control plants were the shortest and yields were the lowest bringing to focus that maize being a heavy feeder realizes green yields in accordance with the nutrient absorbed by the crop. Application of fertilizers (T13) coupled with the soil contribution could assure the timely nutrient demand of the crop and hence ensured proper growth and yields. Although the soil nutrient status was lower (Table 3), the nutrients from the chemical fertilizers could supply the nutrient requirement of the crop. On the other hand, in the residue incorporated plots, maize grew on the nutrients added to the soil via the residues and the ease in availability was governed by the mineralisation and activity of soil microorganisms. The release of N through the N fixation and degeneration of root nodules also enhances the N status in soil. The variation in the performance among treatments involving residue incorporation may be ascribed to the quantum of residues generated in red gram and N fixed due to the treatment imposed during its cultivation and the subsequent decomposition. The initial soil nutrient status (Table 3) is a reflection of the treatment effects in red gram and it is evident that T7 recorded the comparatively highest available N, significantly highest P and K that contributed to the better performance of the maize crop in this treatment. These results are in conformity with the findings of Arif et al. (2011).
It is evident from the data in Table 4 that the protein content was significantly the highest in the treatment T13, where nutrients were given externally as chemical fertilizers. Among the different residue incorporated treatments, T7 resulted in highest protein content, which was at par with treatment T1. The absolute control treatment recorded highest carbohydrate content (78.53%) and the significantly lowest was in T13 (66.23%). Among the residue incorporated treatments, T12 resulted in highest carbohydrate content (77.50%) and the treatment T1 resulted the lowest (68.72%).
The differences in the amount of protein and carbohydrate were due to difference in N availability (Khan et al., 2014). Increased N availability through chemical fertilizer application and absorption by fodder maize under POP recommended treatment would have caused the higher protein content. In residue incorporation, the plausible reason would be the mineralization of crop residues in soil, resulting in nutrient transformations and their mobility into the plant system for a longer period. Similar results have been reported by Bakht et al. (2009) and Almaz et al. (2017).
The higher N status in plants would have encouraged catabolism of carbohydrates leading to the lower carbohydrate content in these treatments. Maize in the non manured plants were deprived of N as evidenced by the lowered protein contents resulting in a higher carbohydrate status. These results are in conformity with findings of Patel (2014) and Buso et al. (2016). Considering the quality, maize plants were nutritionally better with residue incorporation than fertilizer application.
Changes in soil nutrient status
The soil available NPK was found to decline from the status before fodder maize cultivation (Table 3). Perusal of the data revealed that the maximum content was recorded in treatment T10 (168.67, 114.92 and 275.48 kg N, P and K ha-1 respectively). The values were the lowest in the treatments T6, T9 and T3 for available N, P and K respectively. The decline noticed in soil NPK status is undoubtedly due to the utilization by the crop for its growth and metabolic activities. Maize crop requires an adequate supply of nutrients particularly N, P and K for its optimum growth and yield (Agba and Long, 2005). Being a soil exhaustive crop, fodder maize can exploit the inherent fertility of the soil to meet its demands and this would have depleted the nutrient status. However, the fertility status in soil with residue incorporation could support the maize crop for satisfactory yields.
The residual effect of the red gram legume and fertilizer treatments in fodder maize was apparent from the results of the study. The direct effect of the legume coupled with the decomposition dynamics of the incorporated residues could raise the fertility status of the soil resulting in fodder yields, nearly 80-90 per cent that realized under the package of practice recommendation illustrating the scope for reducing the external nutrient inputs in the succeeding crops of red gram cultivation, in a cropping sequence.
- Abiven, S. and Recous, S. (2007). Mineralisation of crop residues on the soil surface or incorporated in the soil under controlled conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 43: 849-852.
- Agba, T.S. and Long, H.S. (2005). Nitrogen effects on maize foliage and grain yield. Nigeria Agricultural Journal. 3: 7-80.
- Almaz, M.G., Halim, R.A., Yusoff, M.M. and Wahid, S.A. (2017). Effect of incorporation of crop residue and inorganic fertilizer on yield and grain quality of maize. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 51(6): 574-579.
- Antil, R.S. and Narwal, R.P. (2007). Integrated nutrient management for maintaining soil health. Indian Journal of Fertilizer. 3: 111-121.
- Arif, Md., Tariqjan, Md., Khan, J.Md., Saeed, Md., Iqbal, M., Ziauddin, Akbar, H., Shahensha and Khan, Z.Md. (2011). Effect of cropping system and residue management on maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 43(2): 915-920.
- Bakht, J., Shafi, M., Jan, M.T. and Shah, Z. (2009). Influence of crop residue management, cropping system and N fertilizer on soil N and C dynamics and sustainable wheat (Triticum aestivum) production. Soil and Tillage Research. 104: 233-240.
- Buso, W.H.D., Franca, A.F.S., Miyagi, E.S., Ferreria, R.N. and Correa, D.S. (2016). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on carbohydrate and protein fractions in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) cultivars. Tropical Grasslands. 4: 47-53.
- Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 680p.
- Gu, Y., Wag, P. and Kong, C. (2009). Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soils influenced by allelopathic rice variety. European Journal of Soil Biology. 45: 436-441.
- Jjagwe, J., Chelimo, K., Karungi, J., Komakech, A.J. and Lederer, J. (2020). Comparative performance of organic fertilizers in maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield and economic results. Agronomy. 10: 1-15.
- Khan, A.H., Minhas, N.M., Asad, M.J., Iqbal, A., Ilyas, M. and Mahmood, R.T. (2014). Estimation of protein, carbohydrate, starch and oil contents of indigenous maize (Zea mays L.) Germplasm. European Academic Research. 2(4): 5230- 5240.
- Patel, S.P.A. (2014). Performance of oat genotypes as influenced by cutting interval and nitrogen levels under fodder-food production system in northern transitional zone of Karnataka. Ph. D thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 246p.
- Svubure, O., Mpepereki, S. and Makonese, F. (2010). Sustainability of maize-based cropping systems in rural areas of Zimbabwe: an assessment of the residual soil fertility effects of grain legumes on maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology. 2(7): 141-148.
- TERI [The Energy and Resources Institute]. (2020). Crop Residue Management: Solution to Achieve Better Air Quality [online]. Available: eriin.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/ crop-residue-management.pdf.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.