Submitted19-10-2020|
Accepted14-01-2021|
First Online 02-03-2021|
ABSTRACT
Methods: Wheat plants were grown up to harvesting stage for two consecutive years from 2018 to 2020. Pots grown plants were treated with three different concentrations of Nano-N, K, Zn and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn along-with a control setup having no external nutrients supplement. Several morphological and yield related parameters were recorded.
Result: Application of Nano-N, K, Zn resulted in statistically significant increase in plant height, seeds per spike, root length, 100 seed weight, yield and biomass accumulation compared to the control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn. Highest yield per pot of 23.87 g was obtained under nano-N, K, Zn treatment while yield under bulk fertilizers and control setup was only 7.54 g and 4.38 g respectively. Our work presents a novel combination of nitrogen, potassium and zinc nanofertilizers which not only increase quality of wheat produce but also environment friendly too.
INTRODUCTION
Starting from seed germination till seed maturation wheat plant requires several macronutrients and micronutrients. Nitrogen is an essential macronutrient which is essential structural component of Rubisco, proteins, nucleic acids, chlorophyll as well as of some hormones (Ata-Ul-Karim et al., 2016). It also helps in grain yield enhancement too (Gul et al., 2019; Kaur and Sharma, 2018). Potassium is also a macronutrient and plays major role in protein synthesis, enzyme activation, carbohydrate metabolism, osmoregulation and yield enhancement (Wang et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 2019). Zinc is a micronutrient required for indole acetic acid (IAA) synthesis, chlorophyll synthesis, carbohydrates formation (Vitosh et al., 1994) and helps in increasing yield and quality (Gowthami and Ananda, 2019; Dore et al., 2018).
The accepted balanced nutrient use ratio of N:K is 4:1 in India but majority of states shows deviation from this ratio (FAI 2000-2007). This ratio for Haryana state is 80:1 and for Punjab state it is 40:1. This shows the highly unbalanced nutrient application status in India (Pathak et al., 2010). Some of adverse effects of excessive use of chemical fertilizers are like hardening of soil, pollution of water and air, release of greenhouse gases which ultimately cause negative impact on environment and human health (Chinnamuthu and Boopathi, 2009).
Nowadays, focus is on the exploration of various applications of the nanotechnology for use in agriculture and other related fields which have brighter prospects ahead. The main advantage of nanofertilizers over the conventional chemical fertilizers is that they show slow-release mechanism after an initial burst while chemical fertilizers are released heavily in the initial stage followed by the release of less and non-uniform quantities in later periods (Fujinuma and Balster, 2007).
In our present work we proposed the foliar application of biosynthesized nitrogen, potassium, zinc oxide nanofertilizer (Nano-N, K, Zn) in wheat and evaluation of their impact on growth, yield and development of wheat for two years. We also tried to find out the optimum concentration of Nano-N, K, Zn at which plants show overall better functioning. In current study we also tried to compare the effects of Nano-N, K, Zn with conventional Bulk/chemical nitrogen, potassium, zinc fertilizer (Bulk-N, K, Zn) and control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Data presented in Table 2 showed that all three levels of nanofertilizers i.e. nano-1, nano-2, nano-3 treatments resulted in statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in fresh and dry weight of root and fresh weight of shoot when compared to bulk fertilizers and control plants (Fig 1).
When the crop was harvested at maturity and grain yield was recorded, we observed that grain yield showed significant improvement after foliar treatments. In case of nano-2 treatment, yield obtained per pot was 23.87 g which was significantly much higher than nano-1 spray (19.70 g), nano-3 spray (16.94g), bulk fertilizers (7.54g) and control (4.38g). Hundred seed weight, plant height, root length, number of spikes per pot and seeds per spike also showed that foliar treatment with all three levels of nanofertilizers brought significant increase (p<0.05) over both bulk fertilizers and control plants. Average number of spikes per pot was 15.21 under nano-2 spray which was significantly (p<0.05) much greater than nano-1 spray (9.07), nano-3 spray (8.29), bulk fertilizers (6.36) and control (4.21).
Fig 1: Various stages of wheat during N, K, Zn nanofertlizer treatment: [A] Booting stage where (i) Nano 1 (ii) Nano 2 (iii) Nano 3 (iv) Bulk Fertilizers (v) Control. [B] Spike formation stage: (i) Nano 1 (ii) Nano 2 (iii) Nano 3 (iv) Bulk Fertilizers (v) Control. [C] Spikes: (i) Nano 1 (ii) Nano 2 (iii) Nano 3 (iv) Bulk Fertilizers (v) Control.
Our results are in confirmation with earlier study of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer on wheat (Aziz et al. 2016). Application of nano NPK fertilizer loaded on chitosan resulted in significant increase in all yield variables in comparison to control plants and normal NPK supplied plants. Application of nano NPK resulted in increase in leaf number, leaf area, plant height and stem diameter as compared to control plants in coffee plants (Ha et al., 2019). Our work is in harmony with the findings of Raliya and Tarafdar, 2013 in clusterbean plants where application of nano zinc oxide resulted in increase in shoot length (27.1%), root area (73.5%), root length (66.3%) and plant biomass (27.1%) as compare to control plants. Similar type of results were obtained in pearl millet where application of nano-nitrogen resulted an increase in root area (539%), root length (159%) and total biomass (157%) as compared to the control plants (Thomas et al., 2016). Increase in yield and morphological parameters can be attributed to the essential role played by nitrogen, zinc and potassium in plant growth and development.
We hereby report the first study assessing the combined effect of nano form of three nutrients i.e. nitrogen, potassium and zinc and comparing their effect with their bulk/chemical counterpart along-with control group. This can provide a new insight into using a combination of N, K, Zn for agriculture purposes.
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES
- Ata-Ul-Karim S.T., Liu X., Lu Z., Yuan Z., Zhu Y., Cao W. (2016). In- season estimation of rice grain yield using critical nitrogen dilution curve. Field Crops Research. 195: 1-8.
- Aziz, H.M.A., Hasaneen, M.N., Omer, A.M. (2016). Nano chitosan-NPK fertilizer enhances the growth and productivity of wheat plants grown in sandy soil. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 14(1): 17.
- Chinnamuthu, C.R., Boopathi, P.M. (2009). Nanotechnology and agroecosystem. Madras Agricultural Journal. 96(1/6): 17-31.
- Dore, V., Koti, R.V., Math, K.K. (2018). Response of zinc application on growth, zinc content and grain yield of rice genotypes and correlation between zinc content and yield attributes of rice genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(6): 625-630. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5096
- FAI (2000–2007) Fertilizer statistics. Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi.
- Fujinuma, R., Balster, N.J. (2007). Controlled-release nitrogen in tree nurseries 1. In Proceedings of the Wisconsin Fertilizer, Aglime and Pest Management Conference (Vol. 46, p. 60). Cooperative Extension, University of Wisconsin-Extension; College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Gowthami, V., Ananda, N. (2019). Zinc and iron ferti-fortification in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(2): 241-244. doi: 10. 18805/IJARe.A-5149.
- Gul, A., Salam, A., Afridi, M.S., Bangash, N.K., Ali, F., Ali, M.Y., Khan, S. Mubeeen, R. (2019). Effect of urea, bio-fertilizers and their interaction on the growth, yield and yield attributes of Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 423-428. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-395.
- Ha, N.M.C., Nguyen, T.H., Wang, S.L. Nguyen, A.D. (2019). Preparation of NPK nanofertilizer based on chitosan nanoparticles and its effect on biophysical characteristics and growth of coffee in green house. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 45(1): 51-63.
- Kaur, G., Sharma, M. (2018). Effect of nitrogen doses and inter crops on growth and yield of broccoli [Brassica oleracea (L.) var. italica]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(5): 566-570. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5058.
- Pathak, H., Mohanty, S., Jain, N., Bhatia, A. (2010). Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium budgets in Indian agriculture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 86: 287-299.
- Raliya, R., Tarafdar, J.C. (2013). ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agricultural Research. 2(1): 48-57.
- Thomas, E., Rathore, I., Tarafdar, J.C. (2016). Bio-inspired synthesis of nitrogen nanoparticles and its application on pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) cv. HHB 67. Journal of Bionanoscience. 10(4): 300-306.
- Vision, (2050). Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, ICAR.
- Vitosh, M.L., Warncke, D.D., and Lucas, R.E. (1994). Secondary and Micronutrients for vegetables and field crops, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University Extension, E-486.
- Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q., Guo, S. (2013). The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International journal of molecular sciences. 14(4): 7370-7390.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.