Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 55 issue 4 (august 2021) : 446-451

Analysis of Drought Susceptibility Index in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]

Akanksha, K. Srivastava, Ayushi Srivastava, B. Sinha
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Cite article:- Akanksha, Srivastava K., Srivastava Ayushi, Sinha B. (2021). Analysis of Drought Susceptibility Index in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 446-451. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5526.
Background: Climatic variations such as drought have high level of impingement on the yield of rain-fed crops like mustard. A drought is an extended period of months or years when region notes a deficiency in its water availability. Water stress causes heavy yield losses in Indian mustard (17-94%). Low water availability during stem elongation, flowering and pod development causes reduction of pods per plant leading to reduction in grain yield. Very meagre efforts have been made towards improving drought tolerance of this crop. Hence there is an urgent need for, development of water use efficient genotypes. Drought Susceptibility Index (DSI) is a measure of drought, based on loss of yield under drought conditions in comparison to the yield under normal conditions. It expresses the separate effects of yield potential and drought susceptibility on yields under drought. In these terms, lower DSI is considered synonymous with higher drought tolerance. In view of above facts, present study is aimed at investigating the effects of drought on yield attributing traits with, the objective of identifying Indian mustard genotypes and their hybrids which can withstand water stress with minimum loss in yield.
Methods: Nine Indian mustard genotypes and their F1s were evaluated under irrigated and rainfed conditions to study the effect of drought by calculating DSI, on yield and yield traits and to characterize their relative tolerance against drought at the Agriculture Research Farm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi during Rabi 2017-18 season. Observations were made for different yield and yield related traits. 
Result: Genotype RB-50 was found as tolerant for seed yield per plant with DSI 0.38 while hybrids RB-50×RH-749 and RB-50×Giriraj were exhibiting tolerant DSI values for siliqua per plant, 1000 seed weight, seed yield per plant and oil content. These parents and F1s would serve as useful donors and hybrids respectively, in mustard breeding programmes for improving drought tolerance.
  1. Alipour A. and Zahedi, H. (2016). Difference in drought resistance among three Brassica species at different growing stages and application of zeolite. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(2): 193-196. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.9359.
  2. Champolivier, L. and Merrien, A. (1996). Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. var. oliefera on yield, yield components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy. 5(3-4): 153-160. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02004-7.
  3. Chauhan, J.S., Tyagi, M.K., Kumar, A., Nashaat, N.I., Singh, M., Singh, N.B., Jakhar, M.L. and Welham, S.J. (2007). Drought effects on yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Plant Breeding. 126: 399-402. doi:10.1111/j.14390523.2007.01394.x.
  4. Fischer, R.A. and Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yields responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29(4): 897-907. doi: 10.1071/AR9780897.
  5. Gunasekara, C.P., Martin, L.D., French, R.J., Siddique, K. and Walton, M.G. (2006). Genotype by environment interactions of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) in Mediterranean type environments: crop growth and seed yield. European Journal of Agronomy. 25: 1-12.
  6. Karthika, M., Krishnaveni and Thirunavukkarasu, V. (2017). Forecasting of meteorological drought using ARIMA model. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(2): 103-111. doi: 0.18805/ijare.v0iOF.7631
  7. Kumar, S. and Upadhyay. S.K. (2019). Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in India: A State level analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(2): 133-142. doi: 10.18805/IJARe. A-5134.
  8. Kumawat, B.L., Sharma, D.D. and Jat, S.C. (1997). Effect of Brassinosteroid on yield and yield attributing characteristics under water deficit stress condition in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Annals of Biology. 13(1): 91-93.
  9. Lamaoui, M., Jemo, M., Datla, R. and Bekkaoui F. (2018). Heat and Drought Stresses in Crops and Approaches for Their Mitigation. Frontiers in Chemistry. 6. doi: 10.3389/fchem. 2018.00026.
  10. Mirzaei, A., Naseri, R., Moghadam, A. and Jahromi, M.E. (2013). The effects of drought stress on seed yield and some agronomic traits of canola cultivars at different growth stages. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2(10): 115-121.
  11. Nagaharu, U. (1935). Genome Analysis in Brassica with Special Reference to the Experimental Formation of B. Napus and Peculiar Mode of Fertilization. Japanese Journal of Botany. 7: 389-452.
  12. Pandey, P.K., Maranville, J.W. and Admou A. (2001). Tropical wheat response to irrigation and nitrogen in a Sahelian environment - Grain yield, yield components and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy. 15: 93-105.
  13. Pocket Book of Agricultural statistics (2017). Government of India Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare Directorate of Economics and Statistics, New Delhi. Accessed from http://agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/pocketbook_0.pdf on 1 March 2019. 
  14. Singh, J., Varma, S.K., Bhatia, J.N. and Raj L. (2019). Effect of different soil moisture regimes and salinity level on growth and yield in mustard. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 488-491. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5124.
  15. Singh, M., Rathore, S.S. and Raja, P. (2014). Physiological and Stress Studies of Different Rapeseed-Mustard Genotypes Under Terminal Heat Stress. International Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 5(2): 133-142.
  16. Singh, R.P., Singh, D.P. and Singh, P. (1988). Variation for plant water relations and yield structure in Brassica juncea L. under drought conditions, Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research. 3: 91-98.
  17. Singh, S.P. and Choudhary, A.K. (2003). Selection criteria for drought tolerance in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breedin. 63(3): 263-264.
  18. Singh, V.V., Garg, P., Meena, H.S. and Meena, M.L. (2018). Drought stress response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology nd Applied Sciences. 7(3): 2519-2526. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.291.
  19. Singh, V.V., Ram, B., Singh, M., Meena, M.L. and Chauhan, J.S. (2014). Generation mean analysis of water stress tolerance parameters in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea(l.) Czern and coss] crosses. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 46(1): 76-80. 
  20. Sodani, R., Seema, Singhal, R.K., Gupta, S., Gupta, N., Chauhan, K.S. and Chauhan, J. (2017). Performance of Yield and Yield Attributes of Ten Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Genotypes under Drought Stress. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience. 5(3): 467-476. doi: 10.18782/ 2320-7051.4018.
  21. Winter, S.R., Musick, J.T. and Porter, K.B. (1988). Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought resistance winter wheat. Crop Science. 28(3): 512-516. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030018x.
  22. Yang, J., Sears, R.G., Gill, B.S. and Paulsen, G.M. (2002). Genotypic differences in utilization of assimilate sources during maturation of wheat under chronic heat and heat shock stresses. Euphytica. 125: 179-188. 2002.

Editorial Board

View all (0)