Banner

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 53 issue 3 (june 2019) : 303-308

Crop adaptation to air pollution I. Effect of particulate and SO2 pollution on growth, yield attributes and sulphur nutrition of wheat, barley and chickpea 

Poonam Yadav, Renu Dhupper, S.D Singh, Bhupinder Singh
1Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.
Cite article:- Yadav Poonam, Dhupper Renu, Singh S.D, Singh Bhupinder (2019). Crop adaptation to air pollution I. Effect of particulate and SO2 pollution on growth, yield attributes and sulphur nutrition of wheat, barley and chickpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(3): 303-308. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5273.

ABSTRACT

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter (PM) are one of the major air pollutants emerging out of the industrial development and human activities. Plants exhibit differential sensitivity to SO2 pollution and its affect on plant growth can be both direct and/or indirect. The present study was conducted in controlled tunnels to assess the effect of particulate matter (PM) and SO2 on growth attributes of two cereals (bread and durum wheat and barley) and a legume (chickpea) species. Relative sensitivity of crops to elevated SO2 followed the following order: durum wheat < bread wheat < barley < chickpea. This study clearly shows that the presence of particulate matter in the growing environment severely inhibits crop growth while the SO2 enriched environment promotes plant growth and S uptake across crops and that the tolerant crop species are capable of utilizing SO2 towards the plant S pool. 

REFERENCES

  1. Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copperenzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24: 1-15. 
  2. Burney, J., and Ramanathan, V. (2014). Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(46): 16319-16324.
  3. Chauhan, A., and Joshi, P. C. (2010). Effect of ambient air pollutants on wheat and mustard crops growing in the vicinity of urban and industrial areas. New York Sci. J, 3(2): 52-60.
  4. Hiscox, J. D., and Israelstam, G. F. (1979). A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57(12): 1332-1334.
  5. Hongfa, C., Shu, J., Shu, Y., Gao, Y., Gao, J., and Zhang, L. (1999). Effects of sulfur dioxide and acid deposition on Chinese crop. Environmental Pollution and Plant Responses. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 295-305.
  6. Lee, H. K., Khaine, I., Kwak, M. J., Jang, J. H., Lee, T. Y., Lee, J. K., and Woo, S. Y. (2017). The relationship between SO 2 exposure and plant physiology: A mini review. Horticulture, Environmen, and Biotechnology, 58(6): 523-529.
  7. Malhotra, S. S. (1977). Effects of aqueous sulphur dioxide on chlorophyll destruction in Pinus contorta. New Phytologist, 78(1): 101-109.
  8. Padhi, S. K., Dash, M., and Swain, S. C. (2013). Effect of sulphur dioxide on growth, chlorophyll and sulphur contents of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.). European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(36).
  9. Pandey, J., and Agrawal, M. (1994). Growth responses of tomato plants to low concentrations of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Scientia Horticulturae, 58(1-2): 67-76.
  10. Peter Singh, L., Gill, S. S., Gill, R., and Tuteja, N. (2012). Mechanism of sulfur dioxide toxicity and tolerance in crop plants. Improving Crop Resistance to Abiotic Stress, 133-163.
  11. Prasad, B. J., and Rao, D. N. (1982). Relative sensitivity of a leguminous and a cereal crop to sulphur dioxide pollution. Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, 29(1): 57-70.
  12. Sha, C., Wang, T., and Lu, J. (2010). Relative sensitivity of wetland plants to SO 2 pollution. Wetlands, 30(6): 1023-1030.
  13. Snedecor, G.W. (1980) Analysis of variance. Statistical methods, In: [Snedecor GW and Cochran WG]. 215-237.
  14. Sprugel, D. G., Miller, J. E., Muller, R. N., Smith, H. J., and Xerikos, P. B. (1980). Sulfur dioxide effects on yield and seed quality in field-grown soybeans. Phytopathology, 70(12): 1129-1133.
  15. Swain, S. C., and Padhi, S. K. (2015). Effect of Sulphur dioxide on growth, Chlorophyll and sulphur contents of Pomegranate. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, 16(1).
  16. Tabatabai, M. A., and Bremner, J. M. (1970). An alkaline oxidation method for determination of total sulfur in soils 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 34(1): 62-65.
  17. Wilson, S. A., and Murray, F. (1990). SO2-induced growth reductions and sulphur accumulation in wheat. Environmental pollution, 66(2): 179-191.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)