Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 52 issue 5 (october 2018) : 548-553,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5012

Estimation of heterosis in relation to combining ability for earliness, yield and quality attributes in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.) 

P
P.K. Hatwal
V
V.S. Yadav
R
Riya Thakur
A
A.K. Mahawar
1Division of Horticulture, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur-302 018, Rajasthan, India.
Cite article:- Hatwal P.K., Yadav V.S., Thakur Riya, Mahawar A.K. (2018). Estimation of heterosis in relation to combining ability for earliness, yield and quality attributes in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(5): 548-553. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5012.

ABSTRACT

Heterosis breeding is a potential tool to achieve improvement in quantity, quality and productivity in pumpkin. An investigation was carried out to study the heterosis and combining ability for earliness and yield characters of 28 hybrids of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.) through diallel mating design excluding reciprocals. Evaluation of parents based on per se and general combining ability (gca) effects revealed that the parents Narendra Agrim, Kashi Harit, Punjab Samrat and Pusa Vishwas were identified as potential donors for improvement of earliness and yield characters. Among the 28 cross combinations of pumpkin, the crosses ‘Kashi Harit x Punjab Samrat’ and ‘Narendra Upcar x Suvarna’ were identified most promising based on per se values, significant sca and heterobeltiosis manifested in them. These two hybrids could be exploited at commercial level after critical testing. 

REFERENCES

  1. Allard, R.W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
  2. Chopra, R. and Kanwar, S.L. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi. p. 36.
  3. Gowen JW (1952). Heterosis. Iowa State College, Iowa, U.S.A.
  4. Griffing, J.B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel cropping system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 463-493. 
  5. Jha, A., Pandey, S., Rai, M., Yadav D.S. and Singh, T.B. (2009). Heterosis in relation to combining ability for flowering behaviors and yield parameters in pumpkin. Veg. Sci., 36 (3): 332-335.
  6. Kushwaha, M.L. and Ram, Hari Har. (2002). Heterosis in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Prog. Hort., 34(2): 174-178.
  7. Lawande, K.E. and Patil, A.V. (1991). Studies on gene action in bittergourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg. Sci. 18 (2): 192-199.
  8. Mahesh B. Ghuge, M. M. Syamal and Shraddha Karcho. (2016). Heterosis in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Indian J. Agric. Res., 50 (5): 466-470.
  9. Mohanty, B.K. and Mishra, R.S. (1999). Genetic studies in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). The Orissa J. Hort., 26(1): 40-43.
  10. Mohanty, B.K. (2000). Gene action for quantitative characters in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir). Indian Agric., 44(3&4): 157-163.
  11. Norshazila S., Irwandi J., Othman R. and Yumi Zuhanis H. H. (2014). Carotenid content in different locality of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.) in Malaysia. Int. J. Pharm Pharm Sci. 6(3): 29-32.
  12. Pandey, S., Singh, J., Upadhyay, A.K. and Ram, D. (2002). Genetic variability for antioxidants and yield components in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). Veg. Sci., 29 : 123-126.
  13. Pandey, Sudhakar, Singh, Jagdish, Upadhyay, A.K., Ram, D. and Rai, Mathura. (2005). Carotenoid content in an Indian collection of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report. 26: 51-53.
  14. Roy, S.K. (1973). A simple and rapid method of estimation of total carotenoid pigment in mango. J. Food Sci. Tech., 10 (1): 45.
  15. Srinivasan, M. (2003). Studies on genetic parameters and characterization in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). M.Sc. Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore. 
  16. Sundaram, V. (2006). Studies on hybrid vigour in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) under salinity. Asian J. Hort. 2(2): 515-526.
  17. Tamilselvi, N. A., Jansirani, P. and Pugalendhi L. (2015). Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for earliness and yield characters in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). African J. Agri. Res., 10 (16): 1904-1912.
  18. Vidya, H. Mahajan and Sirohi, P.S. (2002). Heterosis in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). PKV Res. J. 26 (1 &2): 36-39. 
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 52 issue 5 (october 2018) : 548-553,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5012

    Estimation of heterosis in relation to combining ability for earliness, yield and quality attributes in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.) 

    P
    P.K. Hatwal
    V
    V.S. Yadav
    R
    Riya Thakur
    A
    A.K. Mahawar
    1Division of Horticulture, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur-302 018, Rajasthan, India.
    Cite article:- Hatwal P.K., Yadav V.S., Thakur Riya, Mahawar A.K. (2018). Estimation of heterosis in relation to combining ability for earliness, yield and quality attributes in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(5): 548-553. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5012.

    ABSTRACT

    Heterosis breeding is a potential tool to achieve improvement in quantity, quality and productivity in pumpkin. An investigation was carried out to study the heterosis and combining ability for earliness and yield characters of 28 hybrids of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.) through diallel mating design excluding reciprocals. Evaluation of parents based on per se and general combining ability (gca) effects revealed that the parents Narendra Agrim, Kashi Harit, Punjab Samrat and Pusa Vishwas were identified as potential donors for improvement of earliness and yield characters. Among the 28 cross combinations of pumpkin, the crosses ‘Kashi Harit x Punjab Samrat’ and ‘Narendra Upcar x Suvarna’ were identified most promising based on per se values, significant sca and heterobeltiosis manifested in them. These two hybrids could be exploited at commercial level after critical testing. 

    REFERENCES

    1. Allard, R.W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
    2. Chopra, R. and Kanwar, S.L. (1976). Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi. p. 36.
    3. Gowen JW (1952). Heterosis. Iowa State College, Iowa, U.S.A.
    4. Griffing, J.B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel cropping system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 463-493. 
    5. Jha, A., Pandey, S., Rai, M., Yadav D.S. and Singh, T.B. (2009). Heterosis in relation to combining ability for flowering behaviors and yield parameters in pumpkin. Veg. Sci., 36 (3): 332-335.
    6. Kushwaha, M.L. and Ram, Hari Har. (2002). Heterosis in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Prog. Hort., 34(2): 174-178.
    7. Lawande, K.E. and Patil, A.V. (1991). Studies on gene action in bittergourd (Momordica charantia L.). Veg. Sci. 18 (2): 192-199.
    8. Mahesh B. Ghuge, M. M. Syamal and Shraddha Karcho. (2016). Heterosis in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Indian J. Agric. Res., 50 (5): 466-470.
    9. Mohanty, B.K. and Mishra, R.S. (1999). Genetic studies in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). The Orissa J. Hort., 26(1): 40-43.
    10. Mohanty, B.K. (2000). Gene action for quantitative characters in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir). Indian Agric., 44(3&4): 157-163.
    11. Norshazila S., Irwandi J., Othman R. and Yumi Zuhanis H. H. (2014). Carotenid content in different locality of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.) in Malaysia. Int. J. Pharm Pharm Sci. 6(3): 29-32.
    12. Pandey, S., Singh, J., Upadhyay, A.K. and Ram, D. (2002). Genetic variability for antioxidants and yield components in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). Veg. Sci., 29 : 123-126.
    13. Pandey, Sudhakar, Singh, Jagdish, Upadhyay, A.K., Ram, D. and Rai, Mathura. (2005). Carotenoid content in an Indian collection of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report. 26: 51-53.
    14. Roy, S.K. (1973). A simple and rapid method of estimation of total carotenoid pigment in mango. J. Food Sci. Tech., 10 (1): 45.
    15. Srinivasan, M. (2003). Studies on genetic parameters and characterization in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). M.Sc. Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore. 
    16. Sundaram, V. (2006). Studies on hybrid vigour in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) under salinity. Asian J. Hort. 2(2): 515-526.
    17. Tamilselvi, N. A., Jansirani, P. and Pugalendhi L. (2015). Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for earliness and yield characters in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). African J. Agri. Res., 10 (16): 1904-1912.
    18. Vidya, H. Mahajan and Sirohi, P.S. (2002). Heterosis in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.ex Poir.). PKV Res. J. 26 (1 &2): 36-39. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)