Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 52 issue 3 (june 2018) : 284-289,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4981

Performance of bush type frenchbean varieties (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) with or without rhizobium inoculation

K
K. Das
S
S. Datta
S
S. Sikhdar
1Department of Vegetable and Spice Crops, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari-736 165, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Das K., Datta S., Sikhdar S. (2018). Performance of bush type frenchbean varieties (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) with or without rhizobium inoculation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3): 284-289. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4981.

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted during the rabi season of the years 2015-16 and 2016-17 at the Instructional Farm of Uttar BangaKrishiVishwavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar to study the performance of eight bush type frnch bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties (Shagun, Victoria, Falguni, Falkon Improved, Arka Komal, special Jhati Beans, Nandini and Basuki) regarding growth, fresh pod yield and quality in this region with and without Rhizobium inoculation. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. In case of inoculation treatment, irrespective of varietal differences, seeds were treated with Rhizobiumphaseoli10g/kg of seed. Common fertilizer dose of 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2Okg/ha was applied in each plot. The experimental results revealed that Rhizobium inoculation increased the yield and quality parameters viz, protein %, vitamin-A content and ascorbic acid content in the fresh pods of the frenchbean varieties. However, flowering and harvesting were recorded earlier in without Rhizobium inoculation treatment due to less accumulation of nitrogen content inside the plant bodies. Under Rhizobium inoculation Special  Jhati Beans recorded the highest pod yield (23.05 tonnes/ha) followed by Victoria (22.43 tonnes/ha) and Arka Komal (21.95 tonnes/ha). Regarding without inoculation treatment ArkaKomal recorded the higher yield (20.05 tonnes/ha) followed by Special Jhhati Beans (20.01tonnes/ha) and Nandini (18.76 tonnes/ha).Considering the benefit: cost ratio, french bean varieties ‘SpecialJhhati Beans’ and ‘Victoria’ might be selected for the terai region of West Bengal with a benefit : cost ratio of 2.94 and 2.83 respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. Anjanappa, M., Reddy, N.S., Krishnappa, K. S., Murali, K. and Pitchaimuthu,M .,(2000). Performance of French bean Varieties under Southern Dry Region of Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science,13:503-505.
  2. Das, R., Thapa, U., Debnath,S., Lyngdoh, Y. A., and Mallick, D., (2014). Evaluation of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for seed production. Journal of Applied and Natural Science ., 6: 594 – 598. 
  3. Devi, J., Sharma, A., Singh, Y., Kaoch, V. and Sharma, K. C., (2015). Genetic variability and character associa-tion studies in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under North-Western Himalayas. Legume Research, 38: 149-156. 
  4. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A., (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2 ed). Jhon Wiley and Sons .Newyork ., 84-97.
  5. Hussain, M. M.,(2005). Yield and quality of Bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes as influenced by date of sowing. M.Sc.Thesis, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman AgriculturalUniversity.Gazipur, Bangladesh.
  6. Kalyani, D. L., (2012) Performance of of cluster bean genotypes under varied time of sowing. Legume Research, 35 : 154-158 
  7. Khafa, B. P.,(2013).Response of Common Bean Genotypes to Inoculation withRhizobia and Effects of P and N on Biological Nitrogen Fixation.M.Sc. (Agriculture) Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture., Morogoro, Tanzania.
  8. Kumar, A., Singh, P. K., Rai, N., Bhaskar, G. P.and Datta, D., (2014). Genetic diversity of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes on the basis of morphological traits and molecular markers. Indian Journal of Biotechnology,13: 207-213. 
  9. Leikam, D., Lamond, R. E., Bonczkowski, L. C., Hickman, J. S. and Whitney, D.A.,(2007).Using Legumes in Crop Rotations. Kansas State University.
  10. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry., 193 : 265-275. 
  11. Pandey, R.Y., Gautam, D.M., Thapa, R.B., Sharma, M.D. and Padyal, K.P.,(2011).Variability of French Bean in the Western Mid Hills of Nepal. KasetsartJournal of Natural Sciences, 45 : 780 – 792.
  12. Prakash, J. and Ram, R.B.,(2014). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for seed yield and yield related traits in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. International Journal of Innovative Sciences, 1 : 41-50.
  13. Ramana, V., Ramakrishna, M., Purushotham, K. and Reddy, K. B., (2010). Effect ofbio-fertilizers on growth, yield attributes and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research, 33: 178-183.
  14. Rana, D.K. and Kumar, A.,(2008). Performance of various French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under mid-hill condition of Garhwal Himalaya. Progressive Horticulture.,40: 184-186. 
  15. Ranganna, S., (2001). Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi., 190-210. 
  16. Rashid, A .S. M. and Hossain, M. M., (2014). Yield and quality of green pod production of bush bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) as influenced by harvesting time.aemrican-eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.,14: 1221-1227.
  17. Sardana, V., Dhingrae, K. K., Gille, M .S. and Singh, I. J., (2000).Production Technology of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivation: A Review.Journal of Agricultural Review.,21: 141-154.
  18. Sharma, A., Sharma, M., Sharma, K. C., Singh, Y., Sharma, R. P. and Sharma, G. D. (2014) Stanadadization of sowing date and cultivars for seed production of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Westermn Himalayas. Legume Research, 37 : 287-293.
  19. Singh, A. K., Singh, S.B. and Singh, V., (2009). Influence of nitrogen doses on growth and green pod yield parameters of French bean varieties during kharif season under subtropical area of Jammu region. Legume Research.,32: 142-144.
  20. Singh, B. D., (2012). Plant Breeding. Principles and Methods. KalyaniPublisers. New Delhi. 51.
  21. Vasishtha, H. and Srivastava, R. P.,(2012). Genotypic variations in protein, dietary fibre, saponins and lectins in Rajmash beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Biochemistry.25:150-153.
  22. Yadav, B.V.S., (2015). Performance of Vegetable French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as Influenced by Varieties and Sowing Dates under Southern Zone of Andhra Pradesh.M.Sc. Thesis,Dr. Y. S. R. Agricultural University., Y. S. R. District, Andhra Pradesh. 
  23. Yadegari, M. and Rahamani, H. A., (2010). Evaluation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds’ inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoliand plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and yield components. African Journal of Agricultural Research.,5: 792-799.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 52 issue 3 (june 2018) : 284-289,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4981

    Performance of bush type frenchbean varieties (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) with or without rhizobium inoculation

    K
    K. Das
    S
    S. Datta
    S
    S. Sikhdar
    1Department of Vegetable and Spice Crops, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari-736 165, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India.
    Cite article:- Das K., Datta S., Sikhdar S. (2018). Performance of bush type frenchbean varieties (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) with or without rhizobium inoculation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3): 284-289. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4981.

    ABSTRACT

    An experiment was conducted during the rabi season of the years 2015-16 and 2016-17 at the Instructional Farm of Uttar BangaKrishiVishwavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar to study the performance of eight bush type frnch bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties (Shagun, Victoria, Falguni, Falkon Improved, Arka Komal, special Jhati Beans, Nandini and Basuki) regarding growth, fresh pod yield and quality in this region with and without Rhizobium inoculation. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. In case of inoculation treatment, irrespective of varietal differences, seeds were treated with Rhizobiumphaseoli10g/kg of seed. Common fertilizer dose of 80:40:40 N:P2O5:K2Okg/ha was applied in each plot. The experimental results revealed that Rhizobium inoculation increased the yield and quality parameters viz, protein %, vitamin-A content and ascorbic acid content in the fresh pods of the frenchbean varieties. However, flowering and harvesting were recorded earlier in without Rhizobium inoculation treatment due to less accumulation of nitrogen content inside the plant bodies. Under Rhizobium inoculation Special  Jhati Beans recorded the highest pod yield (23.05 tonnes/ha) followed by Victoria (22.43 tonnes/ha) and Arka Komal (21.95 tonnes/ha). Regarding without inoculation treatment ArkaKomal recorded the higher yield (20.05 tonnes/ha) followed by Special Jhhati Beans (20.01tonnes/ha) and Nandini (18.76 tonnes/ha).Considering the benefit: cost ratio, french bean varieties ‘SpecialJhhati Beans’ and ‘Victoria’ might be selected for the terai region of West Bengal with a benefit : cost ratio of 2.94 and 2.83 respectively.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anjanappa, M., Reddy, N.S., Krishnappa, K. S., Murali, K. and Pitchaimuthu,M .,(2000). Performance of French bean Varieties under Southern Dry Region of Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science,13:503-505.
    2. Das, R., Thapa, U., Debnath,S., Lyngdoh, Y. A., and Mallick, D., (2014). Evaluation of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for seed production. Journal of Applied and Natural Science ., 6: 594 – 598. 
    3. Devi, J., Sharma, A., Singh, Y., Kaoch, V. and Sharma, K. C., (2015). Genetic variability and character associa-tion studies in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under North-Western Himalayas. Legume Research, 38: 149-156. 
    4. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A., (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2 ed). Jhon Wiley and Sons .Newyork ., 84-97.
    5. Hussain, M. M.,(2005). Yield and quality of Bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes as influenced by date of sowing. M.Sc.Thesis, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman AgriculturalUniversity.Gazipur, Bangladesh.
    6. Kalyani, D. L., (2012) Performance of of cluster bean genotypes under varied time of sowing. Legume Research, 35 : 154-158 
    7. Khafa, B. P.,(2013).Response of Common Bean Genotypes to Inoculation withRhizobia and Effects of P and N on Biological Nitrogen Fixation.M.Sc. (Agriculture) Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture., Morogoro, Tanzania.
    8. Kumar, A., Singh, P. K., Rai, N., Bhaskar, G. P.and Datta, D., (2014). Genetic diversity of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes on the basis of morphological traits and molecular markers. Indian Journal of Biotechnology,13: 207-213. 
    9. Leikam, D., Lamond, R. E., Bonczkowski, L. C., Hickman, J. S. and Whitney, D.A.,(2007).Using Legumes in Crop Rotations. Kansas State University.
    10. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry., 193 : 265-275. 
    11. Pandey, R.Y., Gautam, D.M., Thapa, R.B., Sharma, M.D. and Padyal, K.P.,(2011).Variability of French Bean in the Western Mid Hills of Nepal. KasetsartJournal of Natural Sciences, 45 : 780 – 792.
    12. Prakash, J. and Ram, R.B.,(2014). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for seed yield and yield related traits in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Lucknow conditions. International Journal of Innovative Sciences, 1 : 41-50.
    13. Ramana, V., Ramakrishna, M., Purushotham, K. and Reddy, K. B., (2010). Effect ofbio-fertilizers on growth, yield attributes and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research, 33: 178-183.
    14. Rana, D.K. and Kumar, A.,(2008). Performance of various French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under mid-hill condition of Garhwal Himalaya. Progressive Horticulture.,40: 184-186. 
    15. Ranganna, S., (2001). Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi., 190-210. 
    16. Rashid, A .S. M. and Hossain, M. M., (2014). Yield and quality of green pod production of bush bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) as influenced by harvesting time.aemrican-eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.,14: 1221-1227.
    17. Sardana, V., Dhingrae, K. K., Gille, M .S. and Singh, I. J., (2000).Production Technology of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivation: A Review.Journal of Agricultural Review.,21: 141-154.
    18. Sharma, A., Sharma, M., Sharma, K. C., Singh, Y., Sharma, R. P. and Sharma, G. D. (2014) Stanadadization of sowing date and cultivars for seed production of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Westermn Himalayas. Legume Research, 37 : 287-293.
    19. Singh, A. K., Singh, S.B. and Singh, V., (2009). Influence of nitrogen doses on growth and green pod yield parameters of French bean varieties during kharif season under subtropical area of Jammu region. Legume Research.,32: 142-144.
    20. Singh, B. D., (2012). Plant Breeding. Principles and Methods. KalyaniPublisers. New Delhi. 51.
    21. Vasishtha, H. and Srivastava, R. P.,(2012). Genotypic variations in protein, dietary fibre, saponins and lectins in Rajmash beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Indian Journal of Biochemistry.25:150-153.
    22. Yadav, B.V.S., (2015). Performance of Vegetable French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as Influenced by Varieties and Sowing Dates under Southern Zone of Andhra Pradesh.M.Sc. Thesis,Dr. Y. S. R. Agricultural University., Y. S. R. District, Andhra Pradesh. 
    23. Yadegari, M. and Rahamani, H. A., (2010). Evaluation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds’ inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoliand plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and yield components. African Journal of Agricultural Research.,5: 792-799.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)