Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 54 issue 3 (june 2020) : 349-354

The Effect of Plant Spacing and Planting Model on Multiple Cropping of Red Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) and Shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) under Saline Soil Conditions

Nurul Aini, Wiwin Sumiya Dwi Yamika, Luqman Qurata Aini, Muhammad Jauhar Firdaus
1Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia. 
Cite article:- Aini Nurul, Yamika Dwi Sumiya Wiwin, Aini Qurata Luqman, Firdaus Jauhar Muhammad (2020). The Effect of Plant Spacing and Planting Model on Multiple Cropping of Red Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) and Shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) under Saline Soil Conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 54(3): 349-354. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-484.
A field experiment was conducted from October 2018 to April 2019 at Sidomukti Village, Brondong Sub-District of Lamongan Regency, Province of East Java. The research was performed with the aim of examining and obtaining appropriate combinations of plant spacing and planting model for red chili (Capsicum annuum L.) and shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) plants in saline soil conditions. The utilized design on this research was randomized block design. This research consists of 6 combinations that are repeated 4 times, resulting in 24 experimental units. Based on the research, it was found that the treatment of multiple cropping of red chilies i.e. 2 rows of shallot plants between rows of red chilies have land equivalence ratios (LER) greater than 1, being 1.32 and 1.41, which indicates that the treatment of multiple cropping leads to higher land effectiveness.
  1. Baghdadi, A., Halim, R.A., Othman, R., Yusof, M.M. and Atashgahi, A.R.M. (2016). Productivity, relative yield and plant growth of forage corn intercropped with soybean under different crop combination ratio. Legume Research. 39(4): 558-564.
  2. Castellanos, J.Z., Cano-Rios, P., Gracia-Carrillo, E.M., Olalde-Portugal, V., Preciado-Rangel, P., Rios-Plaza, J.L. and Gracia-Hernandez, L. (2017). Hot papper (Capsicum annum L.) growth, fruit yield and quality using organic sources of nutrients. Journal Taylor and Francis Crop. 25(S1): 70-77.
  3. Chaitanya, K.V., Krishna, C.R., Ramana, G.V. and Beebi, S.K., (2014). Salinity stress and sustainable agriculture- A review. Agricultural Review. 35(1): 34-41.
  4. Daliakopoulos, I.N., Tsanis, I.K., Koutroulis, A., Kourgialas, N.N., Varouchakis, A.E., Karatzas, G.P. and Ritsema, C.J. (2016). The threat of soil salinity: A european scale review. Journal Science of the Total Environment. 573: 727-739.
  5. Edgar, O.N., Gweyi-Onyango, J.P. and Korir. N.K. (2017). Plant Row Spacing Effect on Growth and Yield of Green Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) in Western Kenya. Article Archivers of Current Research International (ACRI). 7(3): 1-9.
  6. El-Ramady, H., Alshaal, T., Elhawat, N., Ghazi, A., Elsakhawy, T., Omara, A.E., El-Nahrawy, S., Elmahroruk, M., Abdalla, N., Domokos-Szabolesy, E. and Schnug, E. (2018). Plant nutrient and their roles under saline soil condition. Plant Nutrient and Abiotic Stress Tolerance. 297-324.
  7. Ganajaxy, Halikati, S.I., Hiremath, S.M. and Chittapur, B.M. (2010). Intercropping of maize and french bean – A review. Agricultural Reviews. 31(4): 286-291. 
  8. Getahun, D., Getaneh, M. and Habte, B. (2018). Companion crops for intercropping with onion production in the dry season at Fogera District of South Gondar Zone in Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences. 4: 17-24.
  9. Gogoi, S., Das, M.R., Bora, P., Mazundar, N. and Das, B.K. (2016) Effect of snowing dates and spacing on broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italic) seed production. Indian Journal Agricultural Research. 50(4): 350-353.
  10. Hiebsch, C.K. and McCollum, R.E. (1987). Area-x-time equivalency ratio: A method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal. 79: 15-22.
  11. Liu, T., Song, F., Liu, S., and Zhu, X. (2012). Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to narrow-wide row planting patterns in maize. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6(3): 506-513.
  12. Mohan, H.M., Chittapur, B.M. and Hiremath, S.M. (2013). Evaluation of ricebean and frenchbean as intercrops with maize under different row proportions in the Peninsular Region. Legume Research. 36(4): 338-343.
  13. Mousavi, S.R. and Eskandari, H. (2011). A general overview on intercropping and its advantages in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. 1(11): 482-486.
  14. Singh, R.K., Kumar, H. and Sing, A.K. (2010). Brassica based intercropping system- A review. Agricultural Reviews. 31(4): 253-266.
  15. Sobkowicz, P. (2006) Competition between Triticale (Tritico secale Witt.) and Field Beans (Vicia faba var. minor L.) in Additive Intercrops. Plant Soil Environ. 52(2): 47-54.
  16. Sugito, Y. (2012). Ekologi Tanaman. Universitas Brawijaya Press. Malang.

Editorial Board

View all (0)