Banner

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 52 issue 3 (june 2018) : 278-283

Phenotypic stability studies in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]

Mohan Dadarwal, P.C. Gupta, I.S. Kajala
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
Cite article:- Dadarwal Mohan, Gupta P.C., Kajala I.S. (2018). Phenotypic stability studies in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3): 278-283. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4786.

ABSTRACT

Genotype x environment interaction in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.] was studied for grain yield by growing 57 genotypes consisting of 54 hybrids along with three standard checks in RBD with three replications under three different environments created by different irrigation numbers (E1, E2 and E3) with recommended dose of fertilizers during Kharif, 2015 at Agriculture Research Station farm, ARS Beechhwal, Bikaner. The nature and extent of genotype (g) x environment (e) interactions were studied. The joint regression analysis indicated the importance of unpredictable components along with predictable components of G x E interaction. Among the crosses RMS 6A x BIB-27 and ICMA 04999 x BIB-15 had higher grain yield per plant and showed stability for better management conditions and poor management conditions, respectively. 

REFERENCES

  1. Abuali, A.I.; Abdelmula, A.A.; Khalafalla, M.M.; Hamza, N.B.; Abdalla, A.H. and Idris, A.E. (2014). Assessment of yield stability and adaptability of parental inbred lines and f1-hybrids of grain maize (zea mays L.) using ammi analysis. British Biotechnology Journal, 4(4): 339-349.
  2. Bidinger, F.R.; Mahalakshmi, V. and Rao, G.D.P. (1987). Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet [ Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke ]. Factors affecting yields under stress. Crop and Pasture Science, 38(1):37-48.
  3. Dahiya, B.N.; Deswal, D.P.; Yadav, H.P. and Kharb, R.P.S. (1987). Stability analysis for grain yield in some advance crosses of pearl millet. Heredity, 19: 24-29.
  4. Dixon, A.G.O. and Nukenine, E. N. (1997). Statistical analysis of cassava yield trials with additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Afr. J. Root Tuber Crops, 3: 46-50. 
  5. Eberhart, S.A. and Russel, W.L. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop sci., 6:36-40.
  6. Ezeaku, I.E.; Angarawai, I.I.; Aladele, S.E., and Mohammed, S.G. (2014). Genotype by environment interactions and phenotypic stability analysis for yield and yield components in parental lines of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br). Afr. J. of Agric. Res., 9(37): 2827-2833.
  7. Gupta, S.C. and Ndoye, A.T. (1991). Yield stability analysis of promising pearl millet genotypes in Senegal. Maydica ,36: 83-86.
  8. Mahalakshmi, V. and Bidinger, F.R. and Raju, D.S. (1987). Effect of timing of water deficit on pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum). Field Crops Research, 15 (3-4): 327-339.
  9. Nandanwankar, K.G.; Borikar, S.T. and Chopde, P.R. (1983). Stability for grain and fodder characters in pearl millet. Fifteenth International Congress of Genetics, 2: 575.
  10. Pethani, K.V. and Kapoor, R.L. (1985). Phenotypic stability for grain yield in pearl millet. Indian J. Genetics, 45(2): 362-367.
  11. Prajapati, B. H.; Patel, N.M.; and Khokhar, A.N. (1998). Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). GAU Res. J., 24(1): 62-66.
  12. Shinde, G.C.; Bhingarde, M.T.; Khairnar, M.N., and Mehetre, S.S. (2002). AMMI analysis for stability of grain yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides L.) hybrids. Indian J. of Genet. and Pl. Breed., 62(3): 215-217.
  13. Shrikant; Singh Y.; Singh, A.K. and Rohitashwa (2000). Genotype X environment interaction in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]. Res. on Crops: 286-288.
  14. Virk, D.S., and Mangat, B.K. (1991). Detection of cross over genotype x environment interactions in pearl millet. Euphytica, 52(3):193-    199.
  15. Van Oosterom, E.J.; Mahalakshmi, V.; Bidinger, F.R., and Rao, K.P. (1996). Effect of water availability and temperature on the genotype-by-environment interaction of pearl millet in semi-arid tropical environments. Euphytica, 89(2), 175-183.
  16. Yadav, O.P.; Weltzien, R.E.; Bidinger, F.R. and Mahalakshmi, V. (2000). Heterosis in landrace-based topcross hybrids of pearl millet across arid environments. Euphytica,112(3): 285-295. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)