Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 51 issue 3 (june 2017) : 257-261

Enhancing production of Zea mays genotypes by K application in Peshawar, Pakistan

Uzair Ahmad*, Unab Begum
1<p>Department of Plant Protection, The University of Agriculture, 25120- Peshawar, Pakistan.</p>
Cite article:- Ahmad* Uzair, Begum Unab (2017). Enhancing production of Zea mays genotypes by K applicationin Peshawar, Pakistan . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(3): 257-261. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i03.7915.

The food security is a huge problem with the increase in population of the Pakistan. Maiz (Zea mays) is one of the major cereal crop and has the capability to compete with the production as well as supporting the controlling applications. As, the modern genotypes has the good potential to resist with the potassium (K) application into the field, an experiment was conducted on K levels with 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1. Maize genotypes viz MM-50, MM-44, ZMS-52, ZMS-51, ZMS-40, ZMS-06, GV-41, Kiramat-2C, 325-PW and Babar-1C were tested into the field. Our results concluded that K levels had a significant effect on grain yield and yield components. Application of K at 60 kg ha-1 showed good yield compared to all other levels of K applications. The tested genotypes also had a significant effect on the tested traits. The genotype (MM-50) showed maximum grains yield (3924 kg ha-1) and maximum yield components to all the genotypes. Maximum grains yield (4593 kg ha-1) and 1000 grain weight (260.4 g) were obtained from genotype (MM-50) at K level of 60 kg ha -1.


  1. Ahmad, M. A. H., Bukhsh, A., Ahmad, R., Ishaque, M. and Malik, A. (2009). Response of maize hybrids to varying potassium application in Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 46, 179-184.

  2. Alvi, M. T. (1994). Effect of different levels of NPK on growth and yield of spring maize. M.Sc Thesis Agron. Deptt. Univ. Agric. Faisalabad.

  3. Asif, M., Farrukh, M. S., Shakeel, A. A., Ashfaq, M. W. and Faisal, M. B. (2013). Effect of nitrogen and zinc sulphate on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L). J. Agric. Res. 51, 455-464.

  4. Asif, M., Amanullah, S. and Anwar, M. (2007). Phenology, leaf area and yield of spring maize as affected by levels and timings of potassium application. J. World Applied Sci. 2, 299-303.

  5. Charless, Q. D. (2009). Decreased row spacing as an option for increasing maize (Zea mays L.) yield in Trans Nzoica District. Plant Breeding and Crops, 1: 281-283.

  6. Chaudhary, M. and Malik, J. K. (2000). Determination of optimum level of K and its effect on yield and quality of maize. Pak J Bio Sci. 3, 881-887.

  7. Ijaz, M., Mahmood, A. and Ullah, H. (2014). Response of maize hybrid (Zea mays L.) to different levels of K. Agric. Res. Commun. 1, 30-38.

  8. Iptas, S. and Acar, A. A. (2006). Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. Plant soil environ. 52, 515-522.

  9. Mastoi, G. S., Zia, H., Rajpar, I., Shah, A. N. and Qureshi, S. A. (2013). Response of field grown hybrid maize to integrated use of inorganic and organic potassium fertilizers. Pak. J. Agri. 29, 126-136.

  10. Muhammad, A.R, Asghar.A, Muhammad, A. M and Mumtaz .H.(2002). Effect of fertilizer levels and plant densities on yield and protein contents of autumn planted maize. Pak J.Agric.Sci. 47:201-208

  11. Muhammad, S. J., Bakht, M. T., Jan, W. A. S. and Khan, N. P. (2009). Response of different maize varieties to various NP levels. Sarhad J. Agric. 18(1), 17-25.

  12. Nazim, H., Khan, A. Z., Akbar, H., Bangash, N. G., Hayat, Z. and Idrees, M. (2007). Response of maize varieties to phosphorus and potassium levels”. Sarhad J. Agric. 23, 881-887.

  13. Robert, E. E. (2003). Prospects for increased crop productivity in developing countries. Social science research network. Economic growth center yale university.

  14. Rehman, H. (2009). Response of different maize varieties to planting methods. M.Sc Thesis Agron. Deptt. Univ. Agric. Peshawar.

  15. Rasool, G. J., Khattak, K. and Bhatti, A. U. (1987). Comparative effect of potassium sulphate vs potassium chloride on the yield and chemical composition of maize under D. I. Khan conditions. Pak J. Agric Res. 8, 29-31.

  16. Shafi, M., Qamar, Z. U., Farooq, M., Munir, S. and Mahmood, Z. (2011). Grain production as influences by planting pattern in maize. Sarhad J. Agric. 27, 22-30.

  17. Shah, M. T. and Tariq, S. (2007). Environmental geochemistry of the soils of Peshawar basin, NWFP, Pakistan. J. Chem Soc Pak. 29: 438-445.

  18. Stauffer, M. D., Akhtar, M. E. and Saleem, M. T. (1995). Potassium research and development in Pakistan; Status report. Pak. Agric. Res. Council, Islamabad. 2(3), 22-30.

  19. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principle and Procedure of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book co. New York.

  20. Tsai, C. Y. and Huber, D. M. (1996). Genetic variation of maize hybrids in grain yield response to potassium and inhibiting nitrification. J. Sci Food and Agric. 70, 263-270.

  21. Zhang, K., Wu, W. and Wang, X. F. (2000). Corn response to potash on a Gongzhuling black soil, Jilin Province. Better Crops Int., 14, 10-11.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)