Sample collection and storage
Pickled mussels were purchased from local manufacturers at Bang Kaeo subdistrict, Muang district, Samut Songkhram, who processed pickled mussels without the use of chemical food preservatives. Samples (3 kg) were pooled from three independent sample bags and each sample bag (1 kg) was collected from one separate fermentation batch. All analyses were performed in triplicate unless otherwise stated.
The pooled pickled mussels (100 g per replicate) were separated for pH, salinity and lactic acid bacteria analyses. The remaining samples were transferred to sterile plastic bags and stored at 4°C for further drying experiments.
Fermentation condition
Acidity and salinity
A food pH meter (HI981036, Hanna, Romania) and a salinity checker (SO-303, Tanita, Japan) were used to monitor acidity and salinity during fermentation. Fermentation conditions were represented as pH and NaCl (%), respectively. Measurements were conducted in triplicate.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count and lactic acid production
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) within pickled mussels were screened and represented as LAB count. Each pickled mussel sample (25 g) was stored at 4°C or 25°C for 2 h, homogenized and serially diluted with 0.1% (w/v) peptone water (ten-fold serial dilution: 10
-1 to 10
-10. Each dilution was spread on MRS agar supplemented with 0.8-1.0% (w/v) CaCO
3, then incubated at 30°C under anaerobic conditions for 72 h.
Colonies were counted and expressed as CFU/g. LAB colonies were randomly isolated and identified based on colony morphology, Gram staining and biochemical tests. All microbiological analyses were conducted in triplicate.
Lactic acid production was measured on day 1 and day 14 of refrigerated storage (4°C). The liquid layer (10 mL) was centrifuged and the supernatant was titrated with 0.02 N NaOH using phenolphthalein as an indicator. Lactic acid content was calculated and expressed as percentage (%).
Interpretation of green mussel ferment conditions
Results were compared with optimal pickle green mussel fermentation conditions reported previously, including acidity (pH 3.98-4.74), salinity (NaCl 3.5-4.4%) and LAB count (1.92 × 10
7 -3.60 × 10
10 CFU/g)
(Tanasupawat et al., 1998).
Drying processes
Hot air drying
Pickled green mussels were separated from the fermented liquid. The mussels were pressed using food-grade plastic bags to form a uniform flat layer. The layer was placed on a stainless-steel sieve, flipped and the plastic bag was removed.
Hot air drying was performed at a controlled temperature of 60°C with continuous airflow for 12 h until constant weight was achieved. After drying, mussels were separated by gentle shaking and passed through a 60-mesh sieve to obtain uniformly dried samples. Each drying experiment was conducted in triplicate.
Freeze-drying
Separated pickled green mussels were frozen at -80°C for 24 h. Frozen samples (~100 g per batch) were transferred to drying plates and dried at -45°C using a freeze dryer (FDTE-SERIES, Operon, Korea) under vacuum pressure (P < 133 × 10
-3 Pa) for 72 h. The maximum load was four plates per run. Freeze-dried mussels were stored at -20 °C prior to quality analysis.
This procedure was repeated independently for pickled green mussels with 1-2% Thai seasoning added.
Qualities of dried pickled mussels from different methods
Appearance and color
Appearance and color were evaluated by trained panelists (n = 15) specializing in Thai cooking. Color measurements were obtained using a colorimeter and expressed as L*, a* and b* values. Each sample was measured ten times and analyses were performed in triplicate (
AOAC, 2015).
Moisture content
Moisture content was determined by oven drying at 100-105°C until constant weight. This parameter was used to evaluate shelf life, texture, microbial stability and product weight.
Water activity
Water activity (av) was measured using a water activity analyzer based on vapor pressure. Dried foods with av < 0.6 are considered microbiologically stable (
AOAC, 2015).
Texture profile analysis (TPA)
TPA was conducted using a texture analyzer to simulate chewing through double compression. Parameters measured included hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, chewiness and adhesiveness (
AOAC, 2015). Each measurement was performed in triplicate.
Rehydration test
Dried samples (5 g) were rehydrated in water at 30°C at ratios of 1:2, 1:5, 1:10 and 1:20 (w/v). Rehydrated samples were weighed and rehydration ratio (RR) was calculated (
Giri and Prasad, 2005).
Qualities of freeze-dried pickled mussels between original and seasoning tastes
Freeze-dried pickled mussels were further processed with spices and condiments, producing original and seasoning-flavored products. Quality parameters including appearance, color, moisture content, water activity, texture and rehydration were evaluated. Nutritional composition and microbial safety were also assessed.
Nutritional analysis
Proximate composition including calories, carbohydrate, protein, lipid, ash and moisture was determined according to AOAC methods (
AOAC, 2015). All analyses were conducted in triplicate.
Microbial contamination test
Total plate count (TPC) analysis was performed. Dried samples (25 g) were homogenized with 225 mL peptone buffer, followed by ten-fold serial dilutions (10
-2-10
-6). Aliquots (1 mL) were plated with plate count agar (PCA, 20 mL). Plates were incubated at 35 ± 1°C for 48 h. Colonies (30-300 CFU) were counted and expressed as CFU/g.
Each analysis was performed in duplicate, with PCA plates without samples as negative controls. Acceptable TPC values for dried products ranged between 10
3-10
4 CFU/g
(Jay et al., 2002).
Sensory evaluation
Dried pickled mussel samples were coded and evaluated by panellists (n = 30) using a 9-point hedonic scale for color, odor, flavor, texture and overall liking (
Lawless and Heymann, 1999;
Meilgaard et al., 1999). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and mean differences were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
Ethical approval
This study was exempted from review by the Suan Sunandha University Ethics Committee (COE.1-050/2024).