Phytochemical screening
The methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea leaves was characterised by a brownish-green colour. The extraction yield is around 19.61%, which is considerably lower than the values reported by
Medini et al., (2013) (28.77 and 39.23 %). However,
Farahat (2020) reported that methanolic extract showed a yield of 9.8% for
J. phoenicea leaves collected from Egypt. The yield of plant extracts can be affected by several parameters, it can vary depending on the chemical composition and physical characteristics of the plant material as well as the method and conditions under which the extraction was carried out (
Dai and Mumper, 2010;
Elsherif et al., 2023; Berreghioua and Ziane, 2025b). Phytochemical analysis of
J. phoenicea identified a range of bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, saponins, tannins and terpenoids. Likewise, the phytochemical screening of
J. phoenicea from two different locations in Tunisia revealed the presence of tannins, flavonoids and saponins
(Medini et al., 2013). These phytochemicals have essential biological functions, saponins can lower cholesterol, modulate the immune system and inhibit tumor growth
(Shraim et al., 2021). However, a study by
Makhloufi et al., (2014) did not detect tannins in
J. phoenicea leaves, which contradicts the findings of the current study. Additionally, no glycosides were found in
J. phoenicea leaves.
Antimicrobial activity
The antimicrobial screening of the methanolic extract of
Juniperus phoenicea leaves against six bacterial strains and one
Candida albicans strain revealed varying degrees of sensitivity. The inhibition zone diameters ranged from 9 mm to 19.5 mm (Table 1).
Listeria monocytogenes and
Staphylococcus aureus were the most sensitive strains, exhibiting the largest inhibition zones. In contrast,
Bacillus subtilis and
Enterococcus faecalis showed moderate inhibitory responses. However,
Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
Candida albicans were resistant to the extract’s antimicrobial effect. These results indicate that Gram-positive bacteria are generally more sensitive than Gram-negative bacteria, as previously reported by
Bouzouita et al., (2008) and
Ait-Ouazzou et al. (2012). According to established criteria, an extract is considered active when it produces an inhibition zone ≥10 mm, whereas inhibition zones <7 mm are classified as inactive
(Tekwu et al., 2012; Draoui et al., 2022). The higher sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria can be explained by structural differences in the cell envelope. Gram-negative bacteria possess a complex, rigid outer membrane rich in lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which acts as an effective barrier limiting the diffusion of hydrophobic compounds. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria lack this outer membrane and have a peptidoglycan layer whose relatively permeable structure does not provide sufficient protection against bioactive compounds (
Burt, 2004).
Overall, our results are consistent with several previous studies. Similar to the findings of the present investigation,
Draoui et al., (2022) reported that methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea exhibited moderate to strong antibacterial activity against pathogenic microorganisms, with inhibition zone diameters ranging from 9 to 19 mm. Likewise, a study conducted in Libya in 2021 demonstrated that methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea leaves showed a strong inhibitory effect against
S. aureus (
Alhadad et al., 2023). An additional study conducted in Libya reported a strong antibacterial activity of methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea leaves against
S. aureus and various wild strains of human pathogenic bacteria. In contrast to the findings of the present work,
Elmhdwi et al., (2015) observed that the methanolic extract was also effective against
E. coli and
P. aeruginosa. On the other hand,
C. albicans was found to be resistant, as previously reported by
Zubi et al., (2025).
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), defined as the lowest extract concentration that reduces microbial colony growth by 90%. The MIC was determined for strains that showed sensitivity using the disc diffusion assay. The results obtained show that
L. monocytogenes and
S. aureus had the lowest MIC values of 1.56 mg/mL and 3.12 mg/mL, respectively, while
E. faecalis and
B. subtilis exhibited higher MICs of 6.25 and 12.5 mg/mL, respectively. These results are consistent with previous findings reported in North Africa and the Mediterranean region.
Draoui et al., (2022) reported MIC values between 0.78 and 6.25 mg/mL for methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Similarly,
Zerrouki and Riazi (2021) observed a MIC of 10 mg/mL against
S. aureus for hydromethanolic extract.
Antioxidant activity
The antioxidant capacity of the methanolic extract of
J. phoenicea was determined using the DPPH technique. The results showed that the methanolic extract of
J. pheonicea had a percentage of inhibition of around 90.59% (Fig 1). The synthetic molecule, ascorbic acid, showed a strong reduction at the first concentrations (Fig 2).
In a previous study, the percentage of inhibition for the methanolic extract of
J. pheonicea leaves harvested in Tunisia was 95.89%, which is slightly higher than that obtained in our research
(Medini et al., 2013). In another study, the maximum antiradical power of the methanolic extract of
J. pheonicea was 62.41% (
Al-Mustafa et al., 2021). This disparity might result from various extraction techniques, plant components, solvents or sample origins
(Elsherif et al., 2023).
The concentration required to block 50% of the DPPH radicals was also estimated. The IC
50 value of the methanolic extract was determined to be 0.82 mg/mL. This indicates a moderate antioxidant activity, which remains lower than that of ascorbic acid (IC
50≈0.05 mg/mL). Antioxidant potency can vary depending on extraction methods and plant origin, as reported by
Ennajar et al., (2009), J. phoenicea leaves showed a much lower IC
50 (8.5±0.3 mg/L), highlighting these variations.