The experiments were conducted using a central composite design with 20 runs to optimize the essential oil yield (Y
1) and DPPH radical scavenging activity (Y
2). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic regression model (Table 3) confirmed that the models were highly significant for both responses (p<0.0001)
(Rezzoug et al., 2005). The coefficients of determination (R
2) were 0.9596 for essential oil yield and 0.9933 for DPPH activity, indicating that the models could explain 95.96% and 99.33% of the variability in the responses, respectively
(Chanthai et al., 2012).
Response surface analysis
The three-dimensional plots of the response surface (Fig 2 and Fig 3) clearly illustrate the effects and interactions of the independent variables on the responses.
Essential oil yield (Y1)
•
Effect of microwave power and liquid-to-material ratio: At a constant extraction time of 40 min, the oil yield increased with higher microwave power. The yield also increased as the liquid-to-material ratio increased from 5:1 to 7:1 mL/g but decreased with further increases, suggesting an optimal point around this ratio.
•
Influence of microwave power and extraction time: With a fixed liquid-to-material ratio of 7:1 mL/g, the oil yield was positively correlated with an increase in both microwave power and extraction time, reaching a peak at the central levels.
• The increase in essential oil yield with higher microwave power (from 500 W to 700 W) can be attributed to the efficient heating mechanism of microwaves. Microwave radiation directly interacts with polar molecules, primarily the intracellular water within the plant matrix. This interaction causes rapid, localized superheating, leading to a dramatic increase in internal pressure that ruptures the cell walls and oil glands. Consequently, the essential oil is released more rapidly and completely into the surrounding solvent, thus enhancing the extraction yield.
DPPH radical scavenging activity (Y2)
•
Effect of microwave power: DPPH activity showed an inverse relationship with microwave power, decreasing as the power increased. This could be due to the degradation of some antioxidant compounds at higher energy levels.
•
Influence of liquid-to-material ratio and extraction time: DPPH activity reached a maximum at a liquid-to-material ratio of approximately 7.5:1 mL/g, then decreased. The activity also decreased as the extraction time increased, suggesting that prolonged exposure to microwave radiation may reduce the antioxidant capacity of the extract.
• Interestingly, an inverse relationship was observed between microwave power and DPPH radical scavenging activity. While higher power enhances yield, the associated increase in temperature likely promotes the degradation of thermolabile antioxidant compounds. Components such as certain oxygenated monoterpenes or phenolic compounds, which are known contributors to antioxidant capacity, may have been partially decomposed or volatilized at higher energy levels, leading to a reduction in the overall radical scavenging ability of the extracted oil.
Optimization and model verification
The optimal conditions predicted by the RSM model were a microwave power of 602.49 W, a liquid-to-material ratio of 6.99:1 mL/g and an extraction time of 45.44 min. These predicted values were highly consistent with the experimental results obtained from a validation experiment conducted under slightly modified, practical conditions: A microwave power of 600 W, a liquid-to-material ratio of 7.0:1 mL/g and an extraction time of 45 min (Table 4). The experimental values for essential oil yield (3.35±0.02%) and DPPH activity (87.05±0.05%) were very close to the predicted values, validating the model’s reliability.
Chemical profile of essential oils
The GC-MS analysis identified 39 chemical components in the essential oil extracted under optimal conditions (Table 5). The major compounds were β-Pinen (20.9%), 1,8-Cineol (20.8%) and α-Pinen (13.2%).
The chemical profile of
A. blepharocalyx essential oil in our study was dominated by β-Pinene (20.9%), 1,8-Cineol (20.8%) and α-Pinene (13.2%). This composition shows some similarities to a previous report on the same species from Vietnam by
Hung et al. (2018), who also identified 1,8-Cineol and α-Pinene as major constituents, although in different proportions. However, our finding of β-Pinene as a primary component differs from their report, suggesting that factors such as geographical location, harvest season or the extraction method (MAHD vs. traditional hydrodistillation) could signi-ficantly influence the chemical chemotype of the essential oil.