Background: Western Uttar Pradesh in India is facing escalating extraction of groundwater through privately owned tube wells for irrigation which raises concern for environment and sustainability. The major reasons for increasing groundwater exploitation are inefficient water supply through Government superficial canal water, changing cropping pattern towards cash crops and subsidized power utility used in groundwater pumping. It has resulted in diminishing water-energy-food (WEF) nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices in the region.

Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interview technique from 100 farmers of two villages of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh in India. Date were also collected from 11 other stakeholders who are associated with  agriculture sectors. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA), focus group discussion (FGD) and case study techniques were also used for strengthening the quality of data. 

Result: The cultivation practices in Saharanpur district have completely transformed. It has changed from subsistence agriculture, involving diverse crops, animal husbandry and horticulture to primarily sugarcane, wheat and rice crops. The average percentage of the use of groundwater is 83% and the superficial canal water is 17%. Out of total 100 sample size of farmers in Jakhwala and Rankhandi villages of Saharanpur district, only one farmer was using innovative methods of irrigation. Only two farmers tried to economise water usage by efficient surface irrigation.  Similar are the other findings. The study suggests that farmers should be trained to improve the situation of agriculture cropping pattern by encouraging crop diversification and promote the use of drip and sprinkler methods of irrigation.

WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices are two important aspects for the growth of agriculture sector and improving farmers’ income in the long run. Groundwater utilization has become vital in the agriculture sector in India. According to a Report of the year 2020 (Central Ground Water Board, 2020), India’s total annual groundwater extraction was anticipated 244.92 billion m3, with approximately 89% of it was utilized for irrigation in agriculture. Uttar Pradesh is one of the most productive States in India with respect to agriculture due to the presence of largest groundwater reservoir beneath the Gangetic Alluvial Plain (Sinha et al., 2016). However, due to unregulated extraction and over utilization of groundwater,  the decreasing water levels are significantly affecting even the water-abundant alluvial region of the State.
       
Looking with the lens of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices, it is noticed that there is a direct relationship of increase in groundwater exploitation with production of cash crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice in western Uttar Pradesh. The advancement of groundwater pumping technology has resulted into the growth of agricultural production thereby benefiting the farmers (Smilovic et al.2015). But the nature of these benefits to the farmers are immediate, temporary, costly and at the cost of environmental degradation. It is resulting in diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices. Furthermore, irrigation by tube wells is more convenient to the farmers due to the proximity of pumping stations to the point of water utilization and at affordable cost (Zhu et al.2007). But over extraction of groundwater for irrigation has raised serious concern for environment and sustainability.
       
Most of the studies interpret groundwater management and irrigation governance as separate problems rather than interconnected. This can be seen in the research study of National Aquifer Mapping Programme in which hydro-geological data including assessment of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh has been developed (Central Ground Water Board, 2020). A study analyses the importance of  groundwater governance supported by both scientific mapping and community participation (Kulkarni et al., 2015). Only a few studies emphasize on adoption of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices for effective management of groundwater, electricity and food security (Mukherji, 2020). Hence the present study is highly relevant.
       
The WEF nexus approach focuses on the interconnected relationships among water, energy and food systems through the lens of sustainability. This conceptual approach emerged during the late 20th century and gained significant recognition in the early 2000s (Leck et al., 2015). The Bonn 2011 Nexus Conference, held in Germany, served as an essential platform for promoting the WEF nexus strategy (Hoff, 2011). The significance of the WEF nexus was further reinforced at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in 2012 (Leck et al.2015). This approach prioritizes resource security through cross-sectoral integration, demonstrating how resource usage and availability are interconnected (Biggs et al.2015). The framework additionally highlights the critical role of socio-economic factors in resource governance, particularly through considerations of accessibility, equity and cost-effectiveness (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021).
       
Multiple studies indicate that sustainable development goals (SDGs) cannot be achieved by treating water, energy and food sectors in isolation. One of the study is by where usage of integrated nexus approach is emphasised for achieving SDGs in South Asia (Mitra et al., 2020). Unsustainable agricultural practices, flat-rate or free electricity for irrigation and poor water management of superficial canal water by State have collectively led to groundwater exploitation and energy inefficiency (Mukherji, 2020). There are strong interconnections and interde-pendency among the three sectors, but lacks coordination for sustainable development (Mondal et al., 2023). WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices require cross-sectoral governance, inclusive stakeholder engagement and the integration of ecosystem services into policy frameworks (Bhaduri et al., 2015). A review on sustainability in different sectors including agriculture emphasizes that inefficiencies and mismanagement in one area can trigger negative feedbacks and resource scarcities in others (Zarei et al., 2021). A study conducted in Saharanpur district examined the economic and environmental benefits of agroforestry systems demonstrating that tree-crop integration improves soil health, biodiversity, farm productivity, income diversification and carbon sequestration (Katariya et al., 2025).
       
The WEF nexus approach has gained significant momentum as an emerging research priority since the establishment of the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015 (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021). The 17 SDGs, adopted by the United Nations, were designed to tackle global challenges by 2030 through an integrated approach that addresses economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously (United Nations, 2017). Within this framework of 17 SDGs, some goals hold particular significance for addressing the problem of diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices. Goal 2 focuses on eliminating hunger, achieving food security, improving nutrition standards and advancing sustainable agricultural practices. Goal 7 emphasizes ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy services. Goal 12 centres on establishing sustainable consumption and production patterns across all sectors. There is a need to focus on the importance of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices through integrated management, improved efficiency and policy alignment to protect ecosystems. Keeping this perspective in view, research framework of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices have been elaborated in the present study.
This study was conducted by the authors affiliated to Indian Institute of Jodhpur, India during 2023-2024 in Uttar Pradesh, India which is the most populus State and ranks fourth in terms of area in India. It is situated in the fertile plain of the Indo-Gangetic region (Singh, 2020). Agriculture serves as the primary economic foundation of the State and heavily depends on groundwater. The State is divided into four geographical regions; Bundelkhand, Central, Eastern and Western. In western region of Uttar Pradesh, sugarcane crop is predominantly cultivated followed by wheat and rice. The State undergoes low level of rainfall compared to the national average and western Uttar Pradesh witnessed a more significant decline in rainfall compared to the other regions of the State (Deo et al., 2024). The high agricultural intensity in western Uttar Pradesh caused by the excess utilization of groundwater is leading to a rapid depletion of groundwater level. Hence, diminishing the WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
       
The rationale for selecting Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh as a research site is the significant prevalence of privately owned tube wells which are used for groundwater exploitation and the notable rise in cash cropping intensity of sugarcane, wheat and rice in the region. The district encompasses a total irrigated area of 375,604 acres, with groundwater sources providing irrigation for approximately 84% of this area (Central Ground Water Board, 2020). Overall, the district has significant groundwater depletion. This is evident from the classification of its 11 blocks, with five blocks categorized as over-exploited, four as critical, one as semi-critical and only one as safe.
       
Two villages namely, Rankhandi (larger) and Jakhwala (smaller) were selected from the Deoband sub-district of Saharanpur district for this study. These villages were selected as they differ in size and population, offering two distinct demographic patterns. Both the villages also have access to a variety of irrigation facilities, making them suitable for studying WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. Larger village had 9724 registered voters in 2021. The village covers about 8600 acres of agricultural land. The smaller village had about 2430 voters in 2021. It covers about 1150 acres of agricultural land. The main crops in both the villages are sugarcane, wheat and rice. A third village, Nandi Firozpur, located in the Baliakheri sub-district of Saharanpur district was also selected for a case study highlighting sustainable agricultural practices.
       
The main objective of the study was to understand the WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. The study’s primary data collection strategy centred on conducting detailed semi-structured in-depth interviews with farmers. The sampling strategy involved selecting approximately 5% of tube well owners as the study sample, comprising 80 farmers from the larger village (Rankhandi) and 20 farmers from the smaller village (Jakhwala) from Deoband sub-district of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh. A case study was also conducted in Nandi Firozpur village located in the Baliakheri sub-district of Saharanpur district. 11 other stakeholders from the Saharanpur district were also interviewed who were involved directly or indirectly in agriculture system representing Government Officials, Irrigation Department Officials and Agriculture Department Officials.
       
PRA, FGD and case study techniques were also used for data collection.  Total 3 PRAs were conducted with the group of farmers to prepare socio-economic and demographic profile of the villages. Two PRAs were conducted in the larger village and one in smaller village. To strengthen the quality of data, FGDs were conducted with the farmers in both the villages. Two FGDs in larger village and one in smaller village were conducted. Case studies were conducted to document the sustainable agricultural practices and explore the alternative models or solutions that could be applied in the region for strengthening WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. Two case studies were conducted in each of the villages; larger and smaller and  one case study in third village. PRA technique was used for developing the socio-economic profile of villages and obtaining numerous facts and figures regarding the community’s infrastructure, agricultural cropping pattern, irrigation systems, economy, other income generating activities, population, education and other factors. FGDs were conducted to cover the issues related to WEF nexus approach, climate change resilience, market linkages of agricultural produces and benefits of different schemes being implemented for the welfare of farmers. The research design is given in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Research design.

Historical progression of agriculture sector in western Uttar Pradesh
 
The rise in population increased the pressure on water supplies in Indian agriculture during the 20th century. Increasing agricultural intensity with continuous irrigation throughout the year emerged as the sole method to enhance the agriculture productivity. The tube well technology was pioneered by the British engineers in the Indo-Gangetic basin. The United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh) made extensive efforts to encourage groundwater irrigation in the 1930s (Kahnert and Levine, 1993). Newly developed tube well technology was vigorously promoted by the administration of United Provinces (Shah et al., 2012). Government also implemented public tube well infrastructure and provided small farmers with subsidized irrigation (Shankar, 1992). Green Revolution placed significant emphasis on irrigation as a critical input for augmenting agricultural output. From 1964 to 1966, India experienced three consecutive droughts, leading to its reliance on food assistance from the United States (Shah et al., 2012). During this period and onward, Government vigorously supported the promotion of tube well irrigation in the Indo-Gangetic plains (Shah et al., 2012). Furthermore, surface irrigation through canal failed to adequately accommodate the growing water demands of water-intensive crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice in western Uttar Pradesh (Mukherji, 2020).
       
There was shift from mixed and diversified farming system to cash cropping system with the advent of Green Revolution. For better production in cash crops, farmers started using high yielding variety (HYV) seeds, fertilizers, chemicals and pesticides and replaced own saved local seeds and organic / compost manure. The newly adopted farming system required more water for irrigation. The post Green Revolution era saw a rapid surge in tube well installation across Uttar Pradesh. Shift from canals to tube wells can be seen in the Fig 2 by noticing the huge gap between the net area irrigated by the two sources (canal and tube well) in Saharanpur district.

Fig 2: Area irrigated (source wise) in Saharanpur district for the year 1998-2020.


       
In the last four decades, there has been a complete transformation in cultivation practices in Saharanpur district. Previously, subsistence agriculture was practiced, which involved a mixture of diverse crops, as well as animal husbandry and horticulture. The irrigation relied mostly on rainwater and up to some extent on canal water in the command area. The use of HYV seeds, fertilizers, chemicals and pesticides was minimal. Over time, the variety of crops has decreased  to sugarcane, wheat and rice. The local farmers rely heavily on cash crops, particularly sugarcane, due to the presence of sugar mill factories  in the district. Additionally, the method of deep irrigation by tube wells was followed by farmers instead of using surface level irrigation. This significantly impacted the level of groundwater. Fig 3 shows very large area irrigated by these crops in Saharanpur district from 1998 to 2020.

Fig 3: Area irrigated (crop wise) in Saharanpur district for the year 1998-2020.


 
Government policies concerning irrigation governance
 
The Government policies and initiatives played significant role in shaping groundwater utilization and lacked effectiveness for long-term resource conservation in the region. In India, groundwater rights are governed by the common law of land ownership (Verma and Dimri, 2020). Hence, the landowners possessed the rights to groundwater and extract the groundwater without any regulation. The State oversees management of the water. The Government policies and schemes of subsidies on electricity for tube wells, fertilizers, cultivation of cash crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice are contributing in groundwater exploitation (Sahu and Pradhan, 2024).
       
The primary objectives of the power subsidies were to enhance agricultural productivity, alleviate poverty and mitigate the risk of famine. The subsidies and groundwater utilization have been credited as the key factors that have laid a solid groundwork for the Green Revolution in India (Gandhi and Bhamoriya, 2011). However, even after evolving economy, the subsidies have remained unchanged, leading to excessive exploitation of groundwater and placing a financial strain on the Government. Agriculture in Uttar Pradesh now receives power at a flat rate under Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) after a revision in September 2019 (Kishore et al., 2021). The agricultural activities in Saharanpur district are causing environmental stress due to the gradual decline in canal water supply and groundwater levels. During 2009-2018, pre-monsoon water levels declined in most wells, with 39 wells showing decline rates of 1-81 cm/year and rose in only 5 wells with rates of 0.64-35.16 cm/year (Central Ground Water Board, n.d.). As acquired insights from the fieldwork, presently it is necessary to excavate the wells to a depth of 200 to 250 feet to access groundwater which was around 100 to150 feet or less around 2000. The modern resource-conserving technologies such as micro-irrigation, drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation cannot be easily used in these water-intensive crops.
 
Main findings of the field data analysis
 
Qualitative and quantitative primary data have been collected from the field from farmers and other stakeholders. Main findings of the field data analysis are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Main findings of the field data analysis.



Suggested recommendation to strengthen WEF nexus approach and sustainability
 
Some recommendations are suggested here to strengthen WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
1. Farmers should be trained and motivated to take grassroots action to improve the situation of agriculture cropping pattern in the region to encourage crop diversification. According to a study conducted in Kerala, black gram alongside maize or finger millet in coconut gardens significantly boosts productivity and improves soil nutrient balance, which in turn increases resource use efficiency and sustainability  in agricultural practices (Pillai and Radhakrishnan, 2024).
2. Government should boost the market for agriculture commodities by providing reasonable MSP for different commodities so that they can adopt multiple cropping pattern in place of cash cropping and get the best price for their produces. 
3. Government should also promote FPOs and build their capacity so that farmers collectively can face the onslaughts of production process and markets. They can minimise their production expenses and increase their income. According to a study conducted in Maharashtra, the main challenges for farmers participation in FPOs are insufficient financial support for FPO operations, inadequate infrastructure and capacity building, limited government support, poor market information access and farmers’ lack of awareness about the FPO concept (Salokhe, 2025).
4. Drip and sprinkler methods of irrigation should be promoted and their implementation must be monitored continuously.
5. Government can charge fair price from farmers without providing subsidy for usage of electricity (Mukherji, 2020). Over usage of water and electricity may be decreased by implementing a smart tariff and appropriate power supply rationing for the agricultural sector.
6. The scheme of Amrit Sarovar Yojana which was started by the Union Government, aims to revitalize and develop water bodies in every Indian district, supply water to the surrounding communities and lessen groundwater exploitation. Participation of community people should be encouraged by the Government in such schemes.
7. The conflicting WEF scenario requires logical management of groundwater, power utility and cropping pattern in a comprehensive and integrated way with its connection to the environment. Thus, Agriculture policy should be framed keeping in view WEF Nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
In this research, the WEF nexus framework and agricultural sustainability principles serve as analytical tools to examine interconnected challenges including water scarcity, adequate energy infrastructure requirements and long-term food security assurance. Furthermore, SDGs cannot be achieved by treating water, energy and food sectors in isolation. Findings reveal that intensive cultivation of cash crops particularly sugarcane, wheat and rice has driven a disproportionate rise in groundwater extraction, undermining the integrated resource management envisioned by the WEF nexus. It has resulted in diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices in the region. Agricultural practices in western Uttar Pradesh underwent major transformations because of Green Revolution initiatives. It shifted farming from diversified systems toward water-intensive monocultures. There is a need to transfer policy support from cash crops to mixed and diversified crops. The present study will be highly relevant for future research in agriculture sector on WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices with various perspectives such impact of mixed and diversified farming system, climate change resilience, use of information communication technology, reducing input cost and increasing output and increasing the famers’ income and many more.
The authors extend heartfelt thanks to all the respondents (farmers and other stakeholders) from the western Uttar Pradesh who cooperated and provided data in the study during the field visits.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institution. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct and indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declares that these is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Bhaduri, A., Ringler, C., Dombrowski, I., Mohtar, R. and Scheumann, W. (2015). Sustainability in the water-energy-food nexus. Water International. 40(5-6): 723-732. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1096110.

  2. Biggs, E.M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, J.M., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., McNeill, K., Neef, A., Van Ogtrop, F., Curnow, J., Haworth, B., Duce, S. and Imanari, Y. (2015). Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science and Policy. 54: 389- 397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002.

  3. Central Ground Water Board. (2020). National compilation on dynamic ground water resources of India, 2020. Central Ground Water Board, Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. https://www.cgwb.gov.in/ old_website/documents/2021-08-02-GWRA_India_ 2020.pdf.

  4. Central Ground Water Board. (n.d.). Report on national aquifer mapping programme and ground water management plan of Saharanpur district, Uttar Pradesh. Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. https://cgwb. gov.in/old_website/AQM/NAQUIM_REPORT/UP/Sahara- npur%20NAQUIM%20Report.pdf.

  5. Deo, K., Tripathi, P., Kumar, A., Gupta, A., Singh, K., Mishra, S. and Singh, A. (2024). Trends of rainfall in different sectors of Uttar Pradesh under present scenario of climate change.  Vayumandal. 42(1): 12-20. https://vayumandal.imetsociety. org/index.php/Vayumandal/article/view/135

  6. Gandhi, V., Bhamoriya, V. (2011). Groundwater irrigation in India: Growth challenges and risks in India Infrastructure Report, Oxford University Press, 90-117. 

  7. Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the nexus: Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute. https:/ /uploads.water-energy-food.org/resources/SEI-Paper- Hoff-UnderstandingTheNexus-2011.pdf.

  8. Kahnert, F., Levine, G. (1993). Groundwater irrigation and the rural poor: Options for development in the Gangetic basin. Washinton DC: The World Bank. https://documents1. worldbank.org/curated/en/485761468741010985/pdf/ 298170018213121n0and0the0Rural0Poor.pdf

  9. Katariya, I., Pradhan, L. and Tripathi, N. (2025). Comparative economic analysis and environmental benefits of agroforestry systems: A case study from Saharanpur, India with global perspectives. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research.  59(4): 664-671. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6308.

  10. Kishore, P., Singh, D.R., Srivastava, S. and Kumar, A.P. (2021). Food- groundwater-energy nexus in Indian agriculture: Empirical evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. 10th ASAE International Conference (Virtual), Beijing, China. https://ideas.repec. org/p/ags/asae21/329408.html

  11. Kulkarni, H., Shah, M. and Vijay Shankar, P. (2015). Shaping the contours of groundwater governance in India. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 4: 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejrh.2014.11.004.

  12. Land Use Statistics 1998 to 2020. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://data.desagri.gov.in/weblus/lus-crop- irrigated-area-report-web

  13. Land Use Statistics 2000-01 to 2019-20. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

  14. Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M. and Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Description, Theory and Practice. Geography Compass. 9(8): 445-460. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gec3.12222

  15. Mabhaudhi, T., Nhamo, L., Chibarabada, T.P., Mabaya, G., Mpandeli, S., Liphadzi, S., Senzanje, A., Naidoo, D., Modi, A.T. and Chivenge, P.P. (2021). Assessing progress towards sustainable development goals through nexus planning. Water. 13(9): 1321.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091321.

  16. Mitra, B., Sharma, D., Kuyama, T., Pham, B., Islam, G. and Thao, P. (2020). Water-energy-food nexus perspective: Pathway for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to country action in India. APN Science Bulletin. 10(1). doi:10. 30852/sb.2020.1067.

  17. Mondal, K., Chatterjee, C. and Singh, R. (2023). Examining the coupling and coordination of water-energy-food nexus at a sub- national scale in India - Insights from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 43: 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.spc.2023.10.020.

  18. Mukherji, A. (2020). Sustainable groundwater management in India needs a water-energy-food nexus approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 44(1): 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13123.

  19. Pillai, P.S. and Radhakrishnan, N.V. (2024). Crop diversification for enhanced productivity in the southern laterites of Kerala. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(3): 450- 455. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6067.

  20. Sahu, H. and Pradhan, K.C. (2024). A grave concern: Water-intensive crops and subsidized electricity amplifying groundwater depletion in India. Water Economics and Policy. 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24500012.

  21. Salokhe, S. (2025). Exploring challenges faced by farmers in participating in farmer’s producer organizations: Under- standing the key issues impacting FPO success: A review.  Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(6): 843- 849. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6294.

  22. Shah, T., Giordano, M. and Mukherji, A. (2012). Political economy of the energy-groundwater nexus in India: Exploring issues and assessing policy options. Hydrogeology Journal. 20: 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0816-0.

  23. Shankar, K. (1992). Dynamics of ground water irrigation, Segment Books.https://books.google.co.in/books?id=i1lGAAAAYAAJ.

  24. Singh, A. (2020). Sustainable management of groundwater resources in Uttar Pradesh. The Administrator Journal of LBSNAA. 60(1): 58-80. https://www.lbsnaa.gov.in/Academy Souvenir/documents/6059ccc3393b4Final%20 Adminis- trator% 20Vol%2060%20I.pdf.

  25. Sinha, R.S., Baksh, M. and Dutta, V. (2016). Sustainable groundwater management in Uttar Pradesh with special reference to mapping and management of aquifers. Healthy Rivers - Ecosystem Benefits and Prosperity (pp. 165-179). Bharat  Book Centre.

  26. Smilovic, M., Gleeson, T. and Siebert, S. (2015). The limits of increasing food production with irrigation in India. Food Security. 7: 835-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0477-2.

  27. United Nations. (2017). United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World. https://www. un.org/sustainabledevelopment/.

  28. Verma, A. and Dimri, S. (2020). The law and practice of ground water conservation: With specific reference to the State of Uttar Pradesh. Solid State Technology. 63(6): 17643- 17655. https://solidstatetechnology.us/index.php/JSST/ article/view/7806.

  29. Zarei, S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Kheirinejad, S. and Loáiciga, H.A. (2021). Environmental sustainability: A review of the water- energy-food nexus. AQUA - Water Infrastructure.  Ecosystems and Society. 70(2): 138-154. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua. 2020.058.

  30. Zhu, T., Ringler, C. and Cai, X. (2007). Energy price and groundwater extraction for agriculture: Exploring the energy-water- food nexus at the global and basin levels. International Conference on Linkages Between Energy and Water Management for Agriculture in Developing Countries, Hyderabad, India, 29-30 January 2007.

Background: Western Uttar Pradesh in India is facing escalating extraction of groundwater through privately owned tube wells for irrigation which raises concern for environment and sustainability. The major reasons for increasing groundwater exploitation are inefficient water supply through Government superficial canal water, changing cropping pattern towards cash crops and subsidized power utility used in groundwater pumping. It has resulted in diminishing water-energy-food (WEF) nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices in the region.

Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interview technique from 100 farmers of two villages of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh in India. Date were also collected from 11 other stakeholders who are associated with  agriculture sectors. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA), focus group discussion (FGD) and case study techniques were also used for strengthening the quality of data. 

Result: The cultivation practices in Saharanpur district have completely transformed. It has changed from subsistence agriculture, involving diverse crops, animal husbandry and horticulture to primarily sugarcane, wheat and rice crops. The average percentage of the use of groundwater is 83% and the superficial canal water is 17%. Out of total 100 sample size of farmers in Jakhwala and Rankhandi villages of Saharanpur district, only one farmer was using innovative methods of irrigation. Only two farmers tried to economise water usage by efficient surface irrigation.  Similar are the other findings. The study suggests that farmers should be trained to improve the situation of agriculture cropping pattern by encouraging crop diversification and promote the use of drip and sprinkler methods of irrigation.

WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices are two important aspects for the growth of agriculture sector and improving farmers’ income in the long run. Groundwater utilization has become vital in the agriculture sector in India. According to a Report of the year 2020 (Central Ground Water Board, 2020), India’s total annual groundwater extraction was anticipated 244.92 billion m3, with approximately 89% of it was utilized for irrigation in agriculture. Uttar Pradesh is one of the most productive States in India with respect to agriculture due to the presence of largest groundwater reservoir beneath the Gangetic Alluvial Plain (Sinha et al., 2016). However, due to unregulated extraction and over utilization of groundwater,  the decreasing water levels are significantly affecting even the water-abundant alluvial region of the State.
       
Looking with the lens of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices, it is noticed that there is a direct relationship of increase in groundwater exploitation with production of cash crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice in western Uttar Pradesh. The advancement of groundwater pumping technology has resulted into the growth of agricultural production thereby benefiting the farmers (Smilovic et al.2015). But the nature of these benefits to the farmers are immediate, temporary, costly and at the cost of environmental degradation. It is resulting in diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices. Furthermore, irrigation by tube wells is more convenient to the farmers due to the proximity of pumping stations to the point of water utilization and at affordable cost (Zhu et al.2007). But over extraction of groundwater for irrigation has raised serious concern for environment and sustainability.
       
Most of the studies interpret groundwater management and irrigation governance as separate problems rather than interconnected. This can be seen in the research study of National Aquifer Mapping Programme in which hydro-geological data including assessment of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh has been developed (Central Ground Water Board, 2020). A study analyses the importance of  groundwater governance supported by both scientific mapping and community participation (Kulkarni et al., 2015). Only a few studies emphasize on adoption of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices for effective management of groundwater, electricity and food security (Mukherji, 2020). Hence the present study is highly relevant.
       
The WEF nexus approach focuses on the interconnected relationships among water, energy and food systems through the lens of sustainability. This conceptual approach emerged during the late 20th century and gained significant recognition in the early 2000s (Leck et al., 2015). The Bonn 2011 Nexus Conference, held in Germany, served as an essential platform for promoting the WEF nexus strategy (Hoff, 2011). The significance of the WEF nexus was further reinforced at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in 2012 (Leck et al.2015). This approach prioritizes resource security through cross-sectoral integration, demonstrating how resource usage and availability are interconnected (Biggs et al.2015). The framework additionally highlights the critical role of socio-economic factors in resource governance, particularly through considerations of accessibility, equity and cost-effectiveness (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021).
       
Multiple studies indicate that sustainable development goals (SDGs) cannot be achieved by treating water, energy and food sectors in isolation. One of the study is by where usage of integrated nexus approach is emphasised for achieving SDGs in South Asia (Mitra et al., 2020). Unsustainable agricultural practices, flat-rate or free electricity for irrigation and poor water management of superficial canal water by State have collectively led to groundwater exploitation and energy inefficiency (Mukherji, 2020). There are strong interconnections and interde-pendency among the three sectors, but lacks coordination for sustainable development (Mondal et al., 2023). WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices require cross-sectoral governance, inclusive stakeholder engagement and the integration of ecosystem services into policy frameworks (Bhaduri et al., 2015). A review on sustainability in different sectors including agriculture emphasizes that inefficiencies and mismanagement in one area can trigger negative feedbacks and resource scarcities in others (Zarei et al., 2021). A study conducted in Saharanpur district examined the economic and environmental benefits of agroforestry systems demonstrating that tree-crop integration improves soil health, biodiversity, farm productivity, income diversification and carbon sequestration (Katariya et al., 2025).
       
The WEF nexus approach has gained significant momentum as an emerging research priority since the establishment of the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015 (Mabhaudhi et al., 2021). The 17 SDGs, adopted by the United Nations, were designed to tackle global challenges by 2030 through an integrated approach that addresses economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously (United Nations, 2017). Within this framework of 17 SDGs, some goals hold particular significance for addressing the problem of diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agriculture practices. Goal 2 focuses on eliminating hunger, achieving food security, improving nutrition standards and advancing sustainable agricultural practices. Goal 7 emphasizes ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy services. Goal 12 centres on establishing sustainable consumption and production patterns across all sectors. There is a need to focus on the importance of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices through integrated management, improved efficiency and policy alignment to protect ecosystems. Keeping this perspective in view, research framework of WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices have been elaborated in the present study.
This study was conducted by the authors affiliated to Indian Institute of Jodhpur, India during 2023-2024 in Uttar Pradesh, India which is the most populus State and ranks fourth in terms of area in India. It is situated in the fertile plain of the Indo-Gangetic region (Singh, 2020). Agriculture serves as the primary economic foundation of the State and heavily depends on groundwater. The State is divided into four geographical regions; Bundelkhand, Central, Eastern and Western. In western region of Uttar Pradesh, sugarcane crop is predominantly cultivated followed by wheat and rice. The State undergoes low level of rainfall compared to the national average and western Uttar Pradesh witnessed a more significant decline in rainfall compared to the other regions of the State (Deo et al., 2024). The high agricultural intensity in western Uttar Pradesh caused by the excess utilization of groundwater is leading to a rapid depletion of groundwater level. Hence, diminishing the WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
       
The rationale for selecting Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh as a research site is the significant prevalence of privately owned tube wells which are used for groundwater exploitation and the notable rise in cash cropping intensity of sugarcane, wheat and rice in the region. The district encompasses a total irrigated area of 375,604 acres, with groundwater sources providing irrigation for approximately 84% of this area (Central Ground Water Board, 2020). Overall, the district has significant groundwater depletion. This is evident from the classification of its 11 blocks, with five blocks categorized as over-exploited, four as critical, one as semi-critical and only one as safe.
       
Two villages namely, Rankhandi (larger) and Jakhwala (smaller) were selected from the Deoband sub-district of Saharanpur district for this study. These villages were selected as they differ in size and population, offering two distinct demographic patterns. Both the villages also have access to a variety of irrigation facilities, making them suitable for studying WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. Larger village had 9724 registered voters in 2021. The village covers about 8600 acres of agricultural land. The smaller village had about 2430 voters in 2021. It covers about 1150 acres of agricultural land. The main crops in both the villages are sugarcane, wheat and rice. A third village, Nandi Firozpur, located in the Baliakheri sub-district of Saharanpur district was also selected for a case study highlighting sustainable agricultural practices.
       
The main objective of the study was to understand the WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. The study’s primary data collection strategy centred on conducting detailed semi-structured in-depth interviews with farmers. The sampling strategy involved selecting approximately 5% of tube well owners as the study sample, comprising 80 farmers from the larger village (Rankhandi) and 20 farmers from the smaller village (Jakhwala) from Deoband sub-district of Saharanpur district in western Uttar Pradesh. A case study was also conducted in Nandi Firozpur village located in the Baliakheri sub-district of Saharanpur district. 11 other stakeholders from the Saharanpur district were also interviewed who were involved directly or indirectly in agriculture system representing Government Officials, Irrigation Department Officials and Agriculture Department Officials.
       
PRA, FGD and case study techniques were also used for data collection.  Total 3 PRAs were conducted with the group of farmers to prepare socio-economic and demographic profile of the villages. Two PRAs were conducted in the larger village and one in smaller village. To strengthen the quality of data, FGDs were conducted with the farmers in both the villages. Two FGDs in larger village and one in smaller village were conducted. Case studies were conducted to document the sustainable agricultural practices and explore the alternative models or solutions that could be applied in the region for strengthening WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices. Two case studies were conducted in each of the villages; larger and smaller and  one case study in third village. PRA technique was used for developing the socio-economic profile of villages and obtaining numerous facts and figures regarding the community’s infrastructure, agricultural cropping pattern, irrigation systems, economy, other income generating activities, population, education and other factors. FGDs were conducted to cover the issues related to WEF nexus approach, climate change resilience, market linkages of agricultural produces and benefits of different schemes being implemented for the welfare of farmers. The research design is given in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Research design.

Historical progression of agriculture sector in western Uttar Pradesh
 
The rise in population increased the pressure on water supplies in Indian agriculture during the 20th century. Increasing agricultural intensity with continuous irrigation throughout the year emerged as the sole method to enhance the agriculture productivity. The tube well technology was pioneered by the British engineers in the Indo-Gangetic basin. The United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh) made extensive efforts to encourage groundwater irrigation in the 1930s (Kahnert and Levine, 1993). Newly developed tube well technology was vigorously promoted by the administration of United Provinces (Shah et al., 2012). Government also implemented public tube well infrastructure and provided small farmers with subsidized irrigation (Shankar, 1992). Green Revolution placed significant emphasis on irrigation as a critical input for augmenting agricultural output. From 1964 to 1966, India experienced three consecutive droughts, leading to its reliance on food assistance from the United States (Shah et al., 2012). During this period and onward, Government vigorously supported the promotion of tube well irrigation in the Indo-Gangetic plains (Shah et al., 2012). Furthermore, surface irrigation through canal failed to adequately accommodate the growing water demands of water-intensive crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice in western Uttar Pradesh (Mukherji, 2020).
       
There was shift from mixed and diversified farming system to cash cropping system with the advent of Green Revolution. For better production in cash crops, farmers started using high yielding variety (HYV) seeds, fertilizers, chemicals and pesticides and replaced own saved local seeds and organic / compost manure. The newly adopted farming system required more water for irrigation. The post Green Revolution era saw a rapid surge in tube well installation across Uttar Pradesh. Shift from canals to tube wells can be seen in the Fig 2 by noticing the huge gap between the net area irrigated by the two sources (canal and tube well) in Saharanpur district.

Fig 2: Area irrigated (source wise) in Saharanpur district for the year 1998-2020.


       
In the last four decades, there has been a complete transformation in cultivation practices in Saharanpur district. Previously, subsistence agriculture was practiced, which involved a mixture of diverse crops, as well as animal husbandry and horticulture. The irrigation relied mostly on rainwater and up to some extent on canal water in the command area. The use of HYV seeds, fertilizers, chemicals and pesticides was minimal. Over time, the variety of crops has decreased  to sugarcane, wheat and rice. The local farmers rely heavily on cash crops, particularly sugarcane, due to the presence of sugar mill factories  in the district. Additionally, the method of deep irrigation by tube wells was followed by farmers instead of using surface level irrigation. This significantly impacted the level of groundwater. Fig 3 shows very large area irrigated by these crops in Saharanpur district from 1998 to 2020.

Fig 3: Area irrigated (crop wise) in Saharanpur district for the year 1998-2020.


 
Government policies concerning irrigation governance
 
The Government policies and initiatives played significant role in shaping groundwater utilization and lacked effectiveness for long-term resource conservation in the region. In India, groundwater rights are governed by the common law of land ownership (Verma and Dimri, 2020). Hence, the landowners possessed the rights to groundwater and extract the groundwater without any regulation. The State oversees management of the water. The Government policies and schemes of subsidies on electricity for tube wells, fertilizers, cultivation of cash crops such as sugarcane, wheat and rice are contributing in groundwater exploitation (Sahu and Pradhan, 2024).
       
The primary objectives of the power subsidies were to enhance agricultural productivity, alleviate poverty and mitigate the risk of famine. The subsidies and groundwater utilization have been credited as the key factors that have laid a solid groundwork for the Green Revolution in India (Gandhi and Bhamoriya, 2011). However, even after evolving economy, the subsidies have remained unchanged, leading to excessive exploitation of groundwater and placing a financial strain on the Government. Agriculture in Uttar Pradesh now receives power at a flat rate under Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) after a revision in September 2019 (Kishore et al., 2021). The agricultural activities in Saharanpur district are causing environmental stress due to the gradual decline in canal water supply and groundwater levels. During 2009-2018, pre-monsoon water levels declined in most wells, with 39 wells showing decline rates of 1-81 cm/year and rose in only 5 wells with rates of 0.64-35.16 cm/year (Central Ground Water Board, n.d.). As acquired insights from the fieldwork, presently it is necessary to excavate the wells to a depth of 200 to 250 feet to access groundwater which was around 100 to150 feet or less around 2000. The modern resource-conserving technologies such as micro-irrigation, drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation cannot be easily used in these water-intensive crops.
 
Main findings of the field data analysis
 
Qualitative and quantitative primary data have been collected from the field from farmers and other stakeholders. Main findings of the field data analysis are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Main findings of the field data analysis.



Suggested recommendation to strengthen WEF nexus approach and sustainability
 
Some recommendations are suggested here to strengthen WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
1. Farmers should be trained and motivated to take grassroots action to improve the situation of agriculture cropping pattern in the region to encourage crop diversification. According to a study conducted in Kerala, black gram alongside maize or finger millet in coconut gardens significantly boosts productivity and improves soil nutrient balance, which in turn increases resource use efficiency and sustainability  in agricultural practices (Pillai and Radhakrishnan, 2024).
2. Government should boost the market for agriculture commodities by providing reasonable MSP for different commodities so that they can adopt multiple cropping pattern in place of cash cropping and get the best price for their produces. 
3. Government should also promote FPOs and build their capacity so that farmers collectively can face the onslaughts of production process and markets. They can minimise their production expenses and increase their income. According to a study conducted in Maharashtra, the main challenges for farmers participation in FPOs are insufficient financial support for FPO operations, inadequate infrastructure and capacity building, limited government support, poor market information access and farmers’ lack of awareness about the FPO concept (Salokhe, 2025).
4. Drip and sprinkler methods of irrigation should be promoted and their implementation must be monitored continuously.
5. Government can charge fair price from farmers without providing subsidy for usage of electricity (Mukherji, 2020). Over usage of water and electricity may be decreased by implementing a smart tariff and appropriate power supply rationing for the agricultural sector.
6. The scheme of Amrit Sarovar Yojana which was started by the Union Government, aims to revitalize and develop water bodies in every Indian district, supply water to the surrounding communities and lessen groundwater exploitation. Participation of community people should be encouraged by the Government in such schemes.
7. The conflicting WEF scenario requires logical management of groundwater, power utility and cropping pattern in a comprehensive and integrated way with its connection to the environment. Thus, Agriculture policy should be framed keeping in view WEF Nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices.
In this research, the WEF nexus framework and agricultural sustainability principles serve as analytical tools to examine interconnected challenges including water scarcity, adequate energy infrastructure requirements and long-term food security assurance. Furthermore, SDGs cannot be achieved by treating water, energy and food sectors in isolation. Findings reveal that intensive cultivation of cash crops particularly sugarcane, wheat and rice has driven a disproportionate rise in groundwater extraction, undermining the integrated resource management envisioned by the WEF nexus. It has resulted in diminishing WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices in the region. Agricultural practices in western Uttar Pradesh underwent major transformations because of Green Revolution initiatives. It shifted farming from diversified systems toward water-intensive monocultures. There is a need to transfer policy support from cash crops to mixed and diversified crops. The present study will be highly relevant for future research in agriculture sector on WEF nexus approach and sustainability in agricultural practices with various perspectives such impact of mixed and diversified farming system, climate change resilience, use of information communication technology, reducing input cost and increasing output and increasing the famers’ income and many more.
The authors extend heartfelt thanks to all the respondents (farmers and other stakeholders) from the western Uttar Pradesh who cooperated and provided data in the study during the field visits.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institution. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct and indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declares that these is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Bhaduri, A., Ringler, C., Dombrowski, I., Mohtar, R. and Scheumann, W. (2015). Sustainability in the water-energy-food nexus. Water International. 40(5-6): 723-732. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1096110.

  2. Biggs, E.M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, J.M., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., McNeill, K., Neef, A., Van Ogtrop, F., Curnow, J., Haworth, B., Duce, S. and Imanari, Y. (2015). Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science and Policy. 54: 389- 397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002.

  3. Central Ground Water Board. (2020). National compilation on dynamic ground water resources of India, 2020. Central Ground Water Board, Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. https://www.cgwb.gov.in/ old_website/documents/2021-08-02-GWRA_India_ 2020.pdf.

  4. Central Ground Water Board. (n.d.). Report on national aquifer mapping programme and ground water management plan of Saharanpur district, Uttar Pradesh. Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. https://cgwb. gov.in/old_website/AQM/NAQUIM_REPORT/UP/Sahara- npur%20NAQUIM%20Report.pdf.

  5. Deo, K., Tripathi, P., Kumar, A., Gupta, A., Singh, K., Mishra, S. and Singh, A. (2024). Trends of rainfall in different sectors of Uttar Pradesh under present scenario of climate change.  Vayumandal. 42(1): 12-20. https://vayumandal.imetsociety. org/index.php/Vayumandal/article/view/135

  6. Gandhi, V., Bhamoriya, V. (2011). Groundwater irrigation in India: Growth challenges and risks in India Infrastructure Report, Oxford University Press, 90-117. 

  7. Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the nexus: Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute. https:/ /uploads.water-energy-food.org/resources/SEI-Paper- Hoff-UnderstandingTheNexus-2011.pdf.

  8. Kahnert, F., Levine, G. (1993). Groundwater irrigation and the rural poor: Options for development in the Gangetic basin. Washinton DC: The World Bank. https://documents1. worldbank.org/curated/en/485761468741010985/pdf/ 298170018213121n0and0the0Rural0Poor.pdf

  9. Katariya, I., Pradhan, L. and Tripathi, N. (2025). Comparative economic analysis and environmental benefits of agroforestry systems: A case study from Saharanpur, India with global perspectives. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research.  59(4): 664-671. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6308.

  10. Kishore, P., Singh, D.R., Srivastava, S. and Kumar, A.P. (2021). Food- groundwater-energy nexus in Indian agriculture: Empirical evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. 10th ASAE International Conference (Virtual), Beijing, China. https://ideas.repec. org/p/ags/asae21/329408.html

  11. Kulkarni, H., Shah, M. and Vijay Shankar, P. (2015). Shaping the contours of groundwater governance in India. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 4: 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejrh.2014.11.004.

  12. Land Use Statistics 1998 to 2020. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. https://data.desagri.gov.in/weblus/lus-crop- irrigated-area-report-web

  13. Land Use Statistics 2000-01 to 2019-20. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

  14. Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M. and Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Description, Theory and Practice. Geography Compass. 9(8): 445-460. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gec3.12222

  15. Mabhaudhi, T., Nhamo, L., Chibarabada, T.P., Mabaya, G., Mpandeli, S., Liphadzi, S., Senzanje, A., Naidoo, D., Modi, A.T. and Chivenge, P.P. (2021). Assessing progress towards sustainable development goals through nexus planning. Water. 13(9): 1321.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091321.

  16. Mitra, B., Sharma, D., Kuyama, T., Pham, B., Islam, G. and Thao, P. (2020). Water-energy-food nexus perspective: Pathway for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to country action in India. APN Science Bulletin. 10(1). doi:10. 30852/sb.2020.1067.

  17. Mondal, K., Chatterjee, C. and Singh, R. (2023). Examining the coupling and coordination of water-energy-food nexus at a sub- national scale in India - Insights from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 43: 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.spc.2023.10.020.

  18. Mukherji, A. (2020). Sustainable groundwater management in India needs a water-energy-food nexus approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 44(1): 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13123.

  19. Pillai, P.S. and Radhakrishnan, N.V. (2024). Crop diversification for enhanced productivity in the southern laterites of Kerala. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(3): 450- 455. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6067.

  20. Sahu, H. and Pradhan, K.C. (2024). A grave concern: Water-intensive crops and subsidized electricity amplifying groundwater depletion in India. Water Economics and Policy. 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24500012.

  21. Salokhe, S. (2025). Exploring challenges faced by farmers in participating in farmer’s producer organizations: Under- standing the key issues impacting FPO success: A review.  Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(6): 843- 849. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6294.

  22. Shah, T., Giordano, M. and Mukherji, A. (2012). Political economy of the energy-groundwater nexus in India: Exploring issues and assessing policy options. Hydrogeology Journal. 20: 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0816-0.

  23. Shankar, K. (1992). Dynamics of ground water irrigation, Segment Books.https://books.google.co.in/books?id=i1lGAAAAYAAJ.

  24. Singh, A. (2020). Sustainable management of groundwater resources in Uttar Pradesh. The Administrator Journal of LBSNAA. 60(1): 58-80. https://www.lbsnaa.gov.in/Academy Souvenir/documents/6059ccc3393b4Final%20 Adminis- trator% 20Vol%2060%20I.pdf.

  25. Sinha, R.S., Baksh, M. and Dutta, V. (2016). Sustainable groundwater management in Uttar Pradesh with special reference to mapping and management of aquifers. Healthy Rivers - Ecosystem Benefits and Prosperity (pp. 165-179). Bharat  Book Centre.

  26. Smilovic, M., Gleeson, T. and Siebert, S. (2015). The limits of increasing food production with irrigation in India. Food Security. 7: 835-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0477-2.

  27. United Nations. (2017). United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World. https://www. un.org/sustainabledevelopment/.

  28. Verma, A. and Dimri, S. (2020). The law and practice of ground water conservation: With specific reference to the State of Uttar Pradesh. Solid State Technology. 63(6): 17643- 17655. https://solidstatetechnology.us/index.php/JSST/ article/view/7806.

  29. Zarei, S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Kheirinejad, S. and Loáiciga, H.A. (2021). Environmental sustainability: A review of the water- energy-food nexus. AQUA - Water Infrastructure.  Ecosystems and Society. 70(2): 138-154. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua. 2020.058.

  30. Zhu, T., Ringler, C. and Cai, X. (2007). Energy price and groundwater extraction for agriculture: Exploring the energy-water- food nexus at the global and basin levels. International Conference on Linkages Between Energy and Water Management for Agriculture in Developing Countries, Hyderabad, India, 29-30 January 2007.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)