Screening Pigeon Pea Genotypes for Drought Tolerance: A Biochemical Approach

J
Jidhu Vaishnavi Sivaprakasam1
N
Nagajothi Rajasekaran2,*
1Department of Crop Physiology, Amrita School of Agricultural Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore-641 001, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Crop Physiology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Baburayanpettai-603 307, Tamil Nadu, India.
Backgroud: Pigeon pea, being a rainfed crop, suffers water scarcity to a greater extent. The reduction in yield is due to a reduction in photosynthetic rate and the source-sink relationship. The reduction in photosynthesis occurs due to enzyme degradation and also antioxidant production reduction.

Methods: Thus, screening of pigeon pea genotypes (18no.) based on the accumulation of proteins, enzymes and antioxidants will be easy to identify drought tolerant species and susceptible species.

Result: Among 18 genotypes selected for screening, COPH 2, ICPL12755 and ICPL12974 genotypes are high in proline, epicuticular wax, scavenging enzymes like peroxidase and catalase especially during drought condition than control. The same genotypes were proved with remarkable increase in yields. There are few varieties that show lower amounts of the enzymes along with lesser yield such as CO5, ICPL4777 and ICPL6997. This shows that antioxidant activity and proteins are directly involved in improving yield along with tolerance towards drought condition.
Co: Coimbatore, Coph-coimbatore pigeonpea hybrid, Icph: Icrisat pigeonpea lines, Jkm: Jawahar khargoan, Vbn: Vamban, Vrg: Vamban red gram.
 
Pigeon pea, scientifically known as [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.], is primarily grown in semi-arid tropical regions, where it is irrigated by rainwater. According to FAOSTAT2024, India is responsible for more than 70 per cent of the total cultivated area, with an estimated acreage of 5.01 million hectares and a production of 3.89 million tons. According to Indian institute of pulse research, indias pigeon pea productivity was significantly greater at 859 kg/ha but still it is less potential. The most significant factor that has an impact on production is the unpredictable and non-specific occurrence of drought, which can take place at any point in time during the growing season and has the potential to disrupt both growth and development. The disruption during drought is due to changes in physiological and metabolic processes that have an impact on the growth and development of the crop, which in turn leads to a change in the photosynthetic rate and the source-sink connections. The crop is more susceptible to the effects of drought stress, particularly when it is exposed to drying conditions during the late blooming and early pod develop-ment stages, which leads to significant output losses.
       
Drought stress significantly impacts pigeon pea productivity, during the reproductive stage, by reducing enzyme activity and reproductive processes (Costa and Shanmugathasan, 1999; Kosar et al., 2020). It impairs metabolic functions, diminishes antioxidant enzyme activity and inhibits protein synthesis and photophosphorylation, ultimately stunting plant growth (Naderi et al., 2020). These effects contribute to yield loss, economic instability and food insecurity (Mansoor et al., 2021). In response, plants activate defense mechanisms, including the production of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to scavenge reactive oxygen species (Saman et al., 2022). Screening pigeon pea genotypes for drought tolerance involves evaluating the overexpression or downregulation of stress-responsive enzymes and proteins, which vary due to genotype environment interactions.
The field experiment was conducted at the Millet Breeding Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India using 18 pigeon pea genotypes obtained from the Department of Pulses, TNAU and the National Pulses Research Centre, Vamban. The genotypes include COPH2, VRG11, VRG17, VRG54, VRG61, VRG62, JKM144, JKM185, CO5, VBN2, ICPL4777, ICPL6997, ICPL11119, ICPL11175, ICPL12755, ICPL12974, ICPL11375 and ICPL11038. The research was conducted during 2023-24 in Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
       
The field experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with three replications. The moisture stress was imposed by suspending irrigation during the flowering and pod development stages.
       
Biochemical assessments were conducted at three developmental stages viz., vegetative, flowering and pod formation. The following parameters were recorded using established protocols: The total chlorophyll content was measured in fully expanded leaves at specified intervals using the method of Yoshida et al., (1971) and were expressed in mg g-1. Soluble protein was quantified following Lowry et al., (1951) and reported as mg g-1. The determination of nitrate reductase activity in young leaves was carried out by utilizing the technique of Nicholas et al., (1976) and expressed in mg NO2 g-1 h-1. The IAA oxidase activity was assessed using the method that was proposed by Parthasarathy et al., (1970) with results expressed as µg unoxidized auxin g-1 h-1. Proline accumulation in leaf was estimated in leaf tissue according to Bates et al., (1973) and stated as µg g-1 fresh weight. The peroxidase activity was measured using the technique outlined by Sadasivam and Manickam, (2015) and the results were expressed as enzyme units mg-1 protein-1. The amount of catalase was quantified and expressed as the ìg H2O2 min-1  g-1. The epi cuticular wax concentration was determined using potassium dichromate and expressed in µg cm-2 (Eberconet_al1977).
       
Yield attributes such as number of branches, flowers, pods per plant, fertility coefficient and seed yield were also assessed. A statistical analysis was performed on the data that was acquired to examine it in accordance with the methodology of Panse and Sukhatme (1954).
The present study was conducted to identify pigeon pea genotypes suitable for cultivation in drought prone areas and variable rainfall regions by evaluating their drought tolerance through biochemical and yield-related traits. Genotypes exhibiting higher biochemical content with minimal variation between control and stress conditions were classified as tolerant, whereas those with lower content and greater per cent reduction were deemed susceptible.
 
Biochemical parameters
 
Chlorophyll content
 
Different genotypes of pigeon pea plants experiencing moisture stress may have reduced photosynthetic pigment composition (31-43%), especially reduction in the chlorophyll content than compared with control. During the flowering stage, the total chlorophyll concentration was found to be high (Fig 1), but it quickly decreased as the plant progressed through the senescence stage. In the pigeon pea genotype COPH2, the photosynthetic pigment composition was found to be high, whereas in the genotype ICPL6997, it was found to be low. Similar results were observed from the Jha et al., (2023) who noticed reduction in chlorophyll content in mesophyll cells during water stress. Drought stress reduced chlorophyll development by lowering chlorophyll a/b ratio and damages photosynthetic machinery and accumulatio of reactive oxygen species, which led to further structural and functional alterations (Naderi et al., 2020).

Fig 1: Effect of drought on total chlorophyll content (mg g-1 fresh weight) in pigeon pea genotypes.


  
Soluble protein
 
The content of soluble proteins (Table 1) is regarded to be an index for photosynthetic efficiency since it is a measure of the activity of RuBP carboxylase. Drought stress induced throughout the flowering stage and the pod maturation stage showed the maximum soluble protein content in genotype ICPL12755 and the minimum in ICPL6997 had a negative impact on the soluble protein content, with the per cent reduction being 27.3% and 29.8% respectively. The decrease in soluble protein, lead to a decrease in the activity of RuBP carboxylase and, consequently, the rate of photosynthesis. It was confirmed that drought causes significant changes because water palys an important role in carboxylation process of photosynthesis. The drop in soluble protein that occurs under drought stress may be the result of either an increase in proteolysis enzymes, reduced production of RUBISCO or ROS allocation on degradation or both (Hasnain et al., 2023).

Table 1: Effect of drought on soluble protein (mg g-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Nitrate reductase enzyme
 
Being a leguminous crop, pigeon pea fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic relationship with nitrogen in root nodules with the help of nitrate reductase enzyme. This enzyme converts the nitrate into nitrate which is a cruicial reaction in biological nitrogen fixation. Nitrate reductase enzyme is the most sensitive enzyme which gets reduced during drought condition. According to our study, it was observed that Nitrate Reductase loss was more during stress condition which reflected in yield aspect. ICPL6997 had reduced enzyme activity compared to genotype COPH2 (Fig 2). Enzyme activity dropped to 29.0% and 53.2% during blooming and pod development due to drought stress. Drought lowered nitrogen fixation, lowering nitrate concentration and nitrate reductase activity. Souza et al., (2023), stated that during nitrogen metabolism, nitrate reductase enzyme inactivation reduce nitrate content in the plants. This reduction in nitrate reductase enzyme, limits the amino acid production needed for protein synthesis. However, no studies were observed so far about nitrate reductase enzyme in drought in pigeon pea.

Fig 2: Effect of drought on nitrate reductase activity (µg NO2 g-1 h-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
IAA oxidase enzyme
 
IAA oxidase enzyme reduces IAA responsible for plant growth and development. In our experiment, the value determines the amount of IAA available in the plant without oxidation. The temporal pattern of IAA oxidase activity (Fig 3) demonstrated a decrease in the rate of activity as the crop growth progressed. The genotype VRG61 exhibited the highest level of activity, while ICPL4777 showed the lowest level of activity. The drought stress showed a decrease of 24.0% during the flowering stage and 27.5% during the pod maturation stage. COPH2 showed maximum IAA content in our study maintaining a balance etween growth suppression and stress adaptation. The decrease in IAA oxidase activity led to the preservation of elevated auxin levels and an enhanced fertility coefficient. The activity of IAA oxidase in pigeon pea doubled under the circumstances of moisture stress (Souza et al., 2023) leading to accelerated leaf senescence.

Fig 3: Effect of drought on IAA oxidase activity (µg of unoxidised Auxin g-1 h-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Proline
 
The proline buildup in the cells of pigeon pea is associated with the decrease in tissue water stress and the largest accumulation occured during the pod initiation stage is caused by the reduction in water potential. Proline  is believed to protect plant tissues against stress by acting as nitrogen storage, an Osmo regulator and a protectant for enzymes and cellular structure. The genotype COPH2 exhibited the highest proline content, while ICPL6997 had the lowest (Fig 4). The proline content increased by 32.6% and 48.5%, respectively. Plants experiencing drought stress accumulate organic osmolytes (proline), which are recognized for their role in enhancing the plant’s ability to withstand water scarcity. The accumulation of proline may have facilitated an osmotic process in the root, allowing the maintenance of water potential gradient in the roots (Loho et al., 2025). This resulted in less water stress injury in the plant. A substantial elevation in proline concentration was seen when the stress intensified in pigeon pea (Bisht and Garg, 2023).

Fig 4: Effect of drought on Leaf epicuticular wax content (ìg cm-2) at lowering stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Antioxidant enzymes- peroxidase
 
During stress condition, plants undergo osmostic and ionic stress, with higher production of ROS which are harmful to the plants under high concentration. It will suppress the activities of cells and their respective organs. Plants possess inherent defense mechanisms by increasing enzyme activities peroxidase and catalase, which helps in protecting them from adverse conditions and are responsible for eliminating and getting rid of harmful substances. Modulation on concentration of antioxidant enzyme activity may be essential for plants to withstand environmental drought. Peroxidase, an enzyme, is highly reactive to changes in the environment and is regarded as an indicator of a plant’s ability to withstand abiotic stresses. Peroxidase plays a critical role in the process of morphogenesis and the oxidation of auxin (Bakala et al., 2024). In our study, the enzymatic activity exhibited an upward trend until reaching maturity. COPH2 exhibited a high level of peroxidase concen- tration, while ICPL6997 had a low level during drought (Table 2). This clearly explains that COPH2 could able to tolerate drought condition by mitigating osmotic stress by increasing their scavenging enzyme - peroxidase enzyme.

Table 2: Effect of drought on peroxidase activity (µmoles H2O2 g-1 min-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Catalase
 
The enzyme catalase plays a crucial role in the neutralization of reactive oxygen species, particularly hydrogen peroxide which will harm the structures of chloroplasts and mitochondria in the pigeon pea leaves (Murali et al., 2025). In this study, the catalase activity exhibited an initial increase till the flowering stage, followed by a subsequent reduction as the crop progressed toward maturity. COPH2 exhibited elevated catalase activity, while the CO5 sample displayed reduced catalase activity. At the flowering stage, moisture stress caused an 82.9% rise in catalase activity, while at the pod maturity stage, it caused an 88.8% increase (Table 3). This was in corelation with increase in catalase enzyme followed by their permeability of the plasma membrane in soybeans during drought stress (Porcel and Ruiz-Lozano, 2004).

Table 3: Effect of drought on catalase activity (µmoles H2O2 g-1 min-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


       
Epicuticular wax
on leaves is a crucial characteristic associated with the ability to withstand drought. The wax content exhibited an increase until the flowering stage, followed by a progressive fall until maturity. COPH2 exhibited a higher wax content, while ICPL6997 had a lower wax level. At the flowering stage, drought stress led to a 22.3 per cent increase in wax content, whereas at the pod maturity stage, the rise was 40.2 per cent (Fig 5). The amount of wax on the surface of leaves increased as the soil moisture deficit increased. The presence of a significant amount of epicuticular wax might enhance the ability of a plant to withstand drought conditions. This is due to the fact that high levels of epicuticular wax reduce water loss by epicuticular transpiration, but promote more gaseous exchange through stomata even when the soil moisture is limited (Samdur et al., 2003).

Fig 5: Effect of drought on proline content (ìg g-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.



Yield and yield components
 
Pigeon pea yield is primarily determined by key components such as the number of branches, pods, flowers, fertiltiy coefficient, seed weight and the harvest index serves as crucial indicators for selecting high-performing genotypes, under drought conditions where yield potential becomes more sensitive to physiological efficiency and plant architecture.
       
The number of branches showed a significant aspect that affects crop production in indeterminate crops. VRG11 had many branches, while VBN2 had a small number. Drought stress applied throughout the flowering and pod maturity stages resulted in a reduction of branch numbers by 20.8%, respectively resulting in a low rate of production. This reduced branch growth may ultimately have a negative impact on the overall seed yield of the crops. However, the additional secondary and tertiary branches do not significantly contribute to the yield. The variations in drought resistance across different genotypes were evident in their capacity to sustain the number of branches and LAI (Durga et al., 2003).
       
Number of flowers is an essential traits in determining pod yield. VRG11 had a higher number of flowers compared to ICP 12755 due to relatively higher growth potential. The flower yield was decreased by 16.6 percent due to water stress. The initial fertilized ovary in an inflorescence suppresses the development of subsequent blooms that appear later in the same inflorescence (Jha et al., 2023).
       
Variation in pod yield was primarily driven by an increase in the number of pods per plant, which was closely associated with enhanced development of pod-bearing branches. The genotype ICPL12755 exhibited a higher pod count compared to CO5. Drought during flowering have restricted the conversion of flowers into pods, thereby affecting overall productivity.
       
Drought affects fertility co-efficient, which reflects pod setting percentage. ICPL12755 has a higher co-efficient than CO5 with 25.8% reduction under drought showed. COPH2 had the largest seed production and ICPL6997 the lowest. Seed weight was high in ICPL11119 and low in ICPL11038. The hundred seed weight dropped to 13.6% due to drought stress during blooming and pod maturation. The restricted mobilization of metabolites to reproductive sinks may diminish seed weight. Several plant developmental stages leads to seed yield where COPH2 had the largest seed production and ICPL6997 the lowest. The main cause of yield loss due to drought was due to blossom or pod abortion and drought-induced meiosis impairment. Eventhough floral characters was very good in VBN11 than compared with other genotypes especially COPH2, yield was found reduced due to the drought imposed during pod development stage. COPH2 showed higher yield, due to efficient translocation of starch from leaves to reproductive parts especially under drought condition (Sharma and Garg, 2024; Zhang et al., 2017). Harvest index (HI) measures plant biomass partitioning efficiency towards reproductive parts. COPH2 had a higher HI than JKM 44 dropped 23.3% during drought. A high harvest index substantially correlates with high grain production in pigeon peas.
Biochemical and physiological parameters play a critical role in determining pigeon pea yield under drought. Biochemical parameters such as chlorophyll content, soluble protein, scavenging enzymes (catalase, peroxidase), IAA oxidase activity and epicuticular wax were evaluated alongside yield components. Genotypes COPH2, ICPL12755, ICPL12974, ICPL11175, VBN2 and VRG62 consistently demonstrated superior drought tolerance and higher yields. The study highlights that enhanced activity of scavenging enzymes is not only important for drought resilience but also contributes significantly to yield improvement in pigeon pea.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Bakala, H.S., Devi, J., Singh, G., Singh, I. (2024). Drought and heat stress: Insights into tolerance mechanisms and breeding strategies for pigeonpea improvement. Planta. 259: 123.

  2. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.D., Teare, I.D., (1973): Rapid determination of free proline in water stress studies. Plant Soil. 39: 205-207.

  3. Bisht, A., Garg, N., (2023): Harnessing the role of arbuscular mycorrhizae in arresting nodular senescence by modulating osmolyte synthesis and ascorbate-glutathione pool in cadmium stressed pigeon pea. Plant Growth Regulation. 102: 409-427.

  4. Costa, W.D., Shanmugathasan, K.N., (1999): Effects of irrigation at different growth stages and source-sink manipulation on yield and yield components of mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek in dry and intermediate zones of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 183: 111-117.

  5. Durga, K.K., Rao, M.M., Reddy, M.V., Rao, Y.K., (2003): Effect of early drought stress on morpho-physiological characters and yield of mungbean and urdbean cultivars. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 16(2): 133-135.

  6. Ebercon, A., Blum, A., Jordan, W.R., (1977): A rapid colorimetric method for epicuticular wax content of sorghum leaves. Crop Science. 17: 179-180.

  7. Hasnain, Z., Zafar, S., Usman, S., Zhang, L., Elansary, H.O., (2023): Elucidating role of melatonin foliar spray in ameliorating adverse effects of drought stress on growth and physio- biochemical attributes of Brassica rapa plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 321: 112336.

  8. Jha, Y., Yadav, K., Mohamed, H.I., (2023): Plant growth-promoting bacteria and exogenous phytohormones alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress in pigeon pea plants. Plant and Soil. 505(1): 163-183.

  9. Kosar, F., Akram, N.A., Ashraf, M., Ahmad, A., Alyemeni, P., (2020): Impact of exogenously applied trehalose on leaf biochemistry, achene yield and oil composition of sunflower under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 172(2): 317-333.

  10. Loho, L., Jena, N., Mohanty, S.K., Nedunchezhyian, M. (2025): Stress tolerance in sugar beet under various drought stress cycles. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(6): 906-913. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6362.

  11. Lowry, O.H., Rose Brought, N.T., Farr, L.A., Randall, R.J., (1951): Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193(1): 265-275.

  12. Mansoor, S., Kour, N., Manhas, S., Zahid, S., Wani, O.A., Sharma, V., Wijaya, L., Alyemeni, M.N., Alsahli, A.A., El-Serehy, H.A., Paray, B.A., Ahmad, P., (2021): Biochar as a tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Chemosphere. 271: 129458.

  13. Murali, R., George, A., Jolly, G.E., Jincy, M., (2025): Impact and response of drought stress in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.): A review. Agricultural Reviews. 1-11. doi: 10.18805/ ag.R-2713.

  14. Naderi, S., Fakheri, B.A., Maali-Amiri, R., Mahdinezhad, N., (2020): Tolerance responses in wheat landrace Bolani are related to enhanced metabolic adjustments under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 150: 244-253.

  15. Nicholas, J.C., Harper, J.S., Hageman, H.S., (1976): Nitrate reductase activity in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.): I. Effect of light and temperature. Plant Physiology. 58(6): 731-735.

  16. Panse, V.G. Sukhatme, P.V., (1954): Statistical methods for agricultural  workers. II Edition. ICAR, New Delhi, India, pp. 100-119.

  17. Parthasarathy, K., Balu, D.R.C., Rao, P.S., (1970): Studies on sandal spur. VII. Polyphenol oxidase activity and metabolism of sandal (Santalum album) in healthy and diseased. Proceedings in Indian Academy of Science. 72: 277-284. 

  18. Porcel, R., Ruiz-Lozano, J.M., (2004): Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Expermental Botany. 55(403): 1743-1750.

  19. Sadasivam, S., Manickam, A., (2015): Biochemical Methods. III Edition. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 100-101.

  20. Saman, R.U., Shahbaz, M., Maqsood, M.F., Lili, N., Zulfiqar, U., Haider, F.U., Naz, N., Shahzad, B., (2022): Foliar application of ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) improves the growth and yield of brown mustard (Brassica juncea) by modulating photosynthetic pigments, antioxidant defense and osmolyte production under lead (Pb) stress. Plants. 12(1): 115.

  21. Samdur, M.Y., Manivel, P., Jain, V.K., Chikani, B.M., Gor, H.K., Desai, S., Misra, J.B., (2003): Genotypic differences and water deficit induced enhancement in epicuticular wax load in peanut. Crop Science. 43(4): 1294-1299.

  22. Sharma, V., Garg, N., (2024): Nitric oxide and AMF-mediated regulation of soil enzymes activities, cysteine-H2S system and thiol metabolites in mitigating chromium (Cr (VI)) toxicity in pigeonpea genotypes. Biometals. 37: 185-209.

  23. Souza, L.C., Monteiro, G.G.T.N., Marinho, R.K.M., Souza, E.F.L., Oliveira, S.C.F., Ferreira, A.C.S., Okumura, R.S., (2023): Nitrogen metabolism in maize plants submitted to drought, brassinosteroids and azospirillum. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 83: e276264.

  24. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.H., (1971): Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. International Rice Research Institute. 2nd Ed. Los Bannos. pp: 61-64.

  25. Zhang Bingxue, Qiao Guang, Wen Xiaopeng (2017): Molecular cloning of an S-adenosylmethionine synthase gene from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and its expression analysis under arbuscularmycorrhizae fungi colonization and drought stress. Legume Research. 40(2): 345-350. doi: 10. 18805/lr.v0i0.7298.

Screening Pigeon Pea Genotypes for Drought Tolerance: A Biochemical Approach

J
Jidhu Vaishnavi Sivaprakasam1
N
Nagajothi Rajasekaran2,*
1Department of Crop Physiology, Amrita School of Agricultural Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore-641 001, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Crop Physiology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, Baburayanpettai-603 307, Tamil Nadu, India.
Backgroud: Pigeon pea, being a rainfed crop, suffers water scarcity to a greater extent. The reduction in yield is due to a reduction in photosynthetic rate and the source-sink relationship. The reduction in photosynthesis occurs due to enzyme degradation and also antioxidant production reduction.

Methods: Thus, screening of pigeon pea genotypes (18no.) based on the accumulation of proteins, enzymes and antioxidants will be easy to identify drought tolerant species and susceptible species.

Result: Among 18 genotypes selected for screening, COPH 2, ICPL12755 and ICPL12974 genotypes are high in proline, epicuticular wax, scavenging enzymes like peroxidase and catalase especially during drought condition than control. The same genotypes were proved with remarkable increase in yields. There are few varieties that show lower amounts of the enzymes along with lesser yield such as CO5, ICPL4777 and ICPL6997. This shows that antioxidant activity and proteins are directly involved in improving yield along with tolerance towards drought condition.
Co: Coimbatore, Coph-coimbatore pigeonpea hybrid, Icph: Icrisat pigeonpea lines, Jkm: Jawahar khargoan, Vbn: Vamban, Vrg: Vamban red gram.
 
Pigeon pea, scientifically known as [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.], is primarily grown in semi-arid tropical regions, where it is irrigated by rainwater. According to FAOSTAT2024, India is responsible for more than 70 per cent of the total cultivated area, with an estimated acreage of 5.01 million hectares and a production of 3.89 million tons. According to Indian institute of pulse research, indias pigeon pea productivity was significantly greater at 859 kg/ha but still it is less potential. The most significant factor that has an impact on production is the unpredictable and non-specific occurrence of drought, which can take place at any point in time during the growing season and has the potential to disrupt both growth and development. The disruption during drought is due to changes in physiological and metabolic processes that have an impact on the growth and development of the crop, which in turn leads to a change in the photosynthetic rate and the source-sink connections. The crop is more susceptible to the effects of drought stress, particularly when it is exposed to drying conditions during the late blooming and early pod develop-ment stages, which leads to significant output losses.
       
Drought stress significantly impacts pigeon pea productivity, during the reproductive stage, by reducing enzyme activity and reproductive processes (Costa and Shanmugathasan, 1999; Kosar et al., 2020). It impairs metabolic functions, diminishes antioxidant enzyme activity and inhibits protein synthesis and photophosphorylation, ultimately stunting plant growth (Naderi et al., 2020). These effects contribute to yield loss, economic instability and food insecurity (Mansoor et al., 2021). In response, plants activate defense mechanisms, including the production of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to scavenge reactive oxygen species (Saman et al., 2022). Screening pigeon pea genotypes for drought tolerance involves evaluating the overexpression or downregulation of stress-responsive enzymes and proteins, which vary due to genotype environment interactions.
The field experiment was conducted at the Millet Breeding Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India using 18 pigeon pea genotypes obtained from the Department of Pulses, TNAU and the National Pulses Research Centre, Vamban. The genotypes include COPH2, VRG11, VRG17, VRG54, VRG61, VRG62, JKM144, JKM185, CO5, VBN2, ICPL4777, ICPL6997, ICPL11119, ICPL11175, ICPL12755, ICPL12974, ICPL11375 and ICPL11038. The research was conducted during 2023-24 in Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
       
The field experiment was conducted using a randomized block design with three replications. The moisture stress was imposed by suspending irrigation during the flowering and pod development stages.
       
Biochemical assessments were conducted at three developmental stages viz., vegetative, flowering and pod formation. The following parameters were recorded using established protocols: The total chlorophyll content was measured in fully expanded leaves at specified intervals using the method of Yoshida et al., (1971) and were expressed in mg g-1. Soluble protein was quantified following Lowry et al., (1951) and reported as mg g-1. The determination of nitrate reductase activity in young leaves was carried out by utilizing the technique of Nicholas et al., (1976) and expressed in mg NO2 g-1 h-1. The IAA oxidase activity was assessed using the method that was proposed by Parthasarathy et al., (1970) with results expressed as µg unoxidized auxin g-1 h-1. Proline accumulation in leaf was estimated in leaf tissue according to Bates et al., (1973) and stated as µg g-1 fresh weight. The peroxidase activity was measured using the technique outlined by Sadasivam and Manickam, (2015) and the results were expressed as enzyme units mg-1 protein-1. The amount of catalase was quantified and expressed as the ìg H2O2 min-1  g-1. The epi cuticular wax concentration was determined using potassium dichromate and expressed in µg cm-2 (Eberconet_al1977).
       
Yield attributes such as number of branches, flowers, pods per plant, fertility coefficient and seed yield were also assessed. A statistical analysis was performed on the data that was acquired to examine it in accordance with the methodology of Panse and Sukhatme (1954).
The present study was conducted to identify pigeon pea genotypes suitable for cultivation in drought prone areas and variable rainfall regions by evaluating their drought tolerance through biochemical and yield-related traits. Genotypes exhibiting higher biochemical content with minimal variation between control and stress conditions were classified as tolerant, whereas those with lower content and greater per cent reduction were deemed susceptible.
 
Biochemical parameters
 
Chlorophyll content
 
Different genotypes of pigeon pea plants experiencing moisture stress may have reduced photosynthetic pigment composition (31-43%), especially reduction in the chlorophyll content than compared with control. During the flowering stage, the total chlorophyll concentration was found to be high (Fig 1), but it quickly decreased as the plant progressed through the senescence stage. In the pigeon pea genotype COPH2, the photosynthetic pigment composition was found to be high, whereas in the genotype ICPL6997, it was found to be low. Similar results were observed from the Jha et al., (2023) who noticed reduction in chlorophyll content in mesophyll cells during water stress. Drought stress reduced chlorophyll development by lowering chlorophyll a/b ratio and damages photosynthetic machinery and accumulatio of reactive oxygen species, which led to further structural and functional alterations (Naderi et al., 2020).

Fig 1: Effect of drought on total chlorophyll content (mg g-1 fresh weight) in pigeon pea genotypes.


  
Soluble protein
 
The content of soluble proteins (Table 1) is regarded to be an index for photosynthetic efficiency since it is a measure of the activity of RuBP carboxylase. Drought stress induced throughout the flowering stage and the pod maturation stage showed the maximum soluble protein content in genotype ICPL12755 and the minimum in ICPL6997 had a negative impact on the soluble protein content, with the per cent reduction being 27.3% and 29.8% respectively. The decrease in soluble protein, lead to a decrease in the activity of RuBP carboxylase and, consequently, the rate of photosynthesis. It was confirmed that drought causes significant changes because water palys an important role in carboxylation process of photosynthesis. The drop in soluble protein that occurs under drought stress may be the result of either an increase in proteolysis enzymes, reduced production of RUBISCO or ROS allocation on degradation or both (Hasnain et al., 2023).

Table 1: Effect of drought on soluble protein (mg g-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Nitrate reductase enzyme
 
Being a leguminous crop, pigeon pea fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic relationship with nitrogen in root nodules with the help of nitrate reductase enzyme. This enzyme converts the nitrate into nitrate which is a cruicial reaction in biological nitrogen fixation. Nitrate reductase enzyme is the most sensitive enzyme which gets reduced during drought condition. According to our study, it was observed that Nitrate Reductase loss was more during stress condition which reflected in yield aspect. ICPL6997 had reduced enzyme activity compared to genotype COPH2 (Fig 2). Enzyme activity dropped to 29.0% and 53.2% during blooming and pod development due to drought stress. Drought lowered nitrogen fixation, lowering nitrate concentration and nitrate reductase activity. Souza et al., (2023), stated that during nitrogen metabolism, nitrate reductase enzyme inactivation reduce nitrate content in the plants. This reduction in nitrate reductase enzyme, limits the amino acid production needed for protein synthesis. However, no studies were observed so far about nitrate reductase enzyme in drought in pigeon pea.

Fig 2: Effect of drought on nitrate reductase activity (µg NO2 g-1 h-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
IAA oxidase enzyme
 
IAA oxidase enzyme reduces IAA responsible for plant growth and development. In our experiment, the value determines the amount of IAA available in the plant without oxidation. The temporal pattern of IAA oxidase activity (Fig 3) demonstrated a decrease in the rate of activity as the crop growth progressed. The genotype VRG61 exhibited the highest level of activity, while ICPL4777 showed the lowest level of activity. The drought stress showed a decrease of 24.0% during the flowering stage and 27.5% during the pod maturation stage. COPH2 showed maximum IAA content in our study maintaining a balance etween growth suppression and stress adaptation. The decrease in IAA oxidase activity led to the preservation of elevated auxin levels and an enhanced fertility coefficient. The activity of IAA oxidase in pigeon pea doubled under the circumstances of moisture stress (Souza et al., 2023) leading to accelerated leaf senescence.

Fig 3: Effect of drought on IAA oxidase activity (µg of unoxidised Auxin g-1 h-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Proline
 
The proline buildup in the cells of pigeon pea is associated with the decrease in tissue water stress and the largest accumulation occured during the pod initiation stage is caused by the reduction in water potential. Proline  is believed to protect plant tissues against stress by acting as nitrogen storage, an Osmo regulator and a protectant for enzymes and cellular structure. The genotype COPH2 exhibited the highest proline content, while ICPL6997 had the lowest (Fig 4). The proline content increased by 32.6% and 48.5%, respectively. Plants experiencing drought stress accumulate organic osmolytes (proline), which are recognized for their role in enhancing the plant’s ability to withstand water scarcity. The accumulation of proline may have facilitated an osmotic process in the root, allowing the maintenance of water potential gradient in the roots (Loho et al., 2025). This resulted in less water stress injury in the plant. A substantial elevation in proline concentration was seen when the stress intensified in pigeon pea (Bisht and Garg, 2023).

Fig 4: Effect of drought on Leaf epicuticular wax content (ìg cm-2) at lowering stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Antioxidant enzymes- peroxidase
 
During stress condition, plants undergo osmostic and ionic stress, with higher production of ROS which are harmful to the plants under high concentration. It will suppress the activities of cells and their respective organs. Plants possess inherent defense mechanisms by increasing enzyme activities peroxidase and catalase, which helps in protecting them from adverse conditions and are responsible for eliminating and getting rid of harmful substances. Modulation on concentration of antioxidant enzyme activity may be essential for plants to withstand environmental drought. Peroxidase, an enzyme, is highly reactive to changes in the environment and is regarded as an indicator of a plant’s ability to withstand abiotic stresses. Peroxidase plays a critical role in the process of morphogenesis and the oxidation of auxin (Bakala et al., 2024). In our study, the enzymatic activity exhibited an upward trend until reaching maturity. COPH2 exhibited a high level of peroxidase concen- tration, while ICPL6997 had a low level during drought (Table 2). This clearly explains that COPH2 could able to tolerate drought condition by mitigating osmotic stress by increasing their scavenging enzyme - peroxidase enzyme.

Table 2: Effect of drought on peroxidase activity (µmoles H2O2 g-1 min-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


 
Catalase
 
The enzyme catalase plays a crucial role in the neutralization of reactive oxygen species, particularly hydrogen peroxide which will harm the structures of chloroplasts and mitochondria in the pigeon pea leaves (Murali et al., 2025). In this study, the catalase activity exhibited an initial increase till the flowering stage, followed by a subsequent reduction as the crop progressed toward maturity. COPH2 exhibited elevated catalase activity, while the CO5 sample displayed reduced catalase activity. At the flowering stage, moisture stress caused an 82.9% rise in catalase activity, while at the pod maturity stage, it caused an 88.8% increase (Table 3). This was in corelation with increase in catalase enzyme followed by their permeability of the plasma membrane in soybeans during drought stress (Porcel and Ruiz-Lozano, 2004).

Table 3: Effect of drought on catalase activity (µmoles H2O2 g-1 min-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.


       
Epicuticular wax
on leaves is a crucial characteristic associated with the ability to withstand drought. The wax content exhibited an increase until the flowering stage, followed by a progressive fall until maturity. COPH2 exhibited a higher wax content, while ICPL6997 had a lower wax level. At the flowering stage, drought stress led to a 22.3 per cent increase in wax content, whereas at the pod maturity stage, the rise was 40.2 per cent (Fig 5). The amount of wax on the surface of leaves increased as the soil moisture deficit increased. The presence of a significant amount of epicuticular wax might enhance the ability of a plant to withstand drought conditions. This is due to the fact that high levels of epicuticular wax reduce water loss by epicuticular transpiration, but promote more gaseous exchange through stomata even when the soil moisture is limited (Samdur et al., 2003).

Fig 5: Effect of drought on proline content (ìg g-1) at different growth stages of pigeon pea genotypes.



Yield and yield components
 
Pigeon pea yield is primarily determined by key components such as the number of branches, pods, flowers, fertiltiy coefficient, seed weight and the harvest index serves as crucial indicators for selecting high-performing genotypes, under drought conditions where yield potential becomes more sensitive to physiological efficiency and plant architecture.
       
The number of branches showed a significant aspect that affects crop production in indeterminate crops. VRG11 had many branches, while VBN2 had a small number. Drought stress applied throughout the flowering and pod maturity stages resulted in a reduction of branch numbers by 20.8%, respectively resulting in a low rate of production. This reduced branch growth may ultimately have a negative impact on the overall seed yield of the crops. However, the additional secondary and tertiary branches do not significantly contribute to the yield. The variations in drought resistance across different genotypes were evident in their capacity to sustain the number of branches and LAI (Durga et al., 2003).
       
Number of flowers is an essential traits in determining pod yield. VRG11 had a higher number of flowers compared to ICP 12755 due to relatively higher growth potential. The flower yield was decreased by 16.6 percent due to water stress. The initial fertilized ovary in an inflorescence suppresses the development of subsequent blooms that appear later in the same inflorescence (Jha et al., 2023).
       
Variation in pod yield was primarily driven by an increase in the number of pods per plant, which was closely associated with enhanced development of pod-bearing branches. The genotype ICPL12755 exhibited a higher pod count compared to CO5. Drought during flowering have restricted the conversion of flowers into pods, thereby affecting overall productivity.
       
Drought affects fertility co-efficient, which reflects pod setting percentage. ICPL12755 has a higher co-efficient than CO5 with 25.8% reduction under drought showed. COPH2 had the largest seed production and ICPL6997 the lowest. Seed weight was high in ICPL11119 and low in ICPL11038. The hundred seed weight dropped to 13.6% due to drought stress during blooming and pod maturation. The restricted mobilization of metabolites to reproductive sinks may diminish seed weight. Several plant developmental stages leads to seed yield where COPH2 had the largest seed production and ICPL6997 the lowest. The main cause of yield loss due to drought was due to blossom or pod abortion and drought-induced meiosis impairment. Eventhough floral characters was very good in VBN11 than compared with other genotypes especially COPH2, yield was found reduced due to the drought imposed during pod development stage. COPH2 showed higher yield, due to efficient translocation of starch from leaves to reproductive parts especially under drought condition (Sharma and Garg, 2024; Zhang et al., 2017). Harvest index (HI) measures plant biomass partitioning efficiency towards reproductive parts. COPH2 had a higher HI than JKM 44 dropped 23.3% during drought. A high harvest index substantially correlates with high grain production in pigeon peas.
Biochemical and physiological parameters play a critical role in determining pigeon pea yield under drought. Biochemical parameters such as chlorophyll content, soluble protein, scavenging enzymes (catalase, peroxidase), IAA oxidase activity and epicuticular wax were evaluated alongside yield components. Genotypes COPH2, ICPL12755, ICPL12974, ICPL11175, VBN2 and VRG62 consistently demonstrated superior drought tolerance and higher yields. The study highlights that enhanced activity of scavenging enzymes is not only important for drought resilience but also contributes significantly to yield improvement in pigeon pea.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Bakala, H.S., Devi, J., Singh, G., Singh, I. (2024). Drought and heat stress: Insights into tolerance mechanisms and breeding strategies for pigeonpea improvement. Planta. 259: 123.

  2. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.D., Teare, I.D., (1973): Rapid determination of free proline in water stress studies. Plant Soil. 39: 205-207.

  3. Bisht, A., Garg, N., (2023): Harnessing the role of arbuscular mycorrhizae in arresting nodular senescence by modulating osmolyte synthesis and ascorbate-glutathione pool in cadmium stressed pigeon pea. Plant Growth Regulation. 102: 409-427.

  4. Costa, W.D., Shanmugathasan, K.N., (1999): Effects of irrigation at different growth stages and source-sink manipulation on yield and yield components of mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek in dry and intermediate zones of Sri Lanka. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 183: 111-117.

  5. Durga, K.K., Rao, M.M., Reddy, M.V., Rao, Y.K., (2003): Effect of early drought stress on morpho-physiological characters and yield of mungbean and urdbean cultivars. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 16(2): 133-135.

  6. Ebercon, A., Blum, A., Jordan, W.R., (1977): A rapid colorimetric method for epicuticular wax content of sorghum leaves. Crop Science. 17: 179-180.

  7. Hasnain, Z., Zafar, S., Usman, S., Zhang, L., Elansary, H.O., (2023): Elucidating role of melatonin foliar spray in ameliorating adverse effects of drought stress on growth and physio- biochemical attributes of Brassica rapa plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 321: 112336.

  8. Jha, Y., Yadav, K., Mohamed, H.I., (2023): Plant growth-promoting bacteria and exogenous phytohormones alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress in pigeon pea plants. Plant and Soil. 505(1): 163-183.

  9. Kosar, F., Akram, N.A., Ashraf, M., Ahmad, A., Alyemeni, P., (2020): Impact of exogenously applied trehalose on leaf biochemistry, achene yield and oil composition of sunflower under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 172(2): 317-333.

  10. Loho, L., Jena, N., Mohanty, S.K., Nedunchezhyian, M. (2025): Stress tolerance in sugar beet under various drought stress cycles. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(6): 906-913. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6362.

  11. Lowry, O.H., Rose Brought, N.T., Farr, L.A., Randall, R.J., (1951): Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193(1): 265-275.

  12. Mansoor, S., Kour, N., Manhas, S., Zahid, S., Wani, O.A., Sharma, V., Wijaya, L., Alyemeni, M.N., Alsahli, A.A., El-Serehy, H.A., Paray, B.A., Ahmad, P., (2021): Biochar as a tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Chemosphere. 271: 129458.

  13. Murali, R., George, A., Jolly, G.E., Jincy, M., (2025): Impact and response of drought stress in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.): A review. Agricultural Reviews. 1-11. doi: 10.18805/ ag.R-2713.

  14. Naderi, S., Fakheri, B.A., Maali-Amiri, R., Mahdinezhad, N., (2020): Tolerance responses in wheat landrace Bolani are related to enhanced metabolic adjustments under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 150: 244-253.

  15. Nicholas, J.C., Harper, J.S., Hageman, H.S., (1976): Nitrate reductase activity in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.): I. Effect of light and temperature. Plant Physiology. 58(6): 731-735.

  16. Panse, V.G. Sukhatme, P.V., (1954): Statistical methods for agricultural  workers. II Edition. ICAR, New Delhi, India, pp. 100-119.

  17. Parthasarathy, K., Balu, D.R.C., Rao, P.S., (1970): Studies on sandal spur. VII. Polyphenol oxidase activity and metabolism of sandal (Santalum album) in healthy and diseased. Proceedings in Indian Academy of Science. 72: 277-284. 

  18. Porcel, R., Ruiz-Lozano, J.M., (2004): Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Expermental Botany. 55(403): 1743-1750.

  19. Sadasivam, S., Manickam, A., (2015): Biochemical Methods. III Edition. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 100-101.

  20. Saman, R.U., Shahbaz, M., Maqsood, M.F., Lili, N., Zulfiqar, U., Haider, F.U., Naz, N., Shahzad, B., (2022): Foliar application of ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) improves the growth and yield of brown mustard (Brassica juncea) by modulating photosynthetic pigments, antioxidant defense and osmolyte production under lead (Pb) stress. Plants. 12(1): 115.

  21. Samdur, M.Y., Manivel, P., Jain, V.K., Chikani, B.M., Gor, H.K., Desai, S., Misra, J.B., (2003): Genotypic differences and water deficit induced enhancement in epicuticular wax load in peanut. Crop Science. 43(4): 1294-1299.

  22. Sharma, V., Garg, N., (2024): Nitric oxide and AMF-mediated regulation of soil enzymes activities, cysteine-H2S system and thiol metabolites in mitigating chromium (Cr (VI)) toxicity in pigeonpea genotypes. Biometals. 37: 185-209.

  23. Souza, L.C., Monteiro, G.G.T.N., Marinho, R.K.M., Souza, E.F.L., Oliveira, S.C.F., Ferreira, A.C.S., Okumura, R.S., (2023): Nitrogen metabolism in maize plants submitted to drought, brassinosteroids and azospirillum. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 83: e276264.

  24. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.H., (1971): Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. International Rice Research Institute. 2nd Ed. Los Bannos. pp: 61-64.

  25. Zhang Bingxue, Qiao Guang, Wen Xiaopeng (2017): Molecular cloning of an S-adenosylmethionine synthase gene from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and its expression analysis under arbuscularmycorrhizae fungi colonization and drought stress. Legume Research. 40(2): 345-350. doi: 10. 18805/lr.v0i0.7298.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)