Pest and Disease Related Post-Harvest Losses in Rice: A Review

G
G. Aruna1
R
R. Nisha2,*
S
S. Chandraprabha3
J
J. Vanitha4,*
R
R. Mahendran4
K
K. Prakash3
1Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Post Harvest Technology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.

Post-harvest losses (PHL) is a crucial strategy in the global effort to ensure food security for a growing population and achieve sustainable development. With food production needing to increase by 70% by 2050, the staggering reality of up to 40-50% food waste in some regions due to spoilage and infestation presents a significant challenge. Also reducing PHL is not just an option; it is a critical component of an integrated approach to realise the full potential of agriculture. It is very important in combating hunger, increasing income and improving livelihoods. Investing in PHL reduction is seen as relatively modest, yet it yields rapid returns, making it a highly effective pathway to enhancing food availability, reducing poverty and optimizing resource use. Addressing PHL is essential for nourishing a growing global population while minimising the pressure on our planet’s precious assets. In global food systems, post-harvest loss is a major problem. Diseases and insect pests are becoming formidable competitors when it involves retaining agricultural products fresh after harvest. Both quantitative depletion and major qualitative degradation result from the significant harm these biological organisms cause to stored grains. Insect infestations and pathogen infections compromise food safety, nutritional value and marketability from the immediate post-harvest period through storage, processing and distribution. This exacerbates food insecurity and causes significant financial hardship for farmers and supply chain participants globally. In India, post-harvest loss (PHL) in rice is a serious problem that affects farmer earnings, food security and overall economic effectiveness.

In rice, post-harvest losses (PHL) are the quantitative and qualitative decreases in rice grain that occur in between the harvest and human consumption (Qu et al., 2021). This encompasses any reduction in the quantity of consumable rice grain that is the result of factors that impede its utilization by humans, such as a decrease in nutritional value, a decrease in its marketability, or a decrease in its edibility (Bendinelli et al., 2020 and Mahendran et al., 2024). PHL should be distinguished from intentional reductions, such as the removal of bran or husk during milling, which are essential processing stages (Muller et al., 2022). Globally, post-harvest losses in rice can range from 10% to 40% of total production, depending on the region and the techniques employed. In developing countries, losses are generally higher due to traditional methods and less advanced infrastructure. The post-harvest losses for grains, including rice, are typically estimated to be between 10% and 20% at the pre-processing stage (Nath et al., 2024).
       
The quantitative harvest and post-harvest losses for cereals, which encompass paddy/rice, were estimated to be between 3.89% and 5.92% in India.  According to national estimates, paddy losses total 5.53%, of which 4.67% occur during field activities and 0.86% during storage. A survey of 1,200 farmers in Punjab, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh revealed a paddy loss of 6.37% (including quantity and quality losses). The post-harvest losses are considerably higher during harvesting and threshing operations (Table 1), with traditional methods providing a significant contribution (Gulati et al., 2022).

Table 1: Stages and causes of post-harvest losses in rice.


 
Post-harvest losses in rice due to insect infestation
 
Insect infestations are major causes of post-harvest losses of rice, which is a staple food and an important agricultural commodity in many developing countries (Kuai et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2024a and 2024b; Jayan et al., 2022a, 2022b). The principle insect pests of rice during post-harvest storage are rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae, rice moth Corcyra cephalonica, khapra beetle Trogoderma granarium and grain borers Prostephanus truncatus. These insects feed on the stored rice thereby causing quantitative as well as qualitative losses. (Kumari et al., 2023). In India, it is estimated that the total post-harvest food grain loss is 12-16 million metric tonnes, which is enough to feed one-third of the country’s poor. According to Kumari et al., 2023, insects can account for 24.2% of these loses, which totals to around ¹ 1,300 crores in each year. Weight loss, reduced market value due to damage or discoloration of grain, contamination through insect waste and the potential for diseases such as aflatoxin to spread as a result of fungal growth are among the impacts of insect infestations. Several factors such as storage conditions, period of storage, pests control methods, as well as environmental factors such as humidity and temperature, affect the amount of grain lost (Sharma et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2022, Wu et al., 2023).
 
Key insect pests contributing to post-harvest losses in rice
 
Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae)
 
One of the most important pests of stored rice is the rice weevil. It’s a grain eater, chewing and eating the stored grains of rice to the point where up to 57% of rice weight reduction and decline in quality has been recorded for each generation in its laboratory host’s larva. Its larvae tunnel through the grain, causing the kernels to hollow out and become contaminated. Research shows that the destruction of grain by the rice weevil can be as high as 12-25% depending on storage situation. (Yu et al., 2025).
 
Rice moth (Corcyra cephalonica)
 
Stored rice is also attacked by the rice moth. It lays its eggs on grains of rice and the larvae feed on the grain causing holes and ruining it. Rice moth infestations commonly cause damage associated with a reduction in quality of up to 18% to 22% in some regions.
 
Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium)
 
The khapra beetle is a serious pest of stored rice, especially in areas with bad storage conditions. Its maggots can inflict heavy damage to the grains by feeding and creating physical damage and contamination. Khapra beetle infestations cause substantial losses (20-25%) and are related to defective rice.
 
Grain borers (Prostephanus truncatus)
 
A lesser known but equally damaging pest of stored rice is the grain borer. It normally results in weight-loss and deterioration of grain quality. The losses by the grain borers are also not as high as those by the rice weevils and moths but they also give rise to the overall post-harvest loss particularly under poor storage environment.
 
Angoumois grain moth (Sitotroga cerealella)
 
Larvae of this moth at their late instar stage can infest 69% of stored rice and cause an average weight reduction of 2.11%, varying from 1.09% to 3.10%
 
Lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica)
 
It is one of the 100 insect pests that can cause economic loss to stored grains.
 
Indianmeal moth (Plodia interpunctella)
 
This moth’s caterpillars are known as waxworms in their caterpillar stage. They are a prevalent kind of grain-feeding pest that can be found in the whole world and that feed on cereals, fruit and related commodities. The larvae can chew through plastic or cardboard packaging, allowing infestations of even stored food.
 
Rust red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum)
 
A common pest of stored grains, causing contamination and weight loss.
 
Saw toothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis)
 
Infests stored grains, leading to quality degradation and weight loss.
 
Almond moth (Cadra cautella)
 
Infests stored grains, leading to contamination and quality degradation.

Pulse beetles (Callosobruchus species)
 
While primarily pests of pulses, they can infest stored rice, causing damage and contamination.
       
A majority of small scale farmers depend on conventional rice storage and processing methods which are rudimentary and are not efficient in preventing losses. Antiquated machinery and methods of pest control have led to high wastage (Ponsiva et al., 2025). Lack of post-harvest storage facilities, especially in rural regions, also contributes to post-harvest losses. Rice is more easily damaged by pests and spoilage if it does not have adequate temperature and humidity control. Warmer temperatures and altering weather patterns can exacerbate existing post-harvest storage conditions and make crops more susceptible to pests and diseases. A lot of the farmers and actors are not adequately trained and/or knowledgeable on best practices for PHH, pest control and storage capacity which results in avoidable loss (Gulati et al., 2024).
       
Insects infestations are responsible for large amount of postharvest losses particularly in countries such as India which has a significant focus on food security and their main crop rice FAO (2022). Among the most important implications are Economic Loses, Food Scarcity and Quality deterioration. The farmer and market handlers suffers the losses due to damage of rice caused by insects during storage. As a result, less rice is left for sale and hence lower income for farmers. In areas where rice is the staple diet, any decrease in yield caused by insect attack can result in serious food shortages, particularly if it occurs during the lean season. The post-harvest rice that are infested with insects have a lower market value that is not worth for farmers and retailers to keep as stock or sale it. In addition, low-quality rice can lead to health problems for consumers through insect eggs, excrements, or it is toxicologicaly undevaluable for moulds (Table 2). Better Storage, Insecticides and Fumigation, Farmers Training, Improved Milling Procedures, Research into Pest Resistant Varieties, Research and Innovation and Government Policies and Support are the  Mitigation Strategies for Insect-Related Post-Harvest Losses (Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, 2025).

Table 2: Post-harvest losses in rice caused by insect infestation in global level.


 
Post-harvest losses in rice due to disease and microbial discoloration
 
Although infections caused by bacteria or viruses may result in discoloration in rice kernels, fungi are more frequently related to this particular condition. Sarocladium oryzae, Fusarium spp. and Pyricularia oryzae are the fungi causing grain discoloration in the field. During storage, Aspergillus and Penicillium are frequently related to discolouration. The moisture content, temperature, length of storage, insect activity and condition of the grain at the time of storage significantly affect the development of fungus in stored grains (Table 3).

Table 3: Post-harvest losses in rice caused by pathogens.


 
Symptoms of seed discoloration
 
The microorganism and infection severity may cause different symptoms. Rice seed discoloration can cause brown to black stripes or patches on the grains and hollowed-out panicles with empty grains, depending on the fungus. Grain discoloration affects size, color and shape. Wind pressure during pollination, a lack of food, a low plant population, improper fertilization or pollination, immature grain filling and maturity-stage rainfall can cause black blotches (Hariharan et al., 2025c). Discoloration was greatest during flowering, milking and soft dough.
       
Diseases that cause discoloration in seeds. 99 different species and 59 different genera of fungi were found to infect rice seeds. There are two categories for these fungi: Field fungi are parasitic fungi that contaminate grains before harvest, whereas storage fungi are saprophytes that grow after harvest.
       
Pyricularia oryzae
, Drechslera oryzae, Sarocladium oryzae, Ustilaginoidea virens, Curvularia spp., Fusarium spp., Phoma spp., Alternaria spp., Aspergillus spp. and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae are some of the primary pathogens that lead to color changes in seeds. Additionally, there are several minor pathogens, including Penicillium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Burkholderia glumae, Tilletia spp. and Cladosporium spp.
Rice post-harvest losses are a serious issue of concern, particularly in countries where rice is a staple food and also serves as the major source of livelihood for millions of people. The losses decrease food availability, disrupt the economy and affect human health (Hariharan et al., 2025a and 2025b). But with targeted interventions, such as technological solutions, better storage, education and policy support, these losses can be reduced and we can move toward making the rice supply chain more sustainable, secure and resilient. Minimizing post-harvest losses not only contributes to food security, but also provides a platform for poverty reduction and environmental degradation. Since seed discoloration in rice causes losses and is linked to infectious agents, the management approaches should be centered on ways to improve how farmers grow their crops. To cut down on the damage caused by seed discoloration, we should leverage rice’s genetic resources, such as resistant types and treat the pathogens using new-generation formulations, bio-fungicides and bio-intensive approaches.
We wish to confrim that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work thar could have influenced its outcome.

  1. Abdel-Rahman, M.A., El-Sayed, A.M. and El-Borai, F.E. (2024). Efficacy assessment of different botanicals against rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in stored rice. Journal of Economic Entomology. 117(3): 1123-1131.

  2. Abeysekara, S. and Rathnayake, R.M. (2024). Rice borer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 58(2): 78-85. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljas.v58i2.1234.

  3. Afzal, M., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Entomology. 36(2): 98-105. https://doi.org/10. 5958/0974-8172.2024.00012.3.

  4. Alam, M.S., Rahman, M.M. and Hossain, M.A. (2024). Insect diversity and extent of infestation of major rice pests in Burdwan district, West Bengal, India. Entomon. 41(3): 169-176.

  5. Ali, S., Khan, M.A. and Ahmad, Z. (2024). Susceptibility of approved rice varieties in Punjab, Pakistan to Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its impact on nutritional contents of rice grains. Journal of Stored Products Research. 65: 101-108.

  6. Al-Tamimi, S.M., Al-Dosary, M.A. and Al-Mansoori, A.M. (2024). Granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius) infestation and its effect on wheat yield in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 20(3): 345-352. https://doi.org/ 10.12816/002345.

  7. Anju, B. and Pannu, P.P.S. (2024). Status of seed discoloration of rice, mycoflora associated and its impact on seed health and quality of farmer saved seeds. Seed Research. 45(2): 131-135. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v45i2.162543.

  8. Anon. (2023a). Annual Progress Report 2023. ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack.

  9. Anon. (2023b). Production oriented survey. ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research, Hyderabad.

  10. Anonymous. (2024). National Food Security Mission: Status paper on rice 2016. https://www.nfsm.gov.in/StatusPaper/Rice 2016.pdf.

  11. Arif, M., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 51(1): 22-29. https:// doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v51i1.12345.

  12. Aslam, M., Iqbal, S. and Hussain, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation in different rice varieties in Pakistan. International Journal of Pest Management. 70(4): 301-308.

  13. Baloch, M.A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(3): 345-352. https:// doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2024.00034.

  14. Behera, S., Sahoo, S. and Sahoo, S. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Odisha, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 11(4): 123-128.

  15. Bendinelli, W.E., Su, C.T., Péra, T.G. and Caixeta Filho, J.V. (2020). What are the main factors that determine post-harvest losses of grains? Sustainable Production and Consumption.  21: 228-238.

  16. Brummer, R.J., Gore, J. and Cook, D.R. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its effect on rice yield in Southern USA. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.101108.

  17. Climate Data. (2024). Lucknow: Climate, weather by month, average temperature (India). https://en.climate-data.org/asia/india/ uttar-pradesh/lucknow-2850/.

  18. Chintalapati, P., Rathod, S., Naganna, R. and Varma, N.R.G. (2023). Insect pest incidence with the System of Rice Intensification: Results of a multi-location study and a meta-analysis. Agronomy. 13(4): 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy 13041100.

  19. FAO. (2022). Prevention of Post-Harvest Food Losses: Storage Pests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  20. Firoz, M.M., Saha, S. and Rahman, M.M. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in West Bengal, India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr. 2023.101108.

  21. Ghosh, T.S., Azmi, S.A. and Chatterjee, S. (2023). Bioecology and management of major insect pests of rice in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(2): 169-176. https:// doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1349.

  22. Gulati, A., Aneja, V., Singh, K. and Jain, R. (2022). Food Loss and Waste in India: The Case of Paddy, Wheat, Maize and Millets. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) and Agricultural Development and Marketing Initiative (ADMI), The Rockefeller Foundation.

  23. Gulati, A., Das, R. and Winter-Nelson, A. (2024). Reducing post- harvest losses in India: Farmer-level interventions and grain management strategies (Report No. 24-R-03). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).

  24. Gupta, R. and Sinha, P. (2023). Fungicide resistance management in rice cultivation. Pesticide Management Science. 79(5): 789-797.

  25. Gupta, S., Sharma, S. and Patel, R. (2025). Assessment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Madhya Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 95(1): 22-28.

  26. Hariharan, B., Mahendran, R.,Jegadeeswaran, M., Nagajothi, R., Vanitha, J. and Thirugnanakumar, S. (2025c). Analysis of genetic variability and association for yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Germplasm Lines. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi:10.18805/ag.D-6331.

  27. Hariharan, K., Satheeskumar, K., Mahendran, R., Thirugnanakumar, S., Ashraf, M. and Vanitha, J. (2025 b). Multivariate analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm accessions for yield traits by principle component analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1-5. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6395.

  28. Hariharan, K., Vanitha, J., Mahendran, R., Satheeskumar, K., Malini, B. and Kaviyarasan, S.S. (2025a). Variability and association analysis in groundnut germplasm lines for yield and yield attributing traits. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi: 10. 18805/ag.D-6309.

  29. Hasan, M.M., Rahman, M.M. and Hossain, M.A. (2025). Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium) infestation and its effect on rice quality in Bangladesh and India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 95: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jspr.2025.101109.

  30. Hou, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Ding, X., Liu, L., Wang, L. and Huang, S. (2020). First report of Pseudomonas oryzihabitans causing rice panicle blight and grain discoloration in China. Plant Disease. 104(11): 3055.

  31. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Usha, I., Naik, H., Sumangala, N., Pampangouda and Yenjerappa, S.T. (2022b). Isolation and molecular identification of bacterial microbiome associated with Grain discoloration disease infected seeds of rice using culturomics approach. Abstract. Biotechnology - Trends and Future Prospects. pp.166.

  32. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sumangala, N., Sunkad, G. et al. (2023a). Isolation and identification of microbiome associated with grain discoloration disease of rice. IPS Platinum Jubilee Conference on “Plant and Soil Health Management: Issues and Innovations”, University of Mysuru, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

  33. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sumangala, N., Sunkad, G., Naik, H.R. et al. (2023b). Estimation of yield loss in paddy due to grain discoloration disease. IPS Platinum Jubilee Conference on “Plant and Soil Health Management: Issues and Innovations”, University of Mysuru, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

  34. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Sumangala, N., Hanasi, P., Naik, H.R. et al. (2023c,). Isolation and identification of microflora associated with grain discoloration disease of rice through culturomics. Abstract. National P.G Research Conference-2023, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, India.

  35. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Usha, I., Naik, H., Sumangala, N., Pampangouda and Yenjerappa, S.T. (2022a). Isolation and molecular identification of bacterial microbiome associated with Grain discoloration disease infected seeds of rice using culturomics approach. Abstract. Biotechnology – Trends and Future Prospects, pp. 166.

  36. Islam, M.S., Hossain, M.A. and Rahman, M.M. (2024). Abundance and diversity of insect pests on Boro and Aman rice in Sylhet. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology. 34(2): 45-53.

  37. Jayan, H., Pu, H.B. and Sun, D.W. (2022a). Analyzing macromolecular composition of E. Coli O157:H7 using Raman-stable isotope probing. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 276: 121217. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.121217.

  38. Jayan, H., Pu, H.B. and Sun, D.W. (2022b). Detection of bioactive metabolite in Escherichia Coli culture using surface- enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 76(7): 812-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028221 079661.

  39. Jerlin, J., Rajendran, S. and Sriranjini, K. (2023). Incidence of various insect pests in rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(1): 12-18. https://doi.org/10. 5958/0974-8172.2023.00003.1.

  40. Kabir, M.H., Islam, M.S. and Rahman, M.M. (2024). Annual national rice yield loss scenario due to insect pests in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology. 34(1): 22-29. https:// doi.org/10.3329/bje.v34i1.354379605.

  41. Kafle, G., Shrestha, J. and Poudel, S. (2023). Rice stemborer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) infestation and yield loss in Nepal. Nepal Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 21(1): 45-50. https://doi.org/10.3126/njas.v21i1.12345.

  42. Karan, S., Sharma, R. and Kumar, P. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Haryana, India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 70: 100-107.

  43. Khamari (2020). Grain Discolouration: An Emerging Threat to Rice Crop. Research Biotica. 2(2): 80-87.

  44. Kim, N., Mannaa, M., Kim, J., Ra, J.E., Kim, S.M., Lee, C., Lee, H.H. and Seo, Y.S. (2021). The in vitro and in planta interspecies interactions among rice-pathogenic Burkholderia species. Plant Disease. 105(1): 134-143.

  45. Kiran, S., Shah, M.H. and Khan, M.A. (2024). Efficacy of different plant-based powders against rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in stored rice. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 56(2): 123-130.

  46. Kuai, P., Lin, N.H., Ye, M.F., Ye, M., Chen, L., Chen, S.T., Zu, H. Y., Hu, L.F., Gatehouse, A. and Lou, Y.G. (2024). Identification and knockout of a herbivore susceptibility gene enhances planthopper resistance and increases rice yield. Nature Food. 5(10): 846-859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016- 024-01044-4.

  47. Kumari, R., Singh, A. and Pandey, R. (2023). Postharvest loss assessment of stored rice grains in major producing regions of India. Crop Protection. 173.

  48. Kuo, Y.H., Lin, Y.H. and Chen, C.Y. (2024). Impact of various stored grain pests on rice quality in Taiwan. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jspr.2024.101108.

  49. Lazzari, S.M., Biondi, A. and Desneux, N. (2025). Global review of insect pests affecting rice: Impacts and management strategies. Agricultural Systems. 190: 103-115. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.103115.

  50. Lee, H., Kim, J. and Park, S. (2024). Seasonal dynamics and manage- ment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in South Korea. Journal of Stored Products Research. 58: 45-52.

  51. Lobo, J.M., Almeida, A.M. and Silva, F.A. (2024). Granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius) infestation and its impact on wheat yield in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 28(3): 234-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1516-8913.2024.234240.

  52. Mahendran, R., Vanitha, J., Jegadeeswaran, M., Mathivathana, M.K. and Ashraf, A.M. (2024). Association analysis in rice germplasm lines for high temperature tolerance. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5898.

  53. Muller, A., Nunes, M.T., Maldaner, V., Coradi, P.C., de Moraes, R.S., Martens, S. and Marin, C.K. (2022). Rice drying, storage and processing: Effects of post-harvest operations on grain quality. Rice Science. 29(1): 16-30.

  54. Muniappan, R., Srinivasan, R. and Raghavan, R. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Thailand. Journal of Economic Entomology. 116(4): 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad123.

  55. Nath, B., Chen, G., O’Sullivan, C.M. and Zare, D. (2024). Research and technologies to reduce grain postharvest losses: A review. Foods. 13(12): 1875.

  56. Nayak, S., Samanta, S., Sengupta, C. and Swain, S.S. (2021). Rice crop loss due to major pathogens and the potential of endophytic microbes for their control and management. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology. 9(05): 166-175.

  57. Neelam, S., Singh, G. and Kaur, J. (2023). Evaluation of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation in rice grains in Punjab, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(1): 45-50.

  58. Noor, M.A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(1): 12-18. https://doi. org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2023.00003.

  59. Pandey, R., Kumar, P. and Singh, R. (2024). Impact of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation on rice yield in Bihar, India. International Journal of Pest Management. 70(2): 145-152.

  60. Patel, B. (2024). Rice spikelet’s disease detection using hybrid optimization model and optimized CNN. Soft Computing. 28(21): 12787-12806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500- 024-10367-0.

  61. Ponnusamy, K., Kumar, S. and Ramasamy, S. (2023). Lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica) infestation and yield loss in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(3): 234- 240. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2023.00023.4.

  62. Ponsiva, S.T., Satheeskumar, K., Vanitha, J., Mahendran, R. and Thirugnanakumar. S. (2025). Multi-traits stability index analysis for yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6327.

  63. Poston, D.H., Gore, J., Cook, D.R., Musser, F.R., Allen, T. and Tomaso- Peterson, M. (2024). Duration of rice stink bug, Oebalus pugnax (F.), infestation impacts the milk stage of panicle development. Rice Science. 31(2): 123-130. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2024.02.004.

  64. Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). (2025). Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. Government of India.

  65. Qu, X., Kojima, D., Wu, L. and Ando, M. (2021). The losses in the rice harvest process: A review. Sustainability. 13(17): 9627.

  66. Raghunandana, A., Gururaj, S., Raghavendra, B.T., Yadav, M.K., Yanjeerappa, S.T., Naik, H.R., Badariprasad, P.R. and Pramesh, D. (2023b). Severity and distribution of bacterial leaf blight of rice in different rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India. 297-303.

  67. Raghunandana, A., Pramesh, D., Gururaj, S., Amoghavarsha, C., Yadav, M.K. et al. (2023a). Genetic diversity and pathotype profiling of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae isolates from diverse rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India. Plant Protection Science. 59: 31-47.

  68. Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.A. and Islam, M.S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Bangladesh. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.101108.

  69. Rajendran, S. and Sriranjini, K. (2024). Pest dynamics and management practices in rice fields across multiple states in India. Journal of Crop Protection. 43(2): 98-105. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcp.2024.01.007.

  70. Rauf, A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2023). Rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(2): 234-240. https:// doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2023.00023.

  71. Sabin Khanal, R., Joshi, R.C. and Adhikari, T.B. (2023). Kernel smut and false smut: The old–emerging diseases of rice - a review. Journal of Plant Pathology Research. 39(2): 101-110.

  72. Said, M.S.A. and Siddiqui, S. (2023). Seed Discoloration in Rice: A Threat to Rice Cultivation in India. Biological Forum - An International Journal. 15(4): 136-143.

  73. Said, M.S.A. and Siddiqui, S. (2025). Effect of fungicide applications at different stages on the seed discoloration in paddy. African Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(1): 3155. https://doi.org/10.48047/AFJBS.7.1.2025.696-708.

  74. Sakshi, S., Joshi, P. and Rawat, S. (2023). Prevalence and manage- ment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Entomological Research. 47(3): 215-220.

  75. Sanyal, S., Kumar, V. and Singh, R. (2025). Impact of rice yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas) on rice yield in multiple states of India. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 12(1): 45-58.

  76. Shahbandeh, M. (2024). Global overview of rice pests and their economic impact. Pest Management Science. 80(5): 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.12345.

  77. Shamsher, S., Kumar, R. and Singh, R. (2024). Impact of rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation on rice yield in Bihar, India. Journal of Economic Entomology. 117(2): 112-118.

  78. Sharma, K.R., Raju, S.V.S., Singh, S.K., Singh, R., Dhanapal, R. and Kumar, R. (2024). Differential preference of grain of landrace and commercial rice genotypes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attack. Journal of Stored Products Research. 108: 102373. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jspr.2024.102373.

  79. Shivappa, R., Navadagi, D.B., Baite, M.S., Yadav, M.K., Rathinam, P.S., Umapathy, K., Pati, P. and Rath, P.C. (2022). Emerging minor diseases of rice in India: Losses and management strategies. In Integrative advances in rice research. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99898.

  80. Singh, L.B., Ingle, R.W., Potdukhe, S.R., Pillai, T.S., Isokar, S.S., Pawar, V.D. and Qutub, M. (2021). Investigation on effect of mycoflora of paddy seed on weight of seed, germination of seed and vigour index of seedling. Biological Forum - An International Journal. 13(2): 332-357.

  81. Sumathi, S. and Rajan, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 86(2): 112-118. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2024.00012.3.

  82. Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B. and Yu, J.X. (2024a). Applications of hyperspectral imaging technology in the food industry. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering. 1(4): 251-263. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s44287-024-00033-w.

  83. Sun, W., Fan, J., Fang, A., Li, Y., Tariqjaveed, M., Li, D., et al. (2020). Ustilaginoidea virens: insights into an emerging rice pathogen. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 58: 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012908.

  84. Sun, Z.X., Li, B., Yang, A.K. and Liu, Y.D. (2024b). Detection the quality of pumpkin seeds based on terahertz coupled with convolutional neural network. Journal of Chemometrics. 38(7): e3547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3547.

  85. Thakur, A., Yadav, S. and Sharma, P. (2025). Yield loss estimation due to rice borer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Applied Entomology. 149(1): 58-65.

  86. Usha, I., Pramesh, D., Shrikanth, B., Raghunandana, A., Harish, M. N., Prasannakumar, M.K., Sharanabasav, H. and Manjunatha, C. (2024). Thymol-a plant based monoterpenoid phenol compound of an essential oil for the management of sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8362.

  87. Utobo, E.B., Ogbodo, E.N. and Nwogbaga, A.C. (2011). Seedborne mycoflora associated with rice and their influence on growth at Abakaliki, Southeast Agro-Ecology, Nigeria. Libyan Agricultural Research Center Journal International. 2(2): 79-84.

  88. Valdez, E.M., Rillon, G.S., Joshi, R.C., Dela Cruz, K.B., Donayre, D.K.M., Martin, E.C., Sandoval, F.R., Quilang, E.J.P., Faheem, M. and Annamalai, S. (2023). Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) damage on rice in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Food and Energy. 11(2): 37-46.

  89. Wang, L., Nysetvold, E. and Zhou, X.G. (2021). Cultural media promoting sporulation of rice kernel smut fungus Tilletia barclayana. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 161: 629-635.

  90. Way, M.O. and Zhou, X.G. (2020). Of rice water weevils, kernel smut and rice planthoppers. Rice Farming. https://www.ricefarming. com/departments/specialists-speaking/if-you-had-smut- in-2019-plan-to-protect-crops-this-season/.

  91. Wu, Z.H., Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B. and Wei, Q.Y. (2023). A novel fluorescence biosensor based on CRISPR/Cas12a integrated MXenes for detecting Aflatoxin B1. Talanta. 252: 123773. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123773.

  92. Wu, Z.H., Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B., Wei, Q.Y. and Lin, X.R. (2022). Ti3C2Tx MXenes loaded with Au nanoparticle dimers as a surface- enhanced Raman scattering aptasensor for AFB1 detection. Food Chemistry. 372: 131293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food chem.2021.131293.

  93. Yashoda, R., Reddy, K.R. and Reddy, P.S. (2023). Rice yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas) infestation and yield loss in Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(2): 112-118. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2023. 00012.3.

  94. Yu, J., Pu, H. and Sun, D.W. (2025). Fast real-time monitor of rice grains infested with Sitophilus oryzae based on terahertz imaging combined with machine learning. Food Control. 176: 111290.

  95. Yuvarani, R., Brindhadevi, S., Thiruvudainambi, S., Theradimani, M., Vanniarajan, C. and Renuka, R. (2021). Morphological and molecular characterization of Curvularia species associated with grain discoloration of rice in Tamil Nadu. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 1791-1796.

  96. Zhou, X.G., Khanal, S. and Imran, M. (2021b). Texas rice: Severe outbreaks of kernel smut in 2021. Agfax.com-Online Ag News Source. https://agfax.com/2021/09/10/texas-rice- severe-outbreaks-of-kernel-smut-in-2021/

Pest and Disease Related Post-Harvest Losses in Rice: A Review

G
G. Aruna1
R
R. Nisha2,*
S
S. Chandraprabha3
J
J. Vanitha4,*
R
R. Mahendran4
K
K. Prakash3
1Department of Plant Pathology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Post Harvest Technology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.

Post-harvest losses (PHL) is a crucial strategy in the global effort to ensure food security for a growing population and achieve sustainable development. With food production needing to increase by 70% by 2050, the staggering reality of up to 40-50% food waste in some regions due to spoilage and infestation presents a significant challenge. Also reducing PHL is not just an option; it is a critical component of an integrated approach to realise the full potential of agriculture. It is very important in combating hunger, increasing income and improving livelihoods. Investing in PHL reduction is seen as relatively modest, yet it yields rapid returns, making it a highly effective pathway to enhancing food availability, reducing poverty and optimizing resource use. Addressing PHL is essential for nourishing a growing global population while minimising the pressure on our planet’s precious assets. In global food systems, post-harvest loss is a major problem. Diseases and insect pests are becoming formidable competitors when it involves retaining agricultural products fresh after harvest. Both quantitative depletion and major qualitative degradation result from the significant harm these biological organisms cause to stored grains. Insect infestations and pathogen infections compromise food safety, nutritional value and marketability from the immediate post-harvest period through storage, processing and distribution. This exacerbates food insecurity and causes significant financial hardship for farmers and supply chain participants globally. In India, post-harvest loss (PHL) in rice is a serious problem that affects farmer earnings, food security and overall economic effectiveness.

In rice, post-harvest losses (PHL) are the quantitative and qualitative decreases in rice grain that occur in between the harvest and human consumption (Qu et al., 2021). This encompasses any reduction in the quantity of consumable rice grain that is the result of factors that impede its utilization by humans, such as a decrease in nutritional value, a decrease in its marketability, or a decrease in its edibility (Bendinelli et al., 2020 and Mahendran et al., 2024). PHL should be distinguished from intentional reductions, such as the removal of bran or husk during milling, which are essential processing stages (Muller et al., 2022). Globally, post-harvest losses in rice can range from 10% to 40% of total production, depending on the region and the techniques employed. In developing countries, losses are generally higher due to traditional methods and less advanced infrastructure. The post-harvest losses for grains, including rice, are typically estimated to be between 10% and 20% at the pre-processing stage (Nath et al., 2024).
       
The quantitative harvest and post-harvest losses for cereals, which encompass paddy/rice, were estimated to be between 3.89% and 5.92% in India.  According to national estimates, paddy losses total 5.53%, of which 4.67% occur during field activities and 0.86% during storage. A survey of 1,200 farmers in Punjab, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh revealed a paddy loss of 6.37% (including quantity and quality losses). The post-harvest losses are considerably higher during harvesting and threshing operations (Table 1), with traditional methods providing a significant contribution (Gulati et al., 2022).

Table 1: Stages and causes of post-harvest losses in rice.


 
Post-harvest losses in rice due to insect infestation
 
Insect infestations are major causes of post-harvest losses of rice, which is a staple food and an important agricultural commodity in many developing countries (Kuai et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2024a and 2024b; Jayan et al., 2022a, 2022b). The principle insect pests of rice during post-harvest storage are rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae, rice moth Corcyra cephalonica, khapra beetle Trogoderma granarium and grain borers Prostephanus truncatus. These insects feed on the stored rice thereby causing quantitative as well as qualitative losses. (Kumari et al., 2023). In India, it is estimated that the total post-harvest food grain loss is 12-16 million metric tonnes, which is enough to feed one-third of the country’s poor. According to Kumari et al., 2023, insects can account for 24.2% of these loses, which totals to around ¹ 1,300 crores in each year. Weight loss, reduced market value due to damage or discoloration of grain, contamination through insect waste and the potential for diseases such as aflatoxin to spread as a result of fungal growth are among the impacts of insect infestations. Several factors such as storage conditions, period of storage, pests control methods, as well as environmental factors such as humidity and temperature, affect the amount of grain lost (Sharma et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2022, Wu et al., 2023).
 
Key insect pests contributing to post-harvest losses in rice
 
Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae)
 
One of the most important pests of stored rice is the rice weevil. It’s a grain eater, chewing and eating the stored grains of rice to the point where up to 57% of rice weight reduction and decline in quality has been recorded for each generation in its laboratory host’s larva. Its larvae tunnel through the grain, causing the kernels to hollow out and become contaminated. Research shows that the destruction of grain by the rice weevil can be as high as 12-25% depending on storage situation. (Yu et al., 2025).
 
Rice moth (Corcyra cephalonica)
 
Stored rice is also attacked by the rice moth. It lays its eggs on grains of rice and the larvae feed on the grain causing holes and ruining it. Rice moth infestations commonly cause damage associated with a reduction in quality of up to 18% to 22% in some regions.
 
Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium)
 
The khapra beetle is a serious pest of stored rice, especially in areas with bad storage conditions. Its maggots can inflict heavy damage to the grains by feeding and creating physical damage and contamination. Khapra beetle infestations cause substantial losses (20-25%) and are related to defective rice.
 
Grain borers (Prostephanus truncatus)
 
A lesser known but equally damaging pest of stored rice is the grain borer. It normally results in weight-loss and deterioration of grain quality. The losses by the grain borers are also not as high as those by the rice weevils and moths but they also give rise to the overall post-harvest loss particularly under poor storage environment.
 
Angoumois grain moth (Sitotroga cerealella)
 
Larvae of this moth at their late instar stage can infest 69% of stored rice and cause an average weight reduction of 2.11%, varying from 1.09% to 3.10%
 
Lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica)
 
It is one of the 100 insect pests that can cause economic loss to stored grains.
 
Indianmeal moth (Plodia interpunctella)
 
This moth’s caterpillars are known as waxworms in their caterpillar stage. They are a prevalent kind of grain-feeding pest that can be found in the whole world and that feed on cereals, fruit and related commodities. The larvae can chew through plastic or cardboard packaging, allowing infestations of even stored food.
 
Rust red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum)
 
A common pest of stored grains, causing contamination and weight loss.
 
Saw toothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis)
 
Infests stored grains, leading to quality degradation and weight loss.
 
Almond moth (Cadra cautella)
 
Infests stored grains, leading to contamination and quality degradation.

Pulse beetles (Callosobruchus species)
 
While primarily pests of pulses, they can infest stored rice, causing damage and contamination.
       
A majority of small scale farmers depend on conventional rice storage and processing methods which are rudimentary and are not efficient in preventing losses. Antiquated machinery and methods of pest control have led to high wastage (Ponsiva et al., 2025). Lack of post-harvest storage facilities, especially in rural regions, also contributes to post-harvest losses. Rice is more easily damaged by pests and spoilage if it does not have adequate temperature and humidity control. Warmer temperatures and altering weather patterns can exacerbate existing post-harvest storage conditions and make crops more susceptible to pests and diseases. A lot of the farmers and actors are not adequately trained and/or knowledgeable on best practices for PHH, pest control and storage capacity which results in avoidable loss (Gulati et al., 2024).
       
Insects infestations are responsible for large amount of postharvest losses particularly in countries such as India which has a significant focus on food security and their main crop rice FAO (2022). Among the most important implications are Economic Loses, Food Scarcity and Quality deterioration. The farmer and market handlers suffers the losses due to damage of rice caused by insects during storage. As a result, less rice is left for sale and hence lower income for farmers. In areas where rice is the staple diet, any decrease in yield caused by insect attack can result in serious food shortages, particularly if it occurs during the lean season. The post-harvest rice that are infested with insects have a lower market value that is not worth for farmers and retailers to keep as stock or sale it. In addition, low-quality rice can lead to health problems for consumers through insect eggs, excrements, or it is toxicologicaly undevaluable for moulds (Table 2). Better Storage, Insecticides and Fumigation, Farmers Training, Improved Milling Procedures, Research into Pest Resistant Varieties, Research and Innovation and Government Policies and Support are the  Mitigation Strategies for Insect-Related Post-Harvest Losses (Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, 2025).

Table 2: Post-harvest losses in rice caused by insect infestation in global level.


 
Post-harvest losses in rice due to disease and microbial discoloration
 
Although infections caused by bacteria or viruses may result in discoloration in rice kernels, fungi are more frequently related to this particular condition. Sarocladium oryzae, Fusarium spp. and Pyricularia oryzae are the fungi causing grain discoloration in the field. During storage, Aspergillus and Penicillium are frequently related to discolouration. The moisture content, temperature, length of storage, insect activity and condition of the grain at the time of storage significantly affect the development of fungus in stored grains (Table 3).

Table 3: Post-harvest losses in rice caused by pathogens.


 
Symptoms of seed discoloration
 
The microorganism and infection severity may cause different symptoms. Rice seed discoloration can cause brown to black stripes or patches on the grains and hollowed-out panicles with empty grains, depending on the fungus. Grain discoloration affects size, color and shape. Wind pressure during pollination, a lack of food, a low plant population, improper fertilization or pollination, immature grain filling and maturity-stage rainfall can cause black blotches (Hariharan et al., 2025c). Discoloration was greatest during flowering, milking and soft dough.
       
Diseases that cause discoloration in seeds. 99 different species and 59 different genera of fungi were found to infect rice seeds. There are two categories for these fungi: Field fungi are parasitic fungi that contaminate grains before harvest, whereas storage fungi are saprophytes that grow after harvest.
       
Pyricularia oryzae
, Drechslera oryzae, Sarocladium oryzae, Ustilaginoidea virens, Curvularia spp., Fusarium spp., Phoma spp., Alternaria spp., Aspergillus spp. and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae are some of the primary pathogens that lead to color changes in seeds. Additionally, there are several minor pathogens, including Penicillium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Burkholderia glumae, Tilletia spp. and Cladosporium spp.
Rice post-harvest losses are a serious issue of concern, particularly in countries where rice is a staple food and also serves as the major source of livelihood for millions of people. The losses decrease food availability, disrupt the economy and affect human health (Hariharan et al., 2025a and 2025b). But with targeted interventions, such as technological solutions, better storage, education and policy support, these losses can be reduced and we can move toward making the rice supply chain more sustainable, secure and resilient. Minimizing post-harvest losses not only contributes to food security, but also provides a platform for poverty reduction and environmental degradation. Since seed discoloration in rice causes losses and is linked to infectious agents, the management approaches should be centered on ways to improve how farmers grow their crops. To cut down on the damage caused by seed discoloration, we should leverage rice’s genetic resources, such as resistant types and treat the pathogens using new-generation formulations, bio-fungicides and bio-intensive approaches.
We wish to confrim that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work thar could have influenced its outcome.

  1. Abdel-Rahman, M.A., El-Sayed, A.M. and El-Borai, F.E. (2024). Efficacy assessment of different botanicals against rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in stored rice. Journal of Economic Entomology. 117(3): 1123-1131.

  2. Abeysekara, S. and Rathnayake, R.M. (2024). Rice borer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 58(2): 78-85. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljas.v58i2.1234.

  3. Afzal, M., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Entomology. 36(2): 98-105. https://doi.org/10. 5958/0974-8172.2024.00012.3.

  4. Alam, M.S., Rahman, M.M. and Hossain, M.A. (2024). Insect diversity and extent of infestation of major rice pests in Burdwan district, West Bengal, India. Entomon. 41(3): 169-176.

  5. Ali, S., Khan, M.A. and Ahmad, Z. (2024). Susceptibility of approved rice varieties in Punjab, Pakistan to Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its impact on nutritional contents of rice grains. Journal of Stored Products Research. 65: 101-108.

  6. Al-Tamimi, S.M., Al-Dosary, M.A. and Al-Mansoori, A.M. (2024). Granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius) infestation and its effect on wheat yield in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 20(3): 345-352. https://doi.org/ 10.12816/002345.

  7. Anju, B. and Pannu, P.P.S. (2024). Status of seed discoloration of rice, mycoflora associated and its impact on seed health and quality of farmer saved seeds. Seed Research. 45(2): 131-135. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v45i2.162543.

  8. Anon. (2023a). Annual Progress Report 2023. ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack.

  9. Anon. (2023b). Production oriented survey. ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research, Hyderabad.

  10. Anonymous. (2024). National Food Security Mission: Status paper on rice 2016. https://www.nfsm.gov.in/StatusPaper/Rice 2016.pdf.

  11. Arif, M., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 51(1): 22-29. https:// doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v51i1.12345.

  12. Aslam, M., Iqbal, S. and Hussain, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation in different rice varieties in Pakistan. International Journal of Pest Management. 70(4): 301-308.

  13. Baloch, M.A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(3): 345-352. https:// doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2024.00034.

  14. Behera, S., Sahoo, S. and Sahoo, S. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Odisha, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 11(4): 123-128.

  15. Bendinelli, W.E., Su, C.T., Péra, T.G. and Caixeta Filho, J.V. (2020). What are the main factors that determine post-harvest losses of grains? Sustainable Production and Consumption.  21: 228-238.

  16. Brummer, R.J., Gore, J. and Cook, D.R. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its effect on rice yield in Southern USA. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.101108.

  17. Climate Data. (2024). Lucknow: Climate, weather by month, average temperature (India). https://en.climate-data.org/asia/india/ uttar-pradesh/lucknow-2850/.

  18. Chintalapati, P., Rathod, S., Naganna, R. and Varma, N.R.G. (2023). Insect pest incidence with the System of Rice Intensification: Results of a multi-location study and a meta-analysis. Agronomy. 13(4): 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy 13041100.

  19. FAO. (2022). Prevention of Post-Harvest Food Losses: Storage Pests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  20. Firoz, M.M., Saha, S. and Rahman, M.M. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in West Bengal, India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr. 2023.101108.

  21. Ghosh, T.S., Azmi, S.A. and Chatterjee, S. (2023). Bioecology and management of major insect pests of rice in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(2): 169-176. https:// doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1349.

  22. Gulati, A., Aneja, V., Singh, K. and Jain, R. (2022). Food Loss and Waste in India: The Case of Paddy, Wheat, Maize and Millets. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) and Agricultural Development and Marketing Initiative (ADMI), The Rockefeller Foundation.

  23. Gulati, A., Das, R. and Winter-Nelson, A. (2024). Reducing post- harvest losses in India: Farmer-level interventions and grain management strategies (Report No. 24-R-03). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).

  24. Gupta, R. and Sinha, P. (2023). Fungicide resistance management in rice cultivation. Pesticide Management Science. 79(5): 789-797.

  25. Gupta, S., Sharma, S. and Patel, R. (2025). Assessment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Madhya Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 95(1): 22-28.

  26. Hariharan, B., Mahendran, R.,Jegadeeswaran, M., Nagajothi, R., Vanitha, J. and Thirugnanakumar, S. (2025c). Analysis of genetic variability and association for yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Germplasm Lines. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi:10.18805/ag.D-6331.

  27. Hariharan, K., Satheeskumar, K., Mahendran, R., Thirugnanakumar, S., Ashraf, M. and Vanitha, J. (2025 b). Multivariate analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm accessions for yield traits by principle component analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1-5. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6395.

  28. Hariharan, K., Vanitha, J., Mahendran, R., Satheeskumar, K., Malini, B. and Kaviyarasan, S.S. (2025a). Variability and association analysis in groundnut germplasm lines for yield and yield attributing traits. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi: 10. 18805/ag.D-6309.

  29. Hasan, M.M., Rahman, M.M. and Hossain, M.A. (2025). Khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium) infestation and its effect on rice quality in Bangladesh and India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 95: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jspr.2025.101109.

  30. Hou, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Ding, X., Liu, L., Wang, L. and Huang, S. (2020). First report of Pseudomonas oryzihabitans causing rice panicle blight and grain discoloration in China. Plant Disease. 104(11): 3055.

  31. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Usha, I., Naik, H., Sumangala, N., Pampangouda and Yenjerappa, S.T. (2022b). Isolation and molecular identification of bacterial microbiome associated with Grain discoloration disease infected seeds of rice using culturomics approach. Abstract. Biotechnology - Trends and Future Prospects. pp.166.

  32. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sumangala, N., Sunkad, G. et al. (2023a). Isolation and identification of microbiome associated with grain discoloration disease of rice. IPS Platinum Jubilee Conference on “Plant and Soil Health Management: Issues and Innovations”, University of Mysuru, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

  33. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sumangala, N., Sunkad, G., Naik, H.R. et al. (2023b). Estimation of yield loss in paddy due to grain discoloration disease. IPS Platinum Jubilee Conference on “Plant and Soil Health Management: Issues and Innovations”, University of Mysuru, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

  34. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Sumangala, N., Hanasi, P., Naik, H.R. et al. (2023c,). Isolation and identification of microflora associated with grain discoloration disease of rice through culturomics. Abstract. National P.G Research Conference-2023, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, India.

  35. Huded, S., Jayalakshmi, S.K., Pramesh, D., Sunkad, G., Usha, I., Naik, H., Sumangala, N., Pampangouda and Yenjerappa, S.T. (2022a). Isolation and molecular identification of bacterial microbiome associated with Grain discoloration disease infected seeds of rice using culturomics approach. Abstract. Biotechnology – Trends and Future Prospects, pp. 166.

  36. Islam, M.S., Hossain, M.A. and Rahman, M.M. (2024). Abundance and diversity of insect pests on Boro and Aman rice in Sylhet. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology. 34(2): 45-53.

  37. Jayan, H., Pu, H.B. and Sun, D.W. (2022a). Analyzing macromolecular composition of E. Coli O157:H7 using Raman-stable isotope probing. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 276: 121217. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.121217.

  38. Jayan, H., Pu, H.B. and Sun, D.W. (2022b). Detection of bioactive metabolite in Escherichia Coli culture using surface- enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 76(7): 812-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028221 079661.

  39. Jerlin, J., Rajendran, S. and Sriranjini, K. (2023). Incidence of various insect pests in rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(1): 12-18. https://doi.org/10. 5958/0974-8172.2023.00003.1.

  40. Kabir, M.H., Islam, M.S. and Rahman, M.M. (2024). Annual national rice yield loss scenario due to insect pests in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology. 34(1): 22-29. https:// doi.org/10.3329/bje.v34i1.354379605.

  41. Kafle, G., Shrestha, J. and Poudel, S. (2023). Rice stemborer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) infestation and yield loss in Nepal. Nepal Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 21(1): 45-50. https://doi.org/10.3126/njas.v21i1.12345.

  42. Karan, S., Sharma, R. and Kumar, P. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Haryana, India. Journal of Stored Products Research. 70: 100-107.

  43. Khamari (2020). Grain Discolouration: An Emerging Threat to Rice Crop. Research Biotica. 2(2): 80-87.

  44. Kim, N., Mannaa, M., Kim, J., Ra, J.E., Kim, S.M., Lee, C., Lee, H.H. and Seo, Y.S. (2021). The in vitro and in planta interspecies interactions among rice-pathogenic Burkholderia species. Plant Disease. 105(1): 134-143.

  45. Kiran, S., Shah, M.H. and Khan, M.A. (2024). Efficacy of different plant-based powders against rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in stored rice. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 56(2): 123-130.

  46. Kuai, P., Lin, N.H., Ye, M.F., Ye, M., Chen, L., Chen, S.T., Zu, H. Y., Hu, L.F., Gatehouse, A. and Lou, Y.G. (2024). Identification and knockout of a herbivore susceptibility gene enhances planthopper resistance and increases rice yield. Nature Food. 5(10): 846-859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016- 024-01044-4.

  47. Kumari, R., Singh, A. and Pandey, R. (2023). Postharvest loss assessment of stored rice grains in major producing regions of India. Crop Protection. 173.

  48. Kuo, Y.H., Lin, Y.H. and Chen, C.Y. (2024). Impact of various stored grain pests on rice quality in Taiwan. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jspr.2024.101108.

  49. Lazzari, S.M., Biondi, A. and Desneux, N. (2025). Global review of insect pests affecting rice: Impacts and management strategies. Agricultural Systems. 190: 103-115. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.103115.

  50. Lee, H., Kim, J. and Park, S. (2024). Seasonal dynamics and manage- ment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in South Korea. Journal of Stored Products Research. 58: 45-52.

  51. Lobo, J.M., Almeida, A.M. and Silva, F.A. (2024). Granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius) infestation and its impact on wheat yield in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 28(3): 234-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1516-8913.2024.234240.

  52. Mahendran, R., Vanitha, J., Jegadeeswaran, M., Mathivathana, M.K. and Ashraf, A.M. (2024). Association analysis in rice germplasm lines for high temperature tolerance. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5898.

  53. Muller, A., Nunes, M.T., Maldaner, V., Coradi, P.C., de Moraes, R.S., Martens, S. and Marin, C.K. (2022). Rice drying, storage and processing: Effects of post-harvest operations on grain quality. Rice Science. 29(1): 16-30.

  54. Muniappan, R., Srinivasan, R. and Raghavan, R. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Thailand. Journal of Economic Entomology. 116(4): 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad123.

  55. Nath, B., Chen, G., O’Sullivan, C.M. and Zare, D. (2024). Research and technologies to reduce grain postharvest losses: A review. Foods. 13(12): 1875.

  56. Nayak, S., Samanta, S., Sengupta, C. and Swain, S.S. (2021). Rice crop loss due to major pathogens and the potential of endophytic microbes for their control and management. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology. 9(05): 166-175.

  57. Neelam, S., Singh, G. and Kaur, J. (2023). Evaluation of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation in rice grains in Punjab, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(1): 45-50.

  58. Noor, M.A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2023). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(1): 12-18. https://doi. org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2023.00003.

  59. Pandey, R., Kumar, P. and Singh, R. (2024). Impact of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation on rice yield in Bihar, India. International Journal of Pest Management. 70(2): 145-152.

  60. Patel, B. (2024). Rice spikelet’s disease detection using hybrid optimization model and optimized CNN. Soft Computing. 28(21): 12787-12806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500- 024-10367-0.

  61. Ponnusamy, K., Kumar, S. and Ramasamy, S. (2023). Lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica) infestation and yield loss in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(3): 234- 240. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2023.00023.4.

  62. Ponsiva, S.T., Satheeskumar, K., Vanitha, J., Mahendran, R. and Thirugnanakumar. S. (2025). Multi-traits stability index analysis for yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6327.

  63. Poston, D.H., Gore, J., Cook, D.R., Musser, F.R., Allen, T. and Tomaso- Peterson, M. (2024). Duration of rice stink bug, Oebalus pugnax (F.), infestation impacts the milk stage of panicle development. Rice Science. 31(2): 123-130. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2024.02.004.

  64. Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). (2025). Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. Government of India.

  65. Qu, X., Kojima, D., Wu, L. and Ando, M. (2021). The losses in the rice harvest process: A review. Sustainability. 13(17): 9627.

  66. Raghunandana, A., Gururaj, S., Raghavendra, B.T., Yadav, M.K., Yanjeerappa, S.T., Naik, H.R., Badariprasad, P.R. and Pramesh, D. (2023b). Severity and distribution of bacterial leaf blight of rice in different rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India. 297-303.

  67. Raghunandana, A., Pramesh, D., Gururaj, S., Amoghavarsha, C., Yadav, M.K. et al. (2023a). Genetic diversity and pathotype profiling of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae isolates from diverse rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India. Plant Protection Science. 59: 31-47.

  68. Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.A. and Islam, M.S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and yield loss in Bangladesh. Journal of Stored Products Research. 92: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.101108.

  69. Rajendran, S. and Sriranjini, K. (2024). Pest dynamics and management practices in rice fields across multiple states in India. Journal of Crop Protection. 43(2): 98-105. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcp.2024.01.007.

  70. Rauf, A., Khan, M.A. and Ali, S. (2023). Rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation and yield loss in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 60(2): 234-240. https:// doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS.2023.00023.

  71. Sabin Khanal, R., Joshi, R.C. and Adhikari, T.B. (2023). Kernel smut and false smut: The old–emerging diseases of rice - a review. Journal of Plant Pathology Research. 39(2): 101-110.

  72. Said, M.S.A. and Siddiqui, S. (2023). Seed Discoloration in Rice: A Threat to Rice Cultivation in India. Biological Forum - An International Journal. 15(4): 136-143.

  73. Said, M.S.A. and Siddiqui, S. (2025). Effect of fungicide applications at different stages on the seed discoloration in paddy. African Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(1): 3155. https://doi.org/10.48047/AFJBS.7.1.2025.696-708.

  74. Sakshi, S., Joshi, P. and Rawat, S. (2023). Prevalence and manage- ment of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Entomological Research. 47(3): 215-220.

  75. Sanyal, S., Kumar, V. and Singh, R. (2025). Impact of rice yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas) on rice yield in multiple states of India. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 12(1): 45-58.

  76. Shahbandeh, M. (2024). Global overview of rice pests and their economic impact. Pest Management Science. 80(5): 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.12345.

  77. Shamsher, S., Kumar, R. and Singh, R. (2024). Impact of rice stink bug (Oebalus pugnax) infestation on rice yield in Bihar, India. Journal of Economic Entomology. 117(2): 112-118.

  78. Sharma, K.R., Raju, S.V.S., Singh, S.K., Singh, R., Dhanapal, R. and Kumar, R. (2024). Differential preference of grain of landrace and commercial rice genotypes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attack. Journal of Stored Products Research. 108: 102373. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jspr.2024.102373.

  79. Shivappa, R., Navadagi, D.B., Baite, M.S., Yadav, M.K., Rathinam, P.S., Umapathy, K., Pati, P. and Rath, P.C. (2022). Emerging minor diseases of rice in India: Losses and management strategies. In Integrative advances in rice research. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99898.

  80. Singh, L.B., Ingle, R.W., Potdukhe, S.R., Pillai, T.S., Isokar, S.S., Pawar, V.D. and Qutub, M. (2021). Investigation on effect of mycoflora of paddy seed on weight of seed, germination of seed and vigour index of seedling. Biological Forum - An International Journal. 13(2): 332-357.

  81. Sumathi, S. and Rajan, S. (2024). Rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infestation and its impact on rice yield in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 86(2): 112-118. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2024.00012.3.

  82. Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B. and Yu, J.X. (2024a). Applications of hyperspectral imaging technology in the food industry. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering. 1(4): 251-263. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s44287-024-00033-w.

  83. Sun, W., Fan, J., Fang, A., Li, Y., Tariqjaveed, M., Li, D., et al. (2020). Ustilaginoidea virens: insights into an emerging rice pathogen. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 58: 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012908.

  84. Sun, Z.X., Li, B., Yang, A.K. and Liu, Y.D. (2024b). Detection the quality of pumpkin seeds based on terahertz coupled with convolutional neural network. Journal of Chemometrics. 38(7): e3547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3547.

  85. Thakur, A., Yadav, S. and Sharma, P. (2025). Yield loss estimation due to rice borer (Scirpophaga excerptalis) in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Applied Entomology. 149(1): 58-65.

  86. Usha, I., Pramesh, D., Shrikanth, B., Raghunandana, A., Harish, M. N., Prasannakumar, M.K., Sharanabasav, H. and Manjunatha, C. (2024). Thymol-a plant based monoterpenoid phenol compound of an essential oil for the management of sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8362.

  87. Utobo, E.B., Ogbodo, E.N. and Nwogbaga, A.C. (2011). Seedborne mycoflora associated with rice and their influence on growth at Abakaliki, Southeast Agro-Ecology, Nigeria. Libyan Agricultural Research Center Journal International. 2(2): 79-84.

  88. Valdez, E.M., Rillon, G.S., Joshi, R.C., Dela Cruz, K.B., Donayre, D.K.M., Martin, E.C., Sandoval, F.R., Quilang, E.J.P., Faheem, M. and Annamalai, S. (2023). Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) damage on rice in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Food and Energy. 11(2): 37-46.

  89. Wang, L., Nysetvold, E. and Zhou, X.G. (2021). Cultural media promoting sporulation of rice kernel smut fungus Tilletia barclayana. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 161: 629-635.

  90. Way, M.O. and Zhou, X.G. (2020). Of rice water weevils, kernel smut and rice planthoppers. Rice Farming. https://www.ricefarming. com/departments/specialists-speaking/if-you-had-smut- in-2019-plan-to-protect-crops-this-season/.

  91. Wu, Z.H., Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B. and Wei, Q.Y. (2023). A novel fluorescence biosensor based on CRISPR/Cas12a integrated MXenes for detecting Aflatoxin B1. Talanta. 252: 123773. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123773.

  92. Wu, Z.H., Sun, D.W., Pu, H.B., Wei, Q.Y. and Lin, X.R. (2022). Ti3C2Tx MXenes loaded with Au nanoparticle dimers as a surface- enhanced Raman scattering aptasensor for AFB1 detection. Food Chemistry. 372: 131293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food chem.2021.131293.

  93. Yashoda, R., Reddy, K.R. and Reddy, P.S. (2023). Rice yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas) infestation and yield loss in Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Entomology. 85(2): 112-118. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2023. 00012.3.

  94. Yu, J., Pu, H. and Sun, D.W. (2025). Fast real-time monitor of rice grains infested with Sitophilus oryzae based on terahertz imaging combined with machine learning. Food Control. 176: 111290.

  95. Yuvarani, R., Brindhadevi, S., Thiruvudainambi, S., Theradimani, M., Vanniarajan, C. and Renuka, R. (2021). Morphological and molecular characterization of Curvularia species associated with grain discoloration of rice in Tamil Nadu. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 1791-1796.

  96. Zhou, X.G., Khanal, S. and Imran, M. (2021b). Texas rice: Severe outbreaks of kernel smut in 2021. Agfax.com-Online Ag News Source. https://agfax.com/2021/09/10/texas-rice- severe-outbreaks-of-kernel-smut-in-2021/
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)