Assessment of Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Changes and Prediction using Random Forest, Remote Sensing and GIS at Bagalkote City in Bagalkote District, Karnataka, India

P
P. Manju Kumar1,*
V
Veena S. Soraganvi2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Basaveshwar Engineering College, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bagalkote-587 102, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
2Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bidar-585 403, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Background: LULC analysis helps understand land use patterns and supports sustainable land management. Bagalkote City has undergone major changes due to the Almatti Dam’s submergence, leading to urban relocation and rapid expansion.

Methods: Landsat IV (1991) and Sentinel-2 (2021) images were classified into four categories using ArcGIS 10.8. MLC and Random Forest algorithms were applied for classification and change detection. Accuracy was validated through confusion matrices and ground-truthing, achieving 87.2% and 89.6% accuracy for 1991 and 2021, respectively.

Result: Built-up areas increased by 1295.87% (28.25 km²), mainly due to leapfrog development into zones like Vidyagiri and Navanagar. Urban expansion was analysed within Bagalkote’s boundary and a 4 km buffer.

Land use land cover (LULC) transforms assessment by remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) remains needed for conception city growth then environmental sustainability. Random forest (RF) has emerged as a robust classification algorithm for LULC studies due to its capability to import huge datasets then improve classification accuracy (Belgiu et al., 2016). Google earth engine (GEE), a cloud-created geospatial platform, assists large-scale LULC investigation by integrating machine learning models such as RF with vast satellite imagery (Gorelick et al., 2017). Several studies have applied RF in GEE for LULC classification and prediction. (Jain et al., 2021) validated the use of RF and GEE towards display then predict LULC changes in India, achieving high classification accuracy. Similarly, (Roy et al., 2020) used Landsat data to study urban growth and LULC dynamics, emphasizing the efficiency of RF in urban landscape analysis. Studies by (Sharma et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2019) applied RF models near assess city sprawl and predict future LULC patterns in Indian cities, highlighting the significance of predictive modeling in urban planning. While various studies have analyzed LULC changes in Indian contexts, limited research has focused on Bagalkote City, where post-Almatti Dam rehabilitation has significantly altered the urban landscape (Patil et al., 2015). Integrating RF with GEE offers an opportunity to predict future LULC changes in Bagalkote, which is essential for sustainable land management and urban growth. Recent studies by (Thapa et al., 2009; Sinha et al., 2020) also stress the importance of hybrid models for predicting urban expansion, further validating the use of RF in dynamically changing landscapes. LULC investigation in Karnataka has shown major transformations driven by urbanization, industrialization and agricultural modifications. Bangalore witnessed rapid urban growth from 1991 to 2021, with a 925% increase in built-up areas, primarily analyzed using remote sensing (Sudhira et al., 2004; Ramachandra et al., 2012). Similarly, Mysore experienced significant urban sprawl with a reduction in green spaces and an increase in impervious surfaces between 1991 and 2018 (Ramachandra et al., 2016). Hubli-Dharwad exhibited land conversion from agriculture to urban areas, indicating unsustainable urban growth (Sharma et al., 2019). LULC dynamics in Davangere revealed shifting patterns with agricultural land loss and urban expansion (Basavarajappa et al., 2017). In Shimoga, satellite data indicated major land use changes driven by socio-economic growth (Rao et al., 2003). LULC studies in Bagalkote identified drastic transformations following the construction of Almatti Dam, with increased built-up areas post-rehabilitation (Kumar et al., 2024). Mangalore’s coastal regions witnessed intense urbanization and shoreline changes due to development pressures (Narayan et al., 2015). Tumkur’s LULC changes highlighted a shift from agricultural land to residential and commercial zones (Srinivas et al., 2015). Udupi’s coastal areas experienced LULC alterations due to tourism and urban growth, assessed using multi-temporal satellite imagery (Hebbar et al., 2021). Kolar exhibited a steady growth in urban areas (Manjunatha et al., 2016). Belgaum experienced consistent urban sprawl along major transportation corridors (Patil et al., 2017). LULC analysis of Hassan showed rapid spatial growth with high impervious surface expansion between 2000 and 2020 (Shankar et al., 2020). Bellary’s land cover analysis indicated mining-related degradation and reduction in vegetative cover (Prakash et al., 2018). Mandya district witnessed changes in agricultural practices due to urban expansion (Vijay et al., 2021). Bangalore’s forest transitions revealed significant deforestation, linked to socio-economic changes (Nagendra et al., 2010). Bagalkote’s landscape dynamics post-Almatti Dam showed intense urbanization and urban area proliferation (Kumar et al., 2020). Haveri district experienced LULC shifts due to population growth and urbanization (Shashidhar et al., 2020). Advanced GIS and remote sensing tools have enabled precise LULC classification, ensuring data accuracy for future modeling and sustainable development (Bharath et al., 2017). Analyzed reservoir-induced LULC changes in Bagalkot using remote sensing and GIS, highlighting post-submergence transformations (Kumar et al., 2024). LULC is to examine land use patterns and helping forecast future sustainable terrestrial management. (Seyam et al., 2023). Recent studies have employed GIS and remote sensing techniques to assess LULC dynamics (Hassen et al., 2022). Land use changes influenced by agricultural practices and fallow patterns have been explored in Bihar, India (Kumar and Prasad, 2018). Modelling approaches like CLUMondo offer predictive insights for agricultural restructuring (Nguyen and Tran, 2023). Additionally, land policy implementation significantly impacts spatial land use trends (Le and Pham, 2024).
Study area
 
Bagalkot local planning lies at 16°08′27.1373″-16°12′25. 0265″ to 75°36′39.7573″-75°43′23.5697″. It has a surface area of 49.06 km2 and a 533 meters above mean sea elevation. Bagalkote taluk is surrounded bilgi, Badami, mudhol and  muddebihal in the north, south, east and west respectively (Kumar et al., 2024). Location Map of Study area (Fig 1). 

Fig 1: Location map of study area: Bagalkote municipal boundary area with 4 km buffer.


          
Methodology
 
In the Arc Map 10.8 software has been used for the analysis and classification of satellite images, thematic maps and calculations are carried in Microsoft excel. The land use land cover (LULC) mapping process is shown in a (Fig 2).

Fig 2: The land use landcover (LULC) mapping process is shown in a flowchart.


       
The research work was carried out at the Karnataka state remote sensing applications centre (KSRSAC), Bengaluru, which served as the primary source for geospatial data and technical support. The study and analysis were conducted during the period from January 2023 to December 2023.
 
Data acquisition
 
Multi-temporal optical satellite images were acquired from two primary sources are IRS LISS-IV Data: High-resolution images with a spatial resolution of 23.5 m, useful for land use classification and Sentinel-2 Data: Multi-spectral imagery with improved temporal and spatial resolution (10 m-20 m) to assess recent LULC changes. Ground-truthing was conducted through field surveys and validation using GPS points to assess classification accuracy.
 
Pre-processing and geo-rectification
 
The acquired images were pre-processed to enhance accuracy are radiometric correction to correct atmospheric distortions, geometric correction to align the images with reference ground control points (GCPs) and geo-rectification to ensuring images are projected into a uniform coordinate system for accurate overlay and analysis. Landsat-IV TM (Thematic Mapper) images from 7 August 1991 at a resolution of 23.5 m and Sentinal 2 data from 27 December 2021 at a resolution of (10 m-20 m).

Base map and administrative boundary integration
 
Base map and administrative boundary data for the Bagalkote City were obtained and validated against the satellite images. This step ensured accurate delineation of boundaries and integration of collateral data.
 
Visual image interpretation
 
Visual interpretation of satellite imagery is analysing spectral, spatial and temporal characteristics, incorporating collateral data and city municipal boundaries to enhance classification accuracy and Identifying initial LULC classes for the base year (1991-2021).
 
GIS analysis and LULC change detection (1991-2021)
 
GIS analysis was applied to Integrate ground-truth and collateral data, Detect and quantify changes in LULC patterns between 1991 and 2021 and Change detection was performed through post-classification comparison, highlighting spatial-temporal variations. Image Processing the Landsat-IV has 3 bands and Sentinal2 has 11 bands. There are four classes as follows Waterbody, Buildup area, Agriculture and Forest.

Accuracy assessment
 
The accuracy assessment using supervised classifier randomly produced 200 reference points utilizing stratified random sampling (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Geo-tag 200 random points used for the accuracy assessment of the LULC map 2021.


 
Data validation and quality check
 
The classified LULC maps were validated using City Municipal Boundary Data for spatial verification and Accuracy Assessment through confusion matrices and kappa statistics to evaluate classification consistency.
 
Random forest model development for prediction
 
The random forest (RF) algorithm to predict future LULC patterns. The training dataset was derived from change detection results and the model was validated using GEE. A cloud-based platform for model evaluation and refinement and Multiple iterations to optimize classification accuracy and reduce overfitting.
 
Prediction of LULC distribution for 2031
 
The optimized RF model used to forecast future LULC 2031. The projected maps provide insights into future city expansion and LULC changes.
LULC pattern of Bagalkote city in 1991
 
Fig 4 presents the LULC map layout produced using Landsat 4 TM imagery, along with a pie chart. Additional details, including the zone spreading of land forms in hectares, square kilometers and percentage. Accuracy assessment parameters such as producer accuracy, user accuracy, overall accuracy and the Kappa coefficient for the year 1991. Agricultural (206.76 km2 or 91.22%), forest (12.47 km2, 5.50%), waterbody (5.23 km2, 2.30%) and buildup area (2.18 km2).

Fig 4: LULC pattern and piechart of Bagalkote city in 1991.


 
LULC pattern of Bagalkote city in 2021
 
The Sentinel-2 data used to generate LULC map for 2021 illustrated in (Fig 5). According to the statistics, agricultural land (149.74 km2, 66.06% of the total area) and forest cover (27.69 km2, 12.21%) dominated the land use in 2021. Other land use categories include built-up areas (30.43 km2, 13.42%) and water bodies (18.79 km2, 8.28%). The LULC categories in to hectares and square kilometers, along with their percentages, producer accuracy, overall accuracy, user accuracy and kappa coefficient for 2021. The LULC patterns changed significantly between 1991 and 2021.

Fig 5: LULC pattern and pie chart of Bagalkote city in 2021.


 
LULC change detection from 1991 to 2021
 
The LULC change detection. Around the past three decades, agricultural land includes much declined by approximately 57.02 km2. Conversely, water bodies, forests and built-up areas have extended by 13.56 km2, 15.22 km2 and 28.25 km2, respectively, over the last three decades. Notably, the built-up area has experienced the highest percentage increase (28.25%), indicating a concerning trend of rapid urbanization. Fig 6 illustrates a comparative analysis of land use area changes across different classes, while Table 1 provides a cross-tabulation of the LULC data.

Fig 6: Area change diagram of the LULC Area in 1991 and 2021.



Table 1: LULC change from 1991 to 2031.



Change in Agriculture
 
Fig 7 illustrates changes over agricultural land in Bagalkote City from 1991 to 2021. The dark-colored areas represent unchanged agricultural land, covering approximately 149.74 km2, while the lighter-colored areas indicate land converted from non-agricultural to agricultural use, totaling 206.76 km2. Cross-tabulation analysis reveals that a significant portion of agricultural land has transitioned to vegetation, likely due to shifts in farmers’ livelihood activities. Over the last three decades, total agricultural land has declined by 57.02 km2, raising concerns about food security due to the alarming rate of agricultural land reduction.

Fig 7: Change in agriculture land.



Change in forest
 
The variation in vegetational land is illustrated in Fig 8. The green areas represent unchanged forest land, covering approximately 12.47 km2. The areas where non-forest land has transitioned to forest land are depicted in light green, covering about 15.22 km2.

Fig 8: Change in forest.


 
Change in buildup area
 
The foremost change observed in this area of interest the development of the built-up area, as shown in Fig 9. The built-up area takes increased more than ten times compared to 1991. In 1991, the built-up area was 2.18 km2, which expanded to 30.43 km2 by 2021. This represents a rapid and significant transformation compared to other land use classes.In the figure, dark red indicates the unchanged built-up area of 2.18 km2, while normal red represents newly developed built-up areas, which account for 28.25 km2 of expansion. Detailed information is provided in Table 1.

Fig 9: Change in buildup area.



Change in water body
 
The transformations in the waterbody stay illustrated in Fig 10. The waterbody area has enlarged by around 13.56 km2. The navy-blue shade represents the unchanged waterbody, covering around 5.23 km2, the blue color shows the newly occurred waterbody, which spans approximately 18.79 km². Detailed data is provided in Table 1. The spread in waterbodies may be attributed to patterns of human encroachment.

Fig 10: Change in water body.


 
Predict 2031 land use land cover
 
The changes in the waterbody are illustrated in Fig 11. The table shows land use and land cover (LULC) changes from 1991 to 2031. Agriculture land has significantly decreased by 133.78 km2, dropping from 206.76 km2 to 72.98 km2. This suggests that much agricultural land has been converted to other uses. The buildup area has grown substantially from 2.18 km2 to 96.8 km2, indicating rapid urbanization. Forest area increased by 25.67 km2, possibly due to reforestation or conservation efforts. Waterbody areas also expanded by 13.51 km2, which might be due to better water resource management or natural changes. Despite these changes, the total land area remained constant at 226.66 km2. Detailed information is provided in Table 1. This means the changes are a result of land being reallocated among categories. The sharp rise in buildup area reflects growing infrastructure or residential development. Overall, the data highlights a clear shift from agricultural land to urban and ecological land uses. Bagalkote Prediction of LULC 2031 using Random forest from Sentinel-2 Satellite image bands.

Fig 11: Google earth engine to predict 2030 land use land cover.

The building of a dam at Alamatti on the Krishna River has an impact on Bagalkote city. People are getting properly after the submerged of Bagalkot City and the nearby villages. Due to this, the LULC pattern for the region that is for study has undergone a major shift. This is why this article uses remote sensing imagery and geographical technology. In 2001, the water storing project upriver of the reservoir remained initiated. The study shows that the main land uses in the area under study include forests, built-up areas, water bodies and agriculture. Waterbody, forest and built-up area conversion resulted in a 25.15% (57.02 km2) decrease in agriculture, the study region’s most important land use. The built-up terrain stands the second significant land use. witnessed an increase of 28.25% (28.25 km2) due to the conversion of agricultural land into urban space. The conversion of agricultural land to forest area resulted in a 6.71% increase (15.22 km2) in the study region’s forest, the third most dominant land use. Agriculture land conversion to waterbody resulted in a 5.98% increase (13.56 km2) in waterbodies, the third most significant land use in the study area. The study’s findings demonstrate that the region’s stakeholders and policymakers must be aware of Bagalkote City’s rapid expansion and shifting land use patterns. Therefore, it is concluded that a significant LULC shift has been observed and that the research area goes metamorphosis terminated the late 20 years due to increased urbanization and industrial activity.
The author(s) would like to express sincere gratitude to Mr. D.C. Lingadevaru, Scientific Officer at Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre (KSRSAC), for his valuable support and guidance in providing access to geospatial data. The data used in this study was sourced from the Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre, which played a crucial role in the successful completion of this work.
 
Informed consent
 
This study did not involve human participants or animals. All data used were obtained from publicly available remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) sources. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Basavarajappa, H.T. and Manjunatha, M.C. (2017). Assessment of land use and land cover changes in Davangere district using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Spatial Information Research. 25: 565-577. DOI: 10.1007/s41324- 017-0116-8.

  2. Belgiu, M. and Draguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 114: 24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011.

  3. Bharath, S., Vinay, S. and Srinivasan, R. (2017). Geospatial technologies for land use/land cover dynamics in Karnataka, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. 20(1): 125-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2016. 12.006.

  4. Ghosh, S. and Das, K. (2019). Assessing urban expansion and future growth patterns using remote sensing and RF models. Geocarto International. 34: 1225-1241. doi: 10. 1080/10106049.2018.1497098.

  5. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D. and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment. 202: 18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.

  6. Hassen, E.E., Assen, M. and Belay, T. (2022). Land use/land cover change detection and its drivers in Ethiopia: A geospatial approach. Environmental Challenges. 7: 100495. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100495.

  7. Hebbar, R. and Srinivasan, G. (2021). LULC changes in the coastal region of Udupi, Karnataka using multi-temporal satellite images. Environmental Earth Sciences. 80: 543-556. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-09552-7.

  8. Jain, S., Gupta, S. and Mishra, V. (2021). Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using google earth engine and random forest: A case study in India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 193: 289-299. doi: 10. 1007/s10661-21-08979-5.

  9. Kumar, A. and Prasad, R. (2018). Changes in land use pattern and factors responsible for variations in current fallow land in Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3): 236-242. ​doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4955.

  10. Kumar, A., Reddy, C.S. and Jha, C.S. (2020). Urban growth dynamics and land use change in Bagalkot, Karnataka using geospatial tools. Environment and Urbanization Asia. 11(2): 223- 238. doi: 10.1177/0975425320944673.

  11. Kumar, M., Patil, S. and Yadahalli, G.S. (2024). Reservoir-induced Land use/Land Cover Changes and Urban Growth Dynamics in Bagalkot, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Geoinformatics. (In Press).

  12. Kumar, P.M., Soraganvi, V.S., Basavaraj, D.B. and Lingadevaru, D.C. (2024). Reservoir induced spatio-temporal changes in land-use/land-cover pattern of bagalkot due to submergence using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Engineering for Ecosystem Restoration: Select Proceedings of IACESD 2023. 46(4): 93.

  13. Le, H.Q. and Pham, K.D. (2024). Evaluating the land use implementation results through land policy in Vinh Long Province, Vietnam. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(5): 816-822. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-612.

  14. Manjunatha, M.C. and Kumar, P. (2016). Land use/land cover analysis of Kolar District using Landsat data. Indian Journal of Remote Sensing. 44: 455-462. doi: 10.1007/s12524-016- 0545-x.

  15. Nagendra, H. and Gopal, D. (2010). Street trees in Bangalore: Density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 9(2): 129-137. doi: 10. 1016/j.ufug.2009.12.005.

  16. Narayan, S.M. and Bhat, P.S. (2015). Monitoring and analysis of land use/land cover changes In Mangalore region using remote sensing data. Earth Science Informatics. 8: 817- 828. doi: 10.1007/s12145-015-0227-4.

  17. Nguyen, V.T. and Tran, M.T. (2023). An analysis of land use options using the CLU Mondo model to promote agricultural restructuring in the Mekong Delta’s coastal area in Vietnam. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(4): 482-489. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-545.

  18. Patil, R.S. and Kiran, G.R. (2017). Urban growth monitoring of Belgaum City using remote sensing and GIS. Go-cart International. 32: 1342-1358. DOI: 10.1080/10106049. 2016.1231246.

  19. Patil, V.D. and Mistri, M.B. (2015). Post-dam rehabilitation and land use changes in Bagalkote: A remote sensing approach. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 43: 761-769. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-015-0463-3.

  20. Prakash, K.L., Nagaraja, B.C. and Siddalingamurthy, S. (2018). Land use and land cover change detection in mining region of Bellary district, Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Environmental Biology. 39(3): 373-380. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/39/3(SI)/13.

  21. Ramachandra, T.V., Aithal, B.H. and Sreekantha, S. (2012). Spatial metrics-based landscape structure and dynamics assessment for an emerging Indian megalopolis. Facilities1: 48-57. DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2011.603919.

  22. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H.A. and Sowmyashree, M.V. (2016). Monitoring urbanization and its implications in a mega city from space: Spatiotemporal patterns and its indicators. Journal of Environmental Management. 148: 67-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.019.

  23. Rao, D.S., Reddy, G.P.O. and Krishna, I.V.M. (2003). Monitoring of land use/land cover changes of Shimoga city using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 31(4): 253-263. DOI: 10.1007/BF 03030763.

  24. Roy, P.S., Behera, M.D. and Srivastava, V.K. (2020). Satellite remote sensing: Sensors, applications and techniques. Springer Nature, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8354-4.

  25. Seyam, I.M., Al-Habshi, M.M. and Al-Maktari, A. (2023). Spatio- temporal analysis of urban expansion and land use change using remote sensing and GIS. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 30: 100987. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase. 2023.100987.

  26. Shankar, R. and Raju, K. (2020). Land use changes and spatial growth assessment of Hassan city using geospatial techniques. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 17: 100-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020. 100282.

  27. Sharma, R. and Goyal, R. (2019). Urban sprawl monitoring and modeling using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Jaipur, India. Spatial Information Research. 27: 577-586. DOI: 10.1007/s41324-019-00255-5.

  28. Sharma, R. and Punithavathi, J. (2019). Land use/land cover dynamics of Hubli-Dharwad region using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS. 8: 30-40. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1623702.

  29. Shashidhar, K.C., Doddamani, M.B. and Pujar, R.S. (2020). Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in Haveri district, Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 48: 497-509. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-019-01077-5.

  30. Sinha, S. and Ghosh, P. (2020). Mapping and modeling LULC changes in a semi-arid region using RF and satellite data. Applied Geography. 115: 102-136. DOI: 10.1016/j. apgeog.2020.102136

  31. Srinivas, J. and Reddy, G. (2015). Monitoring urban sprawl and LULC change using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Tumkur, Karnataka. Journal of Environmental Management. 148: 148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2014.07.008.

  32. Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V. and Jagadish, K.S. (2004). Urban sprawl: Metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 5(1): 29-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.002.

  33. Thapa, R.B. and Murayama, Y. (2009). Urban growth modeling of Kathmandu Valley using cellular automata and Markov chain. International Journal of Geoinformatics. 5: 65- 72. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.005.

  34. Vijay, K., Mahalingam, B. and Shankar, R. (2021). Land use/land cover change detection in Mandya district, Karnataka using geospatial techniques. Spatial Information Research 29: 731-742. DOI: 10.1007/s41324-021-00396-8.

Assessment of Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Changes and Prediction using Random Forest, Remote Sensing and GIS at Bagalkote City in Bagalkote District, Karnataka, India

P
P. Manju Kumar1,*
V
Veena S. Soraganvi2
1Department of Civil Engineering, Basaveshwar Engineering College, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bagalkote-587 102, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
2Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bidar-585 403, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Background: LULC analysis helps understand land use patterns and supports sustainable land management. Bagalkote City has undergone major changes due to the Almatti Dam’s submergence, leading to urban relocation and rapid expansion.

Methods: Landsat IV (1991) and Sentinel-2 (2021) images were classified into four categories using ArcGIS 10.8. MLC and Random Forest algorithms were applied for classification and change detection. Accuracy was validated through confusion matrices and ground-truthing, achieving 87.2% and 89.6% accuracy for 1991 and 2021, respectively.

Result: Built-up areas increased by 1295.87% (28.25 km²), mainly due to leapfrog development into zones like Vidyagiri and Navanagar. Urban expansion was analysed within Bagalkote’s boundary and a 4 km buffer.

Land use land cover (LULC) transforms assessment by remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) remains needed for conception city growth then environmental sustainability. Random forest (RF) has emerged as a robust classification algorithm for LULC studies due to its capability to import huge datasets then improve classification accuracy (Belgiu et al., 2016). Google earth engine (GEE), a cloud-created geospatial platform, assists large-scale LULC investigation by integrating machine learning models such as RF with vast satellite imagery (Gorelick et al., 2017). Several studies have applied RF in GEE for LULC classification and prediction. (Jain et al., 2021) validated the use of RF and GEE towards display then predict LULC changes in India, achieving high classification accuracy. Similarly, (Roy et al., 2020) used Landsat data to study urban growth and LULC dynamics, emphasizing the efficiency of RF in urban landscape analysis. Studies by (Sharma et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2019) applied RF models near assess city sprawl and predict future LULC patterns in Indian cities, highlighting the significance of predictive modeling in urban planning. While various studies have analyzed LULC changes in Indian contexts, limited research has focused on Bagalkote City, where post-Almatti Dam rehabilitation has significantly altered the urban landscape (Patil et al., 2015). Integrating RF with GEE offers an opportunity to predict future LULC changes in Bagalkote, which is essential for sustainable land management and urban growth. Recent studies by (Thapa et al., 2009; Sinha et al., 2020) also stress the importance of hybrid models for predicting urban expansion, further validating the use of RF in dynamically changing landscapes. LULC investigation in Karnataka has shown major transformations driven by urbanization, industrialization and agricultural modifications. Bangalore witnessed rapid urban growth from 1991 to 2021, with a 925% increase in built-up areas, primarily analyzed using remote sensing (Sudhira et al., 2004; Ramachandra et al., 2012). Similarly, Mysore experienced significant urban sprawl with a reduction in green spaces and an increase in impervious surfaces between 1991 and 2018 (Ramachandra et al., 2016). Hubli-Dharwad exhibited land conversion from agriculture to urban areas, indicating unsustainable urban growth (Sharma et al., 2019). LULC dynamics in Davangere revealed shifting patterns with agricultural land loss and urban expansion (Basavarajappa et al., 2017). In Shimoga, satellite data indicated major land use changes driven by socio-economic growth (Rao et al., 2003). LULC studies in Bagalkote identified drastic transformations following the construction of Almatti Dam, with increased built-up areas post-rehabilitation (Kumar et al., 2024). Mangalore’s coastal regions witnessed intense urbanization and shoreline changes due to development pressures (Narayan et al., 2015). Tumkur’s LULC changes highlighted a shift from agricultural land to residential and commercial zones (Srinivas et al., 2015). Udupi’s coastal areas experienced LULC alterations due to tourism and urban growth, assessed using multi-temporal satellite imagery (Hebbar et al., 2021). Kolar exhibited a steady growth in urban areas (Manjunatha et al., 2016). Belgaum experienced consistent urban sprawl along major transportation corridors (Patil et al., 2017). LULC analysis of Hassan showed rapid spatial growth with high impervious surface expansion between 2000 and 2020 (Shankar et al., 2020). Bellary’s land cover analysis indicated mining-related degradation and reduction in vegetative cover (Prakash et al., 2018). Mandya district witnessed changes in agricultural practices due to urban expansion (Vijay et al., 2021). Bangalore’s forest transitions revealed significant deforestation, linked to socio-economic changes (Nagendra et al., 2010). Bagalkote’s landscape dynamics post-Almatti Dam showed intense urbanization and urban area proliferation (Kumar et al., 2020). Haveri district experienced LULC shifts due to population growth and urbanization (Shashidhar et al., 2020). Advanced GIS and remote sensing tools have enabled precise LULC classification, ensuring data accuracy for future modeling and sustainable development (Bharath et al., 2017). Analyzed reservoir-induced LULC changes in Bagalkot using remote sensing and GIS, highlighting post-submergence transformations (Kumar et al., 2024). LULC is to examine land use patterns and helping forecast future sustainable terrestrial management. (Seyam et al., 2023). Recent studies have employed GIS and remote sensing techniques to assess LULC dynamics (Hassen et al., 2022). Land use changes influenced by agricultural practices and fallow patterns have been explored in Bihar, India (Kumar and Prasad, 2018). Modelling approaches like CLUMondo offer predictive insights for agricultural restructuring (Nguyen and Tran, 2023). Additionally, land policy implementation significantly impacts spatial land use trends (Le and Pham, 2024).
Study area
 
Bagalkot local planning lies at 16°08′27.1373″-16°12′25. 0265″ to 75°36′39.7573″-75°43′23.5697″. It has a surface area of 49.06 km2 and a 533 meters above mean sea elevation. Bagalkote taluk is surrounded bilgi, Badami, mudhol and  muddebihal in the north, south, east and west respectively (Kumar et al., 2024). Location Map of Study area (Fig 1). 

Fig 1: Location map of study area: Bagalkote municipal boundary area with 4 km buffer.


          
Methodology
 
In the Arc Map 10.8 software has been used for the analysis and classification of satellite images, thematic maps and calculations are carried in Microsoft excel. The land use land cover (LULC) mapping process is shown in a (Fig 2).

Fig 2: The land use landcover (LULC) mapping process is shown in a flowchart.


       
The research work was carried out at the Karnataka state remote sensing applications centre (KSRSAC), Bengaluru, which served as the primary source for geospatial data and technical support. The study and analysis were conducted during the period from January 2023 to December 2023.
 
Data acquisition
 
Multi-temporal optical satellite images were acquired from two primary sources are IRS LISS-IV Data: High-resolution images with a spatial resolution of 23.5 m, useful for land use classification and Sentinel-2 Data: Multi-spectral imagery with improved temporal and spatial resolution (10 m-20 m) to assess recent LULC changes. Ground-truthing was conducted through field surveys and validation using GPS points to assess classification accuracy.
 
Pre-processing and geo-rectification
 
The acquired images were pre-processed to enhance accuracy are radiometric correction to correct atmospheric distortions, geometric correction to align the images with reference ground control points (GCPs) and geo-rectification to ensuring images are projected into a uniform coordinate system for accurate overlay and analysis. Landsat-IV TM (Thematic Mapper) images from 7 August 1991 at a resolution of 23.5 m and Sentinal 2 data from 27 December 2021 at a resolution of (10 m-20 m).

Base map and administrative boundary integration
 
Base map and administrative boundary data for the Bagalkote City were obtained and validated against the satellite images. This step ensured accurate delineation of boundaries and integration of collateral data.
 
Visual image interpretation
 
Visual interpretation of satellite imagery is analysing spectral, spatial and temporal characteristics, incorporating collateral data and city municipal boundaries to enhance classification accuracy and Identifying initial LULC classes for the base year (1991-2021).
 
GIS analysis and LULC change detection (1991-2021)
 
GIS analysis was applied to Integrate ground-truth and collateral data, Detect and quantify changes in LULC patterns between 1991 and 2021 and Change detection was performed through post-classification comparison, highlighting spatial-temporal variations. Image Processing the Landsat-IV has 3 bands and Sentinal2 has 11 bands. There are four classes as follows Waterbody, Buildup area, Agriculture and Forest.

Accuracy assessment
 
The accuracy assessment using supervised classifier randomly produced 200 reference points utilizing stratified random sampling (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Geo-tag 200 random points used for the accuracy assessment of the LULC map 2021.


 
Data validation and quality check
 
The classified LULC maps were validated using City Municipal Boundary Data for spatial verification and Accuracy Assessment through confusion matrices and kappa statistics to evaluate classification consistency.
 
Random forest model development for prediction
 
The random forest (RF) algorithm to predict future LULC patterns. The training dataset was derived from change detection results and the model was validated using GEE. A cloud-based platform for model evaluation and refinement and Multiple iterations to optimize classification accuracy and reduce overfitting.
 
Prediction of LULC distribution for 2031
 
The optimized RF model used to forecast future LULC 2031. The projected maps provide insights into future city expansion and LULC changes.
LULC pattern of Bagalkote city in 1991
 
Fig 4 presents the LULC map layout produced using Landsat 4 TM imagery, along with a pie chart. Additional details, including the zone spreading of land forms in hectares, square kilometers and percentage. Accuracy assessment parameters such as producer accuracy, user accuracy, overall accuracy and the Kappa coefficient for the year 1991. Agricultural (206.76 km2 or 91.22%), forest (12.47 km2, 5.50%), waterbody (5.23 km2, 2.30%) and buildup area (2.18 km2).

Fig 4: LULC pattern and piechart of Bagalkote city in 1991.


 
LULC pattern of Bagalkote city in 2021
 
The Sentinel-2 data used to generate LULC map for 2021 illustrated in (Fig 5). According to the statistics, agricultural land (149.74 km2, 66.06% of the total area) and forest cover (27.69 km2, 12.21%) dominated the land use in 2021. Other land use categories include built-up areas (30.43 km2, 13.42%) and water bodies (18.79 km2, 8.28%). The LULC categories in to hectares and square kilometers, along with their percentages, producer accuracy, overall accuracy, user accuracy and kappa coefficient for 2021. The LULC patterns changed significantly between 1991 and 2021.

Fig 5: LULC pattern and pie chart of Bagalkote city in 2021.


 
LULC change detection from 1991 to 2021
 
The LULC change detection. Around the past three decades, agricultural land includes much declined by approximately 57.02 km2. Conversely, water bodies, forests and built-up areas have extended by 13.56 km2, 15.22 km2 and 28.25 km2, respectively, over the last three decades. Notably, the built-up area has experienced the highest percentage increase (28.25%), indicating a concerning trend of rapid urbanization. Fig 6 illustrates a comparative analysis of land use area changes across different classes, while Table 1 provides a cross-tabulation of the LULC data.

Fig 6: Area change diagram of the LULC Area in 1991 and 2021.



Table 1: LULC change from 1991 to 2031.



Change in Agriculture
 
Fig 7 illustrates changes over agricultural land in Bagalkote City from 1991 to 2021. The dark-colored areas represent unchanged agricultural land, covering approximately 149.74 km2, while the lighter-colored areas indicate land converted from non-agricultural to agricultural use, totaling 206.76 km2. Cross-tabulation analysis reveals that a significant portion of agricultural land has transitioned to vegetation, likely due to shifts in farmers’ livelihood activities. Over the last three decades, total agricultural land has declined by 57.02 km2, raising concerns about food security due to the alarming rate of agricultural land reduction.

Fig 7: Change in agriculture land.



Change in forest
 
The variation in vegetational land is illustrated in Fig 8. The green areas represent unchanged forest land, covering approximately 12.47 km2. The areas where non-forest land has transitioned to forest land are depicted in light green, covering about 15.22 km2.

Fig 8: Change in forest.


 
Change in buildup area
 
The foremost change observed in this area of interest the development of the built-up area, as shown in Fig 9. The built-up area takes increased more than ten times compared to 1991. In 1991, the built-up area was 2.18 km2, which expanded to 30.43 km2 by 2021. This represents a rapid and significant transformation compared to other land use classes.In the figure, dark red indicates the unchanged built-up area of 2.18 km2, while normal red represents newly developed built-up areas, which account for 28.25 km2 of expansion. Detailed information is provided in Table 1.

Fig 9: Change in buildup area.



Change in water body
 
The transformations in the waterbody stay illustrated in Fig 10. The waterbody area has enlarged by around 13.56 km2. The navy-blue shade represents the unchanged waterbody, covering around 5.23 km2, the blue color shows the newly occurred waterbody, which spans approximately 18.79 km². Detailed data is provided in Table 1. The spread in waterbodies may be attributed to patterns of human encroachment.

Fig 10: Change in water body.


 
Predict 2031 land use land cover
 
The changes in the waterbody are illustrated in Fig 11. The table shows land use and land cover (LULC) changes from 1991 to 2031. Agriculture land has significantly decreased by 133.78 km2, dropping from 206.76 km2 to 72.98 km2. This suggests that much agricultural land has been converted to other uses. The buildup area has grown substantially from 2.18 km2 to 96.8 km2, indicating rapid urbanization. Forest area increased by 25.67 km2, possibly due to reforestation or conservation efforts. Waterbody areas also expanded by 13.51 km2, which might be due to better water resource management or natural changes. Despite these changes, the total land area remained constant at 226.66 km2. Detailed information is provided in Table 1. This means the changes are a result of land being reallocated among categories. The sharp rise in buildup area reflects growing infrastructure or residential development. Overall, the data highlights a clear shift from agricultural land to urban and ecological land uses. Bagalkote Prediction of LULC 2031 using Random forest from Sentinel-2 Satellite image bands.

Fig 11: Google earth engine to predict 2030 land use land cover.

The building of a dam at Alamatti on the Krishna River has an impact on Bagalkote city. People are getting properly after the submerged of Bagalkot City and the nearby villages. Due to this, the LULC pattern for the region that is for study has undergone a major shift. This is why this article uses remote sensing imagery and geographical technology. In 2001, the water storing project upriver of the reservoir remained initiated. The study shows that the main land uses in the area under study include forests, built-up areas, water bodies and agriculture. Waterbody, forest and built-up area conversion resulted in a 25.15% (57.02 km2) decrease in agriculture, the study region’s most important land use. The built-up terrain stands the second significant land use. witnessed an increase of 28.25% (28.25 km2) due to the conversion of agricultural land into urban space. The conversion of agricultural land to forest area resulted in a 6.71% increase (15.22 km2) in the study region’s forest, the third most dominant land use. Agriculture land conversion to waterbody resulted in a 5.98% increase (13.56 km2) in waterbodies, the third most significant land use in the study area. The study’s findings demonstrate that the region’s stakeholders and policymakers must be aware of Bagalkote City’s rapid expansion and shifting land use patterns. Therefore, it is concluded that a significant LULC shift has been observed and that the research area goes metamorphosis terminated the late 20 years due to increased urbanization and industrial activity.
The author(s) would like to express sincere gratitude to Mr. D.C. Lingadevaru, Scientific Officer at Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre (KSRSAC), for his valuable support and guidance in providing access to geospatial data. The data used in this study was sourced from the Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre, which played a crucial role in the successful completion of this work.
 
Informed consent
 
This study did not involve human participants or animals. All data used were obtained from publicly available remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) sources. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Basavarajappa, H.T. and Manjunatha, M.C. (2017). Assessment of land use and land cover changes in Davangere district using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Spatial Information Research. 25: 565-577. DOI: 10.1007/s41324- 017-0116-8.

  2. Belgiu, M. and Draguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 114: 24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011.

  3. Bharath, S., Vinay, S. and Srinivasan, R. (2017). Geospatial technologies for land use/land cover dynamics in Karnataka, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. 20(1): 125-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2016. 12.006.

  4. Ghosh, S. and Das, K. (2019). Assessing urban expansion and future growth patterns using remote sensing and RF models. Geocarto International. 34: 1225-1241. doi: 10. 1080/10106049.2018.1497098.

  5. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D. and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment. 202: 18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.

  6. Hassen, E.E., Assen, M. and Belay, T. (2022). Land use/land cover change detection and its drivers in Ethiopia: A geospatial approach. Environmental Challenges. 7: 100495. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100495.

  7. Hebbar, R. and Srinivasan, G. (2021). LULC changes in the coastal region of Udupi, Karnataka using multi-temporal satellite images. Environmental Earth Sciences. 80: 543-556. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-09552-7.

  8. Jain, S., Gupta, S. and Mishra, V. (2021). Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using google earth engine and random forest: A case study in India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 193: 289-299. doi: 10. 1007/s10661-21-08979-5.

  9. Kumar, A. and Prasad, R. (2018). Changes in land use pattern and factors responsible for variations in current fallow land in Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3): 236-242. ​doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4955.

  10. Kumar, A., Reddy, C.S. and Jha, C.S. (2020). Urban growth dynamics and land use change in Bagalkot, Karnataka using geospatial tools. Environment and Urbanization Asia. 11(2): 223- 238. doi: 10.1177/0975425320944673.

  11. Kumar, M., Patil, S. and Yadahalli, G.S. (2024). Reservoir-induced Land use/Land Cover Changes and Urban Growth Dynamics in Bagalkot, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Geoinformatics. (In Press).

  12. Kumar, P.M., Soraganvi, V.S., Basavaraj, D.B. and Lingadevaru, D.C. (2024). Reservoir induced spatio-temporal changes in land-use/land-cover pattern of bagalkot due to submergence using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Engineering for Ecosystem Restoration: Select Proceedings of IACESD 2023. 46(4): 93.

  13. Le, H.Q. and Pham, K.D. (2024). Evaluating the land use implementation results through land policy in Vinh Long Province, Vietnam. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(5): 816-822. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-612.

  14. Manjunatha, M.C. and Kumar, P. (2016). Land use/land cover analysis of Kolar District using Landsat data. Indian Journal of Remote Sensing. 44: 455-462. doi: 10.1007/s12524-016- 0545-x.

  15. Nagendra, H. and Gopal, D. (2010). Street trees in Bangalore: Density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 9(2): 129-137. doi: 10. 1016/j.ufug.2009.12.005.

  16. Narayan, S.M. and Bhat, P.S. (2015). Monitoring and analysis of land use/land cover changes In Mangalore region using remote sensing data. Earth Science Informatics. 8: 817- 828. doi: 10.1007/s12145-015-0227-4.

  17. Nguyen, V.T. and Tran, M.T. (2023). An analysis of land use options using the CLU Mondo model to promote agricultural restructuring in the Mekong Delta’s coastal area in Vietnam. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(4): 482-489. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-545.

  18. Patil, R.S. and Kiran, G.R. (2017). Urban growth monitoring of Belgaum City using remote sensing and GIS. Go-cart International. 32: 1342-1358. DOI: 10.1080/10106049. 2016.1231246.

  19. Patil, V.D. and Mistri, M.B. (2015). Post-dam rehabilitation and land use changes in Bagalkote: A remote sensing approach. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 43: 761-769. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-015-0463-3.

  20. Prakash, K.L., Nagaraja, B.C. and Siddalingamurthy, S. (2018). Land use and land cover change detection in mining region of Bellary district, Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Environmental Biology. 39(3): 373-380. DOI: 10.22438/jeb/39/3(SI)/13.

  21. Ramachandra, T.V., Aithal, B.H. and Sreekantha, S. (2012). Spatial metrics-based landscape structure and dynamics assessment for an emerging Indian megalopolis. Facilities1: 48-57. DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2011.603919.

  22. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H.A. and Sowmyashree, M.V. (2016). Monitoring urbanization and its implications in a mega city from space: Spatiotemporal patterns and its indicators. Journal of Environmental Management. 148: 67-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.019.

  23. Rao, D.S., Reddy, G.P.O. and Krishna, I.V.M. (2003). Monitoring of land use/land cover changes of Shimoga city using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 31(4): 253-263. DOI: 10.1007/BF 03030763.

  24. Roy, P.S., Behera, M.D. and Srivastava, V.K. (2020). Satellite remote sensing: Sensors, applications and techniques. Springer Nature, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8354-4.

  25. Seyam, I.M., Al-Habshi, M.M. and Al-Maktari, A. (2023). Spatio- temporal analysis of urban expansion and land use change using remote sensing and GIS. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 30: 100987. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase. 2023.100987.

  26. Shankar, R. and Raju, K. (2020). Land use changes and spatial growth assessment of Hassan city using geospatial techniques. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 17: 100-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020. 100282.

  27. Sharma, R. and Goyal, R. (2019). Urban sprawl monitoring and modeling using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Jaipur, India. Spatial Information Research. 27: 577-586. DOI: 10.1007/s41324-019-00255-5.

  28. Sharma, R. and Punithavathi, J. (2019). Land use/land cover dynamics of Hubli-Dharwad region using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS. 8: 30-40. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1623702.

  29. Shashidhar, K.C., Doddamani, M.B. and Pujar, R.S. (2020). Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in Haveri district, Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 48: 497-509. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-019-01077-5.

  30. Sinha, S. and Ghosh, P. (2020). Mapping and modeling LULC changes in a semi-arid region using RF and satellite data. Applied Geography. 115: 102-136. DOI: 10.1016/j. apgeog.2020.102136

  31. Srinivas, J. and Reddy, G. (2015). Monitoring urban sprawl and LULC change using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Tumkur, Karnataka. Journal of Environmental Management. 148: 148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2014.07.008.

  32. Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V. and Jagadish, K.S. (2004). Urban sprawl: Metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 5(1): 29-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.002.

  33. Thapa, R.B. and Murayama, Y. (2009). Urban growth modeling of Kathmandu Valley using cellular automata and Markov chain. International Journal of Geoinformatics. 5: 65- 72. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.005.

  34. Vijay, K., Mahalingam, B. and Shankar, R. (2021). Land use/land cover change detection in Mandya district, Karnataka using geospatial techniques. Spatial Information Research 29: 731-742. DOI: 10.1007/s41324-021-00396-8.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)