Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Effect of Season on Incidence of Disease and Performance of Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cattle under Farm Condition of Mizoram

Joram Tatam1, Girin Kalita1, Ranjana Goswami1, T.C. Tolenkhomba1, Lalhumliana Tochhawng1, Dibyajyoti Talukdar1,*
  • https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-8677
1College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Aizawl-796 001, Mizoram, India.

Background: In the field condition, various factors related to productivity and reproduction can hinder the animal’s ability to reproduce effectively, potentially leading to a significant reduction in reproductive efficiency or, in rare cases, infertility. Hence, it is vital to provide dairy farmers with education and guidance on specific strategies to address reproductive issues and manage the various diseases affecting dairy animals.

Methods: Data regarding performances of 35 Holstein Friesian × local crossbred cattle reared in cattle unit of Livestock Farm Complex were collected from farm records for a period of 14 years (2010 to 2024). To study the effect of season on incidence of disease and performance, the data was categorized into four seasons based on the climate of Mizoram: Winter (November-January), spring (February-April), summer (May-August), autumn (September-October). The data utilized for this study was extracted from the records documented in the disease and treatment register maintained in the cattle farm. After collecting the necessary data for analyses, editing and compilation was performed as per the parameter. Records of diseases affected the crossbred cattle in the farm during 2010-2024 was tabulated and interpreted accordingly.

Result: The most prevalent diseases during the study period (2010 to 2024) showed varying incidence rates across seasons. Anestrus was most common in winter, with aan incidence of 27.80%. In spring, mastitis, dystocia and retained placenta (ROP) each accounted for 8.70 per cent. Mastitis was partticularly prominent in summer, with a higher incidence of 37.50%, while in autumn, it accounted for 23.30%. The overall incidence of diseases during winter, spring, summer and autumn seasons were 16.30, 20.70, 36.00 and 27.00 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, highest incidence of diseases in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle was recorded during summer season (May-August).

Mizoram, known for its hilly terrain and nearly 80% forest cover, primarily engages in small-scale cattle farming, which is a significant source of both milk and meat (Boro et al., 2021). Livestock rearing profoundly influences the socio-economic and cultural aspects of Mizoram (Talukdar et al., 2022). In recent times, the dairy industry in Mizoram has shown growth due to collaborative efforts by organizations dedicated to dairy development. However as compared to other Indian states dairy products and milk production in Mizoram remains relatively low despite the importance of dairying in mixed farming systems and its economic significance (Lalrinsangpuii and Priscilla, 2016).
       
Mizoram’s climate encompasses a range from moist sub-tropical to moist tropical climates featuring moderately warm summers and mild winters. Winter temperatures typically fluctuate between 11oC and 24oC, while summer temperatures range from 18oC to 29oC. The state experiences consistent monsoons, with heavy rainfall from May to September. Annual precipitation varies between 2160 mm and 3500 mm. Notably, Mizoram’s winter season is dry with minimal rainfall (Indian State Forest Report, 2011).
       
Various environmental factors, including the herd, year, calving season, age at calving and management practices, significantly influence the performance and health assessment of individual animals and populations (Payne and Wilson, 1999). To optimize conditions in intensive farming systems, meticulous planning and effective management of facilities are essential, supported by a thorough understanding of animal physiology. The timing of calving emerges as a critical element influencing both productivity and reproductive traits. Elevated temperatures lead to increased respiratory rates, resulting in a noticeable decrease in feed consumption and milk production. It is important to highlight that the calving season significantly affects overall milk output, with cows calving in winter demonstrating the highest milk production for each lactation as compared to those calving during dry summer or wet summer-autumn (Amasaib et al., 2011). The profitability of a dairy farming operation relies on four primary components: Breeding, nutrition, healthcare and management strategies. These factors collectively influence the productivity and reproductive efficiency of dairy animals. In the field, various challenges related to productivity and reproduction can impede the effective breeding, potentially leading to a significant reduction in reproductive efficiency or, in rare cases, infertility. Hence, it is vital to provide dairy farmers with education and guidance on specific strategies to address reproductive problems and various diseases of dairy animals (Tomar et al., 2023).
The study was conducted at the Livestock Farm Complex, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Mizoram. Data regarding performances of 35 Holstein Friesian´local crossbred cattle reared in cattle unit of Livestock Farm Complex were collected from farm records for a period of 14 years (2010 to 2024). The animals were provided with standard housing and balanced ration comprising of both green and dry fodder. Sufficient quantities of concentrates, based on their maintenance and production requirements were given to the milch animals. Usual deworming and vaccination schedules were followed for the herds.
       
To analyze the effect of season on disease incidence and performance, the data was divided into four seasons as  classified by the Directorate of Economics and Statistics Planning and Programme Implementation Department Government of Mizoram (2014) such as: winter   (November-January), spring (February-April), summer (May-August), autumn (September-October). The data utilized for this study was extracted from the records documented in the disease and treatment register maintained in the cattle farm of the Livestock Farm Complex. The data collection encompasses a span of 14 years (2010 to 2024). After collecting the necessary data for analyses, editing and compilation was performed as per the parameter. Records of diseases affected the crossbred cattle in the farm during 2010-2024 was tabulated and interpreted accordingly.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The collected data were compiled, tabulated and subjected to various appropriate statistical tests as per Snedecor and Cochran (1995) to draw meaningful results and logical conclusion by using percentage, mean, Standard error (SE), ANOVA.
The results regarding effect of season on incidence of disease in HF crossbred cattle reared under farm condition of Mizoram are presented in the Table 1.

Table 1: Season wise incidence of disease in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle under farm condition of Mizoram.


       
As per the present study, the most prevalent diseases during the study period (2010 to 2024) were anestrus (27.80%) in winter; mastitis, dystocia and ROP which consist of 8.70 per cent each in spring; mastitis in summer (37.50%) and autumn (23.30%) season. The overall incidence of diseases during winter, spring, summer and autumn seasons were 16.30, 20.70, 36.00 and 27.00 per cent, respectively (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Effect of season on incidence of disease in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle reared under farm condition of Mizoram.


       
Inaba et al., (1986) reported maximum incidence of ROP in Holstein cows during winter season. Verma et al., (1986) conducted a study in dairy cattle during winter, summer and rainy season and found the incidence of dystocia as 1.81, 2.38 and 2.19 per cent; retained foetal membrane as 5.13, 6.50, 11.27 per cent; and genital prolapse as 0.50, 1.88 and 1.41 per cent, respectively. Lodhi et al., (1999) reported maximum incidence of ROP during summer and minimum during winter. Pande et al., (2007) also reported highest incidence of ROP in rainy season (15.42%) in crossbred cows. Higher incidence of mastitis recorded in the present study during summer season (37.5%) was in accordance with the reports of (Khair et al., 2013), who reported the declining tendency of cumulative incidence of mastitis, metritis and abortion in the summer, rainy and winter seasons. Contrary to present results, (Khair et al., 2013) reported highest incidence of anoestrus in rainy (0.34%) followed by summer (0.27%) and winter (0.21%) season. On the other hand, Dawit and Ahmed (2013) mentioned that age, management system, season and hygienic condition did not significantly influence the occurrence of reproductive problems. Sheetal et al., (2015) recorded highest ROP incidence during summer (13.97%), followed by spring (10.48%), autumn (11.83%) and winter (9.7%), which were contrary with the results of current findings. The highest prevalence rate of haemoprotozoa in Aizawl district of Mizoram during monsoon (51.29%) as reported by (Ghosh et al., 2020) was in compliance with the present findings. (Badu et al., 2020) recorded the overall incidence rate of 72 per cent mastitis in Mizoram in the summer season which was higher than the outcomes of the present study. Variation in the incidence of different diseases across seasons as reported by other workers and observed in the present study does not reveal a consistent seasonal pattern for each disease. This could be attributed to several factors including the climate and conditions prevalent at different places. However, the higher incidence of diseases during the summer season observed in the present study was in agreement with the findings of most other researchers.
       
Major diseases affected the dairy cattle during the study period are presented in the Table 1 such as mastitis (16.25%), anoestrus (13.75%), silent anestrus (8.75%), diarrhoea (6.88%), dystocia (4.38%), retention of placenta (3.75%), metritis (3.75%), pyometra (2.50%), abortion (2.50%) hygroma (swelling of hoof) (1.88%), obturator paralysis (1.25%), cystic ovaries (1.25%), protozoan disease (1.88%) and parasitic infestation (0.63%).
       
The incidence of different diseases in crossbred cattle during the study period (2010 to 2024), revealed that mastitis, anoestrus and silent oestrus were the most prevalent conditions affecting these animals (Talukdar and Talukdar, 2017). Concurring with the current findings, several studies have reported high incidence rates of mastitis in dairy cattle. Dawit and Ahmed (2013) found a prevalence of 19.3% in exotic cattle, while (Maheshwari et al., 2016) reported a range of 27.81- 36.43% in crossbred cattle. (Jagadeesh et al., 2016) recorded a 43%  in crossbred cattle and 12% in non-descript cattle in Karnataka. Similarly (Badu et al., 2020) observed a high incidence of 72% in dairy cattle in Mizoram and Sinha et al., (2021) found a prevalence of 41.1% in Karan Fries and Sahiwal cows. (These high incidence rates are likely attributed to increased exposure of teats to urine and dung, which may heighten the risk of mastitis in these cattle.
       
Higher incidence of anestrus cases recorded in the present study might be due to low quality of fodder and stall fed management system (Talukdar et al., 2016a; Boro et al., 2021). Under the stall feeding system, the signs of oestrus in animals may go unnoticed, potentially leading to misinterpretation as case of anestrus (Talukdar et al., 2016b). Compared to present findings, (href="#pandey_1994">Pandey et al., 1994) in Tharparkar and Tharparker crossbred (16.47%) and (Khan et al., 2016) in crossbred dairy cattle (31.79%) recorded higher incidence of anestrus cases. On the other hand, (Ahmed et al., 1992) reported a lower incidence of anestrus in Deoni cows and their crossbreds (2.55%), compared to a higher incidence of  5.7% in crossbred dairy cows.
       
In contrast to the results of present study, higher incidence of diarrhoea was reported by Subhash et al., (2012) in cattle (52.51%) and in buffalo (54.37%). Compared to present study, higher incidence of dystocia was reported by Raman and Bawa (1977) in cattle (39.5%),  (Kaikini et al., 1983) in Holstein Friesian crossbred (5.35%), (Ahmed et al., 1992) in cattle (5.14%) in Assam, Pandey et al., (1994) in Tharparkar and Tharparkar crossbred (0.86%) and (Dawit and Ahmed, 2013) in crossbred cattle (7.7%) and (Khan et al., 2016) in crossbred dairy cattle (5.12%). A lower incidence rate of dystocia, in comparison to present study was reported by (Shukla et al., 1980) in Gir cows and their crosses (1.25%) and (Verma et al., 1986) during winter (1.81%), summer (2.38%) and rainy (2.19%) in dairy herd. Compared to present study, higher incidence rate of ROP (33.9%) was recorded by (Raman and Bawa, 1977) , Shukla et al., (1980) in Gir cows and their crosses (8.4%), Kaikini et al., (1983) in Holstein Friesian crossbred (7.06%), Pandey et al., (1994) in Tharparkar and Tharparkar cross (4.78%), Verma et al., (1986) during winter (5.13%), summer (6.50%) and rainy season (11.27%) in dairy cattle, Ahmed et al., (1992) in Assam cattle (8%), Pande et al., (2007) in crossbred cow (15.42%), Dawit and Ahmed (2013) in dairy cow (7.3%), Sheetal et al (2015) in dairy cow during summer (13.97%), autumn (11.83%),  spring (10.48) and winter (9.7%) and Khan et al., (2016) in crossbred dairy cattle (14.35%). Compared to present study, lower rate (1.9%) of ROP was reported by Singh (2003) in local cattle (3.33 %). Compared to present study, higher rate of abortion was reported Raman and Bawa (1977) in dairy cattle (23.6%), Shukla et al., (1980) in Gir cows and their crosses (3.06%), Singh et al., (1984) in Sahiwal and Holstein-Friesian crossbred (4.4%), Singh (2003) in crossbred (5.10%), Dawit and Ahmed (2013) in dairy cow (9%), Khan et al., (2016) in crossbred dairy cattle (11.25%) and Talukdar et al., (2020) recorded 5.11% in crossbred cows. Lower rate of abortion in comparison to the present study was observed by Kaikini et al., (1983) in Holstein Friesian crossbred (1.95%), Pandey et al (1994) in Tharparkar and Tharparkar crossbred (2.29%) and Singh (2003) in local cattle (2.22%). Lower rate of metritis compared to present study was observed by Ahmed et al., (1992) in cattle (1.4%) of Assam, Pandey et al., (1994) in Tharparkar and Tharparkar cross (1.89%) and Singh (2003) in local cattle (2.22 %). Higher rate of metritis than present study was reported by Raman and Bawa (1977) in dairy cattle (29.1%), Kaikini et al., (1983) in Holstein Friesian crossbred (13.8%), Singh (2003) in crosses (11.22%) and Boro et al., (2021) in dairy cattle (16.66%) in Mizoram. Compared to present study, higher rate of pyometra was reported by Raman and Bawa (1977) in crossbred (14.0%), Khan et al., (2016) in crossbred dairy cattle and Boro et al., (2021) in dairy cattle (15.00%) in Mizoram.  However, Singh (2003) reported lower incidence of pyometra in dairy cattle (1.02%) as compared to present study. Higher rate of cystic ovaries compared to present study was reported by Kaikini et al., (1983) in Holstein Friesian crossbred (6.81%) and Boro et al., (2021) in dairy cow (10.00%) in Mizoram. In Comparison to present study, higher rate of protozoan diseases were reported by Panda et al., (2011) in crossbred cattle (27%) in Gujrat with a notable higher prevalence during summer than monsoon and winter seasons. Similarly, Kohli et al., (2014) recorded a 45.4% incidence in crossbred cattle during the rainy season in Dehradun, while Kumar et al., (2016) found a 58.6% incidence in cattle and Ghosh et al., (2020) reported higher incidences during monsoon (51.29%) and winter (15.09%) seasons. These findings indicate higher prevalence of protozoan diseases in cattle than those observed in the present study. Incidence rate of silent estrus in the present study was lower than the 20.00% reported by Boro et al., (2021) in the cattle of Aizawl district of Mizoram. Higher rate of parasitic disease (GI parasite) compared to present study was reported by Chaudhri et al., (2013) in crossbred cows (27.88%) and Kumar et al., (2016) in dairy cattle (45.4%). Based on the reports of various studies, it was observed that the incidence of different diseases in crossbred cattle in the preset study was comparatively lower, except for mastitis and anestrus. With improvements in feeding, housing and hygiene, the incidence rate of these diseases could potentially be reduced further.
The incidence of diseases most prevalent during the study period (2010 to 2024) varied across seasons. Anestrus had the highest incidence in winter (27.80%); while mastitis, dystocia and ROP each accounted for 8.70 per cent during spring. Mastitis was particularly prevalent in summer (37.50%) and in autumn (23.30%) season. The overall incidence of diseases during winter, spring, summer and autumn seasons were 16.30, 20.70, 36.00 and 27.00 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, the higher incidences of diseases in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle were observed during summer season (May -August) in Mizoram.
The authors are grateful to the Dean, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram for granting the necessary permissions to carry out the research work.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Institution Animal Ethics Committee of College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, India.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ahmed, K., Deka, K.C., Deka, B.C. and Borgohain, B.N. (1992). Reproductive disorders in cattle in Assam. Journal of Assam Veterinary Council. 2: 72-73.

  2. Amasaib, E.O., Fadel-Elseed, A.M., Mahala, A.G. and Fadlelmoula, A.A. (2011). Seasonal and parity effects on some performance and reproductive characteristics of crossbred dairy cows raised under tropical conditions of the Sudan. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 23(4): 1-6.

  3. Badu, M., Prasad, H., Rajesh, J.B., Das, G. and Roychoudhury, P. (2020). Mastitis: Havoc to dairy cattle in Mizoram. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8(4):1807-1811.

  4. Boro, U., Talukdar, D.J., Ahmed, F.A., Lalrintluanga, K., Kalita, G., Tolenkhomba, T.C. (2021) Incidence of postpartum anestrus among crossbred cattle in and around Aizawl district of Mizoram. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies.  9(1): 179-180.

  5. Chaudhri, S.S., Bisla, R.S., Bhanot, V. and Singh, H. (2013). Prevalence of haemoprotozoan infections in pyretic dairy animals of eastern Haryana. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(4): 344-347. doi:10.30954/2277-940X.01.2022.10.

  6. Dawit, T. and Ahmed, S. (2013). Reproductive health problems of cows under differentmanagement system in Kombolcha, Northeast Ethiopia. Advances in Biological Research. 7(3): 104-108.

  7. Ghosh, S., Patra, G., K., Borthakur, S., Behera, P., Tolenkhomba, T. C., Deka, A. and Biswas, P. (2020). Prevalence of haemoprotozoa in cattle of Mizoram, India. Biological Rhythm Research. 51(1): 76-87.

  8. Inaba, T., Inoue, A., Shimizu, R., Nakano, Y. and Mori, J. (1986). Plasma concentrations of progesterone, estrogens, vitamin A and â-carotene in cows retaining fetal membranes. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science. 48: 505-508.

  9. Indian state forest report. (2011). Ministry of Development of Northeast Region, Government of India. https://mdoner.gov.in/contentimages/ files/mizoram.pdf. Accessed on 26th October 2023.

  10. Jagadeesh, D.S., Puttamallappa, R.K., Keregallokoppalu, H.G. and Lakshminarasimhiah, M. (2016). Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in cattle and effect on milk quality. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 4(5): 237-240.

  11. Kaikini, A.S., Chikhalikar, G.K. and Dindorkar, C.V. (1983). Reproductive disorders in Holstein Friesian ´ Gir F1 cross-bred cows [India]. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction. 1(1):43-46.

  12. Khair, A., Alam, M.M., Rahman, A.K.M.A., Islam, M.T., Azim, A. and Chowdhury, E.H. (2013). Incidence of reproductive and production diseases of cross-bred dairy cattle in Bangladesh.  Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 11(1): 31-36.

  13. Khan, H.M., Kumar, M. and Sharma, P. (2016). Reproductive disorder in dairy cattle under semi- intensive system of rearing in North-Eastern Region India. Veterinary World. 9(5): 512-518.

  14. Kohli, S., Atheya, U.K. and Thapliyal, A. (2014). Prevalence of the ileriosis in crossbred cattle: Its detection through blood smear examination and polymerasechain reaction in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, India. Veterinary World. 7(3): 168-171.

  15. Kumar, B., Maharana, B.R., Prasad, A., Joseph, J.P., Patel, B. and Patel, J.S. (2016). Seasonal incidence of parasitic diseases in bovines of south western Gujarat (Junagadh). Indian Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 40: 1342-1346.

  16. Lalrinsangpuii, M.R. and Priscilla, L. (2016). Economics of milk production and its constraints in Mizoram. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 69: 5.

  17. Lodhi, L.A., Qureshi, Z.I., Ahmad, I., Nawaz, A. and Jamil, H. (1999). The occurrence of various reproductive disorders in cattle with reference to parity and season. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2:4.

  18. Maheshwari, P.A.W.A.N., Shukla, P.C., Rao, M.L.V. and Shukla, S.N. (2016). Occurrence of subclinical mastitis in cattle in and around Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. The Haryana Veterinarian. 55(2): 160-162.

  19. Panda, S.K., Sahu, B., Rajeev Ranjan, Acharya, A.P. and Rath, S.K. (2011). Prevalence and Clinicopathological study of the ileriosis in bovine in coastalareas of Orissa. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 35(2): 128-132.

  20. Pande, G., Bhatt, V.K. and Thakur, M.S. (2007). Incidence of retention of placenta in crossbred cows-ten years record analysis. The Indian Journal of Veterinary Research. 16(1): 50-51.

  21. Pandey, S.K., Pandit, R.K. and Bhagel, K.K.S. (1994). Reproductive disorders in relation to fertility and milk production in Tharparkar cows and their crosses. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction. 15(2): 131-133.

  22. Payne, W.J.A. and Wilson, R.T. (1999). An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics (No. Edn 5). Blackwell Science.

  23. Raman, S.R.P. and Bawa, S.J.S. (1977). Incidence of pre and post- partum reproductive disorders in bovines. The Haryana Veterinarian.16(2): 99-101.

  24. Sheetal, S.K., Choudhary, S.K., Pandey, R.P. and Sengupta, D. (2015). Effect of season and parity on incidence of retention of placenta in crossbred cattle. Environment and Ecology.  33(1A): 232-234.

  25. Shukla, S.P., Chauhan, R.A.S. and Parekh, H.K. (1980). Incidence of peripartumdisorders in Gir cows and their crosses. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 33(4): 427-432.

  26. Singh, C.S.P., Sharma, D.B., Verma, S.K. and Chauhan, H.V.S. (1984). Comparative studies on Friesian ´ Sahiwal crossbred cows and buffaloes. 1. Reproductive disorders, birth weight and early growth. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 37(2): 145-149.

  27. Singh, S.K. (2003). A comparative study on ovarian conditions and reproductive disorders in local and crossbred cattle of Assam. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.

  28. Sinha, R., Sinha, B., Kumari, R., MR, V., Verma, A. and Gupta, I.D. (2021). Effect of season, stage of lactation, parity and level of milk production on incidence of clinical mastitis in Karan Fries and Sahiwal cows. Biological Rhythm Research. 52(4): 593-602.

  29. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1995). In: Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Oxford and IBH Pub.Cp. New Delhi.

  30. Subhash, M., Verma, A.K., Amit, K., Gupta, M.K. and Sharma, S.D. (2012). Incidence of calf diarrhea in cattle and buffalo calves in Uttar Pradesh, India. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 7(10): 1049-1054.

  31. Talukdar, D., Sarma, K., Kalita, G., Rahman, S., Goswami, R., Chethan, G.E., Das, H. and Konwar, B. (2022). Role of animal husbandry practice in upliftment of socio-economic status of mizo farmer: A review. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 38(1): 09-18. doi: 10.18805/BKAP572.

  32. Talukdar, D.J. and Talukdar, P. (2017) In: Recent Concept on Repeat Breeding, Satish Serial Publishing House, New Delhi.

  33. Talukdar, D.J., Ahmed, K., Deori, S. and Talukdar, P. (2016b). Repeat breeding syndrome in dairy cows: Influence of various etiological factors. The North- East Veterinarian. XVI (3): 30-32.

  34. Talukdar, D.J., Talukdar, P. and Ahmed, K. (2016a). Minerals and its impact on fertility of livestock: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 37(4): 333-337.  doi: 10.18805/ag.v37i4.6464.

  35. Talukdar, D.J., Talukdar, P., Murasing, D.K. and Kayina, A. (2020). Brucellosis in India: An Overview. International Journal of Chemical Studies.  SP-8 (3): 27-34. 

  36. Tomar, D.S., Lathwal, S.S., Singh, P. and Devi, I. (2023). Evaluation of productive and reproductive performance of dairy animals in district Muzaffarnagar of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res. Journal of Extension Education. 23(3): 60-65.

  37. Verma, R.P., Saxena, S.K. and Mishra, R.R. (1986). Seasonal variation in certainreproductive disorders of dairy cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Health. 25(1): 79-80.

Editorial Board

View all (0)