Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 3 (september 2021) : 445-449

Evaluation of Microbiological Quality of Vermicompost Prepared from Different Types of Organic Wastes using Eisenia fetida

Rachna Kapila1, Geeta Verma1, Aparajita Sen1, Arti Nigam1,*
1Department of Microbiology, Institute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, F-4, Hauz Khas Enclave, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110 016, India.
Cite article:- Kapila Rachna, Verma Geeta, Sen Aparajita, Nigam Arti (2021). Evaluation of Microbiological Quality of Vermicompost Prepared from Different Types of Organic Wastes using Eisenia fetida . Agricultural Science Digest. 41(3): 445-449. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5275.
Background: Vermicomposting is the agricultural technique of conversion of organic wastes to a fertile product, which can result in better crop growth and production. However, even though earthworms are the main organisms participating in the process, the microbes associated with it also have an important role to play. These microbes degrade the waste products biochemically and are responsible of the conversion processes. Few studies are carried out on microbial diversity and related enzymes activities in the vermicompost prepared from different organic waste materials.  

Methods: In this paper, we isolated both bacteria and fungi from seven different types of vermicompost, using different selective media. We also studied the activity of hydrolytic enzymes that are associated with the isolated microbes.

Result: It was observed that bacteria like Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus, Actinomycetes, Pigment producing Actinomycetes, Streptomyces, Azotobactor and fungi like Penicillium purpurogenum, Aspergillus sp., Alternaria alternata, Fusarium solani, Rhizopus sp., Mucor hiemalis, Myrothecium verrucaria etc. were present in our vermicompost preparations. The presence of nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and PGPR indicated the good fertilizer value of the vermicompost samples. It was also observed that the diversity of microbes present supported significant levels of CMCase Exoglucanase, Xylanase, β-Glucosidase, Phosphatase and Urease activities.
Vermiculture is the technology of producing vermicompost using earthworms from the agro-wastes. It is simple and useful and thus has been proposed to be one of the front runner technologies of the second green revolution, as it ensures sustainability of agriculture (Sinha et al., 2010; Chaudhary et al., 2004). Vermicomposting refers to the biooxidation and stabilization of organic matter, involving the synergistic actions of earthworms and microorganisms, thereby turning wastes into a valuable soil amendment called vermicompost. Earthworms are directly or indirectly involved in biodegradation of organic wastes, in association with bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi, yeasts, etc., which give rise to humus formation (Jeevanrao and Ramalakshmi, 2002; Lavelle and Spain 2001; Munnoli 2007). While earthworms fragment and condition the substrate, increase the surface area for microbial growth and alter its biological activity, the microorganisms are known for the biochemical degradation of organic waste matter (Dominguez et al., 2010).
 
Vermicomposting converts the original waste materials to give a final product free of pollutants and of greater economic value (Lakshmi et al., 2014; Munnoli, 2015). Studies on the microbes associated with earthworms show that these microbes are directly or indirectly involved in the decomposition of organic matter and soil stabilization. These processes are associated based on symbiotic relationships between the microorganisms and earthworms in the earthworm gut, burrows, casts and pasture land. It is known that microbial biomass is greater in casts of earthworms than in parent soil (Aira et al., 2003; Munnoli, 2007; Tiunov and Scheu, 2000; Agarwal and Arora, 2011).
 
High numbers of microbes were seen in plots treated with vermicompost than in untreated plots, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Higher microbial load was also observed in vermicompost treated paddy fields (Kale et al., 1992; Barik et al., 2010). An increase in the microbial load with potato waste was recorded using leaves of the tree Paulownia elongata and press mud waste using earthworms like Megacolex megascolex, Eisenia fetida and E. eugeniae on comparison with the surrounding soil (Munnoli, 2007; Sarma et al., 2012).
 
The different enzyme activities present in vermicompost that play a major role in the composting process are cellulases, phosphatases and ureases. These enzymes help microbes to utilize different carbon and nitrogen sources from biodegradable waste, while converting them to vermicompost by earthworms. It has also been reported that the enzyme activity and microbial counts in vermicompost samples are related (Singh et al., 2013). However little information is available on microbial diversity and its relation with the enzyme activities in the vermicompost prepared from different organic wastes (Gitanjali, 2007).
 
In this paper, our objectives are: 1. To study the microbial quality of the different vermicompost samples prepared from different organic wastes, by plating them on various nutrient media and 2. To study the activities of different microbial hydrolytic enzymes such as Carboxymethyl Cellulase (CMCase), Exoglucanase, Xylanase, β-Glucosidase, Phosphatase and Urease present in these vermicompost samples.
All the vermicompost samples produced using different substrates (rice straw, grass, orange peel, sugarcane bagasse, neem leaves, wheat straw and sawdust) in the small scale experiment in pots on trial basis and then grown in tanks. Then, the samples were analyzed for their microbial composition and their hydrolytic enzymes activities. The vermicompost were prepared from late June to mid September, 2018, during monsoon season in the premises of Institute of Home Economics, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India (Mean temp 30-35°C, humidity 70-75%). The steps were as follows:
 
Collection of organic wastes
 
The locally available organic wastes selected for this study were rice straw, grass, saw dust, wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, orange peel and neem leaves.
 
Preparation of tank for rearing Eisenia fetida
 
The tank was prepared in the dimensions of 100×40×40cm in length, width and height using concrete, cement, stones as materials for construction on sides and it was filled with grass leaves mixed with cow dung so as to rear maximum number of worms (Eisenia fetida).
 
Experimental setup for the preparation of vermicompost
 
1. Pot experiment
 
In this, cemented pots of sizes 16 inch height × 14 inch diameter, each of capacity 10 kg, with small holes at the bottom were used. Small pebbles were placed in these pots followed by spreading a shallow layer of sand of approximately 1 cm.  On this layer, 1 kg cow dung was added and then 40 earthworms were introduced in each pot. After adding 5 kg substrate it was covered with big dried leaves and wire mesh. The composting mixture was allowed to stand for 15 days by sprinkling water every 2-3 days. After turning, further incubation is allowed till another 15 days. A set up of organic wastes without earthworms was taken as control.
 
2. Pit experiment
 
Pits of sizes 1m length x 80cm width x 20cm depth, made of bricks, concrete and cement on four sides but not on floors were constructed. The vermicomposting set up prepared by putting one inch layer of pebble at the bottom and then spreading a shallow layer of sand and 4 kg cow dung layer, earthworm 2 kg over cow dung layer and finally 20 kg substrate. The seven substrates were used in duplicates namely grass, wheat straw, sawdust, neem leaves, sugarcane bagasse, orange peel and rice straw. The contents were covered with a framed wire mesh. Turning was done after 2 weeks and water was added regularly to avoid drying up of the biomass.
 
Harvesting compost
 
Vermicompost was ready after sixty days. The worms were harvested and vermicompost samples were allowed to dry for three days. The samples were then collected, sieved and carefully packed in air tight plastic bags. These were stored in a refrigerator and samples were used for microbial and enzymatic analysis.
 
Analysis of microbiological quality of vermicompost samples
 
The media used to determine the microbiological quality of samples were Nutrient Agar, Yeast Mannitol Agar, Potato Dextrose agar, King’s Media (base B), Jensen Media, Pikovyskaya’s Media, Cellulose Agar Media, Starch Casein Agar, Azospirillum Media. The most commonly isolated fungal strains were sent for identification at Indian Type Culture Collection, IARI.
 
Analysis of enzyme activity
 
The vermicompost samples were analyzed for the activities of Endoglucanase (Carboxymethyl Cellulase or CMC assay) Exoglucanase (Filter paper assay), Xylanase, β-Glucosidase, Phosphatase and Urease. Enzyme activity of the samples was estimated using live, heat killed enzyme, buffer solutions and respective substrates.
Analysis of microbiological quality of vermicompost samples
 
Various kinds of microorganisms were found in the different samples, as shown in Fig 1-5. Some of the microbes which were identified include:
 

Fig 1: Microbes obtained from Wheat Straw Vermicompost, cultured on A) Potato Dextrose Agar, B) Pikovyskaya Medium, C) Starch Casein Agar and D) Nutrient Agar.


 

Fig 2: Microbes obtained from orange peel vermicompost, cultured on A) Pikovyskaya medium, B) King’s medium, C) Yeast mannitol agar and D) Potato dextrose agar.


 

Fig 3: Microbes obtained from sawdust vermicompost, cultured on A) Cellulose agar medium, B) Potato dextrose agar, C) Pikovyskaya medium and D) Starch casein agar.


 

Fig 4: Microbes obtained from Sugarcane Bagasse Vermicompost, cultured on A) Potato Dextrose Agar, B) Starch Casein Agar, C) Cellulose Agar Medium and D) Yeast Mannitol Agar.


 

Fig 5: Microbes obtained from rice straw vermicompost, cultured on A) Nutrient agar, B) Cellulose agar medium, C) Jensen’s medium and D) Yeast mannitol agar.


 
Bacterial colonies
 
Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus, Actinomycetes, Pigment producing Actinomycetes, Streptomyces and Azotobactor. The presence of nitrogen fixers like Azotobacter, Klebsiella and phosphate solubilizers like Bacillus sp and PGPR like Pseudomonas sp. confirmed the good nutritious quality of the vermicompost samples prepared from the different organic wastes and therefore may be successfully used to increase soil fertility.

Fungal colonies
 
The commonly isolated fungi from vermicompost samples were identified at Indian type culture collection center IARI New Delhi, as Penicillium purpurogenum, Aspergillus niger, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium solani, Rhizopus sp., Mucor hiemalis, Myrothecium verrucaria etc. 
 
Microbial variation in the vermicompost was 10 to 20 times higher than in control substrate samples without earthworms. Similar reports on increase in microbial load in soil treated with vermicompost were given by other investigators (Ghilarov, 1963; Munnoli, 1998, Aira et al., 2003). The presence of bacteria like Bacillus sp, Azotobacter sp and Klebsiella sp and fungi such as Aspergillus sp and Penicillium sp were also reported by other researchers (Illanjiam et al., 2019).
 
Analysis of enzyme activity
 
The vermicompost sample prepared from rice straw showed maximum CMCase activity (5.1 µmol/g/h) followed by orange peels (3.4 µmol/g/h), grass (2.8µmol/g/h), sawdust (2.6 µmol/g/h), neem leaves (2.2 µmol/g/h), wheat straw (2 µmol/g/h) and sugarcane bagasse (1.6 µmol/g/h).

The exoglucanase activity was measured highest in vermicompost of grass (2.7 µmol/g/h), followed by orange peel (1.4 µmol/g/h), wheat straw (1.2 µmol/g/h), sawdust (0.8 µmol/g/h), rice straw (0.6 µmol/g/h) and neem leaves (0.4 µmol/g/h).
 
Xylanase activity was recorded maximum in rice straw vermicompost (8.6µmol/g/h), followed by those made from sawdust (3.3µmol/g/h), grass (2.9 µmol/g/h), orange peels (2.7 µmol/g/h), wheat straw (1.6 µmol/g/h), neem leaves (1.6 µmol/g/h) and sugarcane bagasse (1.3 µmol/g/h).
 
β-Glucosidase activity was highest in vermicompost obtained from rice straw (0.2 µmol/g/h), followed by that obtained from orange peel (0.1 µmol/g/h), neem leaves (0.08 µmol/g/h), wheat straw (0.06 µmol/g/h) and lowest in sugarcane bagasse (0.02 µmol/g/h).

In all cases, the Control organic waste sample showed negligible enzyme activity. The results on cellulase and xylanase activities show that the microbes obtained from vermicompost are able to hydrolyze plant based substrates through these enzymes. Similar results were reported for vermicompost samples by other researchers (Karthika et al., 2020; Chatterjee et al., 2020). Table 1 shows the activity of different hydrolytic enzymes present in vermicompost prepared from different organic wastes.
 

Table 1: Hydrolytic enzyme activities of different vermicompost samples.


 
Vermicompost obtained from orange peel (0.6 µmol/g/h) showed highest Phosphatase activity and the overall Phosphatase activity among the seven samples ranged from 0.2 to 0.6 µmol/g/h. This indicates the presence of phosphate solubilizers in the vermicompost samples. This is advantageous, as these microbes solubilize inorganic phosphates present in the soil and make them readily available for plants (Balachandar et al., 2020). The presence of phosphate solubilizers was also confirmed by microbial colonies on phosphate containing media. Presence of phosphatase activity in vermicompost was also confirmed by other researchers (Biruntha et al., 2020; Balachandar et al., 2020; Karmegam et al., 2019). Urease activity obtained was in the range of 0.3 to 1.0 µmol/g/h, with the maximum activity shown by rice straw vermicompost. The presence of Urease activity indicates the presence of microbes associated with the Nitrogen cycle, allowing more Nitrogen to be available to growing plants from the soil. Urease activity in vermicompost was shown by other investigators also (Karmegam et al., 2019; Sudkolai and Nourbakhsh, 2017).
Several reports state that during vermicomposting there is an increase in the microbial count, but few studies have been done on the presence of microbial diversity and related enzyme activities in the vermicompost samples obtained from different organic wastes. In this study, we isolated and identified certain bacteria, like Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus, Actinomycetes, Pigment producing Actinomycetes, Streptomyces, Azotobactor, as well as fungi like Penicillium purpurogenum, Aspergillus sp., Alternaria alternata, Fusarium solani, Rhizopus sp., Mucor hiemalis, Myrothecium verrucaria etc. These microbes were isolated from different samples of vermicompost prepared from organic wastes viz. sawdust, grass, sugarcane bagasse, wheat straw, neem leaves, rice straw and orange peels. The related high levels of enzymes were seen in the vermicompost samples prepared from different organic wastes in our study. The rich microbial diversity and high levels of related enzyme activities in the vermicompost samples establishes their usefulness as green manure and a safe method of organic waste disposal.
We would like to thank UGC (University Grants Commission) for their financial support in this major project.

  1. Agarwal, S. and Arora, L. (2011). Vermiculture biotechnology for waste management in different seasons: a case study. Journal of Dairying Foods and Home Sciences. 30(3): 209-214. 

  2. Aira, M., Monroy, F. and Domínguez, J. (2003). Effects of two species of earthworms (Allolobophora spp.) on soil systems: A microfauna and biochemical analysis: The 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology· Cardiff· Wales· 2002. Pedobiologia. 47(5-6): 877-881.

  3. Balachandar, R., Baskaran, L., Yuvaraj, A., Thangaraj, R., Subbaiya, R., Ravindran, B. and Karmegam, N. (2020). Enriched pressmud vermicompost production with green manure plants using Eudrilus eugeniae. Bioresource Technology. 299: 122578.

  4. Barik, T., Gulati, J.M.L., Garnayak, L.M. and Bastia, D.K. (2010). Production of vermicompost from agricultural wastes-a review. Agricultural Reviews. 31(3): 172-183.

  5. Biruntha, M., Karmegam, N., Archana, J., Selvi, B.K., Paul, J.A.J., Balamuralikrishnan, B. and Ravindran, B. (2020). Vermiconversion of biowastes with low-to-high C/N ratio into value added vermicompost. Bioresource Technology. 297: 122398.

  6. Chatterjee, R., Debnath, A. and Mishra, S. (2020). Vermicompost and Soil Health. In: Soil Health Springer, Cham. (pp. 69-88).

  7. Chaudhary, D.R., Bhandari, S.C. and Shukla, L.M. (2004). Role of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 25(1): 29-39.

  8. Domínguez, J., Aira, M. and Gómez-Brandón, M. (2010). Vermicomposting: earthworms enhance the work of microbes. In: Microbes at work. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (pp. 93-114).

  9. Ghilarov, M.S. (1963). On the interrelations between soil dwelling invertebrates and soil microorganisms. Soil organisms. 181-186.

  10. Gitanjali, G. (2007). Organic manure production through vermitechnology. Agricultural Science Digest. 27(4): 270-272.

  11. Illanjiam, S., Sivakumar, J. and Sundaram, C.S. (2019). Microbial diversity of vermicompost and its efficacy on organic vegetables. Life Science Informatics Publication. 5(1): 806-819.

  12. Jeevan Rao, K. and Ramalakshmi, S. (2002). Vermiculture technology for effective urban waste management. In Proceedings of a National Seminar on Solid Waste Management (pp. 317-324).

  13. Kale, R.D., Mallesh, B.C., Kubra Bano and Bhagyaraj, D.J. (1992). Influence of vermicompost application on available micronutrients and selected microbial populations in paddy field. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24: 1317-1320.

  14. Karmegam, N., Vijayan, P., Prakash, M. and Paul, J.A.J. (2019). Vermicomposting of paper industry sludge with cowdung and green manure plants using Eisenia fetida: A viable option for cleaner and enriched vermicompost production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 228: 718-728.

  15. Karthika, A., Seenivasagan, R., Kasimani, R., Babalola, O.O. and Vasanthy, M. (2020). Cellulolytic bacteria isolation, screening and optimization of enzyme production from vermicompost of paper cup waste. Waste Management. 116: 58-65.

  16. Lakshmi, C.S.R., Rao, P.C., Sreelatha, T., Madhavi, M., Padmaja, G. and Sireesha, A. (2014). Changes in enzyme activities during vermicomposting and normal composting of vegetable market waste. Agricultural Science Digest-A Research Journal. 34(2): 107-110.

  17. Lavelle, P. and Spain, A.V. (2001). Soil Ecology. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands).

  18. Munnoli, P.M. (1998). A study on management of organic solid waste of agro based industries through vermiculture biotechnology. ME Thesis, TIET Patiala, India, 11-30.

  19. Munnoli, P.M. (2007). Management of industrial organic solid wastes through vermiculture biotechnology with special reference to microorganisms. PhD thesis, India: Goa University. (pp. 1-334).

  20. Munnoli, P.M. (2015). Role of microbes in vermicomposting: a review. In: Bioprospects of Coastal Eubacteria Springer, Cham. (pp. 241-262).

  21. Sarma, U.J., Chakravarty, M. and Bhattacharya, H.C. (2012). Production of In situ vermicompost as affected by earthworms inoculation, season and farm wastes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 46(3): 234-241.

  22. Singh, R., Nigam, A., Verma, G. and Kapila, R. (2013). Vermicomposting-A technology for waste management and recycling and its relevance to horticulture. International Journal of Innovative Horticulture. 2(1): 44-51.

  23. Sinha, R.K., Valani, D., Chauhan, K. and Agarwal, S. (2010). Embarking on a second green revolution for sustainable agriculture by vermiculture biotechnology using earthworms: reviving the dreams of Sir Charles Darwin. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2(7): 113-128.

  24. Sudkolai, S.T. and Nourbakhsh, F. (2017). Urease activity as an index for assessing the maturity of cow manure and wheat residue vermicomposts. Waste Management. 64: 63-66.

  25. Tiunov, A.V. and Scheu, S. (2000). Microfungal communities in soil, litter and casts of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Lumbricidae): a laboratory experiment. Applied Soil Ecology. 14(1): 17-26.

Editorial Board

View all (0)