Banner

Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 41 issue 2 (june 2021) : 345-351

Isolation, Molecular Identification and Multidrug Resistance Profiling of Bacteria Causing Clinical Mastitis in Cows

D.J. Vatalia1, B.B. Bhanderi1,*, V.R. Nimavat1, M.K. Jhala1
1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand-388 001, Gujarat, India.
Cite article:- Vatalia D.J., Bhanderi B.B., Nimavat V.R., Jhala M.K. (2020). Isolation, Molecular Identification and Multidrug Resistance Profiling of Bacteria Causing Clinical Mastitis in Cows . Agricultural Science Digest. 41(2): 345-351. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5220.

ABSTRACT

Background: Mastitis, the inflammation of parenchyma of mammary gland is frequently considered to be costliest and complex disease prevalent in India. Mastitis is caused by pathogens like Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Mycoplasma bovis, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp. and Entercoccus. The treatment of mastitis in animals is carried out using antibiotics. Treatment failure in mastitis is due to increased antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens and also due to indiscriminate use of antibiotics without testing in vitro antibiotic sensitivity test against causal organisms. In comparison to cultural method, PCR assays takes less time for detection of bacteria from the mastitis milk samples. Present research work was carried out regarding isolation, identification and multiple drug resistance profile of clinical bovine mastitis associated pathogens using conventional as well as molecular approach. 

Methods: In the present study, 73 mastitis milk samples were collected from Anand and Panchmahal district of Gujarat. The milk samples were subjected for cultural isolation and DNA extraction for identification of bacteria by cultural and PCR method. Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of the isolates were carried by disc diffusion method and isolates were categorized in multiple drug resistant.     

Result: In the present study, Out of 73 mastitis milk samples collected from cows 48 (65.75%) cows were positive for bacterial isolation and S. aureus was the most predominant bacterial species. PCR from the mastitis milk additionally detected bacteria in culturally negative milk samples. Most sensitive drug was gentamicin and most of the isolates (90.19%) showed the multiple drug resistance for the two to nine drugs with 0.1 to 0.6 multiple antibiotic resistance index.

INTRODUCTION

The dairy sector in India has shown remarkable development in the past decade. Milk quality is an important aspect of dairy production. The emerging Indian dairy industry is being challenged by the increasing demand to produce high quality dairy products from a milk supply that many times may not be satisfactory in its processing characteristics. The quality control programmes of dairy industry focus on several aspects, including the presence of bacteria and somatic cells in raw milk (Singh and Ramchandran, 2020).
       
Mastitis, the inflammation of parenchyma of mammary gland is frequently considered to be costliest and complex disease prevalent in India (Sharma et al., 2006). Mastitis is generally classified into clinical and subclinical mastitis. Clinical mastitis is characterized by local (e.g. swelling of the udder, heat and pain) or systemic (e.g. fever, anorexia, depression) symptoms with milk abnormalities (e.g. milk clots, flakes, watery secretions, blood) (Gruet et al., 2001). Radostitis et al., (2007) have classified udder pathogens into 3 categories viz. major pathogens, minor pathogens and uncommon mastitis pathogens. The major pathogens are Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Mycoplasma bovis, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp. and Entercoccus. The minor pathogens include uncommon species of Staphylococcus and Corynebacteriyum bovis. Streptococcus faecalishas been also causing clinical mastitis in cows (Zeryehun and Abera, 2017). Major mastitis pathogens such as S. aureus, Str. uberis, Str. dysgalactiae and coliforms are usually considered more virulent and damaging to the udder than minor mastitis pathogens such as Corynebacterium spp. and coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) (Reyher et al., 2012).
       
Intramammary infusion and parenteral route of antibiotics are the main approaches to treatment of mastitis on many dairy farms. Because of increased antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens, reduced responses for antibiotic therapy have become very common in veterinary practice (Wang et al., 2006). One important reason for treatment failure is assumed to indiscriminate use of antibiotics without testing in vitro antibiotic sensitivity test against causal organisms (Saxena et al., 1993). This practice at one hand increases economic losses and on other results in development of resistance to commonly used antimicrobials (Owens et al., 1997). For effective suitable antibiotic therapy, bacterial isolation followed by antibiotic sensitivity test are always essential.
       
Efficient control against mastitis requires sensitive, rapid and specific tests to detect and identify the Major bacteria that cause heavy losses to the dairy industry. Molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms is based on DNA amplification of the target pathogen. Therefore, efficient extraction of DNA from mastitic milk of bacteria for identification by PCR is a major step (Cremonesi et al., 2006). Comparison with the cultural method, the PCR assays are less time consuming. It takes less than 24 hours to be complete, while identification of bacteria to the species levels by conventional microbiological and biochemical methods required more than 72 hours (Amin et al., 2011). Due to limitations of culture methods, approaches using PCR have been used to identify mastitis pathogens. PCR-based identification provides a promising option for the rapid identification of bacteria. Species-specific DNA sequences such as the highly conserved rRNA genes or the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer of the ribosomal RNA operon can be used for the identification of bacterial species in hours, rather than days. Moreover, the sensitivity of PCR based assays tends to be superior to bacterial cultures (Forsman et al., 1997) allowing the detection of small numbers of microorganisms. Current study was undertaken for isolation, identification of clinical bovine mastitis associated pathogens with conventional as well as molecular approach to assess the prevalence of pathogen along with its multiple drug resistance profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted for the period from November 2017 to April 2018 at Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India. 
 
Samples
 
Milk sample aseptically collected from total of 73 clinical mastitis affected cows from Anand (50) district and Panchmahal (23) district of Gujarat. All the cows were showing signs of clinical mastitis like flakes in milk, blood in milk, swelling of teats. Clinical mastitis affected udder and teats were first properly washed with 0.001 per cent (1:1000) potassium permanganate solution. After washing, the udder and teats were wiped with tissue paper and subsequently teat and teat orifices were scrubbed with 70 per cent ethanol. After discarding first 2-3 streams of milk, approximately 15ml foremilk samples were collected from affected quarter in a separate sterile screw-capped vial for conducting bacteriological culture examination.
 
Isolation and identification of bacteria from the affected quarters
 
A heavy inoculum of thoroughly mixed milk sample was streaked with the help of sterile platinum loop on 5% sheep blood agar for primary bacterial isolation. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24-48 h. Following the incubation, the plates were examined for bacterial growth and the morphological characteristics of bacterial colonies were recorded. Identification and biochemical characterization of the bacterial isolates was carried out as per methods described by Cowan and Steel (1974).
 
Isolation of genomic DNA from bacterial culture
 
Isolation of genomic DNA from bacterial cultures was done as per Antony et al., (2007). A pure colony of bacteria was inoculated into five ml of brain Heart Infusion broth and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. One and half ml of this broth culture was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was washed twice in PBS and the final pellet was suspended in 100 µl of triple distilled water. The mixture was boiled for 10 min and immediately chilled on ice for 30 min. The sample was then thawed and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was stored at -20°C for further use as template DNA.
 
PCR based identification of the major pathogens
 
The standard strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 1144) and Escherichia coli (MTCC 723) were used for standardization of PCR. The primer details and cycling conditions for each uniplex PCR were as per Table 1 and 2 respectively.
 

Table 1: Details of primers used.


 

Table 2: Steps and conditions of thermal cycling for different primers in PCR.


       
To confirm the targeted PCR amplification, 5 ml of the PCR products from each tube was mixed with one ml of 6X gel loading buffer and electrophoresed along with 100bp DNA molecular weight marker (Gene Ruler, MBI Fermentas) on 2.0% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (at the rate of 0.5 mg/ml) at constant 80 V for 30 min in 0.5X TBE buffer. The amplified product was visualized as a single compact band of expected size under UV light and documented by gel documentation system (SynGene, Gene Genius Bio Imaging System, UK).
 
DNA extraction from the mastitic milk
 
Before milk samples used for DNA extraction they were subjected to process of centrifugation (10000 RPM for three minutes) and remaining milk was discarded and pallet was used for the DNA isolation. Isolation of bacterial genomic DNA directly from mastitic milk samples of cows using Nucleo-poreg DNA Fungal/Bacterial Mini Kit (cat. No. NP- 7006D) were carried out following instruction manual of the kit.
 
Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern
 
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the isolates were conducted as per the method of Bauer et al., (1966). Antibiotics disc (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India) used in the present study were Amikacin (30 mcg), Amoxyclav (30 mcg), Ampicillin (10 mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), Colistin (10 mcg), Ceftriaxone (30 mcg), Erythromycin (15 mcg), Enrofloxacin (10 mcg), Gentamicin (10mcg), Neomycin (30 mcg), Penicillin-G (10IU), Streptomycin (10 mcg), Sulphadiazine (300 mcg) and Tetracycline (30 mcg). Diameters of the clear zone of inhibition were measured and the interpretation of the results was made in accordance with the instructions supplied by the manufacturer (Hi Media Ltd., Mumbai, India). Multiple Antibiotic resistance index (MARI) were also determined for each isolates by dividing the number of antibiotics to which the isolate is resistant to by the total numbers of antibiotics tested (Adenaike, 2016).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation and identification of bacteria from clinical mastitis milk
 
Out of 73 mastitis milk samples collected from cows (n=73), 48 (65.75%) cows were positive for bacterial isolation and 25 (34.25%) cows were negative for bacterial isolation. Detection of culturally negative milk samples may be due to antibiotic therapy given to cows during the collection or it may have missed in the loopful milk samples taken for cultural isolation or may be non-cultivable (on sheep blood agar) etiological agents involved. Out of 48 cows positive for bacterial isolation, a total of 51 isolates of three different bacterial genera viz. Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Escherichia were recovered including 3 cows having mixed bacterial infections by morphological, cultural examination and biochemical test. Amongst the 51 isolates, S. aureus was the most predominant bacterial species accounting for 39.22 per cent (20/51) of all the isolates, followed by Str. agalactiae 31.37 per cent (16/51) and E. coli 29.41 per cent (15/51). A total 39 isolates recovered from 50 cows of Anand district and 12 isolates recovered from 23 cows of Panchmahal district. Amongst the 39 isolates of Anand district, S. aureus was the most predominant bacterial species accounting for the 41.02% (16/39) of the isolates, followed by the 30.76% (12/39) E. coli and 28.20% (11/39) Str. agalactiae. Among the 12 isolates from Panchmahal district, predominant bacterial species was Str. agalactiae 41.67% (5/12) followed by S. aureus 33.33% (4/12) and E. coli 25.00% (3/12). The present finding indicated the predominant bacteria in Anand and Panchahal districts were S. aureus and Str. agalactiae respectively. Present study showed the most predominant bacterial species was S. aureus followed by the Str. agalactiae and E. coli. Higher per cent of Staphylococci reported by Wadhwa et al., (1996) isolated Staphylococcus spp. (68.83%), Streptococcus spp. (16.88%), E. coli (7.8%), Kerrodego and Tareke (2003) isolated Staphylococcus (62.9%), Streptococcus (23.6%) and Coliforms (14.1%), Sharma and Prasad (2003) isolated Staphylococcus spp. (54.05%), Streptococcus spp. (14.41%) and E. coli (11.71%), Sidar (2013) isolated Staphylococcus spp. (44.44%), Streptococcus spp. (11.11%), E. coli (33.33%) and Mia et al., (2017) isolated Staphylococcus spp. (35.42%), Streptococcus spp. (18.75%) and E. coli (14.58%). Very low percent of isolation was reported by Schukken et al., (2009) they isolated higher percentage of E. coli (16.2%) followed by the S. aureus (9.6 %) and Str. agalactiae (0.17%) which showed higher prevalence of gram negative organisms and same was reported recently Manasa et al., (2019).
 
PCR based identification of the isolates
 
The culturally positive S. aureus (20), Str. agalactiae (16) and E. coli (15) were subjected for PCR based amplification of specific DNA sequence coding for the 23S rRNA. All the S. aureus (20), Str. agalactiae (16) and E. coli (15) isolates were also positive by PCR as they yielded an expected amplification product of 179bp (Fig 1), 586bp (Fig 2) and 232bp (Fig 3) respectively.
 

Fig 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of colony PCR and from mastitic milk PCR amplified S. aureus PCR product of 179 bp.


 

Fig 2: Agarose gel electrophoresis of colony PCR and from mastitic milk PCR amplified Str. Agalactiae PCR product of 586bp.


 

Fig 3: Agarose gel electrophoresis of colony PCR and from mastitic milk PCR amplified E. coli PCR product of 232 bp.


 
PCR based identification of bacteria from mastitis milk
 
Using DNA of 73 mastitis milk samples, 59 (80.52%) mastitis milk samples were positive by PCR. Out of 59 cows mastitis milk samples, 61 bacterial species with mixed infection comprised of 24/73 (32.87%) mastitis milk samples positive for S. aureus, 16/73 (21.93%) positive for Str. agalactiae and 21/73(28.76%) positive for E. coli by PCR method with amplification of 179bp (Fig 1) for S. aureus, 586bp (Fig 2) for Str. agalactiae and 232bp (Fig 3) for E. coli. Gangwal (2016) detected 36% E. coli, 28% S. aureus and 4% Str. agalactiae and Kalin et al., (2017) detected 26.5%, 12% and 6% for S. aureus, Str. agalactiae and E. coli respectively by PCR method. In comparison between cultural and PCR methods, 48 cows (65.75%) milk samples positive for S. aureus, Str. agalactiae and E. coli by cultural methods were also found positive in PCR but 11 samples (15.07%) mastitis milk samples negative by cultural method were additionally found to be positive for S. aureus (4) and E. coli (7) by PCR. Overall PCR could additional detected 15.07% more samples positive in comparison with cultural methods. 16S RNA genes are commonly present in multiple copies and have highly conserved and variable sequence segments in all microorganisms (Bentley and Leigh, 1995). PCR based identification  from mastitis milk were also carried out previously by Riffon et al., (2001), Ramesh et al., (2002), Cremonesi et al., (2006), Kumar (2009), Nimavat (2015), Gangawal (2016), Bhanderi and Jhala (2016) and Kalin et al., (2017).
 
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
 
In this study, 51 bacterial isolates subjected for antimicrobial susceptibility test and result revealed that highly sensitive drug was gentamicin (94.11%) followed by the amikacin (86.27%), enrofloxacin (80.39%), streptomycin (80.39%), tetracycline (80.39%), ciprofloxacin (66.66%), ceftriaxone (66.66%), amoxyclav (60.78%) and colistin (52.94%). Whereas low sensitive drugs were sulphadiazine (45.09%), erythromycin (37.25%) and ampicillin (25.49%) and very low sensitive drugs were neomycin (21.56%) and penicillin-G (13.72%) (Fig 4).
 

Fig 4: Percentage antibiotic sensitivity of all the isolates.


       
In this study, 20 S. aureus isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method. Results showed that the most sensitive drugs were amikacin (90.00%), gentamicin (90.00%), tetracycline (90.00%) followed by enrofloxacin (80.00%), streptomycin (80.00%), amoxyclav (75.00%), ciprofloxacin (75.00%), colistin (65.00%), erythromycin (60.00%), ceftriaxone (55.00%) and sulphadiazine (50.00%). Least sensitive drugs were neomycin (15.00%) and ampicillin (10.00%). All the isolates were resistance to penicillin-G. Results of 16 Str. agalactiae showed that the most sensitive drugs were ceftriaxone (93.75%), enrofloxacin (93.75%) and gentamicin (93.75%) which were followed by the amikacin (81.25%), amoxyclav (81.25%), streptomycin (81.25%), tetracycline (62.50%), ciprofloxacin (56.25%) and penicillin-G (43.75%). Low sensitive drugs were ampicillin (37.50%), erythromycin (37.50%), sulphadiazine (25.00%) and neomycin (12.50%). All the isolates were resistance to colistin. All the E. coli (15) isolates were sensitive to gentamicin (100%) followed by the colistin (93.33%), amikacin (86.67%), tetracycline (86.67%), streptomycin (80.00%), ciprofloxacin (66.67%), enrofloxacin (66.67%), sulphadiazine (60.00%), ceftriaxone (53.33%), neomycin (40.00%) and ampicillin (33.33%). Very low sensitive drugs were amoxyclav (20.00%) and erythromycin (6.67%). All the isolates showed the resistance to penicillin-G.
 
Detection of multiple drug resistance
 
In the present study, 51 isolates were subjected for antimicrobial susceptibility test against 14 antibiotics. Out of 51 isolates, 90.19% (46/51) were showed multiple drug resistant and 17.64% (9/51) isolates were resistant to two antibiotics, 21.56% (11/51) were resistant to three antibiotics, 11.76% (6/51) isolates were resistant to four antibiotics, 15.68% (8/51) were resistant to five antibiotics, 5.88% (3/51) isolates were resistant to six antibiotics, 7.84% (4/51) were resistant to seven antibiotics, 3.92% (2/51) isolates were resistant to eight antibiotics and 05.88% (3/51) isolates were resistant to nine antibiotics (Table 3).  Multiple antibiotic resistance index was also analyzed for each isolate which revealed 27.45% and 9.8% isolates had MARI 0.3 and 0.6, respectively shows higher degree of multiple drug resistance. (Fig 5) which is in agreement with previous study (Adenaike, 2016). Present study showed that there were many isolates from mastitis cases showed the multiple drug resistant, indicated judicial use of antibiotics and veterinarians are advising for antibiotic sensitivity test for appropriate therapy.
 

Fig 5: Multiple antibiotic resistance index (MARI) profile of study isolates.


       
Multiple drug resistance of 20 S. aureus isolates revealed that 95.00% (19/20) showed the multiple drug resistance and among them 10.00% (2/20) isolates were resistant to two antibiotics, 45.00% (9/20) isolates were resistant to three antibiotics, 10.00% (2/20) isolates were resistant to four antibiotics, 5.00% (1/20) isolates were resistant to five antibiotics, 5.00% (1/20) isolates were resistant to six antibiotics, 15.00% (3/20) isolates were resistant to seven antibiotics, 05.00% (1/20) isolates were resistant eight antibiotics and none of S. aureus isolate were resistant to nine antibiotics (Table 3). Elemo et al., (2017) estimate the prevalence of multi drug resistance S. aureus from bovine mastitis. Among all multi antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of S. aureus isolates, 52.05% were resistant tothree or four antibiotics and 41.10% were resistant to five or six antimicrobials, 6.85% were resistance to seven or eight antibiotics. Multiple drug resistance of Str. agalactiae isolates found that 100% (16/16) showed the multiple drug resistant and 25.00% (4/16) isolates were resistant to two antibiotics, 12.50% (2/16) isolates were resistant to three antibiotics, 25.00% (4/16) isolates were resistant to four antibiotics, 25.00% (4/16) isolates were resistant to five antibiotics, 12.50% (2/16) isolates were resistant to six antibiotics and none of Str. agalactiae isolate were resistant to seven, eight and nine antibiotics (Table 3). Ding et al., (2016) isolated eighty-one Streptococcus isolates from the clinical bovine mastitis cases tested. Of the 81 isolates, 79 (97.5%) were resistant to at least two of the antimicrobial agents tested and greater than or equal to three antimicrobial agents were observed in 72 (88.9%) Streptococcus isolates, three isolates (3.7%) were resistant to seven antimicrobials. The observation of multiple drug resistance of E. coli were 73.33% (11/15) showed the multiple drug resistant with 20.00% (3/15) isolates were resistant to two antibiotics, 20.00% (3/15) isolates were resistant to five antibiotics, 06.66% (1/15) isolates were resistant to seven antibiotics, 06.66% (1/15) isolates were resistant to eight antibiotics and 20.00% (3/15) isolates were resistant to nine antibiotics (Table 3).
 

Table 3: Detection of multiple drug resistance isolates.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, S. aureus was the most predominant bacterial species followed by Str. agalactiae and E. coli. PCR from the mastitic milk additionally detected bacteria in culturally negative milk samples. Most sensitive drugs were gentamicin and amikacin while penicillin-G and neomycin were most resistance drugs. Among all isolates Str. agalactiae isolates showed multiple drug resistance. Most of the isolates (90.19%) showed the multiple drug resistance for the two to nine drugs with Multiple antibiotic resistance index (MARI) range 0.1 to 0.6.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Authors expressed their gratitude and acknowledged Principal and Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandary, Anand Agricultural University, Anand for providing institutional facilities to carry out the work.

REFERENCES


  1. Amin, A.S., Hamouda, R.H., Abeer, A.A. (2011). PCR assays for detecting major pathogens of mastitis in milk samples. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences. 6(2): 199-206.

  2. Adenaike, O. (2016). Multidrug Resistance and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index of Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Retailed Smoked Fish. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 6: 7-10.

  3. Antony, P.X., Nair, G.K., Jayaprakasan, V., Mini M., Arvindakshan, T.V. (2007). Nucleic acid based differentiation of Pasteurella multocida serotypes. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2(2): 178-182.

  4. Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C., Turk, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standard disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 45: 493-496.

  5. Bentley, R.W. and Leigh, J.A. (1995). Determination of 16S ribosomal RNA gene copy number in Str. uberis, Str. agalactiae, Str. dysgalactiae and Str. parauberis. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 12: 1-8.

  6. Bhanderi, B.B. and Jhala, M.K. (2016). Phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus spp. and PCR-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from subclinical mastitis of cows. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases. 37(2): 77-83.

  7. Cowan, S.T. and Steel, K.J. (1974). Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. (3rd edn.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 140-143.

  8. Cremonesi, P., Castiglioni, B., Malferrari, G., Biunno, I., Vimercati, C., Moroni, P., Morandi, S., Luzzana, M. (2006). Improved method for rapid DNA extraction of mastitis pathogens directly from milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 89: 163-169.

  9. Ding, Y., Zhao, J., He, X., Li, M., Guan, H., Zhang, Z. Li, P. (2016). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence-related genes of Streptococcus obtained from dairy cows with mastitis in Inner Mongolia, China. Pharmaceutical biology. 54(1): 162-167.

  10. Elemo, K.K., Sisay, T., Shiferaw, A., Fato, M.A. (2017). Prevalence, risk factors and multidrug resistance profile of Staphylo-coccus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in selected dairy farms in and around Asella town, Arsi Zone, South Eastern Ethiopia. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 11(45): 1632-1642.

  11. Forsman, P., Tilsala-Timisjarvi, A., Alatossava, T. (1997). Identification of Staphylococcal and Streptococcal causes of bovine mastitis using 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions. Microbiology. 143: 3491-3500.

  12. Gangwal, A. (2016). Development of rapid and sensitive test for identification of bovine mastitis associated pathogens. M. V. Sc. Thesis, submitted to Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

  13. Gillespie, B.E. and Oliver, S.P. (2005). Simultaneous detection of mastitis pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus agalactiae by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Dairy Science. 88: 3510-3518.

  14. Gruet, P., Maincent, P., Berthelot, X., Kaltsatos.V. (2001). Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 50: 245-249.

  15. Kalin R., Karahan M., Acik M.N., Tasdemir B., Cetinkaya B. (2017). Development of a multiplex PCR method for direct detection of common mastitis pathogens in bovine milk samples. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 23(6): 925-931.

  16. Kerrodego, O. and Tareke, F. (2003). Bovine mastitis in selected areas of Southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 35: 197-205.

  17. Kumar, P.A. (2009). Evaluation of PCR test for detecting major pathogens of bubaline mastitis directly from mastitic milk samples of buffaloes. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 41: 1643-1651.

  18. Manasa, V., Venkata Sai Kumar, T., Prasada Rao, T., Aswani Kumar K., Sireesha, K. (2019). Incidence of Bovine Clinical Mastitis Caused by Escherichia coli. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(05): 1249-1256. DOI:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.142.

  19. Mia, M.T., Hossain, M.K., Rumi, N.A., Rahman, M.S., Mahmud, M.S., Das, M. (2017). Detection of bacterial species from clinical mastitis in dairy cows at Nilphamari district and their antibiogram studies. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2(4): 656-663.

  20. Nimavat, V.R. (2015). Optimization of multiplex PCR for identification of MRSA from bovine milk samples and its comparison with conventional diagnostic methods. M. V. Sc. Thesis, submitted to JAU, Junagadh, Gujarat.

  21. Owens, W.E., Ray, C.H., Watts, J.L., Yancey, R.J. (1997). Comparison of success of antibiotic therapy during lactation and result of antimicrobial susceptibility test for bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 80: 313-317.

  22. Radostits, O.M., Gay, C.C., Hinchcliff, C., Constable, P.D. (2007). Veterinary Medicone (10thEdn). Saunders Elsevier. 

  23. Ramesh, A., Padmapriya, B.P., Chandrashekar, A. Varadara, M.C. (2002). Application of a convenient DNA extraction method and multiplex PCR for the direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Yersinia enterocolitica in milk samples. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 16: 307-314.

  24. Reyher, K.K., Dohoo, I.R., Scholl, D.T., Keefe, G.P. (2012). Evaluation of minor pathogen intramammary infection, susceptibility parameters and somatic cell counts on the development of new intramammary infections with major mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science. 95: 3766-3780.

  25. Riffon, R., Sayasith, K., Khalil, H., Dubreuil, P., Drolet, M. Lagace J. (2001). Development of a rapid and sensitive test for identification of major pathogens in bovine mastitis by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 39: 2584-2589.

  26. Saxena, R.K., Dutta, G.N., Borah, P., Buragohain, J. (1993). Incidence and etiology of bovine subclinical mastitis. Indian Veterinary Journal. 70: 201-203.

  27. Schukken, Y.H., Gonzalez, R.N., Tikofsky, L.L., Schulte, H.F., Santisteban, C.G., Welcome, F.L., Bennett, G.J., Zurakowski, M.J., Zadoks, R.N. (2009). CNS mastitis: nothing to worry about? Veterinary Microbiology. 134: 9-14.

  28. Sharma, A. and Prasad, B. (2003). Prevalence and therapy of mastitis in dairy animals of Kangra valley of Himachal Pradesh. Proceedings on 4th round table on Mastitis, IVRI, Izatnagar. 204-213.

  29. Sharma, N., Gautam, A., Upadhyay, S.R., Hussain, K., Soodan, J.S., Gupta, S.K. (2006). Role of antioxidants in udder health. The Indian Journal of Field Veterinarians. 2: 73-76.

  30. Sidar, S.S. (2013). Comparative evaluation of various therapeutic regimens in bovine clinical mastitis. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Deparment of Veterinary medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg.

  31. Singh, A. and Ramachandran, A. (2020). Assessment of hygienic milking practices and prevalence of bovine mastitis in small dairy farms of peri-urban area of Jaipur. Indian Journal Community Medicine. 45(5): 21-25.

  32. Wadhwa, D.R., Rao, V.N., Prasad, B., Mandeep, S., Sharma, M. (1996). Clinical mastitis in cows in Palam valley of Himachal Pradesh: etiology and antibiogram of bacterial isolates. Indian Veterinary Journal. 73: 1271-1273.

  33. Wang, F., Cao, L.T., Hu, S.H. (2006). In vitro inhibitory effect of nisin on major pathogenic bacteria of bovine mastitis. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug. 40: 12-16.

  34. Zeryehun, T. and Abera, G. (2017). Prevalence and bacterial isolates of mastitis in dairy farms in selected districts of Eastern Harrarghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. DOI:10.1155/2017/6498618.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)