Banner

Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 39 issue 3 (september 2019) : 205-209

Post-fertilization Development of Seed in Okra Genotypes: Changes in Seed Quality

A.K. Rai, A. K. Basu
1<div>Department of Seed Science and Technology<br />Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, Nadia -741252</div>
Cite article:- Rai A.K., Basu K. A. (2019). Post-fertilization Development of Seed in Okra Genotypes:Changes in Seed Quality. Agricultural Science Digest. 39(3): 205-209. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4953.

ABSTRACT

A research trail was conducted to assess qualitative changes of Okra genotypes at District Seed Farm “D” Block, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal during summer season of both 2011 and 2012 to assess the post- fertilization changes in seed quality. All the five genotypes were grown with adequate population in three replications following randomized block design (RBD) for the purpose of developmental studies. Harvesting of developing pods were done at 3, 5 and 7 days after anthesis (DAA) and seven days interval thereafter up to 42 DAA .Harvested pods and seeds were utilized for this development programme through total dry matter production, dry seed weight, germination and vigour index. Lalu was identified as the variety for which total dry matter production was maximum, followed by Japani Jhar, Arka Anamika, Ramya and Lady Luck, when average was made over stages of development, irrespective of the cropping seasons. Average germination was recorded to be maximum for Japani Jhar followed by Arka Anamika, Lalu, Lady Luck and Ramya irrespective of the year of experimentation, of which significantly similar performance was noted for Lady Luck and Ramya in first year, and Japani Jhar and Arka Anamika in second year. Significantly highest magnitude of vigour index was derived for Arka Anamika in both the years followed by Japani Jhar, Lalu, Ramya and Lady Luck, when average was made over stages of development. Average vigour index of Lalu and Japani Jhar as well as that of Lady Luck and Ramya were statistically similar with each other.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdul-Baki, A.A. and Anderson, J.D. (1973).Vigour determination in soybean by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 13: 630-633.
  2. Anitha, P., Sadhankumar, P.G. and Rajan, S. (2001). Effect of maturity stages on seed quality in okra. Veg. Sci. 28(1): 76-77.
  3. Annual Report, (2016-17). Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. p. 30.
  4. Basu, A.K. and Moharana, R.L. (2012). Variation in seed development pattern in lablab bean cultivars. Acta Hort. 958: 121-126.
  5. Bharti, N., Ram, R. B. and Singh, A. (2016). Qualitative variation in onion under influence of sulphur fertilization at three different periods.  The Bioscan. 11(1): 189-191.
  6. Demir, I. and Samit, Y. (2001).  Seed quality in relation to fruit maturation and seed dry weight during development in tomato. Seed Sci. Tech. 29:453-462.
  7. Demir, I. and Ellis, R.H. (1992). Changes in seed quality during seed development and maturation in tomato. Seed Sci. Res.. 2: 81–87.
  8. Demir, I., Ashirov, A. M., and Mavi, K. (2008). Effect of Seed Production Environment and Time of Harvest on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Seedling Growth. Res. J. Seed. Sci. 1(1): 1-10.
  9. Dharmalingam, C. and Basu, R. N. (1990). Seed Development and Maturation Studies in Mungbean.  Seed Res. 18 (1): 1-6.
  10. Dornbos, D. L. (1995). Production Environment and Seed Quality. In Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms and Implications, edited by Basra, A. S. London: Food Products Press, 119-45.
  11. Eshiet, A. J. and Brisibe, E. A. (2015).Morphological Characterization and Yield Traits Analysis in Some Selected Varieties of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Adv. in Crop Sci. and Tech. 3(5): 1-5.
  12. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.,Khomari, S. andValizadeh, M. (2009). Effects of seed and seedling vigour on antioxidative isozyme activity and cold acclimation capability of winter oilseed rape. J. of Food, Agric and Env.7:452-456.
  13. Ghassemi-Golezani, K. andMazloomi-Oskooyi, R. (2008). Effect of water supply on seed quality development in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris var.). Internat J Plant Prod. 2:117-124.
  14. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1983). Statistical Procedures for Agric. Res. New York: John Willing and Sons, Inc.
  15. Kwon, O. S. and Bradford, K. J. (1987). Tomato seed development and quality as influenced by preharvest treatment with ethephon.  Hort Sci. 22: 588–591.
  16. Murthy, P. and Kumar, B.M.D. (2004). Studies on seed development and physiological maturity in field bean (Lablab purpureusL.). Legume Res.  27(2): 134-136.
  17. Pandita, V.K., Hosamani, J. and Tomar, B.S. (2012). Seed development and acquisition of desiccation tolerance during maturation of okra seed. Indian J. of Hort.  69(3): 353-359.
  18. Rai, A. K. and Basu, A. K. (2014). Pre-sowing seed bio-priming in okra: Response for seedproduction. The Bioscan. 9(2): 643-647.
  19. Saifullah, M. and Rabbani, M.G. (2009). Evaluation and characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.) genotypes. SAARC J. Agric. 7: 92-99.
  20. Tekrony, D. M. and Hunter, J. L. (1995). Effect of seed maturation and genotype on seed vigour in maize. Crop Sci. 35:857-862.
  21. Torres, S.B. and Marcos-Filho, J. (2005). Physiological potential evaluation in melon seeds (Cucumis melo L.). Seed Sci. and Tech. 33: 341-350.
  22. Valdes, V. M. and Gray, D. (1998). The influence of stage of fruit maturation on seed quality intomato (Lycopersiconlycopersicum (L.) Karsten). Seed Sci. and Tech. 26: 309–318.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)