Loading...

Voltage production using metabolic activities of Azatobacter species and other soil microbial flora in rice field using microbial fuel cell and microbial solar cell technology

DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-4780    | Article Id: D-4780 | Page : 310-312
Citation :- Voltage production using metabolic activities of Azatobacter species and other soil microbial flora in rice field using microbial fuel cell and microbial solar cell technology.Agricultural Science Digest.2018.(38):310-312
Aboli Chimurkar, Vaidehi Chandorkar and Ashok Gomashe vaidehic21@rediffmail.com
Address : Department of Microbiology, Shivaji Science College, Congress Nagar, Nagpur-440 012, Maharashtra, India.
Submitted Date : 23-06-2018
Accepted Date : 22-10-2018

Abstract

The voltage generation from metabolic reactions of bacteria due to exudates in rhizosphere of rice crop was demonstrated by Azatobacter species and natural soil microbial flora using microbial fuel cell. It was observed that voltage generated by microbial fuel cells increased from 0.5 V to 98.0 V till 60th day of the crop for one square feet area of rice field in laboratory conditions and on 90th day of the crop voltage was 1V maintained during day time. The range of increase in voltage was dependent on the intensity of sunlight. It was estimated that if one square feet of rice plantation can produce 1V after 90th day by this method, then in case of one acre of plantation 43560 V could be generated on the 90th day of the crop on each successive day. That might produce rice and enough voltage in an eco-friendly manner.

Keywords

Azatobacter Microbial fuel cell Microbial solar cell Rice crop Voltage generation.

References

  1. Bockari-Gevao S.M., Wan Ishak W.I., Azmi Y., Chan C.W., (2005). Analysis of energy consumption in lowland rice-based cropping system of Malaysia. Science Technology, 27: 819–826. 
  2. Gray, K.A.; Zhao, L. and Emptage, M. (2006) Bioethanol. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10: 141-146.
  3. Gust D, Moore T.A , Moore L.A (1993). Molecular Mimicry of Photosynthetic energy and electron transfer. Accounts chem.Res 26: 198-205.
  4. Helder M., Strik, Timmers R., Buisman C., (2013). Resilience of roof top plant-microbial fuel cells during Dutch Winter. Biomass and Bioenergy, 51:1-7.
  5. Levin, D.B.; Pitt, L. and Love, M. (2004). Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations.
  6. Logan BE, Regan JM (2006) Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Trends Microbiol. 14: 512-518.
  7. McConnell, I.; Li, G. and Brudvig, G. W. (2010). Energy conversion in natural and artificial photosynthesis. Chem. Biol. 17: 434-447.
  8. Mrini M., Senhaji F., Pimentel D., (2001). Energy analysis of sugarcane production in Morocco. Environmental De­velopment Sustainability, 3: 109–126.
  9. Ricaud R., (1980). Energy input and output for sugarcane in Louisiana. In: Handbook of Energy Uti­lization in Agriculture. [Pimentel D. (ed.)], Boca Raton, CRC Press: 135–136.
  10. Tsatsarelis C.A., (1991). Energy requirements for cotton production in the central Greece. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 50: 239–246.
  11. Watanabe, K. (2008). Recent developments in microbial fuel cell technologies for sustainable bioenergy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 106: 528–536.
  12. Yadav R.N., Singh R.K.P., Prasad S., (1991). An economic analysis of energy requirements in the production of potato crop in bihar sharif block of Nalanda district (Bihar). Econ Affair Kalkatta, 36: 112–119.

Global Footprints