Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 38 issue 2 (june 2018) : 108-112,   Doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4706

Evaluation of soil site for suitability of maize and fertility mapping using gis 10.1 in ponnaniyar basin, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India

V
V. Sabareeshwari
M
M. Baskar
P
P.M. Shanmugam
1Department of Soil Science, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy-620 009, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Sabareeshwari V., Baskar M., Shanmugam P.M. (2018). Evaluation of soil site for suitability of maize and fertility mapping using gis 10.1 in ponnaniyar basin, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. Agricultural Science Digest. 38(2): 108-112. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4706.

ABSTRACT

Five pedons (P) were evaluated for their suitability to maize as alternate crop for the existing dominant rice crop at water scarce condition by variation in physiography, parent materials, and soil nutrients in Ponnaniyar basin. The pedons had the parent materials of non-calcareous gneiss with feldspar (P1), granite and feldspar intermingled (P2), weathered gneiss (P3), weathered quartz and felspatic gneiss (P4) and gneiss with lime (P5) with soil orders of Vertisol (P3, P5), Inceptisol (P1, P2) and Alfisol (P4). The soils were low, medium and high in available N, P and K status respectively. Based on the soil analytical report suitability of maize was established. Kunnatur, Eliyattur and Tiruchengodu series are moderately suitable (S2) for maize cultivation. Whereas, Manapparai and Pilamedu series are highly suitable (S1) for maize cultivation. Also, based on the soil fertility data, the map was generated using-the software Arc GIS 10.1 with the help of GPS information for future reference.

REFERENCES

  1. Agarwal, M. C., Agarwal, R. P., Chaudharg, R. S. (1974). Infiltration characteristics of soils as related to soil physical properties. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 22(4): 285-289.
  2. Bruand and Tessier, (2000). Water retention properties of the clay in soils developed on clayey sediments: significance of parent material and soil history. European J. of Soil Sci., 51: 679-688.
  3. Giri Prakash, P. (1997). Soil Resource Appraisal of Gudiyatham Taluk, Pembar-Vagavathi Agram watershed using remote sensing techniques. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
  4. Jackson, m.l. (1973). Soil Chemical Anaysis. Prentice Hall of Indai (Pvt) Ltd., New Delhi., pp.275 
  5. Meena, H. B., Giri, J. D., Mishra, H. K. (2009). Suitability assessment of soils acquiring on different landforms of Chittorgarh district, Rajasthan. Agropedol., 19(2): 75-83.
  6. Olsen, B.R., Cole, C. L., Watanab, P. S., Dean, D. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, U.S.D.A. Circ., pp. 939. 
  7. Paramasivan, P. (1992). Pedology and soil resource management of lower Bhavani project command area, Tamil Nadu. Ph. D. Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
  8. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publication Inc., New York., pp: 368.
  9. Ram, D., Ram, T., Subhash, C. (2010). Characterization and classification of flood-prone soils of eastern plains of Rajasthan for their corrective measures. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 58(2): 228-232.
  10. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook, 60, USDA, Washington. D.C., USA.
  11. Sawhney, J.S., Sharma, B.D and Uppal, H.S. (2005). Morphostratification and characterization of Siwalik piedmont of semiarid tract of punjab. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(3): 273-280.
  12. Singh, I.S and Agrawal, H.P. (2005) Charcterization, genesis and classification of rice soils of Estern region of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Agroped. 15:29-38.
  13. Soil Survey Staff. (2006). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, USDA. Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, D. C. USA.
  14. Stanford, S. and English. (1949). Use of flame photometer in rapid soils tests for Potassium and calcium. Agron. J., 41: 446-447.
  15. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
  16. Sys, I.C., Van Ranst, B. and Debaveye, J. (1991). Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. International training center for post graduate soil scientists, University Ghent.
  17. Vijayakumar, T., Reddy, M. S., Gopalakrishna, V. (1994). Characteristics and classification of soils of northern Telangana zone of Andhra Pradesh. Agropedol., 4: 31-43.
  18. Walia, C.S. and Rao, Y.S.(1996). Genesis, characterization and taxonomic classification of some red soils in Bundelkhand region. J. Indian Soc. soil Sci., 44(3):476-471. 
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 38 issue 2 (june 2018) : 108-112,   Doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4706

    Evaluation of soil site for suitability of maize and fertility mapping using gis 10.1 in ponnaniyar basin, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India

    V
    V. Sabareeshwari
    M
    M. Baskar
    P
    P.M. Shanmugam
    1Department of Soil Science, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy-620 009, Tamil Nadu, India.
    Cite article:- Sabareeshwari V., Baskar M., Shanmugam P.M. (2018). Evaluation of soil site for suitability of maize and fertility mapping using gis 10.1 in ponnaniyar basin, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India. Agricultural Science Digest. 38(2): 108-112. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4706.

    ABSTRACT

    Five pedons (P) were evaluated for their suitability to maize as alternate crop for the existing dominant rice crop at water scarce condition by variation in physiography, parent materials, and soil nutrients in Ponnaniyar basin. The pedons had the parent materials of non-calcareous gneiss with feldspar (P1), granite and feldspar intermingled (P2), weathered gneiss (P3), weathered quartz and felspatic gneiss (P4) and gneiss with lime (P5) with soil orders of Vertisol (P3, P5), Inceptisol (P1, P2) and Alfisol (P4). The soils were low, medium and high in available N, P and K status respectively. Based on the soil analytical report suitability of maize was established. Kunnatur, Eliyattur and Tiruchengodu series are moderately suitable (S2) for maize cultivation. Whereas, Manapparai and Pilamedu series are highly suitable (S1) for maize cultivation. Also, based on the soil fertility data, the map was generated using-the software Arc GIS 10.1 with the help of GPS information for future reference.

    REFERENCES

    1. Agarwal, M. C., Agarwal, R. P., Chaudharg, R. S. (1974). Infiltration characteristics of soils as related to soil physical properties. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 22(4): 285-289.
    2. Bruand and Tessier, (2000). Water retention properties of the clay in soils developed on clayey sediments: significance of parent material and soil history. European J. of Soil Sci., 51: 679-688.
    3. Giri Prakash, P. (1997). Soil Resource Appraisal of Gudiyatham Taluk, Pembar-Vagavathi Agram watershed using remote sensing techniques. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    4. Jackson, m.l. (1973). Soil Chemical Anaysis. Prentice Hall of Indai (Pvt) Ltd., New Delhi., pp.275 
    5. Meena, H. B., Giri, J. D., Mishra, H. K. (2009). Suitability assessment of soils acquiring on different landforms of Chittorgarh district, Rajasthan. Agropedol., 19(2): 75-83.
    6. Olsen, B.R., Cole, C. L., Watanab, P. S., Dean, D. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, U.S.D.A. Circ., pp. 939. 
    7. Paramasivan, P. (1992). Pedology and soil resource management of lower Bhavani project command area, Tamil Nadu. Ph. D. Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
    8. Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publication Inc., New York., pp: 368.
    9. Ram, D., Ram, T., Subhash, C. (2010). Characterization and classification of flood-prone soils of eastern plains of Rajasthan for their corrective measures. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 58(2): 228-232.
    10. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook, 60, USDA, Washington. D.C., USA.
    11. Sawhney, J.S., Sharma, B.D and Uppal, H.S. (2005). Morphostratification and characterization of Siwalik piedmont of semiarid tract of punjab. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(3): 273-280.
    12. Singh, I.S and Agrawal, H.P. (2005) Charcterization, genesis and classification of rice soils of Estern region of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Agroped. 15:29-38.
    13. Soil Survey Staff. (2006). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, USDA. Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, D. C. USA.
    14. Stanford, S. and English. (1949). Use of flame photometer in rapid soils tests for Potassium and calcium. Agron. J., 41: 446-447.
    15. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.
    16. Sys, I.C., Van Ranst, B. and Debaveye, J. (1991). Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. International training center for post graduate soil scientists, University Ghent.
    17. Vijayakumar, T., Reddy, M. S., Gopalakrishna, V. (1994). Characteristics and classification of soils of northern Telangana zone of Andhra Pradesh. Agropedol., 4: 31-43.
    18. Walia, C.S. and Rao, Y.S.(1996). Genesis, characterization and taxonomic classification of some red soils in Bundelkhand region. J. Indian Soc. soil Sci., 44(3):476-471. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)