Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 38 issue 1 (march 2018) : 40-43

Performance of direct seeded sali rice as influenced by sowing dates, sowing methods and nutrient management practices

Milon Jyoti Konwar, M.K. Sarmah, K.N. Das, Lolesh Pegu, Syed Wasifur Rahman, Shyamal Kumar Phukon
1Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785 013, Assam, India.
Cite article:- Konwar Jyoti Milon, Sarmah M.K., Das K.N., Pegu Lolesh, Rahman Wasifur Syed, Phukon Kumar Shyamal (2018). Performance of direct seeded sali rice as influenced by sowing dates, sowing methods and nutrient management practices. Agricultural Science Digest. 38(1): 40-43. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4663.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was carried out at Instructional-cum-farm, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhatduring kharif 2015. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design replicated thrice with four sowing dates in main plots viz., 1May, 11 May, 21and 31May along with combination of two methods of sowing viz., direct seeding and transplanting as well as with two nutrient management practices RDF and INM package in sub-plots. Results revealed that May 11date recorded significantly higher in almost all the growth and yield attributing parameters followed by May 1. The highest grain (40.24 q/ha) and straw (68.07 q/ha) yields were obtained in May 11 sown crop and was significantly superior to that of May 21and May 31. Between the two methods of sowing, transplantingresulted significantly superior in regards to almost all the growth, yield attributes and yield of sali rice. The increase in grain yield under transplanting over direct seeding was4.90 per cent. The corresponding increase in straw yield was 4.31 per cent In respect of nutrient management; INM resulted in higher grain and straw yieldsover RDF. From the economic point of view May 11 sown crop recorded the highest net return (. 57625.00/ha) with B:C ratio of 1.57 whereas in case of methods of sowing and nutrient management practices, direct seeding and INM practice recorded the highest net return and B:C ratio.

REFERENCES

  1. Akbar, N.; Iqbal, A.; Khan, H.Z; Hanif, M.K. and Bashir, M.U. (2010). Effect of different sowing dates on the yield and yield components of direct seeded fine rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2(10): 312-315.
  2. Akram, H.M.; Ali, A.; Nadeem, M.A. and Iqbal, M.S. (2007). Yield and yield components of rice varieties as affected by transplanting dates. J. Agril. Res. 45(2): 105-111.
  3. Alagappan, S. and Venkitaswamy, R. (2014). Performance of different sources of organic manures with INM and RDF on tiller production, dry matter production, grain and straw yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.)Trends in Biosci.7(22): 3588-3596.
  4. Aslam, M.; Hussain, S.; Ramzan, M. and Akhter, M. (2008). Effect of different stand establishment techniques on rice yields and its attributes.J. Anim. Pl. Sci. 18(2-3): 80-82.
  5. Bali, A.S. and Wani, G.A. (2004). Nutrient management in rice-oat cropping system under temperate agro-climatic conditions of Jammu and Kashmir. Environ. Ecol. 22(3): 543-547.
  6. Ehsanullah, A.N.; Jabran, K. and Habib, T. (2007). Comparison of different planting methods of plant population of fine rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Punjab (Pakistan). Pakistan J. Agri. Sci. 44(4): 597-599. 
  7. FAO. (1984). Fertilizer and plant nutrition guide. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 9, Rome, p.176.
  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A. (1984) Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research—Hand Book. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  9. IRRI (2015). International Rice Research Institute, Rice science for a better world.Assessed through irri.org.
  10. Khakwani, A.A.; Zubair, M.; Mansoor, M.; Naveed, K.; Shah, I.H.; Wahab, A.; Llyas, M. and Ahmed, I. (2006). Agronomic and morphological parameters of rice crop as affected by date of transplanting. J. Agron. 5(2): 248-250.
  11. Khalifa, A.A.B. (2009). Physiological evaluation of some hybrid rice varieties under different sowing dates. Australian J. Crop Sci. 3(3):178-183.
  12. Kumar, V. and Ladha, J.K. (2011). Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. Adv. Agron. 111: 297-413.
  13. Maqsoos, M. (1998). Growth and yield of rice and wheat as influenced by different planting methods and nitrogen levels in rice-wheat cropping system. PhD Thesis, Dept: Agron.,Univ, Agric, Faislabad.
  14. Mohandas, S. and Appavu, K. (2000). Direct and residual effect of combined application of basic slag with green leaf manures on soil available nutrients and yield of rice. Madras Agric. J. 87(1-3): 53-56.
  15. Osman, Khalid A.; Mustafa, Ahmed, M.; Elsheikh, Yassir, M.A. and Atif, E. (2015). Influence of different sowing dates on growth and yield of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) in semi-arid zone (Sudan). Intern. J. Agron. Agril. Res. (IJAAR) 6(6): 38-48.
  16. Rakesh, K. and Sharma, H.L. (2004). Effect of dates of transplanting and varieties on dry matter accumulation, yields attributes and yields of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Himachal J. Agril. Res. 30(1): 1-7.
  17. Thiyagarajan, T.M. (2003). Experiments with a modified system of rice intensification in India.Proc. Int. Conf. Sanya, China, p. 137.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)