Loading...

Response of sugarcane genotypes to different levels of fertilizers under rainfed condition of Assam, India

DOI: 10.18805/asd.v0iOF.7321    | Article Id: D-4508 | Page : 83-84
Citation :- Response of sugarcane genotypes to different levels of fertilizersunder rainfed condition of Assam, India .Agricultural Science Digest.2017.(37):83-84

Mahima Begum*, Bijnan Chandra Bordoloi and Dhiman Dev Singla

mahimabegum25@rediffmail.com
Address :

Sugarcane Research Station, Assam Agricultural University, Buralikson-785 618, India.

Submitted Date : 27-10-2016
Accepted Date : 26-12-2016

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in spring planted sugarcane at Sugarcane Research Station, Buralikson, Assam, India during 2014-15 and 2015-16 to evaluate the response of promising mid-late maturing sugarcane genotypes under three levels of fertilizers. Three mid-late maturing promising genotypes, viz. CoBln 14504, CoBln 14505, CoBln 14506 along with a recommended variety CoBln 94063 as check were tested under three levels of NPK fertilizers i.e. 75% RD of NPK, 100%RD of NPK and 125% RD of NPK (135:70:60). Result revealed that among the tested genotypes, CoBln 14505 recorded significantly the higher cane yield (66.50t/ha), NMC (68.10 thousand/ha) over the check as well as other two genotypes. In case of fertilizer, 125% recommended dose of NPK recorded significantly higher cane yield (62.91 t/ha) than the both 75% and 100% recommended dose of NPK. 

Keywords

Fertilizer dose Rainfed Sugarcane genotypes.

References

  1. Dashora, P (2012): Productivity and sustainability of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) genotypes under various planting season and fertility levels in south-east Rajasthan. Academia Arena 4:37-41
  2. Gaffar A (2009): Fertilizer management strategies in spring planted sugarcane, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  3. Gerside A L and Bell M J (2003): Management of legume residue to maximize the nitrogen benefits to the following sugarcane crop. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 26: Sugarcane Agronomy: 16-29
  4. Govt. of Assam (2015): Directorate of Agriculture, Khanapara, Assam 
  5. Madhuri NVK; Kumar HM; RaoSM; Sarala VN abd Giridhar V(2011): Response of promising midlate maturing sugarcane varieties to different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer. Journal of Sugarcane Research 1: 49-54
  6. Stevenson A, Van Der Merwe W, Benninga W and Allison JCS (1992): Response of different sugarcane varieties to greater than normal application of nitrogen. Proceeding of South African Sugar technologists association: 50-53
  7. Wains GM; Mudasir A M; Gaffar A; Fiaz A; Sarwar A M; Ali Z; Ferdosi H.F M (2012): Performance of autumn planted sugarcane at varied fertilizer levels. Mycopth 10: 21-23
  8. Yanam I, Emtryd O, Dinguing L and Grip H (1007): Effect of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on nitrogen uptake and nitrate leaching in an Enmerthicanthrosols profile. Nutrient Cycling Agro. Ecosystems, 48:225-229

Global Footprints