Effect of irrigation levels and agro-chemicals on growth parameters of summer maize (Zea mays L.)

DOI: 10.18805/asd.v36i3.11446    | Article Id: D-4399 | Page : 220-223
Citation :- Effect of irrigation levels and agro-chemicals on growth parametersof summer maize (Zea mays L.) .Agricultural Science Digest.2016.(36):220-223

B.P. Meena, G.S. Chouhan, V.K. Meena* and B.L. Meena

Address :

Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur-313 001, India.

Submitted Date : 21-03-2016
Accepted Date : 2-06-2016


A field experiment was carried out during summer seasons of two consecutive years 2010 and 2011 to assess the effect of irrigation levels and agrochemicals. Application of eight irrigations (at seedling, six leaf, knee-high, before tasseling, 50% tasseling, 50% silking, grain formation and grain filling stages) significantly improved  plant height at harvest over rest of irrigation treatments during both the years. On pooled mean basis, the magnitude of increase in plant height at harvest due to eight irrigations was in the order of 28.41, 18.49, 10.96 and 4.31 per cent over four, five, six and seven irrigations, respectively.  Dry matter accumulation at 50 Day after sowing and at harvest significantly improved with eight and seven irrigations over four, five and six irrigations during both the years of the study.


Dry matter accumulation Irrigation levels Plant height Plant population.


  1. Anonymous (2011). Economic Survey, Directorate of Economic and Statistics, Govt. of India, News. 
  2. Bhatnagar, G.S., Porwal, M.K. and Chaplot, P.C. (1997). Response of mustard to sowing dates and irrigation regimes in Mahi Command Area of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 31: 101-104
  3. Govt. of Rajasthan. (2011). Vital Agriculture Statistics, Statistics Cell, Directorate of Agriculture, Pant krishi Bhawan, Jaipur Pp. 47
  4. Kumawat, B.L. (1996). Response of brassinosteroids in mitigating the effect of water stress in Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.]. M.Sc. Thesis, Deptt. of Agronomy, RAU, Bikaner.
  5. Maliwal, G.L., Thakkar, K.R., Sonani, V.V., Patel, P.H. and Trivedi, S.N. (1998). Response of mustard to irrigation and fertilizations. Annals of Agriculture. Research 19: 353-355.
  6. Mehta, J.P. (2004). Response of bioregulators in mitigating moisture stress in mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss].Ph.D. Thesis, Deptt. of Agronomy, RCA, MPUAT, Udaipur. 
  7. Mehta, J.P., Sharma, D.D., Suman and Shukla, K.B. (2006). Effect of bioregulators and moisture stress on dry matter accumulation and its partitioning in mustard. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 11: 104-107.
  8. Mukherji, S. and Ghosh, A.K. 1996. Plant Physiology. Tata Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. P. 143.
  9. Parihar, C.M., Jat, S.L, Singh, A.K., Kumar, A., Chhipa, K.G, Kumar, B., Singh, K., Sharma, S. and Kumar, S. (2012). Maize Bulletin. All India Coordinated Research Project on Maize, Directorate of Maize Research, IARI, New Delhi. 
  10. Salvi, S.L. (1997). Effect of water stress and bioregulators on growth and yield of mustard [Brassica Juncea (L.) Czern& Coss] in vertisols. M.Sc. Thesis, Deptt. Of Agronomy, RAU, Bikaner.
  11. Meena, V.K. (2014). Productivity and Quality of Clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] Varieties as Influenced by Growth Regulators. Ph.D. Thesis, Deptt. of Agronomy, MPUAT, Udaipur.

Global Footprints