Loading...

Frontline demonstration an effective way of popularization of system of rice intensification (SRI)

DOI: 10.5958/0976-0547.2015.00049.X    | Article Id: D-4293 | Page : 215-217
Citation :- Frontline demonstration an effective way of popularization of system of rice intensification (SRI).Agricultural Science Digest.2015.(35):215-217
Vijendra Kumar Meena, Shoji Joy Edison and Shinoj Subramani kumar.ladla@gmail.com
Address : Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ICAR- Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Narakkal-682 018, Kochi, Kerala.

Abstract

Frontline demonstrations (FLD) were conducted in 2011-12 and 2012-13 at eight farmer’s fields, to popularize the System of Rice Intensification (SRI). SRI technology, conoweeder and two rice varieties were used in FLDs and improved technologies were compared with local practices. Joyti and Uma variety of paddy crop in SRI Method gave higher yield of (30.7, 35.3 and 38.6, 40.7 q/ha) which was 10.1, 13.8 and 12.9, 14.1 q/ha more than farmers practices in first and second year of FLD, respectively. Cono-weeder reduced the labour required for weeding by 35 man-days/ha and labour cost by Rs 20000-25000 /ha. The seed requirement was found lesser in this system (10-12 kg vs 100 kg/ha), the young seedlings were used in order to initiate more tillering (14 days instead of 20-25 days old seedlings) and seedling number (1 in SRI vs. 3-4 seedlings in conventional system). Farmer’s participatory evaluation indicated that SRI method is an acceptable and economically viable technology. As a result in 2012-13, an area of 5 ha, near to the FLD fields was subsequently converted to SRI system. In conventional rice farming farmers use 20-25 days old seedling, ten times quantity of seeds, 3-4 seedlings per hill, standing water of 5cm and 55 labour per ha. This increases the cost of cultivation for conventional method of farming by Rs 25450. There after this technique more popular in Ernakulum, district.

Keywords

Conoweeder Demonstration Rice SRI.

References

  1. Annonymous (2013). Facts and Figures of Agriculture in Kerala Department of Agriculture Thiruvananthapuram December – 2013.
  2. KAU, (2002). Package of Practices Recommendations: Crops, 12th ed. Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 278p.
  3. Kumar, R. (2014 a). Crop technology demonstration: an effective communication approach for dissemination of wheat production technology. Agric. Sci. Digest 34:131-134.
  4. Kumar, R.(2014 b). Assessment of technology gap and productivity gain through Crop technology demonstration in chickpea. Indian J. Agric. Res., 48: 162-164.
  5. Kumar, R. (2013 a). Evaluation of Crop technology demonstration of mustard crop in Transitional plain of Inland Drainage Zone of Rajasthan. Int. J. Agric. Stat. Sci. 9:657-660.
  6. Kumar, R. (2013)b. Boosting barley (Hordium vulgare, L.) production through crop technology demonstration in transitional plain of inland drainage zone of Rajasthan (India). Int. J. Agric. Sci. 3: 026-028.
  7. Kumar, R. (2012). Crop technology demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of sustainable Green Gram production technology. Crop Imp. 39 (Spl.Issue):1583-1584.
  8. Laulanié, H de. (1993). System of rice intensification. Tropicultura (Brussels), 13: 110–114.
  9. Mathew G., Anitha, S., and Balachandran, P.V. (2003). Yield performance of transplanted rice under different irrigation and nitrogen scheduling. In: Special Internat. Symp. Transitions in Agric. for Enhancing Water Productivity, 23–25 September 2003, Agricultural College and Research Institute, TNAU, Killikulam, pp. 27
  10. Singh. V., Singh, R. P. and Pawar, K.S. (1995). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to seed rate and date of Sowing. Indian J. Agron. 40: 697-99.
  11. Suseela, P., Sivaswami, M., Muhammad, C.P. and Vidhu, K.P. (2002). Mechanization of Paddy Cultivation in Kerala. Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 65.
  12. Tyagi . P.K. (1997). Aronomic and physiological responses of wheat genotypes to desiccant spray under irrigated field condition. Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University. Hisar (India).
  13. Tiwari, K. B. and Saxena, A (2001). Economic analysis of FLD of oilseed in Chhindwara. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 16: 185-189.
  14. Tiwari, R. B., Singh, V. and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of FLD in transfer of gram production technology. Maharastra J. Ext. Edu., 22: 19.
  15. Tomer, L. S., Sharma, B. P. and Joshi, K. (2003). Impact of Front Line Demonstration of soyabean in transfer of improved technology. J. Ext. Edu. , 22: 139.

Global Footprints