Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 34 issue 4 (december 2014) : 296 - 298,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01024.6

RESPONSE OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) TO VARYING LEVELS OF SULPHUR AND FORTIFIED VERMICOMPOST UNDER LOAMY SAND SOIL

S
S. Parihar*
P
P.R. Kameriya
R
R. Choudhary
1SKN College of Agriculture, (SK RAU), Jobner-303 328, India
Cite article:- Parihar* S., Kameriya P.R., Choudhary R. (2025). RESPONSE OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) TO VARYING LEVELS OF SULPHUR AND FORTIFIED VERMICOMPOST UNDER LOAMY SAND SOIL. Agricultural Science Digest. 34(4): 296 - 298. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01024.6.

ABSTRACT

Effect of sulphur and fortified vermicompost on growth and yield of mustard [Brassica juncea] was carried out at College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Rajasthan) during rabi season: 2010-11. Sixteen treatment combinations comprising four levels of each sulphur and fortified vermicompost were evaluated. Progressive increase in levels of sulphur from control to 40 kg ha-1 resulted significant improvement in growth and yield attributest. Seed yield and net returns during the crop season, it represented the seed yield 15.98 q ha-1 that was 8.9 and 24.02 per cent higher than 20 kg ha-1 and control, respectively. Remaining at par with 60 kg ha-1, it also fetched 10.47 and 30.4 per cent higher net returns than above levels of sulphur. Growth and yield attributes, seed yield as well as net returns in mustard also increased considerably with every increase in levels of fortified vermicompost. The highest value of most of these attributes was recorded under 6.0 t ha-1, only. Providing the seed yield of 18.65 q ha-1, this level enhanced it to the extent of 10.86, 13.34 and 79.68 per cent over 4.0 t ha-1, 2.0 t ha-1 and control, respectively. Application of fortified vermicompost at 6.0 t ha-1 fetched the maximum net returns of Rs 29551 ha-1 that were 8.17, 33.73 and 86.05 per cent higher than 4.0 t ha-1 , 2.0 t ha-1  and control.

REFERENCES

  1. Akbari, K. N.; Sutaria, G. S.; Vora, V. D.; Hirpara, D. S.; and Padmani, D. R. (2010). Response of oilseed crops to enriched vermicompost on Vertic ustochrept under rainfed conditions. Asian Journal of Soil Science 5: 172-174.
  2. Anonymous, (2009-10). Economic Survey. Vital Agriculture Statistics. Directorate of Agriculture, Pant Krishi Bhavan, Rajasthan.
  3. Jain, A. K.; Sudhir Kumar; Singh, O. P.; Panwar, J. D. S. (2008). Impact of nitrogen and sulphur application on yield, dry matter production and seed oil content in rape seed mustard. Advances in Plant Sciences 21: 531-532.
  4. Jogi, K. J. S.; Parmeet Singh; Lal Singh; Vipin Kumar. (2009). Effect of sulphur sources and levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea). Environment and Ecology 27: 823-826.
  5. Kapur, L. T.; Patel, A. R.; and Thakor, R. F. (2010). Yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss) as affected by sulphur levels. Asian Journal of Soil Science 5: 216-217.
  6. Kumar, N.; Singh, S.; Singh, V. (2006). Effect of iron and sulphur levels on yield, oil content and their uptake by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 51: 63-64.
  7. Manna, M. and Hagra, J.N. (1996). Comparative performance of cow dung slurry. Microbial inoculum and inorganic fertilizer on maize. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 44: 526-528.
  8. Piri, ISSA; Sharma, S. N. (2006). Effect of levels and sources of sulphur on yield attributes, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 51: 217-220.
  9. Premi, O.P.; Arvind Kumar; Manoj, K. and Sinsinwar, B.S. (2004). Effect of organics on Indian mustard, Brassica juncea Czern & Coss. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 21: 180.
  10. Saalbach, E. (1973). The effect of S, Mg and Na on yield and quality of agricultural crops in pontificial academial Scientiarum Scripta varia. The Vetican. 38: 541-588.
  11. Singh, R. and Singh, S.K. (2006). Evaluation of yield and quality aspects of Indian mustard (Brassica junceal. Czernj and cosson) under integrated nutrient management. Annals of Agricultural Research New Series. 26: 448-451.
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 34 issue 4 (december 2014) : 296 - 298,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01024.6

    RESPONSE OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) TO VARYING LEVELS OF SULPHUR AND FORTIFIED VERMICOMPOST UNDER LOAMY SAND SOIL

    S
    S. Parihar*
    P
    P.R. Kameriya
    R
    R. Choudhary
    1SKN College of Agriculture, (SK RAU), Jobner-303 328, India
    Cite article:- Parihar* S., Kameriya P.R., Choudhary R. (2025). RESPONSE OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) TO VARYING LEVELS OF SULPHUR AND FORTIFIED VERMICOMPOST UNDER LOAMY SAND SOIL. Agricultural Science Digest. 34(4): 296 - 298. doi: 10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01024.6.

    ABSTRACT

    Effect of sulphur and fortified vermicompost on growth and yield of mustard [Brassica juncea] was carried out at College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Rajasthan) during rabi season: 2010-11. Sixteen treatment combinations comprising four levels of each sulphur and fortified vermicompost were evaluated. Progressive increase in levels of sulphur from control to 40 kg ha-1 resulted significant improvement in growth and yield attributest. Seed yield and net returns during the crop season, it represented the seed yield 15.98 q ha-1 that was 8.9 and 24.02 per cent higher than 20 kg ha-1 and control, respectively. Remaining at par with 60 kg ha-1, it also fetched 10.47 and 30.4 per cent higher net returns than above levels of sulphur. Growth and yield attributes, seed yield as well as net returns in mustard also increased considerably with every increase in levels of fortified vermicompost. The highest value of most of these attributes was recorded under 6.0 t ha-1, only. Providing the seed yield of 18.65 q ha-1, this level enhanced it to the extent of 10.86, 13.34 and 79.68 per cent over 4.0 t ha-1, 2.0 t ha-1 and control, respectively. Application of fortified vermicompost at 6.0 t ha-1 fetched the maximum net returns of Rs 29551 ha-1 that were 8.17, 33.73 and 86.05 per cent higher than 4.0 t ha-1 , 2.0 t ha-1  and control.

    REFERENCES

    1. Akbari, K. N.; Sutaria, G. S.; Vora, V. D.; Hirpara, D. S.; and Padmani, D. R. (2010). Response of oilseed crops to enriched vermicompost on Vertic ustochrept under rainfed conditions. Asian Journal of Soil Science 5: 172-174.
    2. Anonymous, (2009-10). Economic Survey. Vital Agriculture Statistics. Directorate of Agriculture, Pant Krishi Bhavan, Rajasthan.
    3. Jain, A. K.; Sudhir Kumar; Singh, O. P.; Panwar, J. D. S. (2008). Impact of nitrogen and sulphur application on yield, dry matter production and seed oil content in rape seed mustard. Advances in Plant Sciences 21: 531-532.
    4. Jogi, K. J. S.; Parmeet Singh; Lal Singh; Vipin Kumar. (2009). Effect of sulphur sources and levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea). Environment and Ecology 27: 823-826.
    5. Kapur, L. T.; Patel, A. R.; and Thakor, R. F. (2010). Yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss) as affected by sulphur levels. Asian Journal of Soil Science 5: 216-217.
    6. Kumar, N.; Singh, S.; Singh, V. (2006). Effect of iron and sulphur levels on yield, oil content and their uptake by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 51: 63-64.
    7. Manna, M. and Hagra, J.N. (1996). Comparative performance of cow dung slurry. Microbial inoculum and inorganic fertilizer on maize. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 44: 526-528.
    8. Piri, ISSA; Sharma, S. N. (2006). Effect of levels and sources of sulphur on yield attributes, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 51: 217-220.
    9. Premi, O.P.; Arvind Kumar; Manoj, K. and Sinsinwar, B.S. (2004). Effect of organics on Indian mustard, Brassica juncea Czern & Coss. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 21: 180.
    10. Saalbach, E. (1973). The effect of S, Mg and Na on yield and quality of agricultural crops in pontificial academial Scientiarum Scripta varia. The Vetican. 38: 541-588.
    11. Singh, R. and Singh, S.K. (2006). Evaluation of yield and quality aspects of Indian mustard (Brassica junceal. Czernj and cosson) under integrated nutrient management. Annals of Agricultural Research New Series. 26: 448-451.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Science Digest

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)